Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Meet the 2013 Tennessee Titans

123468

Comments

  • IrishDawg22
    IrishDawg22 Member Posts: 2,754
    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    IrishDawg22 said:

    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    IrishDawg22 said:

    DerekJohnson said:

    Anyone who is truly attempting to argue that Jake was an above average quarterback is too dense to argue with.

    I bet every opposing head coach that went up against Jake would rate him above average as a COLLEGE QB.

    But once again I will defer to your knowledge because I am sure you have a better handle on the game then most coaches.
    Damn I forgot to put this in my doog myths topic. Whenever a Doog can't argue his point using facts he'll passively aggressively mock you by stating "what do you know? Are you a head coach or GM? Yea that's what I thought".
    Do you follow Nascar? I usually only see this high level drafting at Daga or Daytona? Sure hope some of the top posters don't stop quickly, because your head is going to be inserted in a painful position.

    Please, just 1 original thought. If you quit following along like a Zombie and repeating talking points, you just might stumble upon one.
    You've repeated every line from the Doog script. You even resorted to calling out a poster for not being an NFL GM when you couldn't respond to his facts.

    Your level of pressing is exactly why banning Harv was stupid.
    Hold the phone. So, when I express my opinion I am "too dense to argue with". Yet when I challenge that person's football knowledge I am using the "Doog handbook".

    And I have provided more stats than anyone in this thread.

    Nice job with the talking points.

    Thanks for proving my point about the original thought. But it's much easier just to call someone a Doog an move on. That is really clever.

    Maybe you should quit trying to ride the coattails of others.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    IrishDawg22 said:

    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    IrishDawg22 said:

    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    IrishDawg22 said:

    DerekJohnson said:

    Anyone who is truly attempting to argue that Jake was an above average quarterback is too dense to argue with.

    I bet every opposing head coach that went up against Jake would rate him above average as a COLLEGE QB.

    But once again I will defer to your knowledge because I am sure you have a better handle on the game then most coaches.
    Damn I forgot to put this in my doog myths topic. Whenever a Doog can't argue his point using facts he'll passively aggressively mock you by stating "what do you know? Are you a head coach or GM? Yea that's what I thought".
    Do you follow Nascar? I usually only see this high level drafting at Daga or Daytona? Sure hope some of the top posters don't stop quickly, because your head is going to be inserted in a painful position.

    Please, just 1 original thought. If you quit following along like a Zombie and repeating talking points, you just might stumble upon one.
    You've repeated every line from the Doog script. You even resorted to calling out a poster for not being an NFL GM when you couldn't respond to his facts.

    Your level of pressing is exactly why banning Harv was stupid.
    Hold the phone. So, when I express my opinion I am "too dense to argue with". Yet when I challenge that person's football knowledge I am using the "Doog handbook".

    And I have provided more stats than anyone in this thread.

    Nice job with the talking points.

    Thanks for proving my point about the original thought. But it's much easier just to call someone a Doog an move on. That is really clever.

    Maybe you should quit trying to ride the coattails of others.
    Challenging a person's knowledge because they never coached or GMed is a classic Doog move. Idiots on Doogman have done that for over a decade straight now.

    Unless you're a GM of a NFL team, you have no right to justify the stupidity of wasting a top ten pick on Lockner.

    You provided a lot of cherrypicked stats that are all neatly summarized in one standard stat that you didn't like. Impressive if I compare you to a typical poster of your ilk, but that's like comparing Sark to Ty.

    Jake is a legend because the media and fans wanted him to be, even though the black quarterback before him was just as good as he was and the black quarterback after him is significantly better.

    The best part about guilty white Seattle liberals is how racist they actually are.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TommySQC
    TommySQC Member Posts: 5,813
    Listen to the god damn mick unless you want your car bombed
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • IrishDawg22
    IrishDawg22 Member Posts: 2,754
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    IrishDawg22 said:

    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    IrishDawg22 said:

    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    IrishDawg22 said:

    DerekJohnson said:

    Anyone who is truly attempting to argue that Jake was an above average quarterback is too dense to argue with.

    I bet every opposing head coach that went up against Jake would rate him above average as a COLLEGE QB.

    But once again I will defer to your knowledge because I am sure you have a better handle on the game then most coaches.
    Damn I forgot to put this in my doog myths topic. Whenever a Doog can't argue his point using facts he'll passively aggressively mock you by stating "what do you know? Are you a head coach or GM? Yea that's what I thought".
    Do you follow Nascar? I usually only see this high level drafting at Daga or Daytona? Sure hope some of the top posters don't stop quickly, because your head is going to be inserted in a painful position.

    Please, just 1 original thought. If you quit following along like a Zombie and repeating talking points, you just might stumble upon one.
    You've repeated every line from the Doog script. You even resorted to calling out a poster for not being an NFL GM when you couldn't respond to his facts.

    Your level of pressing is exactly why banning Harv was stupid.
    Hold the phone. So, when I express my opinion I am "too dense to argue with". Yet when I challenge that person's football knowledge I am using the "Doog handbook".

    And I have provided more stats than anyone in this thread.

    Nice job with the talking points.

    Thanks for proving my point about the original thought. But it's much easier just to call someone a Doog an move on. That is really clever.

    Maybe you should quit trying to ride the coattails of others.
    Challenging a person's knowledge because they never coached or GMed is a classic Doog move. Idiots on Doogman have done that for over a decade straight now.

    Unless you're a GM of a NFL team, you have no right to justify the stupidity of wasting a top ten pick on Lockner.

    You provided a lot of cherrypicked stats that are all neatly summarized in one standard stat that you didn't like. Impressive if I compare you to a typical poster of your ilk, but that's like comparing Sark to Ty.

    Jake is a legend because the media and fans wanted him to be, even though the black quarterback before him was just as good as he was and the black quarterback after him is significantly better.

    The best part about guilty white Seattle liberals is how racist they actually are.
    Try and keep up.

    Step 1 = "I am to dense to argue with" because I have a different opinion of Jake

    Step 2 = I fire back with a GM comment because his opinion must be the only one that matters

    Step 3 = I am a Doog

    Step 4 = repeat step 1

    Got it!!!!

    This is getting comical. Now the racism card.

    Sure you don't work for Obummer???

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Houhusky
    Houhusky Member Posts: 5,537
    edited July 2013
    Fuck all this metrics, efficiency, or rushing numbers... They are nice but this is getting way to complicated...There is one very easy thing to look at that shows just how meh of a QB Jack is/was... his winning percentage in college

    Here are a few... you will notice Jack seems to lag behind somewhat

    Drew Brees - 65%
    Tom Brady - 88%
    Peyton Manning - 77%
    Eli Manning - 64%
    Ben Roethlisberger - 71%
    Philip Rivers - 71%
    Matt Ryan- 79%
    Joe Flacco - 62%
    Aaron Rodgers - 75%
    Carson Palmer - 63%
    Sam Bradford 77%
    Matt Schaub - 66%
    Andrew Luck - 79%
    Russell Wilson - 60%
    Colin Kaepernick - 63%
    RG3 - 50%


    Jack Lockner - 23%

    Winners fucking win, Great or good college QBs made for the NFL win games regardless shitty coaching, weather, altitude, bad OLs, or shitty WRs. AllJayAllCutler is likely the only other starting QB in the NFL with a similarly poor record and he sucks.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    Houhusky said:

    Fuck all this metrics, efficiency, or rushing numbers... They are nice but this is getting way to complicated...There is one very easy thing to look at that shows just how meh of a QB Jack is/was... his winning percentage in college

    Here are a few... you will notice Jack seems to lag behind somewhat

    Drew Brees - 65%
    Tom Brady - 50%
    Peyton Manning - 77%
    Eli Manning - 64%
    Ben Roethlisberger - 71%
    Philip Rivers - 71%
    Matt Ryan- 79%
    Joe Flacco - 62%
    Aaron Rodgers - 75%
    Carson Palmer - 63%
    Sam Bradford 77%
    Matt Schaub - 66%
    Andrew Luck - 79%
    Russell Wilson - 60%
    Colin Kaepernick - 63%
    RG3 - 50%


    Jack Lockner - 23%

    Winners fucking win, Great or good college QBs made for the NFL win games regardless shitty coaching, weather, altitude, bad OLs, or shitty WRs. AllJayAllCutler is likely the only other starting QB in the NFL with a similarly poor record and he sucks.

    I'm going to have to disagree. There is plenty of QB's who won games in college who turned out to be shitty.

    On the flip side John Elway had a shitty W-L. Bledsoe had a shitty W-L as well. So I don't know if I buy that as the predictor.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,437 Standard Supporter
    edited July 2013
    There's no way Tom Brady won only 50% of his games in college. He was basically a two year starter (I know Henson made a few starts as well) and Michigan went 10-3 and 10-2 in those two years (98 & 99). I can't find how many games Brady started but he attempted way more passes than Henson, so I am assuming he started the vast majority of them.

    http://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/tom-brady-1.html
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    RoadDawg55 said:

    There's no way Tom Brady won only 50% of his games in college. He was basically a two year starter (I know Henson made a few starts as well) and Michigan went 10-3 and 10-2 in those two years (98 & 99). I can't find how many games Brady started but he attempted way more passes than Henson, so I am assuming he started the vast majority of them.

    http://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/tom-brady-1.html

    Yea I was going to say that as well. Why I highlighted it hoping someone with a computer would post his actual W-L.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Houhusky
    Houhusky Member Posts: 5,537
    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    There's no way Tom Brady won only 50% of his games in college. He was basically a two year starter (I know Henson made a few starts as well) and Michigan went 10-3 and 10-2 in those two years (98 & 99). I can't find how many games Brady started but he attempted way more passes than Henson, so I am assuming he started the vast majority of them.

    http://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/tom-brady-1.html

    Yea I was going to say that as well. Why I highlighted it hoping someone with a computer would post his actual W-L.
    you guys are correct about Tom Brady, Typo...
    1998 - 10-3
    1997 - 12-0

    88%




    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter