Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Sorry to hear about ZTF
Comments
-
I misread it. OSU would be a slight favorite but Morris would’ve been activated.dnc said:
Not what I saidlawsandl said:
You would be a slight favorite when down...m’kay.dnc said:
Washington's win probability never dropped below 55% in the game. *If* OSU gets that first down and *if* OSU scores a TD afterwards (far from a guarantee) then they probably move to a slight favorite by the numbers, yes. But if Washington's offense showed anything last year it's that they can score late when they need to. Had Oregon State scored UW is still more likely to pull that out than not.lawsandl said:
You are making an irrelevant semantics argument. If the Beavs score there, they were an odds on favorite to win the game. This idea that UW won comfortably is asinine.dnc said:
"Late" generally means late in the fourth quarter.lawsandl said:
Yes. That’s late in the game. It was a tight game late into the game.dnc said:
And by "late" you mean the second play of the fourth quarter.lawsandl said:
Beavlet was inside the 5 and got robbed by the refs to go up late. Last I checked, special teams matter.haie said:
I've watched that game plenty. A special teams return td was the only thing that made it look close.lawsandl said:
Last year’s victory over Beavlet was nothing to write home about.haie said:
We're coming up on a doogade against Beavlet, but still.lawsandl said:
UW really handled Beavlet and has a good track record against CAL.haie said:I thought quooks didn't care about a reserve DE that only played 4 games?
Guess they're impressed when a DE doesn't get butt slammed by Beavlet and Cal.
Complete scrimmage on UW's part.
But you'd have to understand football to get it so I forgive Oregon fans.
But that's not even the crux of my argument. Calling the second play of the fourth quarter late is disingenuous as hell. No sportscaster ever reported "Oregon State scored a victory on a late TD with 14:45 left in the fourth quarter." Hell taking the lead with 7 minutes left isn't considered "late".
I'm right, you know.
You can still have a “fuck off” for you constant pettiness.
Both UW and Oregon looked pretty shitty at times last year. UW was very uneven. Oregon was as well.
Oregon bitchslapped USC and Stanford and outside of Arizona, UW won by the skin of their teeth. No one earned bragging right in the PAC.
-
I agree with your last sentence.lawsandl said:
I misread it. OSU would be a slight favorite but Morris would’ve been activated.dnc said:
Not what I saidlawsandl said:
You would be a slight favorite when down...m’kay.dnc said:
Washington's win probability never dropped below 55% in the game. *If* OSU gets that first down and *if* OSU scores a TD afterwards (far from a guarantee) then they probably move to a slight favorite by the numbers, yes. But if Washington's offense showed anything last year it's that they can score late when they need to. Had Oregon State scored UW is still more likely to pull that out than not.lawsandl said:
You are making an irrelevant semantics argument. If the Beavs score there, they were an odds on favorite to win the game. This idea that UW won comfortably is asinine.dnc said:
"Late" generally means late in the fourth quarter.lawsandl said:
Yes. That’s late in the game. It was a tight game late into the game.dnc said:
And by "late" you mean the second play of the fourth quarter.lawsandl said:
Beavlet was inside the 5 and got robbed by the refs to go up late. Last I checked, special teams matter.haie said:
I've watched that game plenty. A special teams return td was the only thing that made it look close.lawsandl said:
Last year’s victory over Beavlet was nothing to write home about.haie said:
We're coming up on a doogade against Beavlet, but still.lawsandl said:
UW really handled Beavlet and has a good track record against CAL.haie said:I thought quooks didn't care about a reserve DE that only played 4 games?
Guess they're impressed when a DE doesn't get butt slammed by Beavlet and Cal.
Complete scrimmage on UW's part.
But you'd have to understand football to get it so I forgive Oregon fans.
But that's not even the crux of my argument. Calling the second play of the fourth quarter late is disingenuous as hell. No sportscaster ever reported "Oregon State scored a victory on a late TD with 14:45 left in the fourth quarter." Hell taking the lead with 7 minutes left isn't considered "late".
I'm right, you know.
You can still have a “fuck off” for you constant pettiness.
Both UW and Oregon looked pretty shitty at times last year. UW was very uneven. Oregon was as well.
Oregon bitchslapped USC and Stanford and outside of Arizona, UW won by the skin of their teeth. No one earned bragging right in the PAC.
Fuck off on principle. -
I can remember every game (not just for Oregon, for most pac 12 teams) from 2000 on. Last year has been completely wiped from my memory. In 2 years you could tell me the cougs beat Arizona in the title game and I’d probably nod along in agreement.dnc said:
I agree with your last sentence.lawsandl said:
I misread it. OSU would be a slight favorite but Morris would’ve been activated.dnc said:
Not what I saidlawsandl said:
You would be a slight favorite when down...m’kay.dnc said:
Washington's win probability never dropped below 55% in the game. *If* OSU gets that first down and *if* OSU scores a TD afterwards (far from a guarantee) then they probably move to a slight favorite by the numbers, yes. But if Washington's offense showed anything last year it's that they can score late when they need to. Had Oregon State scored UW is still more likely to pull that out than not.lawsandl said:
You are making an irrelevant semantics argument. If the Beavs score there, they were an odds on favorite to win the game. This idea that UW won comfortably is asinine.dnc said:
"Late" generally means late in the fourth quarter.lawsandl said:
Yes. That’s late in the game. It was a tight game late into the game.dnc said:
And by "late" you mean the second play of the fourth quarter.lawsandl said:
Beavlet was inside the 5 and got robbed by the refs to go up late. Last I checked, special teams matter.haie said:
I've watched that game plenty. A special teams return td was the only thing that made it look close.lawsandl said:
Last year’s victory over Beavlet was nothing to write home about.haie said:
We're coming up on a doogade against Beavlet, but still.lawsandl said:
UW really handled Beavlet and has a good track record against CAL.haie said:I thought quooks didn't care about a reserve DE that only played 4 games?
Guess they're impressed when a DE doesn't get butt slammed by Beavlet and Cal.
Complete scrimmage on UW's part.
But you'd have to understand football to get it so I forgive Oregon fans.
But that's not even the crux of my argument. Calling the second play of the fourth quarter late is disingenuous as hell. No sportscaster ever reported "Oregon State scored a victory on a late TD with 14:45 left in the fourth quarter." Hell taking the lead with 7 minutes left isn't considered "late".
I'm right, you know.
You can still have a “fuck off” for you constant pettiness.
Both UW and Oregon looked pretty shitty at times last year. UW was very uneven. Oregon was as well.
Oregon bitchslapped USC and Stanford and outside of Arizona, UW won by the skin of their teeth. No one earned bragging right in the PAC.
Fuck off on principle. -
Man, arguing UW/Beav win probabilities quarter by quarter from a 4 game season ... or whatever.
This place sucks balls. Not the same since I left IMO.
Go to the Finance Board, apply for membership, and learn something for Christ's sake.
Or DIAFF. IDC. -
Pressing
-
Leave the "Pressing" posts to @PurpleBaze ; he's the standard.BennyBeaver said:Pressing
-
-
-
Link?DJDuck said:
-
Absolutely butchered meme. No wonder DJ is in the minion death cultDJDuck said: -
-
-
I admire the way you lean into the cluelessness.DJDuck said:
