Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
UWDoogpound Giving Kim a run for his money...
HeretoBeatmyChest
Member Posts: 4,295
http://www.uwdawgpound.com/2014/7/6/5873675/uwdp-preseason-pac-12-poll
Most of these guys think USC will win the South. I've pasted some of the comments.
Despite the hype behind UCLA, it is hard to see a team in the South that can go toe to toe with the talent still underlying the USC roster. Combined with Sark's innovative up-tempo attack, the Trojans look to be a game or two better than a UCLA team that still lacks consistent offensive line play.
USC has loads of talent, sleeping giant but not anymore. UCLA -- A lot of room between 1 and 2.
Barring injury, USC has enough talent at the skill positions to be very effective offensively, and will probably boast the best defense in the conference. UCLA is too unsettled on the offensive line (Brett Hundley just got sacked again) and ASU has lost too much on defense to take another step forward.
I like USC. I think Steve Sarkisian running the style he did at UW with that level of talent is going to just steamroll a lot of teams -- maybe everybody in the South provided they can get lucky with health. I think UCLA is good, but not the top-everything hype the media has been giving them (they haven't beaten either Stanford or Oregon since 2008, and they're going to win (probably) 3 games against those schools and get to the playoff all of a sudden? Please.). They're a three loss team (minimum) this year with that schedule.
Most of these guys think USC will win the South. I've pasted some of the comments.
Despite the hype behind UCLA, it is hard to see a team in the South that can go toe to toe with the talent still underlying the USC roster. Combined with Sark's innovative up-tempo attack, the Trojans look to be a game or two better than a UCLA team that still lacks consistent offensive line play.
USC has loads of talent, sleeping giant but not anymore. UCLA -- A lot of room between 1 and 2.
Barring injury, USC has enough talent at the skill positions to be very effective offensively, and will probably boast the best defense in the conference. UCLA is too unsettled on the offensive line (Brett Hundley just got sacked again) and ASU has lost too much on defense to take another step forward.
I like USC. I think Steve Sarkisian running the style he did at UW with that level of talent is going to just steamroll a lot of teams -- maybe everybody in the South provided they can get lucky with health. I think UCLA is good, but not the top-everything hype the media has been giving them (they haven't beaten either Stanford or Oregon since 2008, and they're going to win (probably) 3 games against those schools and get to the playoff all of a sudden? Please.). They're a three loss team (minimum) this year with that schedule.
Comments
-
UCLA is gonna rape USC, el oh elllll
-
Oh wow
-
Doogs gonna doog.
-
Calling his offense 'innovative' is an assault on journalism, football and the dictionary.
-
more time sighting! At the bottom.
wait... I thought he was taking time away to be with family? -
Boobs and Harv are his familydhdawg said:more time sighting! At the bottom.
wait... I thought he was taking time away to be with family?
-
Hurry-Up offense is a total waste with SC's talent....it's like the guys using ribeye's for their cheesesteaks.
-
It's personal with them too. They all said that they thought Sark was an average coach but were just defending him because of the "blind hatred for Sark." Now they're picking him to win the South.
-
Imagine how good USC offense would have been under Carroll if Sark innovative genius had been there at the time!!!!1!
-
Sounds like a lot of you guys forgot about 0-12...
-
All I know is He_Needs_More_CockusPurpleJ said: -
What? USC has a great chance of winning the South and the athletes to beat Oregon. Until Hundley consistently plays well, and UCLA finds some skill players (Shaq Evans was only one) Lucien and Payton are garbage. The leaping mexican TE is good though.
-
disagreepuppylove_sugarsteel said:What? USC has a great chance of winning the South and the athletes to beat Oregon. Until Hundley consistently plays well, and UCLA finds some skill players (Shaq Evans was only one) Lucien and Payton are garbage. The leaping mexican TE is good though.
-
More_cockus would have jumped all over that post.
-
I didn't realize that the bubble screen was innovative offense
-
"Innovative". Chip Kelly would get a real chuckle out of that one.
-
I'm going to repeat myself for the 30th time so bear with me, but Sark's innovative offense couldn't get the ball over the Notre Dame 1 yard line 14 plays in a row with Chris Polk and Jake Locker in the backfield.
-
He had four good chuckles already (43–19, 53–16, 34–17, 52–21).RaccoonHarry said:"Innovative". Chip Kelly would get a real chuckle out of that one.
-
You can't expect to run the ball with the grass as long as it is at ND Stadium.Meek said:
I'm going to repeat myself for the 30th time so bear with me, but Sark's innovative offense couldn't get the ball over the Notre Dame 1 yard line 14 plays in a row with Chris Polk and Jake Locker in the backfield.
-
Notre Dame has mystique. Ironically, that's the name of the stripper that Sark fucked the night before the game.
-
Not to mention the parallaxHuskyJW said:
You can't expect to run the ball with the grass as long as it is at ND Stadium.
Meek said:I'm going to repeat myself for the 30th time so bear with me, but Sark's innovative offense couldn't get the ball over the Notre Dame 1 yard line 14 plays in a row with Chris Polk and Jake Locker in the backfield.
-
What amazes me is how so many of the idiots that have watched Sark for 5 years and those in the national media haven't figured out the myth that is SC.
Does SC have talent? Absolutely. But they've also had talent the last 2 years under Kiffie and I'm not convinced that Kiffie is that much better/worse off than Sark. I'm still trying to figure out why Saban wanted anything to do with Kiffie ... but that's a whole different topic.
SC's biggest problem through their "probation" hasn't been that they've lacked talent ... it's that they've lacked depth.
The biggest thing that a "big school" can do is that they can line up 1-85 on their roster and just constantly rotate players in/out of the game because often the drop off from the starters to backups isn't THAT noticeable. Take that to how a mediocre .500 team looks (say the 2009 Huskies) where you might have some solid front line players but there was a massive drop once injuries or fatigue hit.
SC hasn't had that depth the last few years and they certainly aren't going to have much more this year. On top of that, if you look at the class that Sark signed in his first class, he basically picked the low hanging fruit that he was establishing as the UW class and convinced them to go to SC so that he could get early momentum and that all important free pub.
And as for UCLA, last I checked they abused SC last season 35-14 and beat them the year before that 38-28. Sark hasn't beat Mora yet either. So until Sark/SC can figure out how to beat UCLA, the kings of LA at the moment is UCLA. -
A lot of
peopletwisters are seriously underestimating the effects of UPTEMPO offense and BUBBLE SCREENS and LAWNMOWER DANCES!!!11!! LOL have you forgotten about owen twelve??!!
That's what I thought. -
It's too bad owen biddle didn't wear the number 12.
-
lolMeek said:I'm going to repeat myself for the 30th time so bear with me, but Sark's innovative offense couldn't get the ball over the Notre Dame 1 yard line 14 plays in a row with Chris Polk and Jake Locker in the backfield.
that's right
and doogs blamed the officiating, not the coaching staff that couldn't move the ball one fucking yard on eight (!) consecutive plays, despite an offense littered with NFL athletes.
-
I often wonder who uses a bigger butt plug, Kim, or the faggots at ButtPound.
-
I think I had a drunk convo with someone who posts at the doogpound, it went along the lines lke this.
Doog: "I like the Petersen hire but was excited to see what Sark was going to do next"
Me: "Same as always, 5-4 in conference, probably gets 9 wins due to the shitty OOC schedule, and plays in a pointless bowel game".
Doog: "You can't tell me he didn't improve every season though"
Me: "He didn't though, 7-6 = 7-6 = 7-6. 5-4 = 5-4 =5-4 =5-4"
Doog: "It doesn't matter, he isn't our coach anymore, we just need to win... and beat Oregon this year! Pete better get that done"
Me: "Sark got royally butt fucked by Oregon every year, how come those standards only apply now?"
Doog: "Yea but still" -
Good question. Are you measuring size in terms of diameter or length? Or both? And if using diameter, would you just compare the final diameter, or the starting size as well? I assume the amount of taper varies significantly by model, so some plugs may start out relatively small, but end up being quite large.Swaye said:I often wonder who uses a bigger butt plug, Kim, or the faggots at ButtPound.
