I'm saying that having two strokes is almost certainly evidence that there was an underlying issue that might have killed him in the near future regardless. I don't think it's likely that the strokes just coincidentally occurred within 6 hours of the riots. But I don't want to even attempt to criminalize causing fatal strokes because reasonable doubt is necessarily going to be present.
I don't think it's likely that the strokes just coincidentally occurred within 6 hours of the riots.
Feeeeeeeelings, nothing more than feelings.
Btw, this is the same dumbfuck who "thought" initially that Mike Brown was shot in the back while running away and who later claimed that it was "credible" when people claimed Brown was shot point blank in the head, with his arms in the air.
If there was no evidence he was assaulted, much less battered, then even the next day it's a little hard to connect. I'd agree. Sure, if he were one of my own, I'd wonder if his "bad day at work" was a contributing factor; but he's a cop, I guess, and cops have bad days at work of this sort. Comes with the territory.
I'm a little confused by the thread. Not rhetorically ... actually confused.
So is the issue with the Trump Bros that the narrative was that the guy died from blows to the head and that was a lie? That's one question, and a fair one.
And is @HHusky making the point that the beating or whatever happened to the guy is likely linked to the strokes?
Is there a dispute about whether anything at all happened to him during the siege? Yeah I can look it up but I spend my free time here, so fuck off in advance.
If nothing physically happened to him, I'd say the link between the siege and a stroke weeks later, while interesting, is attenuated. If he got the ever loving shit beat out of him, w/ or w/o an extinguisher or whatever the fuck it supposedly was, then yeah, that seems like a connection. I'm not a doc, but if you beat the shit out of someone past a given age and they die of a stroke a few weeks later, if it's one of mine I have questions at least.
Or again, is the issue that none of that matters and that the media jumped the gun?
There's no evidence that he was assaulted period. He died the next day of stroke not weeks later. Dazzler is a fucking liar. Never believe anything the Dazzler says, you'll be much better off.
He died the next day. You're right, but you don't comprehend.
He stroked within a few hours of the insurrection and the evidence is clear that he was assaulted.
If there was no evidence he was assaulted, much less battered, then even the next day it's a little hard to connect. I'd agree. Sure, if he were one of my own, I'd wonder if his "bad at work" was a contributing factor; but he's a cop, I guess, and cops have bad days at work of this sort. Comes with the territory.
Pre-existing conditions. No doubt the riot was stressful but there is zero evidence to support the lie Dazzler first pushed about him having his head beat in, and there's no evidence to support Dazzler's later lie that bear spray killed him and no evidence to support that he was ever assaulted.
Pretty much the hat trick of lies for the Dazzler.
If there was no evidence he was assaulted, much less battered, then even the next day it's a little hard to connect. I'd agree. Sure, if he were one of my own, I'd wonder if his "bad at work" was a contributing factor; but he's a cop, I guess, and cops have bad days at work of this sort. Comes with the territory.
Pre-existing conditions. No doubt the riot was stressful but there is zero evidence to support the lie Dazzler first pushed about him having his head beat in, and there's no evidence to support Dazzler's later lie that bear spray killed him and no evidence to support that he was ever assaulted.
Pretty much the hat trick of lies for the Dazzler.
Madam, attacking someone with chemical irritants is an assault. You need to educate yourself with some basics.
If there was no evidence he was assaulted, much less battered, then even the next day it's a little hard to connect. I'd agree. Sure, if he were one of my own, I'd wonder if his "bad at work" was a contributing factor; but he's a cop, I guess, and cops have bad days at work of this sort. Comes with the territory.
Pre-existing conditions. No doubt the riot was stressful but there is zero evidence to support the lie Dazzler first pushed about him having his head beat in, and there's no evidence to support Dazzler's later lie that bear spray killed him and no evidence to support that he was ever assaulted.
Pretty much the hat trick of lies for the Dazzler.
Madam, attacking someone with chemical irritants is an assault. You need to educate yourself with some basics.
Kunt, there's no evidence that anyone attacked him with chemical irritants. But please keep lying.
If there was no evidence he was assaulted, much less battered, then even the next day it's a little hard to connect. I'd agree. Sure, if he were one of my own, I'd wonder if his "bad at work" was a contributing factor; but he's a cop, I guess, and cops have bad days at work of this sort. Comes with the territory.
Pre-existing conditions. No doubt the riot was stressful but there is zero evidence to support the lie Dazzler first pushed about him having his head beat in, and there's no evidence to support Dazzler's later lie that bear spray killed him and no evidence to support that he was ever assaulted.
Pretty much the hat trick of lies for the Dazzler.
Madam, attacking someone with chemical irritants is an assault. You need to educate yourself with some basics.
Kunt, there's no evidence that anyone attacked him with chemical irritants. But please keep lying.
If there was no evidence he was assaulted, much less battered, then even the next day it's a little hard to connect. I'd agree. Sure, if he were one of my own, I'd wonder if his "bad at work" was a contributing factor; but he's a cop, I guess, and cops have bad days at work of this sort. Comes with the territory.
Pre-existing conditions. No doubt the riot was stressful but there is zero evidence to support the lie Dazzler first pushed about him having his head beat in, and there's no evidence to support Dazzler's later lie that bear spray killed him and no evidence to support that he was ever assaulted.
Pretty much the hat trick of lies for the Dazzler.
Madam, attacking someone with chemical irritants is an assault. You need to educate yourself with some basics.
Kunt, there's no evidence that anyone attacked him with chemical irritants. But please keep lying.
sure
Is there any evidence that chemical irritants caused his death Dazzler? Yes or no?
If there was no evidence he was assaulted, much less battered, then even the next day it's a little hard to connect. I'd agree. Sure, if he were one of my own, I'd wonder if his "bad at work" was a contributing factor; but he's a cop, I guess, and cops have bad days at work of this sort. Comes with the territory.
Pre-existing conditions. No doubt the riot was stressful but there is zero evidence to support the lie Dazzler first pushed about him having his head beat in, and there's no evidence to support Dazzler's later lie that bear spray killed him and no evidence to support that he was ever assaulted.
Pretty much the hat trick of lies for the Dazzler.
Madam, attacking someone with chemical irritants is an assault. You need to educate yourself with some basics.
Kunt, there's no evidence that anyone attacked him with chemical irritants. But please keep lying.
sure
Is there any evidence that chemical irritants caused his death Dazzler? Yes or no?
If there was no evidence he was assaulted, much less battered, then even the next day it's a little hard to connect. I'd agree. Sure, if he were one of my own, I'd wonder if his "bad at work" was a contributing factor; but he's a cop, I guess, and cops have bad days at work of this sort. Comes with the territory.
Pre-existing conditions. No doubt the riot was stressful but there is zero evidence to support the lie Dazzler first pushed about him having his head beat in, and there's no evidence to support Dazzler's later lie that bear spray killed him and no evidence to support that he was ever assaulted.
Pretty much the hat trick of lies for the Dazzler.
Madam, attacking someone with chemical irritants is an assault. You need to educate yourself with some basics.
Kunt, there's no evidence that anyone attacked him with chemical irritants. But please keep lying.
sure
Is there any evidence that chemical irritants caused his death Dazzler? Yes or no?
Rather obviously (sounds familiar, don't it?) he had a stressful day at work, might have ingested a little bear spray, but not a lot, went home and had a couple strokes that did him in.
Press then lied its ass off for weeks, along with dems who exploited the fuck out of "Trumps Goons Beat a Cop to Death with a fire extinquisher! Fucking Hypocrites! They were always on the cops side when they were beating and killing blacks and allies! Fuck You, Trump! Orange Man Bad! Orange Man Bad!"
The issue is lying liars, the lies they tell and the lying little libs like H who lie and love to be lied to by the lying liars.
Can I be any clearer?
So, no evidence he was beaten or struck?
None. He exerted himself and may have pushed or been pushed some. He apparently caught some bearspray, but not enough to require medical treatment.
If there was no evidence he was assaulted, much less battered, then even the next day it's a little hard to connect. I'd agree. Sure, if he were one of my own, I'd wonder if his "bad at work" was a contributing factor; but he's a cop, I guess, and cops have bad days at work of this sort. Comes with the territory.
Pre-existing conditions. No doubt the riot was stressful but there is zero evidence to support the lie Dazzler first pushed about him having his head beat in, and there's no evidence to support Dazzler's later lie that bear spray killed him and no evidence to support that he was ever assaulted.
Pretty much the hat trick of lies for the Dazzler.
Madam, attacking someone with chemical irritants is an assault. You need to educate yourself with some basics.
Kunt, there's no evidence that anyone attacked him with chemical irritants. But please keep lying.
sure
Is there any evidence that chemical irritants caused his death Dazzler? Yes or no?
If there was no evidence he was assaulted, much less battered, then even the next day it's a little hard to connect. I'd agree. Sure, if he were one of my own, I'd wonder if his "bad at work" was a contributing factor; but he's a cop, I guess, and cops have bad days at work of this sort. Comes with the territory.
Pre-existing conditions. No doubt the riot was stressful but there is zero evidence to support the lie Dazzler first pushed about him having his head beat in, and there's no evidence to support Dazzler's later lie that bear spray killed him and no evidence to support that he was ever assaulted.
Pretty much the hat trick of lies for the Dazzler.
Madam, attacking someone with chemical irritants is an assault. You need to educate yourself with some basics.
Kunt, there's no evidence that anyone attacked him with chemical irritants. But please keep lying.
sure
Is there any evidence that chemical irritants caused his death Dazzler? Yes or no?
embarrassed yourself?
Shocking, the Kunt dodges the question.
Not playing your game, blob.
Yeah, it's just a "game" asking you if he died from being sprayed with chemical irritants. You claimed they "killed" him buy assaulting him with bear spray but when you're asked if there's any evidence that the bear spray killed him, that's just a "game." Fuck off liar.
If there was no evidence he was assaulted, much less battered, then even the next day it's a little hard to connect. I'd agree. Sure, if he were one of my own, I'd wonder if his "bad at work" was a contributing factor; but he's a cop, I guess, and cops have bad days at work of this sort. Comes with the territory.
Pre-existing conditions. No doubt the riot was stressful but there is zero evidence to support the lie Dazzler first pushed about him having his head beat in, and there's no evidence to support Dazzler's later lie that bear spray killed him and no evidence to support that he was ever assaulted.
Pretty much the hat trick of lies for the Dazzler.
Madam, attacking someone with chemical irritants is an assault. You need to educate yourself with some basics.
Kunt, there's no evidence that anyone attacked him with chemical irritants. But please keep lying.
sure
Is there any evidence that chemical irritants caused his death Dazzler? Yes or no?
embarrassed yourself?
Shocking, the Kunt dodges the question.
Not playing your game, blob.
Yeah, it's just a "game" asking you if he died from being sprayed with chemical irritants. You claimed they "killed" him buy assaulting him with bear spray but when you're asked if there's any evidence that the bear spray killed him, that's just a "game." Fuck off liar.
If there was no evidence he was assaulted, much less battered, then even the next day it's a little hard to connect. I'd agree. Sure, if he were one of my own, I'd wonder if his "bad at work" was a contributing factor; but he's a cop, I guess, and cops have bad days at work of this sort. Comes with the territory.
Pre-existing conditions. No doubt the riot was stressful but there is zero evidence to support the lie Dazzler first pushed about him having his head beat in, and there's no evidence to support Dazzler's later lie that bear spray killed him and no evidence to support that he was ever assaulted.
Pretty much the hat trick of lies for the Dazzler.
Madam, attacking someone with chemical irritants is an assault. You need to educate yourself with some basics.
Kunt, there's no evidence that anyone attacked him with chemical irritants. But please keep lying.
sure
Is there any evidence that chemical irritants caused his death Dazzler? Yes or no?
embarrassed yourself?
Shocking, the Kunt dodges the question.
Not playing your game, blob.
Yeah, it's just a "game" asking you if he died from being sprayed with chemical irritants. You claimed they "killed" him buy assaulting him with bear spray but when you're asked if there's any evidence that the bear spray killed him, that's just a "game." Fuck off liar.
If there was no evidence he was assaulted, much less battered, then even the next day it's a little hard to connect. I'd agree. Sure, if he were one of my own, I'd wonder if his "bad at work" was a contributing factor; but he's a cop, I guess, and cops have bad days at work of this sort. Comes with the territory.
Pre-existing conditions. No doubt the riot was stressful but there is zero evidence to support the lie Dazzler first pushed about him having his head beat in, and there's no evidence to support Dazzler's later lie that bear spray killed him and no evidence to support that he was ever assaulted.
Pretty much the hat trick of lies for the Dazzler.
Madam, attacking someone with chemical irritants is an assault. You need to educate yourself with some basics.
Kunt, there's no evidence that anyone attacked him with chemical irritants. But please keep lying.
sure
Is there any evidence that chemical irritants caused his death Dazzler? Yes or no?
embarrassed yourself?
Shocking, the Kunt dodges the question.
Not playing your game, blob.
Yeah, it's just a "game" asking you if he died from being sprayed with chemical irritants. You claimed they "killed" him buy assaulting him with bear spray but when you're asked if there's any evidence that the bear spray killed him, that's just a "game." Fuck off liar.
If there was no evidence he was assaulted, much less battered, then even the next day it's a little hard to connect. I'd agree. Sure, if he were one of my own, I'd wonder if his "bad at work" was a contributing factor; but he's a cop, I guess, and cops have bad days at work of this sort. Comes with the territory.
Pre-existing conditions. No doubt the riot was stressful but there is zero evidence to support the lie Dazzler first pushed about him having his head beat in, and there's no evidence to support Dazzler's later lie that bear spray killed him and no evidence to support that he was ever assaulted.
Pretty much the hat trick of lies for the Dazzler.
Madam, attacking someone with chemical irritants is an assault. You need to educate yourself with some basics.
Kunt, there's no evidence that anyone attacked him with chemical irritants. But please keep lying.
sure
Is there any evidence that chemical irritants caused his death Dazzler? Yes or no?
embarrassed yourself?
Shocking, the Kunt dodges the question.
Not playing your game, blob.
Yeah, it's just a "game" asking you if he died from being sprayed with chemical irritants. You claimed they "killed" him buy assaulting him with bear spray but when you're asked if there's any evidence that the bear spray killed him, that's just a "game." Fuck off liar.
If there was no evidence he was assaulted, much less battered, then even the next day it's a little hard to connect. I'd agree. Sure, if he were one of my own, I'd wonder if his "bad at work" was a contributing factor; but he's a cop, I guess, and cops have bad days at work of this sort. Comes with the territory.
Pre-existing conditions. No doubt the riot was stressful but there is zero evidence to support the lie Dazzler first pushed about him having his head beat in, and there's no evidence to support Dazzler's later lie that bear spray killed him and no evidence to support that he was ever assaulted.
Pretty much the hat trick of lies for the Dazzler.
Madam, attacking someone with chemical irritants is an assault. You need to educate yourself with some basics.
Kunt, there's no evidence that anyone attacked him with chemical irritants. But please keep lying.
sure
Is there any evidence that chemical irritants caused his death Dazzler? Yes or no?
embarrassed yourself?
Shocking, the Kunt dodges the question.
Not playing your game, blob.
Yeah, it's just a "game" asking you if he died from being sprayed with chemical irritants. You claimed they "killed" him buy assaulting him with bear spray but when you're asked if there's any evidence that the bear spray killed him, that's just a "game." Fuck off liar.
Don't go away mad.
Just go away.
White flag.
congrats
Imagine being such a fucking Kunt that you claim he was killed because he was sprayed with bear spray, but when you're asked if there is any evidence that bear spray caused his death, you're too big a fucking Kunt to answer.
Comments
Feeeeeeeelings, nothing more than feelings.
Btw, this is the same dumbfuck who "thought" initially that Mike Brown was shot in the back while running away and who later claimed that it was "credible" when people claimed Brown was shot point blank in the head, with his arms in the air.
He stroked within a few hours of the insurrection and the evidence is clear that he was assaulted.
Pretty much the hat trick of lies for the Dazzler.
Just go away.
Fuck off, hypocrite.