Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Say her name

«1

Comments

  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,003
    White, unarmed, females are not subject to justified use of deadly force protocols. Everybody knows that.

  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,623 Founders Club
    Wonder if they’ll just hand her $27m like Minneapolis.

    She’ll probably quietly get something just to keep the officers name out of the press.
  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,623 Founders Club
    @Mellowdawg quick on the downvote draw today. I’m sure he has his reasons.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,624 Standard Supporter
    Bob_C said:

    @Mellowdawg quick on the downvote draw today. I’m sure he has his reasons.

    His reasons is shooting conservatives is OK. The left is off the reservation and need to be reigned in, the hard way.
  • MelloDawg
    MelloDawg Member Posts: 6,835
    Sledog said:

    Bob_C said:

    @Mellowdawg quick on the downvote draw today. I’m sure he has his reasons.

    His reasons is shooting conservatives is OK. The left is off the reservation and need to be reigned in, the hard way.
    Not true. Also, not a leftist.
  • GreenRiverGatorz
    GreenRiverGatorz Member Posts: 10,165
    Bob_C said:

    Wonder if they’ll just hand her $27m like Minneapolis.

    She’ll probably quietly get something just to keep the officers name out of the press.

    Why would her family get paid? Was the shooting not justified?
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,534 Standard Supporter

    Bob_C said:

    Wonder if they’ll just hand her $27m like Minneapolis.

    She’ll probably quietly get something just to keep the officers name out of the press.

    Why would her family get paid? Was the shooting not justified?
    Was the officer reasonably afraid of imminent physical danger from an unarmed 35 year old woman? And if he was reasonably afraid, then why was he the only one to fire? If it was reasonable, then we should have had dozens of shootings. Be nice to have some actual facts. One fact is that no capitol police that were physically harmed. If we had a transparent government we would know more. Need to sue to get these facts.
  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072
    @MelloDawg fuck off.

    I hope you are shot and killed by a Federal agent and we learn about it so you can be laughed at while your family is mocked on Twitter.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,663 Founders Club
    doogie said:

    @MelloDawg fuck off.

    I hope you are shot and killed by a Federal agent and we learn about it so you can be laughed at while your family is mocked on Twitter.

    Same
  • MelloDawg
    MelloDawg Member Posts: 6,835
    The Olympic level mental gymnastics being performed regarding this day are interesting.

    Don’t forget, you’ll still need to face Finland. People forget that.
  • MelloDawg
    MelloDawg Member Posts: 6,835
    MelloDawg said:

    The Olympic level mental gymnastics being performed regarding this day are interesting.

    Don’t forget, you’ll still need to face Finland. People forget that.

    *Upvote*
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,003
    Bob_C said:

    @Mellowdawg quick on the downvote draw today. I’m sure he has his reasons.

    he's a faggot leftist shill.

    They're bad reasons but those are his reasons.

  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,003
    MelloDawg said:

    The Olympic level mental gymnastics being performed regarding this day are interesting.

    Don’t forget, you’ll still need to face Finland. People forget that.

    What mental gymnastics are there? An unarmed woman was shot down in cold blood with no warning, no nothing. Bang bang dead.

    And, who shot her by the way? Has that ever been disclosed? Why not him over Lebron's "Who's Next" guy?

    Hypocrite.



  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,003
    doogie said:

    @MelloDawg fuck off.

    I hope you are shot and killed by a Federal agent and we learn about it so you can be laughed at while your family is mocked on Twitter.

    In a hypothetical sense, #metoo.

    Even dumbfucks like @MelloShillDawg don't deserve death wished on them.

    DIAFF, sure. But he can light his own damned match for that one.

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,663 Founders Club
    Still haven't released the name of the killer cop either
  • MelloDawg
    MelloDawg Member Posts: 6,835
    edited April 2021

    MelloDawg said:

    The Olympic level mental gymnastics being performed regarding this day are interesting.

    Don’t forget, you’ll still need to face Finland. People forget that.

    What mental gymnastics are there? An unarmed woman was shot down in cold blood with no warning, no nothing. Bang bang dead.

    And, who shot her by the way? Has that ever been disclosed? Why not him over Lebron's "Who's Next" guy?

    Hypocrite.



    Mental gymnastics over this incident on that day? Doesn't sound like there are any, I assume folks here have watched the videos of her entering the building and have made their conclusions before commenting. It does sound like you disagree with the DOJ's finding that the officer acted in self-defense in this instance.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,663 Founders Club
    Imagine the mental gymnastics to call this shit mostly peaceful as it went on for months. Mental spastics not gymnastics





  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,534 Standard Supporter
    MelloDawg said:

    MelloDawg said:

    The Olympic level mental gymnastics being performed regarding this day are interesting.

    Don’t forget, you’ll still need to face Finland. People forget that.

    What mental gymnastics are there? An unarmed woman was shot down in cold blood with no warning, no nothing. Bang bang dead.

    And, who shot her by the way? Has that ever been disclosed? Why not him over Lebron's "Who's Next" guy?

    Hypocrite.



    Mental gymnastics over this incident on that day? Doesn't sound like there are any, I assume folks here have watched the videos of her entering the building and have made their conclusions before commenting. It does sound like you disagree with the DOJ's finding that the officer acted in self-defense in this instance.
    Yeah, just like I disagree with the FBI finding that the BernieBro who hated republicans shot up a republican baseball game and almost killed Steve Scalise wasn't domestic terrorism but was an attempt at suicide by cop. Funny that he is still alive but that is our crack government at work.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    MelloDawg said:

    Sledog said:

    Bob_C said:

    @Mellowdawg quick on the downvote draw today. I’m sure he has his reasons.

    His reasons is shooting conservatives is OK. The left is off the reservation and need to be reigned in, the hard way.
    Not true. Also, not a leftist.
    Since you're too big a fucking coward to actually state a position on most things and all you really do is down vote anything with a conservative slant I say you're lying until proven otherwise.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    MelloDawg said:

    The Olympic level mental gymnastics being performed regarding this day are interesting.

    Don’t forget, you’ll still need to face Finland. People forget that.

    This is one of this Kunt's favorite responses. He feels it's really cute. Just don't ask him to detail the "revisionist history" or mental gymnastic being performed because he'll run and hide like Kunt if you do.
  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072

    doogie said:

    @MelloDawg fuck off.

    I hope you are shot and killed by a Federal agent and we learn about it so you can be laughed at while your family is mocked on Twitter.

    In a hypothetical sense, #metoo.

    Even dumbfucks like @MelloShillDawg don't deserve death wished on them.

    DIAFF, sure. But he can light his own damned match for that one.

    disagree.
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,003
    MelloDawg said:

    MelloDawg said:

    The Olympic level mental gymnastics being performed regarding this day are interesting.

    Don’t forget, you’ll still need to face Finland. People forget that.

    What mental gymnastics are there? An unarmed woman was shot down in cold blood with no warning, no nothing. Bang bang dead.

    And, who shot her by the way? Has that ever been disclosed? Why not him over Lebron's "Who's Next" guy?

    Hypocrite.



    Mental gymnastics over this incident on that day? Doesn't sound like there are any, I assume folks here have watched the videos of her entering the building and have made their conclusions before commenting. It does sound like you disagree with the DOJ's finding that the officer acted in self-defense in this instance.
    Shill.

    Say her fucking name, shill.

    Say the shooter's name.

  • GreenRiverGatorz
    GreenRiverGatorz Member Posts: 10,165

    Bob_C said:

    Wonder if they’ll just hand her $27m like Minneapolis.

    She’ll probably quietly get something just to keep the officers name out of the press.

    Why would her family get paid? Was the shooting not justified?
    Was the officer reasonably afraid of imminent physical danger from an unarmed 35 year old woman? And if he was reasonably afraid, then why was he the only one to fire? If it was reasonable, then we should have had dozens of shootings. Be nice to have some actual facts. One fact is that no capitol police that were physically harmed. If we had a transparent government we would know more. Need to sue to get these facts.
    All I saw was a video of an armed crowd trying to break into a barricaded area of the Capitol Building where members of Congress were. And then one of those idiots was shot. But you and I agree, nothing wrong with getting more facts any time the state takes a life. You especially have always been extremely consistent in this principle.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    Bob_C said:

    Wonder if they’ll just hand her $27m like Minneapolis.

    She’ll probably quietly get something just to keep the officers name out of the press.

    Why would her family get paid? Was the shooting not justified?
    Was the officer reasonably afraid of imminent physical danger from an unarmed 35 year old woman? And if he was reasonably afraid, then why was he the only one to fire? If it was reasonable, then we should have had dozens of shootings. Be nice to have some actual facts. One fact is that no capitol police that were physically harmed. If we had a transparent government we would know more. Need to sue to get these facts.
    All I saw was a video of an armed crowd trying to break into a barricaded area of the Capitol Building where members of Congress were. And then one of those idiots was shot. But you and I agree, nothing wrong with getting more facts any time the state takes a life. You especially have always been extremely consistent in this principle.
    What was she armed with?
  • GreenRiverGatorz
    GreenRiverGatorz Member Posts: 10,165
    SFGbob said:

    Bob_C said:

    Wonder if they’ll just hand her $27m like Minneapolis.

    She’ll probably quietly get something just to keep the officers name out of the press.

    Why would her family get paid? Was the shooting not justified?
    Was the officer reasonably afraid of imminent physical danger from an unarmed 35 year old woman? And if he was reasonably afraid, then why was he the only one to fire? If it was reasonable, then we should have had dozens of shootings. Be nice to have some actual facts. One fact is that no capitol police that were physically harmed. If we had a transparent government we would know more. Need to sue to get these facts.
    All I saw was a video of an armed crowd trying to break into a barricaded area of the Capitol Building where members of Congress were. And then one of those idiots was shot. But you and I agree, nothing wrong with getting more facts any time the state takes a life. You especially have always been extremely consistent in this principle.
    What was she armed with?
    Who said she was armed?
  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,534 Standard Supporter

    SFGbob said:

    Bob_C said:

    Wonder if they’ll just hand her $27m like Minneapolis.

    She’ll probably quietly get something just to keep the officers name out of the press.

    Why would her family get paid? Was the shooting not justified?
    Was the officer reasonably afraid of imminent physical danger from an unarmed 35 year old woman? And if he was reasonably afraid, then why was he the only one to fire? If it was reasonable, then we should have had dozens of shootings. Be nice to have some actual facts. One fact is that no capitol police that were physically harmed. If we had a transparent government we would know more. Need to sue to get these facts.
    All I saw was a video of an armed crowd trying to break into a barricaded area of the Capitol Building where members of Congress were. And then one of those idiots was shot. But you and I agree, nothing wrong with getting more facts any time the state takes a life. You especially have always been extremely consistent in this principle.
    What was she armed with?
    Who said she was armed?
    Never question a leftard's integrity or how much they want an honest discussion about anything.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    edited April 2021

    SFGbob said:

    Bob_C said:

    Wonder if they’ll just hand her $27m like Minneapolis.

    She’ll probably quietly get something just to keep the officers name out of the press.

    Why would her family get paid? Was the shooting not justified?
    Was the officer reasonably afraid of imminent physical danger from an unarmed 35 year old woman? And if he was reasonably afraid, then why was he the only one to fire? If it was reasonable, then we should have had dozens of shootings. Be nice to have some actual facts. One fact is that no capitol police that were physically harmed. If we had a transparent government we would know more. Need to sue to get these facts.
    All I saw was a video of an armed crowd trying to break into a barricaded area of the Capitol Building where members of Congress were. And then one of those idiots was shot. But you and I agree, nothing wrong with getting more facts any time the state takes a life. You especially have always been extremely consistent in this principle.
    What was she armed with?
    Who said she was armed?
    You did

    All I saw was a video of an armed crowd trying to break into a barricaded area of the Capitol Building where members of Congress were.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    edited April 2021

    SFGbob said:

    Bob_C said:

    Wonder if they’ll just hand her $27m like Minneapolis.

    She’ll probably quietly get something just to keep the officers name out of the press.

    Why would her family get paid? Was the shooting not justified?
    Was the officer reasonably afraid of imminent physical danger from an unarmed 35 year old woman? And if he was reasonably afraid, then why was he the only one to fire? If it was reasonable, then we should have had dozens of shootings. Be nice to have some actual facts. One fact is that no capitol police that were physically harmed. If we had a transparent government we would know more. Need to sue to get these facts.
    All I saw was a video of an armed crowd trying to break into a barricaded area of the Capitol Building where members of Congress were. And then one of those idiots was shot. But you and I agree, nothing wrong with getting more facts any time the state takes a life. You especially have always been extremely consistent in this principle.
    What was she armed with?
    Who said she was armed?
    Never question a leftard's integrity or how much they want an honest discussion about anything.
    But he isn't a "leftard" he is Conservative just like you and me. In fact he probably agrees with most all things you or I say, when he isn't busy performing his passive aggressive Kunt act where he down votes everything you or I say.
  • GreenRiverGatorz
    GreenRiverGatorz Member Posts: 10,165
    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Bob_C said:

    Wonder if they’ll just hand her $27m like Minneapolis.

    She’ll probably quietly get something just to keep the officers name out of the press.

    Why would her family get paid? Was the shooting not justified?
    Was the officer reasonably afraid of imminent physical danger from an unarmed 35 year old woman? And if he was reasonably afraid, then why was he the only one to fire? If it was reasonable, then we should have had dozens of shootings. Be nice to have some actual facts. One fact is that no capitol police that were physically harmed. If we had a transparent government we would know more. Need to sue to get these facts.
    All I saw was a video of an armed crowd trying to break into a barricaded area of the Capitol Building where members of Congress were. And then one of those idiots was shot. But you and I agree, nothing wrong with getting more facts any time the state takes a life. You especially have always been extremely consistent in this principle.
    What was she armed with?
    Who said she was armed?
    You did

    All I saw was a video of an armed crowd trying to break into a barricaded area of the Capitol Building where members of Congress were.
    No I didn't. I said people in the crowd were armed, not her. But we can squabble semantics all you want, it wouldn't be a Bob argument without it.

    Anyways, back to the point at hand, I have no problem recognizing that she herself was unarmed. Maybe police tactical superiority guy @Sledog can weigh in, but I'd guess that given the tight quarters and the sheer number of the horde trying to get through, it probably wouldn't have been very prudent for the cop to wait for the door to break down before identifying who was and wasn't armed. Generally speaking, if one person in the mob has a gun, the whole mob is fair game when it comes to self-defense.

    But Westlinn is right, no harm in getting more facts.