Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Marcus Tshsthsthonis couch sale

Who's next?
Dude on dawgman showed a convo with Marjon Beauchamp's dad claiming 7 more guys (including MT) entering the portal
«1

Comments

  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,098
    He’ll do fine in the MWC or WCC

    He can play in the P12 but he’s also pretty soft defensively
  • Edwin_Bambino
    Edwin_Bambino Member Posts: 2,944
    It will at least be interesting to see how the roster is constructed next year, none of those guys are must keeps. Roster full of random portal guys and Bajema and Bey literally can’t be any worse than what we’ve watched the last two years.
  • Edwin_Bambino
    Edwin_Bambino Member Posts: 2,944
    @Shenexon it would be chill if you guys could hire Hop back now, just saying.
  • BroadcastingDawg
    BroadcastingDawg Member Posts: 1,519
    edited March 2021
    Tsohonis and Battle would bum me out... the rest, who cares?

    Also, I'm pretty sure Hamier has no eligibility other than grad transferring... and who would take him? He fucking blows.

    Edit: Ah I guess there's an extra year of eligibility cause of Covid... welp... I hope Wright moves on anyway.
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    I’d rather keep the roster and lose Hop than lose the roster and keep Hop.
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,098
    dnc said:

    I’d rather keep the roster and lose Hop than lose the roster and keep Hop.

    Couldn’t disagree more

    Some of the guys leaving could be decent P12 role players maybe but nobody in that group is a difference maker ... I suspect most will drop at least one level of a conference

    This is effectively gutting the roster for the next coach which IMO is preferable to the next coach having to come in and burn bridges step 1
  • huskyhooligan
    huskyhooligan Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 5,938 Swaye's Wigwam
    So based on that list returners would be:

    Bey
    Bajema
    Sorn
    Green - Maybe re covid

    Then add
    Grant
    Penn

    I imagine there will be a late edition or two.

    I'd personally like to see Battle return, his ceiling is still high.
    I'd like to see Tshonis return as well. I like his moxy.

    I never thought Brooks was a high P5 guy. Never understood the hype.
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    Tequilla said:

    dnc said:

    I’d rather keep the roster and lose Hop than lose the roster and keep Hop.

    Couldn’t disagree more

    Some of the guys leaving could be decent P12 role players maybe but nobody in that group is a difference maker ... I suspect most will drop at least one level of a conference

    This is effectively gutting the roster for the next coach which IMO is preferable to the next coach having to come in and burn bridges step 1
    These kids aren’t being run off they’re abandoning this sinking ship.

    If Hop could recruit it would be one thing. He can’t.

    He’s going to replace them with even worse players.
  • Quietcowskee
    Quietcowskee Member Posts: 4,224 Standard Supporter
    So...is Beauchamp coming?
  • OreDawg
    OreDawg Member Posts: 673
    dnc said:

    Tequilla said:

    dnc said:

    I’d rather keep the roster and lose Hop than lose the roster and keep Hop.

    Couldn’t disagree more

    Some of the guys leaving could be decent P12 role players maybe but nobody in that group is a difference maker ... I suspect most will drop at least one level of a conference

    This is effectively gutting the roster for the next coach which IMO is preferable to the next coach having to come in and burn bridges step 1
    These kids aren’t being run off they’re abandoning this sinking ship.

    If Hop could recruit it would be one thing. He can’t.

    He’s going to replace them with even worse players.
    I agree to a point, but I've seen pretty awful teams have way less attrition though. Some might be jumping ship, but some are probably also being told it would be better for them to leave. Hop recruited pretty well until like a year and a half ago. I bet he's got some slime ball connections that can get us a few decent transfers. Still going to finish 9-12 next year in the conference, Jen is just delaying the inevitable.
  • Quietcowskee
    Quietcowskee Member Posts: 4,224 Standard Supporter
    OreDawg said:

    dnc said:

    Tequilla said:

    dnc said:

    I’d rather keep the roster and lose Hop than lose the roster and keep Hop.

    Couldn’t disagree more

    Some of the guys leaving could be decent P12 role players maybe but nobody in that group is a difference maker ... I suspect most will drop at least one level of a conference

    This is effectively gutting the roster for the next coach which IMO is preferable to the next coach having to come in and burn bridges step 1
    These kids aren’t being run off they’re abandoning this sinking ship.

    If Hop could recruit it would be one thing. He can’t.

    He’s going to replace them with even worse players.
    I agree to a point, but I've seen pretty awful teams have way less attrition though. Some might be jumping ship, but some are probably also being told it would be better for them to leave. Hop recruited pretty well until like a year and a half ago. I bet he's got some slime ball connections that can get us a few decent transfers. Still going to finish 9-12 next year in the conference, Jen is just delaying the inevitable.
    Yep. This is the “hire Michael Porter Sr.” period of his coaching arc.
  • BroadcastingDawg
    BroadcastingDawg Member Posts: 1,519

    Tsohonis and Battle would bum me out... the rest, who cares?

    Also, I'm pretty sure Hamier has no eligibility other than grad transferring... and who would take him? He fucking blows.

    Edit: Ah I guess there's an extra year of eligibility cause of Covid... welp... I hope Wright moves on anyway.

    SEVEN rumored transfers. Five you don’t care about and two would mildly bum you out.

    And the person responsible for that roster should get another year?
    And you sit here and bitch about something you know isn't going to happen.
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,098
    dnc said:

    Tequilla said:

    dnc said:

    I’d rather keep the roster and lose Hop than lose the roster and keep Hop.

    Couldn’t disagree more

    Some of the guys leaving could be decent P12 role players maybe but nobody in that group is a difference maker ... I suspect most will drop at least one level of a conference

    This is effectively gutting the roster for the next coach which IMO is preferable to the next coach having to come in and burn bridges step 1
    These kids aren’t being run off they’re abandoning this sinking ship.

    If Hop could recruit it would be one thing. He can’t.

    He’s going to replace them with even worse players.
    They can be leaving for any given reason ... leaving Hop is as good of a reason as any.

    But for your argument to hold and mine to be wrong, you'd be betting on these players finding themselves playing meaningful roles at peer programs. I don't know if you're going to find that.

    Honestly at this point, I'm not sure if I care if Hop can bring in transfers that turn things around next year or falls on his face in a way that makes his firing this time next year a formality.

    But I'm also not going to sit and act like everybody leaving the program is a huge loss ...

    When Ty Jones, Puka, and Chincredible left the program, we've been really quick to call out the losses. We seem to forget that Jones went to Fresno and Chin went to Sacramento St. Puka leaving appears to have as much to do with external factors as anything and both him and his brother went to BYU. In all cases, they left to play at lower levels.

    Then compare the players that were brought in to football being highly rated guys coming from major programs.

    I think one thing people need to get used to is that the transfer portal is as much about solving your misses in past recruiting as it is players looking for new opportunities. I don't know as a coach if I'd be active in pushing a player to the portal per se. I would tell him what I their role on the team next year being. If that's not acceptable then I'm ok with the player entering the portal. And as soon as the player hits the portal, as far as I'm concerned, if I'm not actively trying to retain that player, then it's don't let the door hit you on the way out.

    Sorry not sorry.
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,098
    dnc said:
    Hameir Wright: Assuming he wants to continue playing, I see moving back closer to his home and playing either mid-tier or lower Big East (UConn, Providence) or perhaps A-10 (Dayton, Bonnies, etc)

    Nate Roberts: Similar type of deal as Wright. He's a role/bench player for a higher end conference team and maybe he heads back to DC to play with Georgetown. Instead, I could see him being a guy that drops down to play MAAC (someone that maybe Pitino take a shot on at Iona) or the CAA where his size/athleticism will be a stark contrast against most of the other players.

    Erik Stevenson: This will be 3 schools in 3 years which just screams someone that thinks higher of his abilities than what they really are. He likely views himself as a high end scorer and will be looking for spots where he can do so. I could see him landing at a mid-tier WCC team or perhaps a MWC team like Boise. High end for him would be coming in as a 6th man type player for a San Diego St, Nevada, etc.

    Nate Pryor: I see him as a Big Sky player at best. Could see him dropping down to play for Seattle U.

    Jarran Brooks: Similar to Pryor in that he's probably in the Big Sky or Seattle U caliber.

    Marcus Tsohonis: I think I mentioned previously that I can see him being a very good player for a WCC or Big West team. I think he's good enough to get away playing in the MWC. Frankly, he's not tough enough to play P5.

    Raequan Battle: He's absolutely a guy that could head to a WCC, Big Sky, or Big West program and become a volume scorer if he can figure out what a good shot is ... which will help him find consistency.

    So of the 7 players leaving the program, I'd be shocked if 4 of them ended up playing anywhere close to a high major level. The only one that I'd bet on is Wright as he's got a track record of being a role player that can play on a decent squad being supported by good players around them. Perhaps Stevenson gets a bit. Tsohonis could get a bite but I think he needs to go somewhere and play before considering a move back to a high major level.

    All in all, you can see why this team wasn't good ... when it comes to finding a destination for them they are a bunch of role players at best, none are difference makers, and trying to find a landing spot almost assuredly results in a level or multi-level drop.
  • FremontTroll
    FremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744

    Tsohonis and Battle would bum me out... the rest, who cares?

    Also, I'm pretty sure Hamier has no eligibility other than grad transferring... and who would take him? He fucking blows.

    Edit: Ah I guess there's an extra year of eligibility cause of Covid... welp... I hope Wright moves on anyway.

    SEVEN rumored transfers. Five you don’t care about and two would mildly bum you out.

    And the person responsible for that roster should get another year?
    And you sit here and bitch about something you know isn't going to happen.
    And you actively campaign in support of something you know won’t work.
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    Tequilla said:



    But for your argument to hold and mine to be wrong, you'd be betting on these players finding themselves playing meaningful roles at peer programs. I don't know if you're going to find that.

    Bullshit. All I said is I'd rather lose the shit coach than the shit roster. By your convoluted reasoning for your argument to hold you've have to be betting on Hop to find a HC job at a peer program.

    We both know that ain't happening.
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,098
    In a perfect world Hop gets fired ... nobody is arguing that point.

    Reality is that he's not getting fired because we're not buying him out.

    So we end up losing players that are dead weight on the roster next year, the year after, etc.

    I'd rather Hop is cleaning out those players than the next guy
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    Tequilla said:

    In a perfect world Hop gets fired ... nobody is arguing that point.

    This whole subthread has been you arguing how you "Couldn’t disagree more" with the idea better to lose Hop than the players but sure.gif.
  • bananasnblondes
    bananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,511
    My biggest fear is that Hop scraps together a group that wins a couple big games, ends up like 6th or 7th in the Pac and gets into the NIT or something.

    Then all the Doog Fains of the world go full court press on "this team is making progress. You can't throw all this away now. He deserves at least 2, probably 3 more years and Jen Cohen knows that."
  • ReignMan
    ReignMan Member Posts: 217
    Hop burns this kids redshirt because he had no clue if his starting point guard was going to class or not because he was to busy high fiving and hugging his players, like a good asst. coach would do. Then this year he sits him, plays him, sits him, plays him.

    This is such a joke, its so obvious what has to happen and we just get to watch it spiral out of control. Can you imagine the season ticket count next year, will make the buyout look cheap.