Huge Dem/Leftist/MSM fraud reveal: JUST IN: ME rules Brian Sicknick died from Two Strokes
Comments
-
None. He exerted himself and may have pushed or been pushed some. He apparently caught some bearspray, but not enough to require medical treatment.creepycoug said:
So, no evidence he was beaten or struck?TurdBomber said:Rather obviously (sounds familiar, don't it?) he had a stressful day at work, might have ingested a little bear spray, but not a lot, went home and had a couple strokes that did him in.
Press then lied its ass off for weeks, along with dems who exploited the fuck out of "Trumps Goons Beat a Cop to Death with a fire extinquisher! Fucking Hypocrites! They were always on the cops side when they were beating and killing blacks and allies! Fuck You, Trump! Orange Man Bad! Orange Man Bad!"
The issue is lying liars, the lies they tell and the lying little libs like H who lie and love to be lied to by the lying liars.
Can I be any clearer? -
Not playing your game, blob.SFGbob said:
Shocking, the Kunt dodges the question.HHusky said:
embarrassed yourself?SFGbob said:
Is there any evidence that chemical irritants caused his death Dazzler? Yes or no?HHusky said:
sureSFGbob said:
Kunt, there's no evidence that anyone attacked him with chemical irritants. But please keep lying.HHusky said:
Madam, attacking someone with chemical irritants is an assault. You need to educate yourself with some basics.SFGbob said:
Pre-existing conditions. No doubt the riot was stressful but there is zero evidence to support the lie Dazzler first pushed about him having his head beat in, and there's no evidence to support Dazzler's later lie that bear spray killed him and no evidence to support that he was ever assaulted.creepycoug said:If there was no evidence he was assaulted, much less battered, then even the next day it's a little hard to connect. I'd agree. Sure, if he were one of my own, I'd wonder if his "bad at work" was a contributing factor; but he's a cop, I guess, and cops have bad days at work of this sort. Comes with the territory.
Pretty much the hat trick of lies for the Dazzler. -
Yeah, it's just a "game" asking you if he died from being sprayed with chemical irritants. You claimed they "killed" him buy assaulting him with bear spray but when you're asked if there's any evidence that the bear spray killed him, that's just a "game." Fuck off liar.HHusky said:
Not playing your game, blob.SFGbob said:
Shocking, the Kunt dodges the question.HHusky said:
embarrassed yourself?SFGbob said:
Is there any evidence that chemical irritants caused his death Dazzler? Yes or no?HHusky said:
sureSFGbob said:
Kunt, there's no evidence that anyone attacked him with chemical irritants. But please keep lying.HHusky said:
Madam, attacking someone with chemical irritants is an assault. You need to educate yourself with some basics.SFGbob said:
Pre-existing conditions. No doubt the riot was stressful but there is zero evidence to support the lie Dazzler first pushed about him having his head beat in, and there's no evidence to support Dazzler's later lie that bear spray killed him and no evidence to support that he was ever assaulted.creepycoug said:If there was no evidence he was assaulted, much less battered, then even the next day it's a little hard to connect. I'd agree. Sure, if he were one of my own, I'd wonder if his "bad at work" was a contributing factor; but he's a cop, I guess, and cops have bad days at work of this sort. Comes with the territory.
Pretty much the hat trick of lies for the Dazzler. -
Don't go away mad.SFGbob said:
Yeah, it's just a "game" asking you if he died from being sprayed with chemical irritants. You claimed they "killed" him buy assaulting him with bear spray but when you're asked if there's any evidence that the bear spray killed him, that's just a "game." Fuck off liar.HHusky said:
Not playing your game, blob.SFGbob said:
Shocking, the Kunt dodges the question.HHusky said:
embarrassed yourself?SFGbob said:
Is there any evidence that chemical irritants caused his death Dazzler? Yes or no?HHusky said:
sureSFGbob said:
Kunt, there's no evidence that anyone attacked him with chemical irritants. But please keep lying.HHusky said:
Madam, attacking someone with chemical irritants is an assault. You need to educate yourself with some basics.SFGbob said:
Pre-existing conditions. No doubt the riot was stressful but there is zero evidence to support the lie Dazzler first pushed about him having his head beat in, and there's no evidence to support Dazzler's later lie that bear spray killed him and no evidence to support that he was ever assaulted.creepycoug said:If there was no evidence he was assaulted, much less battered, then even the next day it's a little hard to connect. I'd agree. Sure, if he were one of my own, I'd wonder if his "bad at work" was a contributing factor; but he's a cop, I guess, and cops have bad days at work of this sort. Comes with the territory.
Pretty much the hat trick of lies for the Dazzler.
Just go away. -
White flag.HHusky said:
Don't go away mad.SFGbob said:
Yeah, it's just a "game" asking you if he died from being sprayed with chemical irritants. You claimed they "killed" him buy assaulting him with bear spray but when you're asked if there's any evidence that the bear spray killed him, that's just a "game." Fuck off liar.HHusky said:
Not playing your game, blob.SFGbob said:
Shocking, the Kunt dodges the question.HHusky said:
embarrassed yourself?SFGbob said:
Is there any evidence that chemical irritants caused his death Dazzler? Yes or no?HHusky said:
sureSFGbob said:
Kunt, there's no evidence that anyone attacked him with chemical irritants. But please keep lying.HHusky said:
Madam, attacking someone with chemical irritants is an assault. You need to educate yourself with some basics.SFGbob said:
Pre-existing conditions. No doubt the riot was stressful but there is zero evidence to support the lie Dazzler first pushed about him having his head beat in, and there's no evidence to support Dazzler's later lie that bear spray killed him and no evidence to support that he was ever assaulted.creepycoug said:If there was no evidence he was assaulted, much less battered, then even the next day it's a little hard to connect. I'd agree. Sure, if he were one of my own, I'd wonder if his "bad at work" was a contributing factor; but he's a cop, I guess, and cops have bad days at work of this sort. Comes with the territory.
Pretty much the hat trick of lies for the Dazzler.
Just go away. -
congratsSFGbob said:
White flag.HHusky said:
Don't go away mad.SFGbob said:
Yeah, it's just a "game" asking you if he died from being sprayed with chemical irritants. You claimed they "killed" him buy assaulting him with bear spray but when you're asked if there's any evidence that the bear spray killed him, that's just a "game." Fuck off liar.HHusky said:
Not playing your game, blob.SFGbob said:
Shocking, the Kunt dodges the question.HHusky said:
embarrassed yourself?SFGbob said:
Is there any evidence that chemical irritants caused his death Dazzler? Yes or no?HHusky said:
sureSFGbob said:
Kunt, there's no evidence that anyone attacked him with chemical irritants. But please keep lying.HHusky said:
Madam, attacking someone with chemical irritants is an assault. You need to educate yourself with some basics.SFGbob said:
Pre-existing conditions. No doubt the riot was stressful but there is zero evidence to support the lie Dazzler first pushed about him having his head beat in, and there's no evidence to support Dazzler's later lie that bear spray killed him and no evidence to support that he was ever assaulted.creepycoug said:If there was no evidence he was assaulted, much less battered, then even the next day it's a little hard to connect. I'd agree. Sure, if he were one of my own, I'd wonder if his "bad at work" was a contributing factor; but he's a cop, I guess, and cops have bad days at work of this sort. Comes with the territory.
Pretty much the hat trick of lies for the Dazzler.
Just go away. -
Ever heard of a mirror?HHusky said:
Don't go away mad.SFGbob said:
Yeah, it's just a "game" asking you if he died from being sprayed with chemical irritants. You claimed they "killed" him buy assaulting him with bear spray but when you're asked if there's any evidence that the bear spray killed him, that's just a "game." Fuck off liar.HHusky said:
Not playing your game, blob.SFGbob said:
Shocking, the Kunt dodges the question.HHusky said:
embarrassed yourself?SFGbob said:
Is there any evidence that chemical irritants caused his death Dazzler? Yes or no?HHusky said:
sureSFGbob said:
Kunt, there's no evidence that anyone attacked him with chemical irritants. But please keep lying.HHusky said:
Madam, attacking someone with chemical irritants is an assault. You need to educate yourself with some basics.SFGbob said:
Pre-existing conditions. No doubt the riot was stressful but there is zero evidence to support the lie Dazzler first pushed about him having his head beat in, and there's no evidence to support Dazzler's later lie that bear spray killed him and no evidence to support that he was ever assaulted.creepycoug said:If there was no evidence he was assaulted, much less battered, then even the next day it's a little hard to connect. I'd agree. Sure, if he were one of my own, I'd wonder if his "bad at work" was a contributing factor; but he's a cop, I guess, and cops have bad days at work of this sort. Comes with the territory.
Pretty much the hat trick of lies for the Dazzler.
Just go away.
Fuck off, hypocrite. -
Imagine being such a fucking Kunt that you claim he was killed because he was sprayed with bear spray, but when you're asked if there is any evidence that bear spray caused his death, you're too big a fucking Kunt to answer.HHusky said:
congratsSFGbob said:
White flag.HHusky said:
Don't go away mad.SFGbob said:
Yeah, it's just a "game" asking you if he died from being sprayed with chemical irritants. You claimed they "killed" him buy assaulting him with bear spray but when you're asked if there's any evidence that the bear spray killed him, that's just a "game." Fuck off liar.HHusky said:
Not playing your game, blob.SFGbob said:
Shocking, the Kunt dodges the question.HHusky said:
embarrassed yourself?SFGbob said:
Is there any evidence that chemical irritants caused his death Dazzler? Yes or no?HHusky said:
sureSFGbob said:
Kunt, there's no evidence that anyone attacked him with chemical irritants. But please keep lying.HHusky said:
Madam, attacking someone with chemical irritants is an assault. You need to educate yourself with some basics.SFGbob said:
Pre-existing conditions. No doubt the riot was stressful but there is zero evidence to support the lie Dazzler first pushed about him having his head beat in, and there's no evidence to support Dazzler's later lie that bear spray killed him and no evidence to support that he was ever assaulted.creepycoug said:If there was no evidence he was assaulted, much less battered, then even the next day it's a little hard to connect. I'd agree. Sure, if he were one of my own, I'd wonder if his "bad at work" was a contributing factor; but he's a cop, I guess, and cops have bad days at work of this sort. Comes with the territory.
Pretty much the hat trick of lies for the Dazzler.
Just go away. -
I (now vaguely) recall seeing video of someone falling down in a crowd and being beaten or hit with something. I assume this was someone else?
-
Yes, that was someone else.creepycoug said:I (now vaguely) recall seeing video of someone falling down in a crowd and being beaten or hit with something. I assume this was someone else?
