Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Grinolds letting Peterman have it re: TBS

1356

Comments

  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,259
    RD,

    I don't think I ever said that losing Eason is a good thing. I just wasn't worried about it. If he wants to go elsewhere he goes elsewhere. I'll be worried if/when Petersen doesn't recruit a solid QB in the 2016 class.

    We have 4 talented QBs on the roster right now and a good one signed up for 2015. We'll lose at least one probably going into this season. We'll sign another next year and the year after that.

    As long as you are getting one really good QB in each class, I just flat out don't care where he comes from.

    QB recruiting is different than anything else ...
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,259
    If I had the time right now, I'd go off on this Kim Jong Vino report ...

    For now, it just deserves a w.jw.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • puppylove_sugarsteel
    puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    Jack was hiding from Sark at BHS. Kim is such a boof. Petersen will hear about this. Don't expect Coach to field any of Kim's questions (if he even keeps his cred). Can't wait to hear him whine about it.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    bananasnblondes said:

    Apparently Peterman's recruitment of local players is a major reason for alarm.

    In the (paraphrased) words of Kimmy:

    What happened?

    Joyner? Throckmorton? Eason? All these guys were heavy UW leans and if you told me a year ago that Petersen would lose all 3 I would not have believed you. You have to ask why is he losing these local players that wanted to come to UW?

    At this point, the previous staff's local recruiting woes are brought up, and of course, according to Kim, it's apples and oranges:

    First of all, recruiting locally now is way different than it was 3 years ago. Sark came into a much different situation than Petersen.
    Banner - Sark wanted him but there were some major red flags there
    Garnett - Wanted Stanford's academics, no loss by Sark
    Williams - Wasn't good enough. The staff would not take his commitment
    Jack - academic issues. loved Mora. not Sark's fault. In fact, heard rumors that Jack really loved the UW staff under Sark but just felt more comfortable with Mora because he knew him longer

    As you can see, there were perfectly goo explanations of why these kids went elsewhere. But with Joyner, Throckmorton, and Eason, some serious questions need to be asked, according to Kim


    Seriously Woodward, get this fucking clown away from the program

    -bananaboat


    Bumper crop....
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Swaye
    Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,741 Founders Club
    edited July 2014
    Kim would lie if the truth sounded better. I fucking hate that guy faggot.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BlowItUp
    BlowItUp Member Posts: 877
    Kim - give me some local names and i will give you my opinion as to why they didnt come.

    poster - Do you really need to defend Sark like this?

    post got deleted, no warning just gone.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BlowItUp
    BlowItUp Member Posts: 877
    edited July 2014
    Spokane kid is not a local loss (re: Mattingly)

    A Bay area kid not choosing an LA school is the same thing.

    FYI.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CFetters_Nacho_Lover
    CFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 32,881 Founders Club
    DerekJohnson said:

    image

    Jack's love for Sark was evident that night at the Rose Bowl.

    Jack looked really soft scoring all those touchdowns.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter