Meet the 2013 Tennessee Titans
Comments
-
He was actually 15-25 as starting QB and 12-13 in non Ty era. So even your own stats were wrong.IrishDawg22 said:Once again we have someone posting incorrect stats.
Please show me how Jake's winning % was 23%??
It was actually 36% (15-27). 46% (12-14) in the non Try Losingham era.
Hmmm, I wonder what Try would have done to the winning % of those other QBs????
Anyways still not great. -
Jack was 3-13 with Ty.........So many people posting incorrect stats in this thread my god.TheKobeStopper said:
Ty before Jack- 72-67IrishDawg22 said:
Hmmm, I wonder what Try would have done to the winning % of those other QBs????
Ty with Jack- 4-21
Perhaps ya boi Jack was the anchor dragging down Husky Legend Ty Willingham. -
For some reason I added 2 extra losses in 09'.He_Needs_More_Time said:
He was actually 15-25 as starting QB and 12-13 in non Ty era. So even your own stats were wrong.IrishDawg22 said:Once again we have someone posting incorrect stats.
Please show me how Jake's winning % was 23%??
It was actually 36% (15-27). 46% (12-14) in the non Try Losingham era.
Hmmm, I wonder what Try would have done to the winning % of those other QBs????
Anyways still not great.
So I think that makes him 12-12 under Sark, 5-7 Yr 1 and 7-5 Yr 2 (missed Oregon game). -
Yea he was 12-12 under Sark, I assumed you forgot the Price vs Oregon game so I just subtracted one loss.IrishDawg22 said:
For some reason I added 2 extra losses in 09'.He_Needs_More_Time said:
He was actually 15-25 as starting QB and 12-13 in non Ty era. So even your own stats were wrong.IrishDawg22 said:Once again we have someone posting incorrect stats.
Please show me how Jake's winning % was 23%??
It was actually 36% (15-27). 46% (12-14) in the non Try Losingham era.
Hmmm, I wonder what Try would have done to the winning % of those other QBs????
Anyways still not great.
So I think that makes him 12-12 under Sark, 5-7 Yr 1 and 7-5 Yr 2 (missed Oregon game).
