Kobe Bitch
Comments
-
If you could read, you'd already know the answer.TheKobeStopper said:
Oh wow, so cool. Where are these 4th gen plants in use?TurdBomber said:
4th Generation Nuclear plants consume their own waste on-site, thereby reducing the net generated waste footprint to zero.TheKobeStopper said:
Renewables would create more jobs. Why would we choose to go down the path that has more serious risks, creates nuclear waste and doesn’t create enough jobs?Bob_C said:Kobe, why no nuclear?
But you have to read above a 4th grade level to know this, APAG.
In the same vein, where is a major city powered only by wind and solar, APAG? -
Kobe taking it to the twatters? Must have forgot to take his midol.
-
Guy is a complete lying piece of shit. What makes him worse is what a fucking coward he is. He'll smear you with his lies and when you call him on it and ask him to back up his mouth with some evidence that you ever said what he claims you said, he runs and hides like a Kunt.Tequilla said:If you’re going to try to come after me on Twitter ... get your fucking facts straight
Absolutely NOTHING that you accuse me of is even remotely close to accurate -
I don't hear anyone seriously denying outright that climate change exists. What I see is nuance, legitimate questions as to causation and proportion of it that is caused by human activity, etc.
What I also see daily is the complete laziness of people like APAG who have not read the Green New Deal and do not understand how little it actually addresses climate change, versus how chock full of race-baiting and divisive bullshit it is, under the guise of equity, as though the white man is the root cause of any and all forms of pollution, climate change, environmental destruction and exploitation, and therefore must be dethroned and replaced by BIPOC people who's spiritual connection to the Earth is superior in every way, which will rightfully lead humanity back to the agrarian, organic, utopian world where people can return to mass starvation, diseases like polio and malaria, and all those other organic trappings that created such a perfect harmonious world before whitey came along and ruined it all. -
What are you talking about? If 97% isn't a consensus then you need to be forced onto a train.LebamDawg said:I am not a weather specialist nor do I claim to know anything about the detailed content of the atmosphere and how each element affects the weather. How much do humans impact the weather/climate is all a mystery to me.
What I disagree with is "a consensus of" being the determining factor in totally changing our? economy. Joining in with the Paris Accords that set guide lines that cost the US and does nothing to the other nations that join but do nothing that the accord outlined.
Follow the money and the actual estimates of the impact these changes would make. It is more like trying to pick the fly shit out of the pepper.
Climate change is not a proven science it is a best guess. Too many politicians world wide are making too much money off this science -
You mean like all the semen swallowers of Black Lives Matter who never got past the trademarked slogan and actually read that Marxist group’s manifesto and the felons behind it?TurdBomber said:I don't hear anyone seriously denying outright that climate change exists. What I see is nuance, legitimate questions as to causation and proportion of it that is caused by human activity, etc.
What I also see daily is the complete laziness of people like APAG who have not read the Green New Deal and do not understand how little it actually addresses climate change, versus how chock full of race-baiting and divisive bullshit it is, under the guise of equity, as though the white man is the root cause of any and all forms of pollution, climate change, environmental destruction and exploitation, and therefore must be dethroned and replaced by BIPOC people who's spiritual connection to the Earth is superior in every way, which will rightfully lead humanity back to the agrarian, organic, utopian world where people can return to mass starvation, diseases like polio and malaria, and all those other organic trappings that created such a perfect harmonious world before whitey came along and ruined it all.
-
Posted this dozens of times. 12,000 years ago Chicago was under a mile of ice. Happened many times in the past. Now it isn't. Not one leftard wants to deal with this most basic fact. Human CO2 emissions had nothing to do with it. Just like asking a leftard how much should the US spend on reducing CO2 emissions and what will it accomplish. Toss in the non-serious proposed solutions, none of which entail nukes or shipping US LNG to Asia. Case closed.TurdBomber said:I don't hear anyone seriously denying outright that climate change exists. What I see is nuance, legitimate questions as to causation and proportion of it that is caused by human activity, etc.
What I also see daily is the complete laziness of people like APAG who have not read the Green New Deal and do not understand how little it actually addresses climate change, versus how chock full of race-baiting and divisive bullshit it is, under the guise of equity, as though the white man is the root cause of any and all forms of pollution, climate change, environmental destruction and exploitation, and therefore must be dethroned and replaced by BIPOC people who's spiritual connection to the Earth is superior in every way, which will rightfully lead humanity back to the agrarian, organic, utopian world where people can return to mass starvation, diseases like polio and malaria, and all those other organic trappings that created such a perfect harmonious world before whitey came along and ruined it all. -
But I hear Chinese solar panels are cheap, easy to install, get you tax credits, and can power your car to go 11 miles after half a day in the sun.WestlinnDuck said:
Posted this dozens of times. 12,000 years ago Chicago was under a mile of ice. Happened many times in the past. Now it isn't. Not one leftard wants to deal with this most basic fact. Human CO2 emissions had nothing to do with it. Just like asking a leftard how much should the US spend on reducing CO2 emissions and what will it accomplish. Toss in the non-serious proposed solutions, none of which entail nukes or shipping US LNG to Asia. Case closed.TurdBomber said:I don't hear anyone seriously denying outright that climate change exists. What I see is nuance, legitimate questions as to causation and proportion of it that is caused by human activity, etc.
What I also see daily is the complete laziness of people like APAG who have not read the Green New Deal and do not understand how little it actually addresses climate change, versus how chock full of race-baiting and divisive bullshit it is, under the guise of equity, as though the white man is the root cause of any and all forms of pollution, climate change, environmental destruction and exploitation, and therefore must be dethroned and replaced by BIPOC people who's spiritual connection to the Earth is superior in every way, which will rightfully lead humanity back to the agrarian, organic, utopian world where people can return to mass starvation, diseases like polio and malaria, and all those other organic trappings that created such a perfect harmonious world before whitey came along and ruined it all. -
No scientist has ever said how much man contributes to climate change. Is it 50? Okay, then I'll bike more. If it's two percent, fuck off. I'm not going to take it that seriously until someone does.
Kobeslobber and other SJWs just ignore and deflect. -
We aren’t not dealing with the fact, we think it’s laughably stupid. Hey guys, did you know a meteor caused the climate to change 12,000 years ago therefore humans can’t cause climate change?WestlinnDuck said:
Posted this dozens of times. 12,000 years ago Chicago was under a mile of ice. Happened many times in the past. Now it isn't. Not one leftard wants to deal with this most basic fact. Human CO2 emissions had nothing to do with it. Just like asking a leftard how much should the US spend on reducing CO2 emissions and what will it accomplish. Toss in the non-serious proposed solutions, none of which entail nukes or shipping US LNG to Asia. Case closed.TurdBomber said:I don't hear anyone seriously denying outright that climate change exists. What I see is nuance, legitimate questions as to causation and proportion of it that is caused by human activity, etc.
What I also see daily is the complete laziness of people like APAG who have not read the Green New Deal and do not understand how little it actually addresses climate change, versus how chock full of race-baiting and divisive bullshit it is, under the guise of equity, as though the white man is the root cause of any and all forms of pollution, climate change, environmental destruction and exploitation, and therefore must be dethroned and replaced by BIPOC people who's spiritual connection to the Earth is superior in every way, which will rightfully lead humanity back to the agrarian, organic, utopian world where people can return to mass starvation, diseases like polio and malaria, and all those other organic trappings that created such a perfect harmonious world before whitey came along and ruined it all.
The air quality changed long before humans existed, therefore, humans can’t change the quality of the air.
Earthquakes happened long before humans existed, therefore, humans can’t cause earthquake.
You’re educationally sub-normal.
