Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Sorry to hear about ZTF
Comments
-
Yes. That’s late in the game. It was a tight game late into the game.dnc said:
And by "late" you mean the second play of the fourth quarter.lawsandl said:
Beavlet was inside the 5 and got robbed by the refs to go up late. Last I checked, special teams matter.haie said:
I've watched that game plenty. A special teams return td was the only thing that made it look close.lawsandl said:
Last year’s victory over Beavlet was nothing to write home about.haie said:
We're coming up on a doogade against Beavlet, but still.lawsandl said:
UW really handled Beavlet and has a good track record against CAL.haie said:I thought quooks didn't care about a reserve DE that only played 4 games?
Guess they're impressed when a DE doesn't get butt slammed by Beavlet and Cal.
Complete scrimmage on UW's part.
But you'd have to understand football to get it so I forgive Oregon fans. -
"Late" generally means late in the fourth quarter.lawsandl said:
Yes. That’s late in the game. It was a tight game late into the game.dnc said:
And by "late" you mean the second play of the fourth quarter.lawsandl said:
Beavlet was inside the 5 and got robbed by the refs to go up late. Last I checked, special teams matter.haie said:
I've watched that game plenty. A special teams return td was the only thing that made it look close.lawsandl said:
Last year’s victory over Beavlet was nothing to write home about.haie said:
We're coming up on a doogade against Beavlet, but still.lawsandl said:
UW really handled Beavlet and has a good track record against CAL.haie said:I thought quooks didn't care about a reserve DE that only played 4 games?
Guess they're impressed when a DE doesn't get butt slammed by Beavlet and Cal.
Complete scrimmage on UW's part.
But you'd have to understand football to get it so I forgive Oregon fans. -
Because I love UW and Pac 12 football?BennyBeaver said:
Why would you watch a “scrimmage” “plenty?”haie said:
I've watched that game plenty. A special teams return td was the only thing that made it look close.lawsandl said:
Last year’s victory over Beavlet was nothing to write home about.haie said:
We're coming up on a doogade against Beavlet, but still.lawsandl said:
UW really handled Beavlet and has a good track record against CAL.haie said:I thought quooks didn't care about a reserve DE that only played 4 games?
Guess they're impressed when a DE doesn't get butt slammed by Beavlet and Cal.
Complete scrimmage on UW's part.
But you'd have to understand football to get it so I forgive Oregon fans.
You’re a fucking loser WashougalDoog faggot. That’s why.
What should I do, Beavlet "winner"? Go hide and cry for 4 years because the orange man nutted all over the shitty party I worship? -
Unhinged.
-
Sure am Benny!BennyBeaver said:Unhinged.
-
You are making an irrelevant semantics argument. If the Beavs score there, they were an odds on favorite to win the game. This idea that UW won comfortably is asinine.dnc said:
"Late" generally means late in the fourth quarter.lawsandl said:
Yes. That’s late in the game. It was a tight game late into the game.dnc said:
And by "late" you mean the second play of the fourth quarter.lawsandl said:
Beavlet was inside the 5 and got robbed by the refs to go up late. Last I checked, special teams matter.haie said:
I've watched that game plenty. A special teams return td was the only thing that made it look close.lawsandl said:
Last year’s victory over Beavlet was nothing to write home about.haie said:
We're coming up on a doogade against Beavlet, but still.lawsandl said:
UW really handled Beavlet and has a good track record against CAL.haie said:I thought quooks didn't care about a reserve DE that only played 4 games?
Guess they're impressed when a DE doesn't get butt slammed by Beavlet and Cal.
Complete scrimmage on UW's part.
But you'd have to understand football to get it so I forgive Oregon fans. -
Washington's win probability never dropped below 55% in the game. *If* OSU gets that first down and *if* OSU scores a TD afterwards (far from a guarantee) then they probably move to a slight favorite by the numbers, yes. But if Washington's offense showed anything last year it's that they can score late when they need to. Had Oregon State scored UW is still more likely to pull that out than not.lawsandl said:
You are making an irrelevant semantics argument. If the Beavs score there, they were an odds on favorite to win the game. This idea that UW won comfortably is asinine.dnc said:
"Late" generally means late in the fourth quarter.lawsandl said:
Yes. That’s late in the game. It was a tight game late into the game.dnc said:
And by "late" you mean the second play of the fourth quarter.lawsandl said:
Beavlet was inside the 5 and got robbed by the refs to go up late. Last I checked, special teams matter.haie said:
I've watched that game plenty. A special teams return td was the only thing that made it look close.lawsandl said:
Last year’s victory over Beavlet was nothing to write home about.haie said:
We're coming up on a doogade against Beavlet, but still.lawsandl said:
UW really handled Beavlet and has a good track record against CAL.haie said:I thought quooks didn't care about a reserve DE that only played 4 games?
Guess they're impressed when a DE doesn't get butt slammed by Beavlet and Cal.
Complete scrimmage on UW's part.
But you'd have to understand football to get it so I forgive Oregon fans.
But that's not even the crux of my argument. Calling the second play of the fourth quarter late is disingenuous as hell. No sportscaster ever reported "Oregon State scored a victory on a late TD with 14:45 left in the fourth quarter." Hell taking the lead with 7 minutes left isn't considered "late".
I'm right, you know. -
This little war...
-
You would be a slight favorite when down...m’kay.dnc said:
Washington's win probability never dropped below 55% in the game. *If* OSU gets that first down and *if* OSU scores a TD afterwards (far from a guarantee) then they probably move to a slight favorite by the numbers, yes. But if Washington's offense showed anything last year it's that they can score late when they need to. Had Oregon State scored UW is still more likely to pull that out than not.lawsandl said:
You are making an irrelevant semantics argument. If the Beavs score there, they were an odds on favorite to win the game. This idea that UW won comfortably is asinine.dnc said:
"Late" generally means late in the fourth quarter.lawsandl said:
Yes. That’s late in the game. It was a tight game late into the game.dnc said:
And by "late" you mean the second play of the fourth quarter.lawsandl said:
Beavlet was inside the 5 and got robbed by the refs to go up late. Last I checked, special teams matter.haie said:
I've watched that game plenty. A special teams return td was the only thing that made it look close.lawsandl said:
Last year’s victory over Beavlet was nothing to write home about.haie said:
We're coming up on a doogade against Beavlet, but still.lawsandl said:
UW really handled Beavlet and has a good track record against CAL.haie said:I thought quooks didn't care about a reserve DE that only played 4 games?
Guess they're impressed when a DE doesn't get butt slammed by Beavlet and Cal.
Complete scrimmage on UW's part.
But you'd have to understand football to get it so I forgive Oregon fans.
But that's not even the crux of my argument. Calling the second play of the fourth quarter late is disingenuous as hell. No sportscaster ever reported "Oregon State scored a victory on a late TD with 14:45 left in the fourth quarter." Hell taking the lead with 7 minutes left isn't considered "late".
I'm right, you know. -
Not what I saidlawsandl said:
You would be a slight favorite when down...m’kay.dnc said:
Washington's win probability never dropped below 55% in the game. *If* OSU gets that first down and *if* OSU scores a TD afterwards (far from a guarantee) then they probably move to a slight favorite by the numbers, yes. But if Washington's offense showed anything last year it's that they can score late when they need to. Had Oregon State scored UW is still more likely to pull that out than not.lawsandl said:
You are making an irrelevant semantics argument. If the Beavs score there, they were an odds on favorite to win the game. This idea that UW won comfortably is asinine.dnc said:
"Late" generally means late in the fourth quarter.lawsandl said:
Yes. That’s late in the game. It was a tight game late into the game.dnc said:
And by "late" you mean the second play of the fourth quarter.lawsandl said:
Beavlet was inside the 5 and got robbed by the refs to go up late. Last I checked, special teams matter.haie said:
I've watched that game plenty. A special teams return td was the only thing that made it look close.lawsandl said:
Last year’s victory over Beavlet was nothing to write home about.haie said:
We're coming up on a doogade against Beavlet, but still.lawsandl said:
UW really handled Beavlet and has a good track record against CAL.haie said:I thought quooks didn't care about a reserve DE that only played 4 games?
Guess they're impressed when a DE doesn't get butt slammed by Beavlet and Cal.
Complete scrimmage on UW's part.
But you'd have to understand football to get it so I forgive Oregon fans.
But that's not even the crux of my argument. Calling the second play of the fourth quarter late is disingenuous as hell. No sportscaster ever reported "Oregon State scored a victory on a late TD with 14:45 left in the fourth quarter." Hell taking the lead with 7 minutes left isn't considered "late".
I'm right, you know.
