Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Long but informative read
RoadTrip
Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,146 
in Tug Tavern
Unindicted Co-Conspirators in 1/6 Cases Raise Disturbing Questions of Federal Foreknowledge - Revolver
https://www.revolver.news/2021/06/federal-foreknowledge-jan-6-unindicted-co-conspirators-raise-disturbing-questions/
https://www.revolver.news/2021/06/federal-foreknowledge-jan-6-unindicted-co-conspirators-raise-disturbing-questions/
Comments
-
Very interesting . . . Once again, MSN is AWOL and disinterested in doing investigative journalism.
-
I know you're being sarcastic, but MSN (meaning Microsoft Network) is a web portal and related collection of Internet services and apps for Windows and mobile devices, provided by Microsoft and launched on August 24, 1995, the same release date as Windows 95. The Microsoft Network was initially a subscription-based dial-up online service that later became an Internet service provider named MSN Dial-up. At the same time, the company launched a new web portal named Microsoft Internet Start and set it as the first default home page of Internet Explorer, its web browser. In 1998, Microsoft renamed and moved this web portal to the domain name www.msn.com, where it has remained.[3]trublue said:Very interesting . . . Once again, MSN is AWOL and disinterested in doing investigative journalism.
In addition to its original MSN Dial-up service, Microsoft has used the 'MSN' brand name for a wide variety of products and services over the years, notably Hotmail (later Outlook.com), Messenger (which was once synonymous with 'MSN' in Internet slang and has now been replaced by Skype), and its web search engine, which is now Bing, and several other rebranded and discontinued services.
The current website and suite of apps offered by MSN was first introduced by Microsoft in 2014 as part of a complete redesign and relaunch.[4] MSN is based in the United States and offers international versions of its portal for dozens of countries around the world.[5] -
What an "on brand" response by you.GreenRiverGatorz said:
I know you're being sarcastic, but MSN (meaning Microsoft Network) is a web portal and related collection of Internet services and apps for Windows and mobile devices, provided by Microsoft and launched on August 24, 1995, the same release date as Windows 95. The Microsoft Network was initially a subscription-based dial-up online service that later became an Internet service provider named MSN Dial-up. At the same time, the company launched a new web portal named Microsoft Internet Start and set it as the first default home page of Internet Explorer, its web browser. In 1998, Microsoft renamed and moved this web portal to the domain name www.msn.com, where it has remained.[3]trublue said:Very interesting . . . Once again, MSN is AWOL and disinterested in doing investigative journalism.
In addition to its original MSN Dial-up service, Microsoft has used the 'MSN' brand name for a wide variety of products and services over the years, notably Hotmail (later Outlook.com), Messenger (which was once synonymous with 'MSN' in Internet slang and has now been replaced by Skype), and its web search engine, which is now Bing, and several other rebranded and discontinued services.
The current website and suite of apps offered by MSN was first introduced by Microsoft in 2014 as part of a complete redesign and relaunch.[4] MSN is based in the United States and offers international versions of its portal for dozens of countries around the world.[5] -
As they said in the 70s, once you lose Revolver News, you lose the nation.trublue said:Very interesting . . . Once again, MSN is AWOL and disinterested in doing investigative journalism.
-
For those taking notes at home - if you're trying to demonstrate that you're not bothered (and shaking and about to vomit) by a little jab from a separate thread, constantly bringing it up in other threads is probably not the most convincing tactic.SFGbob said:
What an "on brand" response by you.GreenRiverGatorz said:
I know you're being sarcastic, but MSN (meaning Microsoft Network) is a web portal and related collection of Internet services and apps for Windows and mobile devices, provided by Microsoft and launched on August 24, 1995, the same release date as Windows 95. The Microsoft Network was initially a subscription-based dial-up online service that later became an Internet service provider named MSN Dial-up. At the same time, the company launched a new web portal named Microsoft Internet Start and set it as the first default home page of Internet Explorer, its web browser. In 1998, Microsoft renamed and moved this web portal to the domain name www.msn.com, where it has remained.[3]trublue said:Very interesting . . . Once again, MSN is AWOL and disinterested in doing investigative journalism.
In addition to its original MSN Dial-up service, Microsoft has used the 'MSN' brand name for a wide variety of products and services over the years, notably Hotmail (later Outlook.com), Messenger (which was once synonymous with 'MSN' in Internet slang and has now been replaced by Skype), and its web search engine, which is now Bing, and several other rebranded and discontinued services.
The current website and suite of apps offered by MSN was first introduced by Microsoft in 2014 as part of a complete redesign and relaunch.[4] MSN is based in the United States and offers international versions of its portal for dozens of countries around the world.[5] -
I just enjoy mocking pompous jackasses.GreenRiverGatorz said:
For those taking notes at home - if you're trying to demonstrate that you're not bothered (and shaking and about to vomit) by a little jab from a separate thread, constantly bringing it up in other threads is probably not the most convincing tactic.SFGbob said:
What an "on brand" response by you.GreenRiverGatorz said:
I know you're being sarcastic, but MSN (meaning Microsoft Network) is a web portal and related collection of Internet services and apps for Windows and mobile devices, provided by Microsoft and launched on August 24, 1995, the same release date as Windows 95. The Microsoft Network was initially a subscription-based dial-up online service that later became an Internet service provider named MSN Dial-up. At the same time, the company launched a new web portal named Microsoft Internet Start and set it as the first default home page of Internet Explorer, its web browser. In 1998, Microsoft renamed and moved this web portal to the domain name www.msn.com, where it has remained.[3]trublue said:Very interesting . . . Once again, MSN is AWOL and disinterested in doing investigative journalism.
In addition to its original MSN Dial-up service, Microsoft has used the 'MSN' brand name for a wide variety of products and services over the years, notably Hotmail (later Outlook.com), Messenger (which was once synonymous with 'MSN' in Internet slang and has now been replaced by Skype), and its web search engine, which is now Bing, and several other rebranded and discontinued services.
The current website and suite of apps offered by MSN was first introduced by Microsoft in 2014 as part of a complete redesign and relaunch.[4] MSN is based in the United States and offers international versions of its portal for dozens of countries around the world.[5] -
Ditto
-
GreenRiverGatorz said:
I know you're being sarcastic, but MSN (meaning Microsoft Network) is a web portal and related collection of Internet services and apps for Windows and mobile devices, provided by Microsoft and launched on August 24, 1995, the same release date as Windows 95. The Microsoft Network was initially a subscription-based dial-up online service that later became an Internet service provider named MSN Dial-up. At the same time, the company launched a new web portal named Microsoft Internet Start and set it as the first default home page of Internet Explorer, its web browser. In 1998, Microsoft renamed and moved this web portal to the domain name www.msn.com, where it has remained.[3]trublue said:Very interesting . . . Once again, MSN is AWOL and disinterested in doing investigative journalism.
In addition to its original MSN Dial-up service, Microsoft has used the 'MSN' brand name for a wide variety of products and services over the years, notably Hotmail (later Outlook.com), Messenger (which was once synonymous with 'MSN' in Internet slang and has now been replaced by Skype), and its web search engine, which is now Bing, and several other rebranded and discontinued services.
The current website and suite of apps offered by MSN was first introduced by Microsoft in 2014 as part of a complete redesign and relaunch.[4] MSN is based in the United States and offers international versions of its portal for dozens of countries around the world.[5]GreenRiverGatorz said:
My bad . . . I meant mainstream media/news.trublue said:Very interesting . . . Once again, MSN is AWOL and disinterested in doing investigative journalism.
You must be related to HH. -
trublue said:GreenRiverGatorz said:
I know you're being sarcastic, but MSN (meaning Microsoft Network) is a web portal and related collection of Internet services and apps for Windows and mobile devices, provided by Microsoft and launched on August 24, 1995, the same release date as Windows 95. The Microsoft Network was initially a subscription-based dial-up online service that later became an Internet service provider named MSN Dial-up. At the same time, the company launched a new web portal named Microsoft Internet Start and set it as the first default home page of Internet Explorer, its web browser. In 1998, Microsoft renamed and moved this web portal to the domain name www.msn.com, where it has remained.[3]trublue said:Very interesting . . . Once again, MSN is AWOL and disinterested in doing investigative journalism.
In addition to its original MSN Dial-up service, Microsoft has used the 'MSN' brand name for a wide variety of products and services over the years, notably Hotmail (later Outlook.com), Messenger (which was once synonymous with 'MSN' in Internet slang and has now been replaced by Skype), and its web search engine, which is now Bing, and several other rebranded and discontinued services.
The current website and suite of apps offered by MSN was first introduced by Microsoft in 2014 as part of a complete redesign and relaunch.[4] MSN is based in the United States and offers international versions of its portal for dozens of countries around the world.[5]
Has to take his "wins" wherever he can find them.GreenRiverGatorz said:
My bad . . . I meant mainstream media/news.trublue said:Very interesting . . . Once again, MSN is AWOL and disinterested in doing investigative journalism.
You must be related to HH. -
Gotta link, faux “centrist”?MelloDawg said:
As they said in the 70s, once you lose Revolver News, you lose the nation.trublue said:Very interesting . . . Once again, MSN is AWOL and disinterested in doing investigative journalism.
If you didn’t bother to read it, best not to to comment on the contents or the source, “Centrist”.
Where does the. “Centrist” get his news, i.e., reliable, in depth, trustworthy?
I’m all ears.
-
I rely on news outlets which lean to the left and news outlets which lean to the right. Once I gather the talking points, I generally come to an opinion that’s somewhere in the middle.trublue said:
Gotta link, faux “centrist”?MelloDawg said:
As they said in the 70s, once you lose Revolver News, you lose the nation.trublue said:Very interesting . . . Once again, MSN is AWOL and disinterested in doing investigative journalism.
If you didn’t bother to read it, best not to to comment on the contents or the source, “Centrist”.
Where does the. “Centrist” get his news, i.e., reliable, in depth, trustworthy?
I’m all ears.
Side note: You don’t have to have read the article to know where Revolver sits on the issues of the day. -
Name names, Centrist.
Be specific.
Which ones “lean to the right”?
Which ones “lean to the left”?
I want to be more informed like you. -
-
I see you didn’t bother to read the article either.
Raises some interesting questions about federal law enforcement’s involvement in the January 6, 2021 “insurrection” . . .
Taken from the charging docs (the indictments).
Antifa is an idea, though. -
Their investigative reporting on this subject is truly shocking and should be concerning to anyone regardless of their political persuasion. You will not see this issue nor level of analysis anywhere but you don't care so whatever man.MelloDawg said:
I rely on news outlets which lean to the left and news outlets which lean to the right. Once I gather the talking points, I generally come to an opinion that’s somewhere in the middle.trublue said:
Gotta link, faux “centrist”?MelloDawg said:
As they said in the 70s, once you lose Revolver News, you lose the nation.trublue said:Very interesting . . . Once again, MSN is AWOL and disinterested in doing investigative journalism.
If you didn’t bother to read it, best not to to comment on the contents or the source, “Centrist”.
Where does the. “Centrist” get his news, i.e., reliable, in depth, trustworthy?
I’m all ears.
Side note: You don’t have to have read the article to know where Revolver sits on the issues of the day. -
Correct.
I had never heard of Revolver News before reading this article.
-
What a special day to be a Rush Limbaugh dick sucking conservative that posts here. This just confirms (in your minds) all of the drivel that you guys suck out of his ass.trublue said:Ditto
-
#analdouchnozellivesmattertooGrundleStiltzkin said:
What a special day to be a Rush Limbaugh dick sucking conservative that posts here. This just confirms (in your minds) all of the drivel that you guys suck out of his ass.trublue said:Ditto
-
I see. The question was too tough, Centrist?trublue said:Name names, Centrist.
Be specific.
Which ones “lean to the right”?
Which ones “lean to the left”?
I want to be more informed like you.
Spill it.
-
I read the bulk of it. What’s the crux of the article? The FBI had plants in the militia group and motivated/rallied them to commit violence at the Capitol as a big set up? Wray was a mastermind of all of this and it was another effort to make Trump look bad?RoadTrip said:
Their investigative reporting on this subject is truly shocking and should be concerning to anyone regardless of their political persuasion. You will not see this issue nor level of analysis anywhere but you don't care so whatever man.MelloDawg said:
I rely on news outlets which lean to the left and news outlets which lean to the right. Once I gather the talking points, I generally come to an opinion that’s somewhere in the middle.trublue said:
Gotta link, faux “centrist”?MelloDawg said:
As they said in the 70s, once you lose Revolver News, you lose the nation.trublue said:Very interesting . . . Once again, MSN is AWOL and disinterested in doing investigative journalism.
If you didn’t bother to read it, best not to to comment on the contents or the source, “Centrist”.
Where does the. “Centrist” get his news, i.e., reliable, in depth, trustworthy?
I’m all ears.
Side note: You don’t have to have read the article to know where Revolver sits on the issues of the day.
Big, if true. -
Sure. Just not a voting issue for a centrist who supported the dems real attempt at an insurrection resulting in two impeachment votes based on nothing.
-
Maybe 1/5th of it. This was most certainly true of the plot to kidnap Gretchen Whitmer. Again, you don't care and are most likely not intelligent enough to understand the ramifications so there's no point in wasting my time.MelloDawg said:
I read the bulk of it. What’s the crux of the article? The FBI had plants in the militia group and motivated/rallied them to commit violence at the Capitol as a big set up? Wray was a mastermind of all of this and it was another effort to make Trump look bad?RoadTrip said:
Their investigative reporting on this subject is truly shocking and should be concerning to anyone regardless of their political persuasion. You will not see this issue nor level of analysis anywhere but you don't care so whatever man.MelloDawg said:
I rely on news outlets which lean to the left and news outlets which lean to the right. Once I gather the talking points, I generally come to an opinion that’s somewhere in the middle.trublue said:
Gotta link, faux “centrist”?MelloDawg said:
As they said in the 70s, once you lose Revolver News, you lose the nation.trublue said:Very interesting . . . Once again, MSN is AWOL and disinterested in doing investigative journalism.
If you didn’t bother to read it, best not to to comment on the contents or the source, “Centrist”.
Where does the. “Centrist” get his news, i.e., reliable, in depth, trustworthy?
I’m all ears.
Side note: You don’t have to have read the article to know where Revolver sits on the issues of the day.
Big, if true. -
I do care, so much so to where I think there should be thorough investigations on a bipartisan level to uncover what really happened on 1/6 and how it got to that point.RoadTrip said:
Maybe 1/5th of it. This was most certainly true of the plot to kidnap Gretchen Whitmer. Again, you don't care and are most likely not intelligent enough to understand the ramifications so there's no point in wasting my time.MelloDawg said:
I read the bulk of it. What’s the crux of the article? The FBI had plants in the militia group and motivated/rallied them to commit violence at the Capitol as a big set up? Wray was a mastermind of all of this and it was another effort to make Trump look bad?RoadTrip said:
Their investigative reporting on this subject is truly shocking and should be concerning to anyone regardless of their political persuasion. You will not see this issue nor level of analysis anywhere but you don't care so whatever man.MelloDawg said:
I rely on news outlets which lean to the left and news outlets which lean to the right. Once I gather the talking points, I generally come to an opinion that’s somewhere in the middle.trublue said:
Gotta link, faux “centrist”?MelloDawg said:
As they said in the 70s, once you lose Revolver News, you lose the nation.trublue said:Very interesting . . . Once again, MSN is AWOL and disinterested in doing investigative journalism.
If you didn’t bother to read it, best not to to comment on the contents or the source, “Centrist”.
Where does the. “Centrist” get his news, i.e., reliable, in depth, trustworthy?
I’m all ears.
Side note: You don’t have to have read the article to know where Revolver sits on the issues of the day.
Big, if true.
Someone should put a resolution through Congress to establish some kind of commission. -
I’m sure the commission would be interested in only the particulars of interest to the Rats.
Release ALL of the video now that the Government possesses.
I’m sure the DOJ would be part of the most transparent administration in American history by identifying the “unindicted co-conspirators”(federal agents and/or their informants) and the specific roles and actions they were involved in leading up to and including the day of the Insurrection.
Still waiting for your list of sources that are slightly left and slightly right. -
You should listen to Krystal Ball and Enjeti on Rogen. Segment on the entrapment bullshit the FBIs pull on 'terrorists'.MelloDawg said:
I do care, so much so to where I think there should be thorough investigations on a bipartisan level to uncover what really happened on 1/6 and how it got to that point.RoadTrip said:
Maybe 1/5th of it. This was most certainly true of the plot to kidnap Gretchen Whitmer. Again, you don't care and are most likely not intelligent enough to understand the ramifications so there's no point in wasting my time.MelloDawg said:
I read the bulk of it. What’s the crux of the article? The FBI had plants in the militia group and motivated/rallied them to commit violence at the Capitol as a big set up? Wray was a mastermind of all of this and it was another effort to make Trump look bad?RoadTrip said:
Their investigative reporting on this subject is truly shocking and should be concerning to anyone regardless of their political persuasion. You will not see this issue nor level of analysis anywhere but you don't care so whatever man.MelloDawg said:
I rely on news outlets which lean to the left and news outlets which lean to the right. Once I gather the talking points, I generally come to an opinion that’s somewhere in the middle.trublue said:
Gotta link, faux “centrist”?MelloDawg said:
As they said in the 70s, once you lose Revolver News, you lose the nation.trublue said:Very interesting . . . Once again, MSN is AWOL and disinterested in doing investigative journalism.
If you didn’t bother to read it, best not to to comment on the contents or the source, “Centrist”.
Where does the. “Centrist” get his news, i.e., reliable, in depth, trustworthy?
I’m all ears.
Side note: You don’t have to have read the article to know where Revolver sits on the issues of the day.
Big, if true.
Someone should put a resolution through Congress to establish some kind of commission.
They (the FBI) are not your side.
Perhaps they are on YOUR side. But they are not on the side of the Constitution.
Those fucks egged on the shooter at the Texas church - they KNEW he was going to be there and shooting it up.
Same bullshit they did with the Black Panthers in the 60s. Infiltrate, agitate and arrest. Job security.
