Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Trump Acquitted.
Comments
-
They honestly cant help themselves. Their only playbook for 5 years has been making trump the boogeyman and opposing him. Now the left is going to get mad at them when he doesn't literally go to jail. (Which of course is ludicrous and has a 0% chance of ever happening)thechatch said:Nancy and Chuck had to know it would play out this way. I just don’t understand spending the political capital on this, while covid relief just sort of sat there.
This is how you lose your majority.
Like people are sure, not even just hopefully but fully convinced, that trump will go behind bars in NY or DC.
Its amazing how they havent learned over and over and over again. It's been like once a month for 5 years.
The craziest part is that if they just forgot about trump and actually passed some popular shit for the next 4 years then they could completely destroy the republican party in general.
Its set up so easy for someone to be a hero.
And yet, we know exactly how they will fuck it up. Because they are a bunch of shitheads who only care about their own money.
-
Trump was impeached TWICE! Vote for Me! Will be Mitts campaign slogan as he takes the stage of the first debate in the Round of 24 for ‘24. The battle to see who gets the honor of losing to Trump, again.ReignMan said:Looks like Mitt took his thumb out of his mouth long enough to vote to impeach Trump.
-
Trump fills stadiums.doogie said:
Trump was impeached TWICE! Vote for Me! Will be Mitts campaign slogan as he takes the stage of the first debate in the Round of 24 for ‘24. The battle to see who gets the honor of losing to Trump, again.ReignMan said:Looks like Mitt took his thumb out of his mouth long enough to vote to impeach Trump.
Mitt can’t fill a bathtub.
-
This is one big fucking loser thread
Both sides -
Can’t fill the polls though....PurpleThrobber said:
Trump fills stadiums.doogie said:
Trump was impeached TWICE! Vote for Me! Will be Mitts campaign slogan as he takes the stage of the first debate in the Round of 24 for ‘24. The battle to see who gets the honor of losing to Trump, again.ReignMan said:Looks like Mitt took his thumb out of his mouth long enough to vote to impeach Trump.
Mitt can’t fill a bathtub. -
Would be funny if he believes the cnn hype and makes a run.PurpleThrobber said:
Trump fills stadiums.doogie said:
Trump was impeached TWICE! Vote for Me! Will be Mitts campaign slogan as he takes the stage of the first debate in the Round of 24 for ‘24. The battle to see who gets the honor of losing to Trump, again.ReignMan said:Looks like Mitt took his thumb out of his mouth long enough to vote to impeach Trump.
Mitt can’t fill a bathtub. -
It's also about keeping the publics eye off of Joe and the destruction being wrought on our nation as well as the massive death count Slow Joe is racking up.
-
HuskyJW said:
Can’t fill thePurpleThrobber said:
Trump fills stadiums.doogie said:
Trump was impeached TWICE! Vote for Me! Will be Mitts campaign slogan as he takes the stage of the first debate in the Round of 24 for ‘24. The battle to see who gets the honor of losing to Trump, again.ReignMan said:Looks like Mitt took his thumb out of his mouth long enough to vote to impeach Trump.
Mitt can’t fill a bathtub.polosDominion though.... -
2024 is a loser again for the GOP with mail in ballots. It’s basically like the first 15 scripted plays in Chip Kelly’s offense....not a whole lot you can do about it with MSM cover.
-
To be fair if they ever did anything worth a shit they'd win. Dems essentially gave up the biggest demographic there is (white blue collar folks) and the GOP took no advantage.thechatch said:2024 is a loser again for the GOP with mail in ballots. It’s basically like the first 15 scripted plays in Chip Kelly’s offense....not a whole lot you can do about it with MSM cover.
-
Nailed it. Hilarious that either side thinks they won here.HuskyJW said:This is one big fucking loser thread
Both sides -
Your side lost. Pretty simple, really.Duckwithabone said:
Nailed it. Hilarious that either side thinks they won here.HuskyJW said:This is one big fucking loser thread
Both sides -
-
They won’t be able to doctor evidence in any criminal proceeding. And the simple fact is that the Court was already being stormed before Trump was done speaking Jan 6th.NorthwestFresh said:
The Left has a fantasy about criminally indicting Trump for “insurrection” but that would require discovery along with Pelosi’s and Bowser’s official communications, along with the media who were in the Capitol during the “riot” like the NYT reporter being subpoenaed.Kaepsknee said:The Real crime here is the House leadership pushing through a 2nd impeachment when they knew there wasn’t a chance in Hell of the Senate convicting.
The first time was when the Pandemic was getting their guys in there and no attention from Congress was given.
This time it was for a not my President. The guy that left office a month ago. Meanwhile Biden’s main campaign promise of sending Cheques as soon as possible rings empty.
And come next Thursday, Trump won’t get the clicks and eyeballs that any tweet or news story about him received today. And within 2 weeks the Media Cabal will be looking for fresh meat. And that will be ol Joe.
Trump fades away to help primary RINOs unless New York’s AG goes after him. Which opens a whole can of worms for Cuomo. -
You lost, again. Take the L and STFU.HHusky said:
acquittedPurpleThrobber said:
Please to be posting a copy of your law degree -it's quite clear you have no fucking clue on the US Constitution.HHusky said:"clears"
funny
Article I § 2 of the United States Constitution gives the House of Representatives the sole power to impeach (make formal charges against) and Article I § 3 gives the Senate the sole power to try impeachments. The Senate would then debate the matter, and vote, each individual Senator voting whether to convict the President and remove him from office, or against conviction. If more than two-thirds of the Senators present vote to convict, the President would be removed from office. Thus a Senator who abstained from voting but was present would in effect be voting against conviction. (Article I § 3).
It's over - your overlords didn't have the votes.
Like we say, fuck off.
The Founding Fathers win again.
not cleared of inciting the Capitol riot
words have meaning -
Swalwell needs more tim to get his own photoshopped tweets in thereTurdBomber said:
You lost, again. Take the L and STFU.HHusky said:
acquittedPurpleThrobber said:
Please to be posting a copy of your law degree -it's quite clear you have no fucking clue on the US Constitution.HHusky said:"clears"
funny
Article I § 2 of the United States Constitution gives the House of Representatives the sole power to impeach (make formal charges against) and Article I § 3 gives the Senate the sole power to try impeachments. The Senate would then debate the matter, and vote, each individual Senator voting whether to convict the President and remove him from office, or against conviction. If more than two-thirds of the Senators present vote to convict, the President would be removed from office. Thus a Senator who abstained from voting but was present would in effect be voting against conviction. (Article I § 3).
It's over - your overlords didn't have the votes.
Like we say, fuck off.
The Founding Fathers win again.
not cleared of inciting the Capitol riot
words have meaning -
Fang Fang approved, of course.....LoneStarDawg said:
Swalwell needs more tim to get his own photoshopped tweets in thereTurdBomber said:
You lost, again. Take the L and STFU.HHusky said:
acquittedPurpleThrobber said:
Please to be posting a copy of your law degree -it's quite clear you have no fucking clue on the US Constitution.HHusky said:"clears"
funny
Article I § 2 of the United States Constitution gives the House of Representatives the sole power to impeach (make formal charges against) and Article I § 3 gives the Senate the sole power to try impeachments. The Senate would then debate the matter, and vote, each individual Senator voting whether to convict the President and remove him from office, or against conviction. If more than two-thirds of the Senators present vote to convict, the President would be removed from office. Thus a Senator who abstained from voting but was present would in effect be voting against conviction. (Article I § 3).
It's over - your overlords didn't have the votes.
Like we say, fuck off.
The Founding Fathers win again.
not cleared of inciting the Capitol riot
words have meaning -
Ah the “punting is winning” mindset. Makes sense on a full blown doog board.doogie said:
Your side lost. Pretty simple, really.Duckwithabone said:
Nailed it. Hilarious that either side thinks they won here.HuskyJW said:This is one big fucking loser thread
Both sides -
-
There are many fine zip ties.....
-
The narrative that terrorist pre-planned and were there to kidnap congressmen & women has been debunked. The cuffs were apparently brought to the capital by Capitol Police, who left them on a table where the now infamous "Mr. Zip Ties" picked them up.GrundleStiltzkin said:
No evidence of pre-planned kidnapping, which was the initial purpose for releasing that earlier photo. -
And they hate the term "Fake News".TurdBomber said:
The narrative that terrorist pre-planned and were there to kidnap congressmen & women has been debunked. The cuffs were apparently brought to the capital by Capitol Police, who left them on a table where the now infamous "Mr. Zip Ties" picked them up.GrundleStiltzkin said:
No evidence of pre-planned kidnapping, which was the initial purpose for releasing that earlier photo. -
Or, Capitol police were told to leave them there for a photo-op like the one the Left finally got.TurdBomber said:
The narrative that terrorist pre-planned and were there to kidnap congressmen & women has been debunked. The cuffs were apparently brought to the capital by Capitol Police, who left them on a table where the now infamous "Mr. Zip Ties" picked them up.GrundleStiltzkin said:
No evidence of pre-planned kidnapping, which was the initial purpose for releasing that earlier photo.
Which is why the Senate couldn’t have witnesses in their Show Trial. Pelosi’s “investigation” will likely be the Mueller Hoax Part 2. Only looking to one side for conspiracies and collusion’s as the media ignores all evidence of the Rats’ guilt and hypocrisy. -
I'm heading trump is gonna be taken down by dc and ny. The walls are closing in!
-
DC! DC! DC!NorthwestFresh said:
Or, Capitol police were told to leave them there for a photo-op like the one the Left finally got.TurdBomber said:
The narrative that terrorist pre-planned and were there to kidnap congressmen & women has been debunked. The cuffs were apparently brought to the capital by Capitol Police, who left them on a table where the now infamous "Mr. Zip Ties" picked them up.GrundleStiltzkin said:
No evidence of pre-planned kidnapping, which was the initial purpose for releasing that earlier photo.
Which is why the Senate couldn’t have witnesses in their Show Trial. Pelosi’s “investigation” will likely be the Mueller Hoax Part 2. Only looking to one side for conspiracies and collusion’s as the media ignores all evidence of the Rats’ guilt and hypocrisy.
Gonna miss you Russia! Russia! Russia! -
#OJ_approved!greenblood said:
Can they retry him again? No? So yeah, cleared. Fucking moron.HHusky said:
acquittedPurpleThrobber said:
Please to be posting a copy of your law degree -it's quite clear you have no fucking clue on the US Constitution.HHusky said:"clears"
funny
Article I § 2 of the United States Constitution gives the House of Representatives the sole power to impeach (make formal charges against) and Article I § 3 gives the Senate the sole power to try impeachments. The Senate would then debate the matter, and vote, each individual Senator voting whether to convict the President and remove him from office, or against conviction. If more than two-thirds of the Senators present vote to convict, the President would be removed from office. Thus a Senator who abstained from voting but was present would in effect be voting against conviction. (Article I § 3).
It's over - your overlords didn't have the votes.
Like we say, fuck off.
The Founding Fathers win again.
not cleared of inciting the Capitol riot
words have meaning -
I'm hearing the Throbber is a Russian assetPurpleThrobber said:
DC! DC! DC!NorthwestFresh said:
Or, Capitol police were told to leave them there for a photo-op like the one the Left finally got.TurdBomber said:
The narrative that terrorist pre-planned and were there to kidnap congressmen & women has been debunked. The cuffs were apparently brought to the capital by Capitol Police, who left them on a table where the now infamous "Mr. Zip Ties" picked them up.GrundleStiltzkin said:
No evidence of pre-planned kidnapping, which was the initial purpose for releasing that earlier photo.
Which is why the Senate couldn’t have witnesses in their Show Trial. Pelosi’s “investigation” will likely be the Mueller Hoax Part 2. Only looking to one side for conspiracies and collusion’s as the media ignores all evidence of the Rats’ guilt and hypocrisy.
Gonna miss you Russia! Russia! Russia!
-
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/89/9d/c2/899dc2171325fac14fed7801932f8e9a.jpgPitchfork51 said:
I'm hearing the Throbber is a Russian assetPurpleThrobber said:
DC! DC! DC!NorthwestFresh said:
Or, Capitol police were told to leave them there for a photo-op like the one the Left finally got.TurdBomber said:
The narrative that terrorist pre-planned and were there to kidnap congressmen & women has been debunked. The cuffs were apparently brought to the capital by Capitol Police, who left them on a table where the now infamous "Mr. Zip Ties" picked them up.GrundleStiltzkin said:
No evidence of pre-planned kidnapping, which was the initial purpose for releasing that earlier photo.
Which is why the Senate couldn’t have witnesses in their Show Trial. Pelosi’s “investigation” will likely be the Mueller Hoax Part 2. Only looking to one side for conspiracies and collusion’s as the media ignores all evidence of the Rats’ guilt and hypocrisy.
Gonna miss you Russia! Russia! Russia!
No. The Throbber is all about Russian asses
-
Must've gotten lost in translationPurpleThrobber said:
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/89/9d/c2/899dc2171325fac14fed7801932f8e9a.jpgPitchfork51 said:
I'm hearing the Throbber is a Russian assetPurpleThrobber said:
DC! DC! DC!NorthwestFresh said:
Or, Capitol police were told to leave them there for a photo-op like the one the Left finally got.TurdBomber said:
The narrative that terrorist pre-planned and were there to kidnap congressmen & women has been debunked. The cuffs were apparently brought to the capital by Capitol Police, who left them on a table where the now infamous "Mr. Zip Ties" picked them up.GrundleStiltzkin said:
No evidence of pre-planned kidnapping, which was the initial purpose for releasing that earlier photo.
Which is why the Senate couldn’t have witnesses in their Show Trial. Pelosi’s “investigation” will likely be the Mueller Hoax Part 2. Only looking to one side for conspiracies and collusion’s as the media ignores all evidence of the Rats’ guilt and hypocrisy.
Gonna miss you Russia! Russia! Russia!
No. The Throbber is all about Russian asses
Carry on -
I’d trust him guys.HuskyJW said:This is one big fucking loser thread
Both sides
No one knows loser like JW.
