There's no way Tom Brady won only 50% of his games in college. He was basically a two year starter (I know Henson made a few starts as well) and Michigan went 10-3 and 10-2 in those two years (98 & 99). I can't find how many games Brady started but he attempted way more passes than Henson, so I am assuming he started the vast majority of them.
Hmmm, I wonder what Try would have done to the winning % of those other QBs????
Ty before Jack- 72-67
Ty with Jack- 4-21
Perhaps ya boi Jack was the anchor dragging down Husky Legend Ty Willingham.
I sense some tongue in cheek, but I disagree. Ty took the UW job to get one more good payday. He basically gave up on coaching after he was fired from Notre Dame. I'm sure he was lazy at Stanford and Notre Dame, but I doubt he put in as little effort there as he did at UW.
Anyone who is truly attempting to argue that Jake was an above average quarterback is too dense to argue with.
I bet every opposing head coach that went up against Jake would rate him above average as a COLLEGE QB.
But once again I will defer to your knowledge because I am sure you have a better handle on the game then most coaches.
Damn I forgot to put this in my doog myths topic. Whenever a Doog can't argue his point using facts he'll passively aggressively mock you by stating "what do you know? Are you a head coach or GM? Yea that's what I thought".
Do you follow Nascar? I usually only see this high level drafting at Daga or Daytona? Sure hope some of the top posters don't stop quickly, because your head is going to be inserted in a painful position.
Please, just 1 original thought. If you quit following along like a Zombie and repeating talking points, you just might stumble upon one.
You've repeated every line from the Doog script. You even resorted to calling out a poster for not being an NFL GM when you couldn't respond to his facts.
Your level of pressing is exactly why banning Harv was stupid.
Hold the phone. So, when I express my opinion I am "too dense to argue with". Yet when I challenge that person's football knowledge I am using the "Doog handbook".
And I have provided more stats than anyone in this thread.
Nice job with the talking points.
Thanks for proving my point about the original thought. But it's much easier just to call someone a Doog an move on. That is really clever.
Maybe you should quit trying to ride the coattails of others.
Challenging a person's knowledge because they never coached or GMed is a classic Doog move. Idiots on Doogman have done that for over a decade straight now.
Unless you're a GM of a NFL team, you have no right to justify the stupidity of wasting a top ten pick on Lockner.
You provided a lot of cherrypicked stats that are all neatly summarized in one standard stat that you didn't like. Impressive if I compare you to a typical poster of your ilk, but that's like comparing Sark to Ty.
Jake is a legend because the media and fans wanted him to be, even though the black quarterback before him was just as good as he was and the black quarterback after him is significantly better.
The best part about guilty white Seattle liberals is how racist they actually are.
I bet a lot of fans are glad this guy isn't a GM. What would he have done with these guys in their first couple of years...
Eli Manning 48% 53% 57% 56% Peyton 56% 28 INT Brees 59% 31 INTs 1st 2 full seasons Flaco 57% in yr 4
The performances by RGIII and RW were very rare, and almost every QB in the history of the NFL would be considered a failure when compared to their rookie season.
Maybe give the guy more than 1 full season before Nostradumbass considers it a complete failure.
How's Lockner doing for you on Madden 2014?
I bet you are one of these young Husky fans that talk about how great Sonny was @ QB. Even with those numbers and record, he is a Husky Legend after all.
The hate for Jake cracks me up.
It's not hate to point out how mediocre Jake Locker was as a college quarterback. The facts and the stats speak for themselves.
Please take off you Sonny jersey before you post.
He IS a Husky Legend.
Dude was 15-25 as a starting QB in his Husky career. If that makes him a legend, that means the football program is more fucked than any of us feared.
I noticed you don't bother to reference any of his stats...I can't imagine why.
My God, does anyone on here know anything about Husky football? Go get a coffee and browse through the Husky record book.
You might see Jake's name once or twice.
So he played for 2 of the worst coaches in Husky history, but the record is put at his doorstep?
Sorry, you can't have it both ways.
Jake's in the record books because he started 40 games. He accumulated numbers by playing a lot, not by playing well.
Here are the career leaders by passer rating for Husky QBs (source, minimum 100 pass attempts):
Price - 138.9 (BENCH HIS BLACK ASS!!!!) Moon - 134.9 Flick - 133.7 Hobert - 132.4 B. Huard - 131.3 D. Huard - 129.9 Pickett - 125.0 Cowan - 123.3 Stanback - 122.9 Tuiasosopo - 121.7 Locker - 119.0
Thanks for proving once again that Doogs hate stats and facts. The myth that Jake Locker was a legendary Husky is sickening. He was a white Stanback, at best (hi Golve!).
Comments
Please show me how Jake's winning % was 23%??
It was actually 36% (15-27). 46% (12-14) in the non Try Losingham era.
Hmmm, I wonder what Try would have done to the winning % of those other QBs????
Only at Washington does winning less than 25% of your games make you a fucking legend.
Ty with Jack- 4-21
Perhaps ya boi Jack was the anchor dragging down Husky Legend Ty Willingham.
Please proceed to carry out your agenda but please quit making shit up.
Anyways still not great.
So I think that makes him 12-12 under Sark, 5-7 Yr 1 and 7-5 Yr 2 (missed Oregon game).