Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Huge Dem/Leftist/MSM fraud reveal: JUST IN: ME rules Brian Sicknick died from Two Strokes

2

Comments

  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,041 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    I'm saying that having two strokes is almost certainly evidence that there was an underlying issue that might have killed him in the near future regardless. I don't think it's likely that the strokes just coincidentally occurred within 6 hours of the riots. But I don't want to criminalize causing fatal strokes because reasonable doubt is necessarily going to be present.

    Just as likely your faggy allies lied and told Sicknick people were being beat to death by fire extinguishers, which caused him to stroke out.

    So that scenario makes you a cop-killer.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,916
    TurdBomber said:

    HHusky said:

    I'm saying that having two strokes is almost certainly evidence that there was an underlying issue that might have killed him in the near future regardless. I don't think it's likely that the strokes just coincidentally occurred within 6 hours of the riots. But I don't want to criminalize causing fatal strokes because reasonable doubt is necessarily going to be present.

    Just as likely your faggy allies lied and told Sicknick people were being beat to death by fire extinguishers, which caused him to stroke out.

    So that scenario makes you a cop-killer.
    You seem to be having a lot of trouble accepting our agreement that this wasn't murder.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,041 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    TurdBomber said:

    HHusky said:

    I'm saying that having two strokes is almost certainly evidence that there was an underlying issue that might have killed him in the near future regardless. I don't think it's likely that the strokes just coincidentally occurred within 6 hours of the riots. But I don't want to criminalize causing fatal strokes because reasonable doubt is necessarily going to be present.

    Just as likely your faggy allies lied and told Sicknick people were being beat to death by fire extinguishers, which caused him to stroke out.

    So that scenario makes you a cop-killer.
    You seem to be having a lot of trouble accepting our agreement that this wasn't murder.
    Show me where I wrote or implied "murder."

    Are you actually that fucking stu....Nevermind.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,916
    TurdBomber said:

    HHusky said:

    TurdBomber said:

    HHusky said:

    I'm saying that having two strokes is almost certainly evidence that there was an underlying issue that might have killed him in the near future regardless. I don't think it's likely that the strokes just coincidentally occurred within 6 hours of the riots. But I don't want to criminalize causing fatal strokes because reasonable doubt is necessarily going to be present.

    Just as likely your faggy allies lied and told Sicknick people were being beat to death by fire extinguishers, which caused him to stroke out.

    So that scenario makes you a cop-killer.
    You seem to be having a lot of trouble accepting our agreement that this wasn't murder.
    Show me where I wrote or implied "murder."

    Are you actually that fucking stu....Nevermind.
    More trouble even than I thought.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,041 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    TurdBomber said:

    HHusky said:

    TurdBomber said:

    HHusky said:

    I'm saying that having two strokes is almost certainly evidence that there was an underlying issue that might have killed him in the near future regardless. I don't think it's likely that the strokes just coincidentally occurred within 6 hours of the riots. But I don't want to criminalize causing fatal strokes because reasonable doubt is necessarily going to be present.

    Just as likely your faggy allies lied and told Sicknick people were being beat to death by fire extinguishers, which caused him to stroke out.

    So that scenario makes you a cop-killer.
    You seem to be having a lot of trouble accepting our agreement that this wasn't murder.
    Show me where I wrote or implied "murder."

    Are you actually that fucking stu....Nevermind.
    More trouble even than I thought.
    Trouble understanding what "nevermind" means? Shocking.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,916
    TurdBomber said:

    HHusky said:

    TurdBomber said:

    HHusky said:

    TurdBomber said:

    HHusky said:

    I'm saying that having two strokes is almost certainly evidence that there was an underlying issue that might have killed him in the near future regardless. I don't think it's likely that the strokes just coincidentally occurred within 6 hours of the riots. But I don't want to criminalize causing fatal strokes because reasonable doubt is necessarily going to be present.

    Just as likely your faggy allies lied and told Sicknick people were being beat to death by fire extinguishers, which caused him to stroke out.

    So that scenario makes you a cop-killer.
    You seem to be having a lot of trouble accepting our agreement that this wasn't murder.
    Show me where I wrote or implied "murder."

    Are you actually that fucking stu....Nevermind.
    More trouble even than I thought.
    Trouble understanding what "nevermind" means? Shocking.
    ok
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,057
    TurdBomber said:

    Rather obviously (sounds familiar, don't it?) he had a stressful day at work, might have ingested a little bear spray, but not a lot, went home and had a couple strokes that did him in.

    Press then lied its ass off for weeks, along with dems who exploited the fuck out of "Trumps Goons Beat a Cop to Death with a fire extinquisher! Fucking Hypocrites! They were always on the cops side when they were beating and killing blacks and allies! Fuck You, Trump! Orange Man Bad! Orange Man Bad!"

    The issue is lying liars, the lies they tell and the lying little libs like H who lie and love to be lied to by the lying liars.

    Can I be any clearer?

    So, no evidence he was beaten or struck?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    WestlinnDuck said:

    TurdBomber said:

    HHusky said:

    thechatch said:

    I’m not celebrating.

    So you're just chiming in on DJ's thread that bitches about honoring the dead police officer in a somber, reflective manner. Got it.
    Neither somber, nor reflective. People like you do neither.

    Sicknick's death was 100% politicized by the Left and the MSM, which lazy clowns like yourself swallow at every opportunity.
    Dazzler is proud of being a champion fake news swallower. Never embarrassed, never trying to do better, just lies about it.
    Once Dazzler buys into the narrative, he is sold and no amount of facts will get him to admit he was wrong. Medical Examiner says it wasn't murder and that the police office died of natural causes, ignore it and lie and claim they really did murder him, they just can't prove it in a court of law.
    Madam, I specifically said it's not murder. The State can't possibly prove he wouldn't have stroked out shortly after being assaulted even if he hadn't been assaulted.

    Common sense let's you recognize the reasonable doubt without losing sight of what's probable.

    Leftist lie, it's what they do, it's who they are.

    So the insurrectionists killed him, but it wasn't they way we thought they killed him,

    So they "killed" him but they didn't murder him. There's no evidence he was even assaulted Dazzler. But please keep lying.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    creepycoug said:

    I'm a little confused by the thread. Not rhetorically ... actually confused.

    So is the issue with the Trump Bros that the narrative was that the guy died from blows to the head and that was a lie? That's one question, and a fair one.

    And is @HHusky making the point that the beating or whatever happened to the guy is likely linked to the strokes?

    Is there a dispute about whether anything at all happened to him during the siege? Yeah I can look it up but I spend my free time here, so fuck off in advance.

    If nothing physically happened to him, I'd say the link between the siege and a stroke weeks later, while interesting, is attenuated. If he got the ever loving shit beat out of him, w/ or w/o an extinguisher or whatever the fuck it supposedly was, then yeah, that seems like a connection. I'm not a doc, but if you beat the shit out of someone past a given age and they die of a stroke a few weeks later, if it's one of mine I have questions at least.

    Or again, is the issue that none of that matters and that the media jumped the gun?

    There's no evidence that he was assaulted period. He died the next day of stroke not weeks later. Dazzler is a fucking liar. Never believe anything the Dazzler says, you'll be much better off.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,916
    edited April 2021
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    WestlinnDuck said:

    TurdBomber said:

    HHusky said:

    thechatch said:

    I’m not celebrating.

    So you're just chiming in on DJ's thread that bitches about honoring the dead police officer in a somber, reflective manner. Got it.
    Neither somber, nor reflective. People like you do neither.

    Sicknick's death was 100% politicized by the Left and the MSM, which lazy clowns like yourself swallow at every opportunity.
    Dazzler is proud of being a champion fake news swallower. Never embarrassed, never trying to do better, just lies about it.
    Once Dazzler buys into the narrative, he is sold and no amount of facts will get him to admit he was wrong. Medical Examiner says it wasn't murder and that the police office died of natural causes, ignore it and lie and claim they really did murder him, they just can't prove it in a court of law.
    Madam, I specifically said it's not murder. The State can't possibly prove he wouldn't have stroked out shortly after being assaulted even if he hadn't been assaulted.

    Common sense let's you recognize the reasonable doubt without losing sight of what's probable.

    Leftist lie, it's what they do, it's who they are.

    So the insurrectionists killed him, but it wasn't they way we thought they killed him,

    So they "killed" him but they didn't murder him. There's no evidence he was even assaulted Dazzler. But please keep lying.
    They killed him but didn't murder him. Yes. You understood me. Bravo!

    You do need to brush up on the facts, however.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    HHusky said:

    I'm saying that having two strokes is almost certainly evidence that there was an underlying issue that might have killed him in the near future regardless. I don't think it's likely that the strokes just coincidentally occurred within 6 hours of the riots. But I don't want to even attempt to criminalize causing fatal strokes because reasonable doubt is necessarily going to be present.

    I don't think it's likely that the strokes just coincidentally occurred within 6 hours of the riots.


    Feeeeeeeelings, nothing more than feelings.

    Btw, this is the same dumbfuck who "thought" initially that Mike Brown was shot in the back while running away and who later claimed that it was "credible" when people claimed Brown was shot point blank in the head, with his arms in the air.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,057
    edited April 2021
    If there was no evidence he was assaulted, much less battered, then even the next day it's a little hard to connect. I'd agree. Sure, if he were one of my own, I'd wonder if his "bad day at work" was a contributing factor; but he's a cop, I guess, and cops have bad days at work of this sort. Comes with the territory.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,916
    edited April 2021
    SFGbob said:

    creepycoug said:

    I'm a little confused by the thread. Not rhetorically ... actually confused.

    So is the issue with the Trump Bros that the narrative was that the guy died from blows to the head and that was a lie? That's one question, and a fair one.

    And is @HHusky making the point that the beating or whatever happened to the guy is likely linked to the strokes?

    Is there a dispute about whether anything at all happened to him during the siege? Yeah I can look it up but I spend my free time here, so fuck off in advance.

    If nothing physically happened to him, I'd say the link between the siege and a stroke weeks later, while interesting, is attenuated. If he got the ever loving shit beat out of him, w/ or w/o an extinguisher or whatever the fuck it supposedly was, then yeah, that seems like a connection. I'm not a doc, but if you beat the shit out of someone past a given age and they die of a stroke a few weeks later, if it's one of mine I have questions at least.

    Or again, is the issue that none of that matters and that the media jumped the gun?

    There's no evidence that he was assaulted period. He died the next day of stroke not weeks later. Dazzler is a fucking liar. Never believe anything the Dazzler says, you'll be much better off.
    He died the next day. You're right, but you don't comprehend.

    He stroked within a few hours of the insurrection and the evidence is clear that he was assaulted.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    creepycoug said:

    If there was no evidence he was assaulted, much less battered, then even the next day it's a little hard to connect. I'd agree. Sure, if he were one of my own, I'd wonder if his "bad at work" was a contributing factor; but he's a cop, I guess, and cops have bad days at work of this sort. Comes with the territory.

    Pre-existing conditions. No doubt the riot was stressful but there is zero evidence to support the lie Dazzler first pushed about him having his head beat in, and there's no evidence to support Dazzler's later lie that bear spray killed him and no evidence to support that he was ever assaulted.

    Pretty much the hat trick of lies for the Dazzler.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,916
    SFGbob said:

    creepycoug said:

    If there was no evidence he was assaulted, much less battered, then even the next day it's a little hard to connect. I'd agree. Sure, if he were one of my own, I'd wonder if his "bad at work" was a contributing factor; but he's a cop, I guess, and cops have bad days at work of this sort. Comes with the territory.

    Pre-existing conditions. No doubt the riot was stressful but there is zero evidence to support the lie Dazzler first pushed about him having his head beat in, and there's no evidence to support Dazzler's later lie that bear spray killed him and no evidence to support that he was ever assaulted.

    Pretty much the hat trick of lies for the Dazzler.
    Madam, attacking someone with chemical irritants is an assault. You need to educate yourself with some basics.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    creepycoug said:

    If there was no evidence he was assaulted, much less battered, then even the next day it's a little hard to connect. I'd agree. Sure, if he were one of my own, I'd wonder if his "bad at work" was a contributing factor; but he's a cop, I guess, and cops have bad days at work of this sort. Comes with the territory.

    Pre-existing conditions. No doubt the riot was stressful but there is zero evidence to support the lie Dazzler first pushed about him having his head beat in, and there's no evidence to support Dazzler's later lie that bear spray killed him and no evidence to support that he was ever assaulted.

    Pretty much the hat trick of lies for the Dazzler.
    Madam, attacking someone with chemical irritants is an assault. You need to educate yourself with some basics.
    Kunt, there's no evidence that anyone attacked him with chemical irritants. But please keep lying.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,916
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    creepycoug said:

    If there was no evidence he was assaulted, much less battered, then even the next day it's a little hard to connect. I'd agree. Sure, if he were one of my own, I'd wonder if his "bad at work" was a contributing factor; but he's a cop, I guess, and cops have bad days at work of this sort. Comes with the territory.

    Pre-existing conditions. No doubt the riot was stressful but there is zero evidence to support the lie Dazzler first pushed about him having his head beat in, and there's no evidence to support Dazzler's later lie that bear spray killed him and no evidence to support that he was ever assaulted.

    Pretty much the hat trick of lies for the Dazzler.
    Madam, attacking someone with chemical irritants is an assault. You need to educate yourself with some basics.
    Kunt, there's no evidence that anyone attacked him with chemical irritants. But please keep lying.
    sure
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    creepycoug said:

    If there was no evidence he was assaulted, much less battered, then even the next day it's a little hard to connect. I'd agree. Sure, if he were one of my own, I'd wonder if his "bad at work" was a contributing factor; but he's a cop, I guess, and cops have bad days at work of this sort. Comes with the territory.

    Pre-existing conditions. No doubt the riot was stressful but there is zero evidence to support the lie Dazzler first pushed about him having his head beat in, and there's no evidence to support Dazzler's later lie that bear spray killed him and no evidence to support that he was ever assaulted.

    Pretty much the hat trick of lies for the Dazzler.
    Madam, attacking someone with chemical irritants is an assault. You need to educate yourself with some basics.
    Kunt, there's no evidence that anyone attacked him with chemical irritants. But please keep lying.
    sure
    Is there any evidence that chemical irritants caused his death Dazzler? Yes or no?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,916
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    creepycoug said:

    If there was no evidence he was assaulted, much less battered, then even the next day it's a little hard to connect. I'd agree. Sure, if he were one of my own, I'd wonder if his "bad at work" was a contributing factor; but he's a cop, I guess, and cops have bad days at work of this sort. Comes with the territory.

    Pre-existing conditions. No doubt the riot was stressful but there is zero evidence to support the lie Dazzler first pushed about him having his head beat in, and there's no evidence to support Dazzler's later lie that bear spray killed him and no evidence to support that he was ever assaulted.

    Pretty much the hat trick of lies for the Dazzler.
    Madam, attacking someone with chemical irritants is an assault. You need to educate yourself with some basics.
    Kunt, there's no evidence that anyone attacked him with chemical irritants. But please keep lying.
    sure
    Is there any evidence that chemical irritants caused his death Dazzler? Yes or no?
    embarrassed yourself?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    creepycoug said:

    If there was no evidence he was assaulted, much less battered, then even the next day it's a little hard to connect. I'd agree. Sure, if he were one of my own, I'd wonder if his "bad at work" was a contributing factor; but he's a cop, I guess, and cops have bad days at work of this sort. Comes with the territory.

    Pre-existing conditions. No doubt the riot was stressful but there is zero evidence to support the lie Dazzler first pushed about him having his head beat in, and there's no evidence to support Dazzler's later lie that bear spray killed him and no evidence to support that he was ever assaulted.

    Pretty much the hat trick of lies for the Dazzler.
    Madam, attacking someone with chemical irritants is an assault. You need to educate yourself with some basics.
    Kunt, there's no evidence that anyone attacked him with chemical irritants. But please keep lying.
    sure
    Is there any evidence that chemical irritants caused his death Dazzler? Yes or no?
    embarrassed yourself?
    Shocking, the Kunt dodges the question.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,041 Standard Supporter
    creepycoug said:

    TurdBomber said:

    Rather obviously (sounds familiar, don't it?) he had a stressful day at work, might have ingested a little bear spray, but not a lot, went home and had a couple strokes that did him in.

    Press then lied its ass off for weeks, along with dems who exploited the fuck out of "Trumps Goons Beat a Cop to Death with a fire extinquisher! Fucking Hypocrites! They were always on the cops side when they were beating and killing blacks and allies! Fuck You, Trump! Orange Man Bad! Orange Man Bad!"

    The issue is lying liars, the lies they tell and the lying little libs like H who lie and love to be lied to by the lying liars.

    Can I be any clearer?

    So, no evidence he was beaten or struck?
    None. He exerted himself and may have pushed or been pushed some. He apparently caught some bearspray, but not enough to require medical treatment.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,916
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    creepycoug said:

    If there was no evidence he was assaulted, much less battered, then even the next day it's a little hard to connect. I'd agree. Sure, if he were one of my own, I'd wonder if his "bad at work" was a contributing factor; but he's a cop, I guess, and cops have bad days at work of this sort. Comes with the territory.

    Pre-existing conditions. No doubt the riot was stressful but there is zero evidence to support the lie Dazzler first pushed about him having his head beat in, and there's no evidence to support Dazzler's later lie that bear spray killed him and no evidence to support that he was ever assaulted.

    Pretty much the hat trick of lies for the Dazzler.
    Madam, attacking someone with chemical irritants is an assault. You need to educate yourself with some basics.
    Kunt, there's no evidence that anyone attacked him with chemical irritants. But please keep lying.
    sure
    Is there any evidence that chemical irritants caused his death Dazzler? Yes or no?
    embarrassed yourself?
    Shocking, the Kunt dodges the question.
    Not playing your game, blob.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    creepycoug said:

    If there was no evidence he was assaulted, much less battered, then even the next day it's a little hard to connect. I'd agree. Sure, if he were one of my own, I'd wonder if his "bad at work" was a contributing factor; but he's a cop, I guess, and cops have bad days at work of this sort. Comes with the territory.

    Pre-existing conditions. No doubt the riot was stressful but there is zero evidence to support the lie Dazzler first pushed about him having his head beat in, and there's no evidence to support Dazzler's later lie that bear spray killed him and no evidence to support that he was ever assaulted.

    Pretty much the hat trick of lies for the Dazzler.
    Madam, attacking someone with chemical irritants is an assault. You need to educate yourself with some basics.
    Kunt, there's no evidence that anyone attacked him with chemical irritants. But please keep lying.
    sure
    Is there any evidence that chemical irritants caused his death Dazzler? Yes or no?
    embarrassed yourself?
    Shocking, the Kunt dodges the question.
    Not playing your game, blob.
    Yeah, it's just a "game" asking you if he died from being sprayed with chemical irritants. You claimed they "killed" him buy assaulting him with bear spray but when you're asked if there's any evidence that the bear spray killed him, that's just a "game." Fuck off liar.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,916
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    creepycoug said:

    If there was no evidence he was assaulted, much less battered, then even the next day it's a little hard to connect. I'd agree. Sure, if he were one of my own, I'd wonder if his "bad at work" was a contributing factor; but he's a cop, I guess, and cops have bad days at work of this sort. Comes with the territory.

    Pre-existing conditions. No doubt the riot was stressful but there is zero evidence to support the lie Dazzler first pushed about him having his head beat in, and there's no evidence to support Dazzler's later lie that bear spray killed him and no evidence to support that he was ever assaulted.

    Pretty much the hat trick of lies for the Dazzler.
    Madam, attacking someone with chemical irritants is an assault. You need to educate yourself with some basics.
    Kunt, there's no evidence that anyone attacked him with chemical irritants. But please keep lying.
    sure
    Is there any evidence that chemical irritants caused his death Dazzler? Yes or no?
    embarrassed yourself?
    Shocking, the Kunt dodges the question.
    Not playing your game, blob.
    Yeah, it's just a "game" asking you if he died from being sprayed with chemical irritants. You claimed they "killed" him buy assaulting him with bear spray but when you're asked if there's any evidence that the bear spray killed him, that's just a "game." Fuck off liar.
    Don't go away mad.

    Just go away.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    creepycoug said:

    If there was no evidence he was assaulted, much less battered, then even the next day it's a little hard to connect. I'd agree. Sure, if he were one of my own, I'd wonder if his "bad at work" was a contributing factor; but he's a cop, I guess, and cops have bad days at work of this sort. Comes with the territory.

    Pre-existing conditions. No doubt the riot was stressful but there is zero evidence to support the lie Dazzler first pushed about him having his head beat in, and there's no evidence to support Dazzler's later lie that bear spray killed him and no evidence to support that he was ever assaulted.

    Pretty much the hat trick of lies for the Dazzler.
    Madam, attacking someone with chemical irritants is an assault. You need to educate yourself with some basics.
    Kunt, there's no evidence that anyone attacked him with chemical irritants. But please keep lying.
    sure
    Is there any evidence that chemical irritants caused his death Dazzler? Yes or no?
    embarrassed yourself?
    Shocking, the Kunt dodges the question.
    Not playing your game, blob.
    Yeah, it's just a "game" asking you if he died from being sprayed with chemical irritants. You claimed they "killed" him buy assaulting him with bear spray but when you're asked if there's any evidence that the bear spray killed him, that's just a "game." Fuck off liar.
    Don't go away mad.

    Just go away.
    White flag.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,916
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    creepycoug said:

    If there was no evidence he was assaulted, much less battered, then even the next day it's a little hard to connect. I'd agree. Sure, if he were one of my own, I'd wonder if his "bad at work" was a contributing factor; but he's a cop, I guess, and cops have bad days at work of this sort. Comes with the territory.

    Pre-existing conditions. No doubt the riot was stressful but there is zero evidence to support the lie Dazzler first pushed about him having his head beat in, and there's no evidence to support Dazzler's later lie that bear spray killed him and no evidence to support that he was ever assaulted.

    Pretty much the hat trick of lies for the Dazzler.
    Madam, attacking someone with chemical irritants is an assault. You need to educate yourself with some basics.
    Kunt, there's no evidence that anyone attacked him with chemical irritants. But please keep lying.
    sure
    Is there any evidence that chemical irritants caused his death Dazzler? Yes or no?
    embarrassed yourself?
    Shocking, the Kunt dodges the question.
    Not playing your game, blob.
    Yeah, it's just a "game" asking you if he died from being sprayed with chemical irritants. You claimed they "killed" him buy assaulting him with bear spray but when you're asked if there's any evidence that the bear spray killed him, that's just a "game." Fuck off liar.
    Don't go away mad.

    Just go away.
    White flag.
    congrats
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,041 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    creepycoug said:

    If there was no evidence he was assaulted, much less battered, then even the next day it's a little hard to connect. I'd agree. Sure, if he were one of my own, I'd wonder if his "bad at work" was a contributing factor; but he's a cop, I guess, and cops have bad days at work of this sort. Comes with the territory.

    Pre-existing conditions. No doubt the riot was stressful but there is zero evidence to support the lie Dazzler first pushed about him having his head beat in, and there's no evidence to support Dazzler's later lie that bear spray killed him and no evidence to support that he was ever assaulted.

    Pretty much the hat trick of lies for the Dazzler.
    Madam, attacking someone with chemical irritants is an assault. You need to educate yourself with some basics.
    Kunt, there's no evidence that anyone attacked him with chemical irritants. But please keep lying.
    sure
    Is there any evidence that chemical irritants caused his death Dazzler? Yes or no?
    embarrassed yourself?
    Shocking, the Kunt dodges the question.
    Not playing your game, blob.
    Yeah, it's just a "game" asking you if he died from being sprayed with chemical irritants. You claimed they "killed" him buy assaulting him with bear spray but when you're asked if there's any evidence that the bear spray killed him, that's just a "game." Fuck off liar.
    Don't go away mad.

    Just go away.
    Ever heard of a mirror?

    Fuck off, hypocrite.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    creepycoug said:

    If there was no evidence he was assaulted, much less battered, then even the next day it's a little hard to connect. I'd agree. Sure, if he were one of my own, I'd wonder if his "bad at work" was a contributing factor; but he's a cop, I guess, and cops have bad days at work of this sort. Comes with the territory.

    Pre-existing conditions. No doubt the riot was stressful but there is zero evidence to support the lie Dazzler first pushed about him having his head beat in, and there's no evidence to support Dazzler's later lie that bear spray killed him and no evidence to support that he was ever assaulted.

    Pretty much the hat trick of lies for the Dazzler.
    Madam, attacking someone with chemical irritants is an assault. You need to educate yourself with some basics.
    Kunt, there's no evidence that anyone attacked him with chemical irritants. But please keep lying.
    sure
    Is there any evidence that chemical irritants caused his death Dazzler? Yes or no?
    embarrassed yourself?
    Shocking, the Kunt dodges the question.
    Not playing your game, blob.
    Yeah, it's just a "game" asking you if he died from being sprayed with chemical irritants. You claimed they "killed" him buy assaulting him with bear spray but when you're asked if there's any evidence that the bear spray killed him, that's just a "game." Fuck off liar.
    Don't go away mad.

    Just go away.
    White flag.
    congrats
    Imagine being such a fucking Kunt that you claim he was killed because he was sprayed with bear spray, but when you're asked if there is any evidence that bear spray caused his death, you're too big a fucking Kunt to answer.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,057
    I (now vaguely) recall seeing video of someone falling down in a crowd and being beaten or hit with something. I assume this was someone else?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    creepycoug said:

    I (now vaguely) recall seeing video of someone falling down in a crowd and being beaten or hit with something. I assume this was someone else?

    Yes, that was someone else.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter