Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Meet the 2013 Tennessee Titans

1234568»

Comments

  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453

    Once again we have someone posting incorrect stats.

    Please show me how Jake's winning % was 23%??

    It was actually 36% (15-27). 46% (12-14) in the non Try Losingham era.

    Hmmm, I wonder what Try would have done to the winning % of those other QBs????

    He was actually 15-25 as starting QB and 12-13 in non Ty era. So even your own stats were wrong.

    Anyways still not great.
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453



    Hmmm, I wonder what Try would have done to the winning % of those other QBs????

    Ty before Jack- 72-67

    Ty with Jack- 4-21

    Perhaps ya boi Jack was the anchor dragging down Husky Legend Ty Willingham.
    Jack was 3-13 with Ty.........So many people posting incorrect stats in this thread my god.
  • IrishDawg22
    IrishDawg22 Member Posts: 2,754

    Once again we have someone posting incorrect stats.

    Please show me how Jake's winning % was 23%??

    It was actually 36% (15-27). 46% (12-14) in the non Try Losingham era.

    Hmmm, I wonder what Try would have done to the winning % of those other QBs????

    He was actually 15-25 as starting QB and 12-13 in non Ty era. So even your own stats were wrong.

    Anyways still not great.
    For some reason I added 2 extra losses in 09'.

    So I think that makes him 12-12 under Sark, 5-7 Yr 1 and 7-5 Yr 2 (missed Oregon game).
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453

    Once again we have someone posting incorrect stats.

    Please show me how Jake's winning % was 23%??

    It was actually 36% (15-27). 46% (12-14) in the non Try Losingham era.

    Hmmm, I wonder what Try would have done to the winning % of those other QBs????

    He was actually 15-25 as starting QB and 12-13 in non Ty era. So even your own stats were wrong.

    Anyways still not great.
    For some reason I added 2 extra losses in 09'.

    So I think that makes him 12-12 under Sark, 5-7 Yr 1 and 7-5 Yr 2 (missed Oregon game).
    Yea he was 12-12 under Sark, I assumed you forgot the Price vs Oregon game so I just subtracted one loss.