Huge Dem/Leftist/MSM fraud reveal: JUST IN: ME rules Brian Sicknick died from Two Strokes

TurdBomber

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

I'm saying that having two strokes is almost certainly evidence that there was an underlying issue that might have killed him in the near future regardless. I don't think it's likely that the strokes just coincidentally occurred within 6 hours of the riots. But I don't want to even attempt to criminalize causing fatal strokes because reasonable doubt is necessarily going to be present.

I don't think it's likely that the strokes just coincidentally occurred within 6 hours of the riots.


Feeeeeeeelings, nothing more than feelings.

Btw, this is the same dumbfuck who "thought" initially that Mike Brown was shot in the back while running away and who later claimed that it was "credible" when people claimed Brown was shot point blank in the head, with his arms in the air.

@HHusky still believes this, I'm sure.

Has he ever retracted it or admitted that no such evidence ever existed? Of course not. He's a Hard-Lefty.

HHusky

TurdBomber said:

creepycoug said:

TurdBomber said:

Rather obviously (sounds familiar, don't it?) he had a stressful day at work, might have ingested a little bear spray, but not a lot, went home and had a couple strokes that did him in.

Press then lied its ass off for weeks, along with dems who exploited the fuck out of "Trumps Goons Beat a Cop to Death with a fire extinquisher! Fucking Hypocrites! They were always on the cops side when they were beating and killing blacks and allies! Fuck You, Trump! Orange Man Bad! Orange Man Bad!"

The issue is lying liars, the lies they tell and the lying little libs like H who lie and love to be lied to by the lying liars.

Can I be any clearer?

So, no evidence he was beaten or struck?

None. He exerted himself and may have pushed or been pushed some. He apparently caught some bearspray, but not enough to require medical treatment.

There were no doctors on the scene of riot. He was incapacitated for about 20 minutes by the bear spray.

HHusky

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

creepycoug said:

If there was no evidence he was assaulted, much less battered, then even the next day it's a little hard to connect. I'd agree. Sure, if he were one of my own, I'd wonder if his "bad at work" was a contributing factor; but he's a cop, I guess, and cops have bad days at work of this sort. Comes with the territory.

Pre-existing conditions. No doubt the riot was stressful but there is zero evidence to support the lie Dazzler first pushed about him having his head beat in, and there's no evidence to support Dazzler's later lie that bear spray killed him and no evidence to support that he was ever assaulted.

Pretty much the hat trick of lies for the Dazzler.

Madam, attacking someone with chemical irritants is an assault. You need to educate yourself with some basics.

Kunt, there's no evidence that anyone attacked him with chemical irritants. But please keep lying.

sure

Is there any evidence that chemical irritants caused his death Dazzler? Yes or no?

embarrassed yourself?

Shocking, the Kunt dodges the question.

Not playing your game, blob.

Yeah, it's just a "game" asking you if he died from being sprayed with chemical irritants. You claimed they "killed" him buy assaulting him with bear spray but when you're asked if there's any evidence that the bear spray killed him, that's just a "game." Fuck off liar.

Don't go away mad.

Just go away.

White flag.

congrats

Imagine being such a fucking Kunt that you claim he was killed because he was sprayed with bear spray, but when you're asked if there is any evidence that bear spray caused his death, you're too big a fucking Kunt to answer.

He died from two strokes, ma'am. That's been established.

WestlinnDuck

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

creepycoug said:

If there was no evidence he was assaulted, much less battered, then even the next day it's a little hard to connect. I'd agree. Sure, if he were one of my own, I'd wonder if his "bad at work" was a contributing factor; but he's a cop, I guess, and cops have bad days at work of this sort. Comes with the territory.

Pre-existing conditions. No doubt the riot was stressful but there is zero evidence to support the lie Dazzler first pushed about him having his head beat in, and there's no evidence to support Dazzler's later lie that bear spray killed him and no evidence to support that he was ever assaulted.

Pretty much the hat trick of lies for the Dazzler.

Madam, attacking someone with chemical irritants is an assault. You need to educate yourself with some basics.

Kunt, there's no evidence that anyone attacked him with chemical irritants. But please keep lying.

sure

Is there any evidence that chemical irritants caused his death Dazzler? Yes or no?

embarrassed yourself?

Shocking, the Kunt dodges the question.

Not playing your game, blob.

Yeah, it's just a "game" asking you if he died from being sprayed with chemical irritants. You claimed they "killed" him buy assaulting him with bear spray but when you're asked if there's any evidence that the bear spray killed him, that's just a "game." Fuck off liar.

Don't go away mad.

Just go away.

White flag.

congrats

Imagine being such a fucking Kunt that you claim he was killed because he was sprayed with bear spray, but when you're asked if there is any evidence that bear spray caused his death, you're too big a fucking Kunt to answer.

He died from two strokes, ma'am. That's been established.

Yep. And not from bear spray. Finally decided to come clean.

SFGbob

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

creepycoug said:

If there was no evidence he was assaulted, much less battered, then even the next day it's a little hard to connect. I'd agree. Sure, if he were one of my own, I'd wonder if his "bad at work" was a contributing factor; but he's a cop, I guess, and cops have bad days at work of this sort. Comes with the territory.

Pre-existing conditions. No doubt the riot was stressful but there is zero evidence to support the lie Dazzler first pushed about him having his head beat in, and there's no evidence to support Dazzler's later lie that bear spray killed him and no evidence to support that he was ever assaulted.

Pretty much the hat trick of lies for the Dazzler.

Madam, attacking someone with chemical irritants is an assault. You need to educate yourself with some basics.

Kunt, there's no evidence that anyone attacked him with chemical irritants. But please keep lying.

sure

Is there any evidence that chemical irritants caused his death Dazzler? Yes or no?

embarrassed yourself?

Shocking, the Kunt dodges the question.

Not playing your game, blob.

Yeah, it's just a "game" asking you if he died from being sprayed with chemical irritants. You claimed they "killed" him buy assaulting him with bear spray but when you're asked if there's any evidence that the bear spray killed him, that's just a "game." Fuck off liar.

Don't go away mad.

Just go away.

White flag.

congrats

Imagine being such a fucking Kunt that you claim he was killed because he was sprayed with bear spray, but when you're asked if there is any evidence that bear spray caused his death, you're too big a fucking Kunt to answer.

He died from two strokes, ma'am. That's been established.

Got it, that's why you still cling to the narrative about the assault killing him despite the fact that Medical Examiner say there's no evidence to support it.

Because you're both a liar and hack.

HHusky

WestlinnDuck said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

creepycoug said:

If there was no evidence he was assaulted, much less battered, then even the next day it's a little hard to connect. I'd agree. Sure, if he were one of my own, I'd wonder if his "bad at work" was a contributing factor; but he's a cop, I guess, and cops have bad days at work of this sort. Comes with the territory.

Pre-existing conditions. No doubt the riot was stressful but there is zero evidence to support the lie Dazzler first pushed about him having his head beat in, and there's no evidence to support Dazzler's later lie that bear spray killed him and no evidence to support that he was ever assaulted.

Pretty much the hat trick of lies for the Dazzler.

Madam, attacking someone with chemical irritants is an assault. You need to educate yourself with some basics.

Kunt, there's no evidence that anyone attacked him with chemical irritants. But please keep lying.

sure

Is there any evidence that chemical irritants caused his death Dazzler? Yes or no?

embarrassed yourself?

Shocking, the Kunt dodges the question.

Not playing your game, blob.

Yeah, it's just a "game" asking you if he died from being sprayed with chemical irritants. You claimed they "killed" him buy assaulting him with bear spray but when you're asked if there's any evidence that the bear spray killed him, that's just a "game." Fuck off liar.

Don't go away mad.

Just go away.

White flag.

congrats

Imagine being such a fucking Kunt that you claim he was killed because he was sprayed with bear spray, but when you're asked if there is any evidence that bear spray caused his death, you're too big a fucking Kunt to answer.

He died from two strokes, ma'am. That's been established.

Yep. And not from bear spray. Finally decided to come clean.

I've been saying that all day, Gasbag.

Maybe your nurse can help you.

SFGbob

TurdBomber said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

I'm saying that having two strokes is almost certainly evidence that there was an underlying issue that might have killed him in the near future regardless. I don't think it's likely that the strokes just coincidentally occurred within 6 hours of the riots. But I don't want to even attempt to criminalize causing fatal strokes because reasonable doubt is necessarily going to be present.

I don't think it's likely that the strokes just coincidentally occurred within 6 hours of the riots.


Feeeeeeeelings, nothing more than feelings.

Btw, this is the same dumbfuck who "thought" initially that Mike Brown was shot in the back while running away and who later claimed that it was "credible" when people claimed Brown was shot point blank in the head, with his arms in the air.

@HHusky still believes this, I'm sure.

Has he ever retracted it or admitted that no such evidence ever existed? Of course not. He's a Hard-Lefty.

He did exactly what he is now trying to do in this Sicknick case. After swallowing hook line and sinker the bullshit "hands up don't shoot" story and swallowing like a bitch, yet again a lying narrative from Al Sharpton and Ben Crump about Brown being shot in the back while he ran away, and lying about how Brown never even assaulted the officer, as the 3 separate autopsies pulled the rug out on his bullshit and lies he just shifted the narrative.

That's where the "insurance settlements" indicate guilt narrative was born and the belief that Obama and Holder were part of the official cover up.

HHusky

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

creepycoug said:

If there was no evidence he was assaulted, much less battered, then even the next day it's a little hard to connect. I'd agree. Sure, if he were one of my own, I'd wonder if his "bad at work" was a contributing factor; but he's a cop, I guess, and cops have bad days at work of this sort. Comes with the territory.

Pre-existing conditions. No doubt the riot was stressful but there is zero evidence to support the lie Dazzler first pushed about him having his head beat in, and there's no evidence to support Dazzler's later lie that bear spray killed him and no evidence to support that he was ever assaulted.

Pretty much the hat trick of lies for the Dazzler.

Madam, attacking someone with chemical irritants is an assault. You need to educate yourself with some basics.

Kunt, there's no evidence that anyone attacked him with chemical irritants. But please keep lying.

sure

Is there any evidence that chemical irritants caused his death Dazzler? Yes or no?

embarrassed yourself?

Shocking, the Kunt dodges the question.

Not playing your game, blob.

Yeah, it's just a "game" asking you if he died from being sprayed with chemical irritants. You claimed they "killed" him buy assaulting him with bear spray but when you're asked if there's any evidence that the bear spray killed him, that's just a "game." Fuck off liar.

Don't go away mad.

Just go away.

White flag.

congrats

Imagine being such a fucking Kunt that you claim he was killed because he was sprayed with bear spray, but when you're asked if there is any evidence that bear spray caused his death, you're too big a fucking Kunt to answer.

He died from two strokes, ma'am. That's been established.

Got it, that's why you still cling to the narrative about the assault killing him despite the fact that Medical Examiner say there's no evidence to support it.

Because you're both a liar and hack.

He died from stroking a few short hours after he was assaulted. Murder requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt. So no murder. Am I typing too fast?

SFGbob

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

creepycoug said:

If there was no evidence he was assaulted, much less battered, then even the next day it's a little hard to connect. I'd agree. Sure, if he were one of my own, I'd wonder if his "bad at work" was a contributing factor; but he's a cop, I guess, and cops have bad days at work of this sort. Comes with the territory.

Pre-existing conditions. No doubt the riot was stressful but there is zero evidence to support the lie Dazzler first pushed about him having his head beat in, and there's no evidence to support Dazzler's later lie that bear spray killed him and no evidence to support that he was ever assaulted.

Pretty much the hat trick of lies for the Dazzler.

Madam, attacking someone with chemical irritants is an assault. You need to educate yourself with some basics.

Kunt, there's no evidence that anyone attacked him with chemical irritants. But please keep lying.

sure

Is there any evidence that chemical irritants caused his death Dazzler? Yes or no?

embarrassed yourself?

Shocking, the Kunt dodges the question.

Not playing your game, blob.

Yeah, it's just a "game" asking you if he died from being sprayed with chemical irritants. You claimed they "killed" him buy assaulting him with bear spray but when you're asked if there's any evidence that the bear spray killed him, that's just a "game." Fuck off liar.

Don't go away mad.

Just go away.

White flag.

congrats

Imagine being such a fucking Kunt that you claim he was killed because he was sprayed with bear spray, but when you're asked if there is any evidence that bear spray caused his death, you're too big a fucking Kunt to answer.

He died from two strokes, ma'am. That's been established.

Got it, that's why you still cling to the narrative about the assault killing him despite the fact that Medical Examiner say there's no evidence to support it.

Because you're both a liar and hack.

He died from stroking a few short hours after he was assaulted. Murder requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt. So no murder. Am I typing too fast?

He also died of a stroke after putting on his pants earlier that day. Using the Dazzler's Kunt logic we could say that pants wearing killed him.

HHusky

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

HHusky said:

SFGbob said:

creepycoug said:

If there was no evidence he was assaulted, much less battered, then even the next day it's a little hard to connect. I'd agree. Sure, if he were one of my own, I'd wonder if his "bad at work" was a contributing factor; but he's a cop, I guess, and cops have bad days at work of this sort. Comes with the territory.

Pre-existing conditions. No doubt the riot was stressful but there is zero evidence to support the lie Dazzler first pushed about him having his head beat in, and there's no evidence to support Dazzler's later lie that bear spray killed him and no evidence to support that he was ever assaulted.

Pretty much the hat trick of lies for the Dazzler.

Madam, attacking someone with chemical irritants is an assault. You need to educate yourself with some basics.

Kunt, there's no evidence that anyone attacked him with chemical irritants. But please keep lying.

sure

Is there any evidence that chemical irritants caused his death Dazzler? Yes or no?

embarrassed yourself?

Shocking, the Kunt dodges the question.

Not playing your game, blob.

Yeah, it's just a "game" asking you if he died from being sprayed with chemical irritants. You claimed they "killed" him buy assaulting him with bear spray but when you're asked if there's any evidence that the bear spray killed him, that's just a "game." Fuck off liar.

Don't go away mad.

Just go away.

White flag.

congrats

Imagine being such a fucking Kunt that you claim he was killed because he was sprayed with bear spray, but when you're asked if there is any evidence that bear spray caused his death, you're too big a fucking Kunt to answer.

He died from two strokes, ma'am. That's been established.

Got it, that's why you still cling to the narrative about the assault killing him despite the fact that Medical Examiner say there's no evidence to support it.

Because you're both a liar and hack.

He died from stroking a few short hours after he was assaulted. Murder requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt. So no murder. Am I typing too fast?

He also died of a stroke after putting on his pants earlier that day. Using the Dazzler's Kunt logic we could say that pants wearing killed him.

I suppose if putting on one's pants was particularly traumatic, you might have a point. In the real world, trauma can hasten strokes.

Don't quit your day job.