Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.
Comments
-
The guy from CHiPs?SFGbob said:
Rats are seriously talking about packing the Supreme Court, Dazzler blames the GOP. But trust him, he would have been totally opposed to the Rats blocking a vote on a Judicial nominee if they had the power to do so.HHusky said:
Yes, yes. "You would have done it too!" Always the projection of the fanatic.SFGbob said:
You're a lying sack of shit. If the Rats held the Senate and they did exactly what the GOP did you wouldn't have said a fucking thing about it other than to praise it. You're a fraud and liar Dazzler.HHusky said:
Some of us would have been happy to do things in the traditional manner. The GOP broke that convention. Some Democrats want revenge.SFGbob said:
Fuck off. The GOP never did anything even remotely like this. Telling that Dazzler doesn't criticize the Rats but blames the GOP for what the Rats are now doing.HHusky said:Some traditions are more equal than others.
You girls started this march toward doing whatever you have the raw power to do.
I said you'd get an opposite and equal reaction.
#I_told_you_so
Regrettable, but exactly what I told you would happen.
Doesn't everyone recall the Dazzler OUTRAGE when the Rats did exactly that with Miguel Estrada. Fucking liar and a hack Dazzler. -
None, and they were under no obligation to do so. They didn't violate any rules or policies nor did they have to change any rules or procedures that were available to them. They exercised the already existing power they had.HustlinOwl said:
How much work did the GOP put in to confirm Garland?SFGbob said:Okay to lie and talk about how Republican "stole" the Supreme Court
-
The lying shit show they performed in front of the entire world during the Kavanaugh hearings was as low as one side can get. The procedural non-vote on Garland was nothing.SFGbob said:
Rats are seriously talking about packing the Supreme Court, Dazzler blames the GOP. But trust him, he would have been totally opposed to the Rats blocking a vote on a Judicial nominee if they had the power to do so.HHusky said:
Yes, yes. "You would have done it too!" Always the projection of the fanatic.SFGbob said:
You're a lying sack of shit. If the Rats held the Senate and they did exactly what the GOP did you wouldn't have said a fucking thing about it other than to praise it. You're a fraud and liar Dazzler.HHusky said:
Some of us would have been happy to do things in the traditional manner. The GOP broke that convention. Some Democrats want revenge.SFGbob said:
Fuck off. The GOP never did anything even remotely like this. Telling that Dazzler doesn't criticize the Rats but blames the GOP for what the Rats are now doing.HHusky said:Some traditions are more equal than others.
You girls started this march toward doing whatever you have the raw power to do.
I said you'd get an opposite and equal reaction.
#I_told_you_so
Regrettable, but exactly what I told you would happen.
Doesn't everyone recall the Dazzler OUTRAGE when the Rats did exactly that with Miguel Estrada. Fucking liar and a hack Dazzler. -
Called it!SFGbob said:
None, and they were under no obligation to do so.HustlinOwl said:
How much work did the GOP put in to confirm Garland?SFGbob said:Okay to lie and talk about how Republican "stole" the Supreme Court
That's the standard. -
Called what? That you're a shameless liar and a hack? That's fact was established long ago Dazzler.HHusky said:
Called it!SFGbob said:
None, and they were under no obligation to do so.HustlinOwl said:
How much work did the GOP put in to confirm Garland?SFGbob said:Okay to lie and talk about how Republican "stole" the Supreme Court
That's the standard. -
The baseless Kavanaugh smear was another move that Dazzler applauded and another great example of the Dazzler's shifting standard for proof and evidence.Bendintheriver said:
The lying shit show they performed in front of the entire world during the Kavanaugh hearings was as low as one side can get. The procedural non-vote on Garland was nothing.SFGbob said:
Rats are seriously talking about packing the Supreme Court, Dazzler blames the GOP. But trust him, he would have been totally opposed to the Rats blocking a vote on a Judicial nominee if they had the power to do so.HHusky said:
Yes, yes. "You would have done it too!" Always the projection of the fanatic.SFGbob said:
You're a lying sack of shit. If the Rats held the Senate and they did exactly what the GOP did you wouldn't have said a fucking thing about it other than to praise it. You're a fraud and liar Dazzler.HHusky said:
Some of us would have been happy to do things in the traditional manner. The GOP broke that convention. Some Democrats want revenge.SFGbob said:
Fuck off. The GOP never did anything even remotely like this. Telling that Dazzler doesn't criticize the Rats but blames the GOP for what the Rats are now doing.HHusky said:Some traditions are more equal than others.
You girls started this march toward doing whatever you have the raw power to do.
I said you'd get an opposite and equal reaction.
#I_told_you_so
Regrettable, but exactly what I told you would happen.
Doesn't everyone recall the Dazzler OUTRAGE when the Rats did exactly that with Miguel Estrada. Fucking liar and a hack Dazzler. -
Then vote him down and go to the next person. Intentionally leaving a seat open for over a year isn't necessarily the definition of stealing, but it's pretty fucking close.Goduckies said:
Why waste time when they knew he wasn't going to get confirmed?HustlinOwl said:
How much work did the GOP put in to confirm Garland?SFGbob said:Okay to lie and talk about how Republican "stole" the Supreme Court
-
How is it close? Were the Rats "stealing" Judicial seats when they refused to vote on Bush's nominees? Of course you never once referred to that as "stealing."HustlinOwl said:
Then vote him down and go to the next person. Intentionally leaving a seat open for over a year isn't necessarily the definition of stealing, but it's pretty fucking close.Goduckies said:
Why waste time when they knew he wasn't going to get confirmed?HustlinOwl said:
How much work did the GOP put in to confirm Garland?SFGbob said:Okay to lie and talk about how Republican "stole" the Supreme Court
-
Pretty sure Harry Reid got the ball rolling on that, but you do you, kiddo.HHusky said:Some traditions are more equal than others.
You girls started this march toward doing whatever you have the raw power to do.
I said you'd get an opposite and equal reaction.
#I_told_you_so -
It would be almost the same thing if not completely different.SFGbob said:
How is it close? Were the Rats "stealing" Judicial seats when they refused to vote on Bush's nominees? Of course you never once referred to that as "stealing."HustlinOwl said:
Then vote him down and go to the next person. Intentionally leaving a seat open for over a year isn't necessarily the definition of stealing, but it's pretty fucking close.Goduckies said:
Why waste time when they knew he wasn't going to get confirmed?HustlinOwl said:
How much work did the GOP put in to confirm Garland?SFGbob said:Okay to lie and talk about how Republican "stole" the Supreme Court
In October 2005, George W. Bush nominated Harriet Miers, a corporate attorney from Texas who had served as Bush's private attorney and as White House Counsel, as an Associate Justice to replace retiring Justice Sandra Day O'Connor. Miers was widely perceived as unqualified for the position, and it later emerged that she had allowed her law license to lapse for a time. The nomination was immediately attacked by politicians and commentators from across the political spectrum. At Miers's request, Bush withdrew the nomination on October 27, ostensibly to avoid violating executive privilege by disclosing details of her work at the White House.[47] Four days later, Bush nominated Samuel Alito to the seat. Alito was confirmed by a vote of 58–42 on January 31, 2006.[6]
