Fucking win.
In the end though it comes down to wins. Husky football comes down to a lot to me. When the team is winning my life is better... Straight up.
Peternorth has gained our trust. 92-12 doesn't happen by accident. Fuck yea we should be excited for this season. I almost guarantee this season will let us down. At least it doesn't involve getting assraped 3 times a season.
Peterman will win us games. A lot of games. Fuck Stanford. Fuck Oregon. Fuck every team in the conference.
It boils down to wins... and Petersen has a fantastic track record when it comes to that. He has earned our trust through his body of record.
If he ends up being some other random faggot coach then I will be the first to call my ass out.... But for some reason I dont feel like that will happen.
Brace yourselves boys, this season is about to be a treat. No more depressing losses. No more Plungers.
Washington football is back... And its going to be fun
Comments
-
I predict that we will win ... and we will win in ABUNDANCE
-
Runner up to Mora? Are you saying you'd take mora over peterman?
-
Yes at the time I would have taken Mora over Petersenchrisvashon said:Runner up to Mora? Are you saying you'd take mora over peterman?
But I pretty much shut my brain off as Peternorth as a viable option. Lol.
-
This team has a serious badass front 7. The best since '94 (when we should've gone undefeated). Petermen is about a million times better a coach than Stark. Even though we lose Sankey and Rastafarian-Samuels-Carta-Jenks we are in great shape at TE with Daniels and very good shape at RB with Coleman and whomever else.
We have an adult running the program and we have our best trench-team in 20 years. We also have a soft-open schedule to work out the kinks and every tough team except Oregon at home. We're in great fucking shape. -
I believe it takes a little time (more than a year) to judge a coach. But if we can win the games we're supposed to win, and get through 2014 without being avalanched - not one time - I'll be smiling. Some hope that we're actually approaching the upper echelon.CuntWaffle said:So I have been dooging it up when it comes to Peterman. Fucking fantastic hire.... Runner up to Mora.
In the end though it comes down to wins. Husky football comes down to a lot to me. When the team is winning my life is better... Straight up.
Peternorth has gained our trust. 92-12 doesn't happen by accident. Fuck yea we should be excited for this season. I almost guarantee this season will let us down. At least it doesn't involve getting assraped 3 times a season.
Peterman will win us games. A lot of games. Fuck Stanford. Fuck Oregon. Fuck every team in the conference.
It boils down to wins... and Petersen has a fantastic track record when it comes to that. He has earned our trust through his body of record.
If he ends up being some other random faggot coach then I will be the first to call my ass out.... But for some reason I dont feel like that will happen.
Brace yourselves boys, this season is about to be a treat. No more depressing losses. No more Plungers.
Washington football is back... And its going to be fun -
Assuming the fourth DL is at least an adequate player, we should have one of the best front 7s in the country. Not being hyperbolic.
-
I'm not even going that doog yet.Gladstone said:Assuming the fourth DL is at least an adequate player, we should have one of the best front 7s in the country. Not being hyperbolic.
-
On behalf of PL_SS:Gladstone said:Assuming the fourth DL is at least an adequate player, we should have one of the best front 7s in the country. Not being hyperbolic.
SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC -
If we're being electric-shock-lie-detector-hooked-up-to-genitals honest, this statement would be true for 100% of the people on this site, and probably still true for manyCuntWaffle said:
Yes at the time I would have taken Mora over Petersenchrisvashon said:Runner up to Mora? Are you saying you'd take mora over peterman?
But I pretty much shut my brain off as Peternorth as a viable option. Lol. -
Dwayne Washington will own montlake this year.
-
It's true for me right now. No electric shocks to the genitals needed. But to repeat, I'm very happy Petersen is here and have regained peace of mind in regards to UW football.bananasnblondes said:
If we're being electric-shock-lie-detector-hooked-up-to-genitals honest, this statement would be true for 100% of the people on this site, and probably still true for manyCuntWaffle said:
Yes at the time I would have taken Mora over Petersenchrisvashon said:Runner up to Mora? Are you saying you'd take mora over peterman?
But I pretty much shut my brain off as Peternorth as a viable option. Lol. -
Truth be told, I expect one last plungering in Autzen this year.
-
TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Truth be told, I expect
one lastten more years of plungering by Oregon. -
I'd rather have Mora.bananasnblondes said:
If we're being electric-shock-lie-detector-hooked-up-to-genitals honest, this statement would be true for 100% of the people on this site, and probably still true for manyCuntWaffle said:
Yes at the time I would have taken Mora over Petersenchrisvashon said:Runner up to Mora? Are you saying you'd take mora over peterman?
But I pretty much shut my brain off as Peternorth as a viable option. Lol.
I'd also rather have Saban, or Carroll.
There are a handful of men I'd prefer to be coaching the Dawgs. This doesn't keep me from being fucking ecstatic about the hire.
Woody hit a home run. After a steady diet of trying to bunt for a base hit and being thrown out by 45 feet ever since RN was let go, getting Peterman was and is shockingly awesome. -
Little known fact, but Huskieie Stadium is actually in the U District.jecornel said:Dwayne Washington will own montlake this year.
-
In fact, it's on Aurora Avenue, directly across the street from a 7-11.doogsinparadise said:
Little known fact, but Huskieie Stadium is actually in the U District.jecornel said:Dwayne Washington will own montlake this year.
-
Probably. But 2015 is looking pretty good, no?TierbsHsotBoobs said:Truth be told, I expect one last plungering in Autzen this year.
-
oregonblitzkrieg said:TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Truth be told, I expect
one lastten more years of plungering by Oregon.
As long as there at least 2 Autzen parking lot rapes I am fine with this.
-
You haven't been paying attention around here ... have you?oregonblitzkrieg said:TierbsHsotBoobs said:Truth be told, I expect
one lastten more years of plungering by Oregon. -
Are you new here? The O/U on the number of Autzen parking lot rapes is 5.CuntWaffle said:oregonblitzkrieg said:TierbsHsotBoobs said:Truth be told, I expect
one lastten more years of plungering by Oregon.
As long as there at least 2 Autzen parking lot rapes I am fine with this. -
Yes, that's when Peterman pops and Helfrich fires himself.RaccoonHarry said:
Probably. But 2015 is looking pretty good, no?TierbsHsotBoobs said:Truth be told, I expect one last plungering in Autzen this year.
-
TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Yes, that's when Peterman pops and Helfrich fires himself at halftime at the 50 yard line.RaccoonHarry said:
Probably. But 2015 is looking pretty good, no?TierbsHsotBoobs said:Truth be told, I expect one last plungering in Autzen this year.
-
if you guys are really fucking lucky and there is an Allah, the Quooks will save him for going 8-5. That role reversal will be really bad.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Yes, that's when Peterman pops and Helfrich fires himself.RaccoonHarry said:
Probably. But 2015 is looking pretty good, no?TierbsHsotBoobs said:Truth be told, I expect one last plungering in Autzen this year.
But maybe Helf figures the job out and keeps the rivalry fun (this is my LIFPO mantra) -
On paper Oregon will be favored by 10-14 but I'm not convinced we can't go in there and pull the upset. Last year that was Oregon's best performance of the year and the bounces went their way that game.
We will have a much better DL & DL depth. That is something we haven't had in a while. Oregon also has potential questions at WR and on defense having lost 6 starters. Notice I say potential. They've recruited well and good players are filling in.
Also factor in that we've gone from Sark against Chip to Pete against Helfrich. Helfrich appeared to lose his team after the Stanford game. They were not good the last several games of the regular season. What happens if they lose to UCLA the week before?
UW has the talent to play with Oregon, the players know that and with Petersen instead of Sark, they will believe they can win. That, along with the depth and experience on both lines will give them a reasonable chance, which is a huge upgrade from no chance in recent years.
Mariotta is probably the difference though. I think Oregon is vulnerable though. No Chip. Huge expectations. Nearly tanked last year after facing adversity. They are a Mariotta injury away from being a big disappointment. You could say that about any team's QB but Oregon has the biggest expectations of anyone and Mariotta may be more susceptible to injury than some of the other QB's. I do expect Oregon's OL and tailbacks to be very good though. -
I think there are still question marks about this year's UW team. For starters, I'm not sold on Miley Cyrus just yet. Also, this OL is still the OL that was (not) recruited by Sark. The defense should get better, but as long as we have a credible receiving threat (not 5*, all world, just credible) I think we will be able to stretch you out and create the seams that our offense needs to work.
This is Helfirch's show-or-go year, so either way it will be interesting. -
TL;DR Doog analysis of the week.HeretoBeatmyChest said:On paper Oregon will be favored by 10-14 but I'm not convinced we can't go in there and pull the upset. Last year that was Oregon's best performance of the year and the bounces went their way that game.
We will have a much better DL & DL depth. That is something we haven't had in a while. Oregon also has potential questions at WR and on defense having lost 6 starters. Notice I say potential. They've recruited well and good players are filling in.
Also factor in that we've gone from Sark against Chip to Pete against Helfrich. Helfrich appeared to lose his team after the Stanford game. They were not good the last several games of the regular season. What happens if they lose to UCLA the week before?
UW has the talent to play with Oregon, the players know that and with Petersen instead of Sark, they will believe they can win. That, along with the depth and experience on both lines will give them a reasonable chance, which is a huge upgrade from no chance in recent years.
Mariotta is probably the difference though. I think Oregon is vulnerable though. No Chip. Huge expectations. Nearly tanked last year after facing adversity. They are a Mariotta injury away from being a big disappointment. You could say that about any team's QB but Oregon has the biggest expectations of anyone and Mariotta may be more susceptible to injury than some of the other QB's. I do expect Oregon's OL and tailbacks to be very good though. -
Disagree. It's been a really long time since any of us have seen what competency and planning can do behind the wheel of a hungry UW program. I think Oregon wins the game and the division but the biggest argument I've seen with them is "They're bringing everyone back. It'll be the same Oregon team as last year." That's interesting because aside from the UW game, I didn't like what I saw out of them for large stretches of the season. Also consider that if we are a run heavy team then Miles likely won't factor in as much (and I think he's being undersold anyways) as we'll be aiming for an early lead and burning clock.oregonblitzkrieg said:
TL;DR Doog analysis of the week.HeretoBeatmyChest said:On paper Oregon will be favored by 10-14 but I'm not convinced we can't go in there and pull the upset. Last year that was Oregon's best performance of the year and the bounces went their way that game.
We will have a much better DL & DL depth. That is something we haven't had in a while. Oregon also has potential questions at WR and on defense having lost 6 starters. Notice I say potential. They've recruited well and good players are filling in.
Also factor in that we've gone from Sark against Chip to Pete against Helfrich. Helfrich appeared to lose his team after the Stanford game. They were not good the last several games of the regular season. What happens if they lose to UCLA the week before?
UW has the talent to play with Oregon, the players know that and with Petersen instead of Sark, they will believe they can win. That, along with the depth and experience on both lines will give them a reasonable chance, which is a huge upgrade from no chance in recent years.
Mariotta is probably the difference though. I think Oregon is vulnerable though. No Chip. Huge expectations. Nearly tanked last year after facing adversity. They are a Mariotta injury away from being a big disappointment. You could say that about any team's QB but Oregon has the biggest expectations of anyone and Mariotta may be more susceptible to injury than some of the other QB's. I do expect Oregon's OL and tailbacks to be very good though. -
I don't much like what I saw out of them either last year. Even with the blowouts, watching the sloppy play was excrutiating. If Helfrich and Frost haven't cleaned this shit up, it's the clearest sign that they need to go.haie said:
Disagree. It's been a really long time since any of us have seen what competency and planning can do behind the wheel of a hungry UW program. I think Oregon wins the game and the division but the biggest argument I've seen with them is "They're bringing everyone back. It'll be the same Oregon team as last year." That's interesting because aside from the UW game, I didn't like what I saw out of them for large stretches of the season. Also factor in that if we are a run heavy team then Miles likely won't factor is as much (and I think he's being undersold anyways) as we'll be aiming for an early lead and burning clock.oregonblitzkrieg said:
TL;DR Doog analysis of the week.HeretoBeatmyChest said:On paper Oregon will be favored by 10-14 but I'm not convinced we can't go in there and pull the upset. Last year that was Oregon's best performance of the year and the bounces went their way that game.
We will have a much better DL & DL depth. That is something we haven't had in a while. Oregon also has potential questions at WR and on defense having lost 6 starters. Notice I say potential. They've recruited well and good players are filling in.
Also factor in that we've gone from Sark against Chip to Pete against Helfrich. Helfrich appeared to lose his team after the Stanford game. They were not good the last several games of the regular season. What happens if they lose to UCLA the week before?
UW has the talent to play with Oregon, the players know that and with Petersen instead of Sark, they will believe they can win. That, along with the depth and experience on both lines will give them a reasonable chance, which is a huge upgrade from no chance in recent years.
Mariotta is probably the difference though. I think Oregon is vulnerable though. No Chip. Huge expectations. Nearly tanked last year after facing adversity. They are a Mariotta injury away from being a big disappointment. You could say that about any team's QB but Oregon has the biggest expectations of anyone and Mariotta may be more susceptible to injury than some of the other QB's. I do expect Oregon's OL and tailbacks to be very good though. -
This is the nightmare scenario for all Quacks because we've seen what has happened when the Oregon machine fails to meet their own expectations ... they light themselves on fire and go down in flames.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
Also factor in that we've gone from Sark against Chip to Pete against Helfrich. Helfrich appeared to lose his team after the Stanford game. They were not good the last several games of the regular season. What happens if they lose to UCLA the week before after losing to Michigan State in early September? -
Spoken like a true Quook.oregonblitzkrieg said:
TL;DR Doog analysis of the week.HeretoBeatmyChest said:On paper Oregon will be favored by 10-14 but I'm not convinced we can't go in there and pull the upset. Last year that was Oregon's best performance of the year and the bounces went their way that game.
We will have a much better DL & DL depth. That is something we haven't had in a while. Oregon also has potential questions at WR and on defense having lost 6 starters. Notice I say potential. They've recruited well and good players are filling in.
Also factor in that we've gone from Sark against Chip to Pete against Helfrich. Helfrich appeared to lose his team after the Stanford game. They were not good the last several games of the regular season. What happens if they lose to UCLA the week before?
UW has the talent to play with Oregon, the players know that and with Petersen instead of Sark, they will believe they can win. That, along with the depth and experience on both lines will give them a reasonable chance, which is a huge upgrade from no chance in recent years.
Mariotta is probably the difference though. I think Oregon is vulnerable though. No Chip. Huge expectations. Nearly tanked last year after facing adversity. They are a Mariotta injury away from being a big disappointment. You could say that about any team's QB but Oregon has the biggest expectations of anyone and Mariotta may be more susceptible to injury than some of the other QB's. I do expect Oregon's OL and tailbacks to be very good though.
