Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Trump Acquitted.

pawz
pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,437 Founders Club
edited February 2021 in Tug Tavern
«1

Comments

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,898
    "clears"

    funny
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,437 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    "clears"

    funny

    2024
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,898
    pawz said:

    HHusky said:

    "clears"

    funny

    2024
    sure
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,042
    HHusky said:

    "clears"

    funny

    Please to be posting a copy of your law degree -it's quite clear you have no fucking clue on the US Constitution.

    Article I § 2 of the United States Constitution gives the House of Representatives the sole power to impeach (make formal charges against) and Article I § 3 gives the Senate the sole power to try impeachments. The Senate would then debate the matter, and vote, each individual Senator voting whether to convict the President and remove him from office, or against conviction. If more than two-thirds of the Senators present vote to convict, the President would be removed from office. Thus a Senator who abstained from voting but was present would in effect be voting against conviction. (Article I § 3).


    It's over - your overlords didn't have the votes.

    Like we say, fuck off.

    The Founding Fathers win again.

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,898

    HHusky said:

    "clears"

    funny

    Please to be posting a copy of your law degree -it's quite clear you have no fucking clue on the US Constitution.

    Article I § 2 of the United States Constitution gives the House of Representatives the sole power to impeach (make formal charges against) and Article I § 3 gives the Senate the sole power to try impeachments. The Senate would then debate the matter, and vote, each individual Senator voting whether to convict the President and remove him from office, or against conviction. If more than two-thirds of the Senators present vote to convict, the President would be removed from office. Thus a Senator who abstained from voting but was present would in effect be voting against conviction. (Article I § 3).


    It's over - your overlords didn't have the votes.

    Like we say, fuck off.

    The Founding Fathers win again.

    acquitted

    not cleared of inciting the Capitol riot

    words have meaning
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,042
    edited February 2021
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    "clears"

    funny

    Please to be posting a copy of your law degree -it's quite clear you have no fucking clue on the US Constitution.

    Article I § 2 of the United States Constitution gives the House of Representatives the sole power to impeach (make formal charges against) and Article I § 3 gives the Senate the sole power to try impeachments. The Senate would then debate the matter, and vote, each individual Senator voting whether to convict the President and remove him from office, or against conviction. If more than two-thirds of the Senators present vote to convict, the President would be removed from office. Thus a Senator who abstained from voting but was present would in effect be voting against conviction. (Article I § 3).


    It's over - your overlords didn't have the votes.

    Like we say, fuck off.

    The Founding Fathers win again.

    acquitted

    not cleared of inciting the Capitol riot

    words have meaning
    Indubitably.

    Fuck off.

    With meaning.

    Post the law degree or STFU.
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,042
    Need to mix that with the blonde MILF from LSU dance...

  • thechatch
    thechatch Member Posts: 7,221 Standard Supporter
    Another fantastic waste of time and money.

    Have the covid checks been mailed out?
  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,658 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    "clears"

    funny

    Please to be posting a copy of your law degree -it's quite clear you have no fucking clue on the US Constitution.

    Article I § 2 of the United States Constitution gives the House of Representatives the sole power to impeach (make formal charges against) and Article I § 3 gives the Senate the sole power to try impeachments. The Senate would then debate the matter, and vote, each individual Senator voting whether to convict the President and remove him from office, or against conviction. If more than two-thirds of the Senators present vote to convict, the President would be removed from office. Thus a Senator who abstained from voting but was present would in effect be voting against conviction. (Article I § 3).


    It's over - your overlords didn't have the votes.

    Like we say, fuck off.

    The Founding Fathers win again.

    acquitted

    not cleared of inciting the Capitol riot

    words have meaning
    Was cleared an option in the voting?
  • ReignMan
    ReignMan Member Posts: 217
    Looks like Mitt took his thumb out of his mouth long enough to vote to impeach Trump.

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,898
    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    "clears"

    funny

    Please to be posting a copy of your law degree -it's quite clear you have no fucking clue on the US Constitution.

    Article I § 2 of the United States Constitution gives the House of Representatives the sole power to impeach (make formal charges against) and Article I § 3 gives the Senate the sole power to try impeachments. The Senate would then debate the matter, and vote, each individual Senator voting whether to convict the President and remove him from office, or against conviction. If more than two-thirds of the Senators present vote to convict, the President would be removed from office. Thus a Senator who abstained from voting but was present would in effect be voting against conviction. (Article I § 3).


    It's over - your overlords didn't have the votes.

    Like we say, fuck off.

    The Founding Fathers win again.

    acquitted

    not cleared of inciting the Capitol riot

    words have meaning
    Was cleared an option in the voting?
    Take it up with the OP
  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    edited February 2021
    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    "clears"

    funny

    Please to be posting a copy of your law degree -it's quite clear you have no fucking clue on the US Constitution.

    Article I § 2 of the United States Constitution gives the House of Representatives the sole power to impeach (make formal charges against) and Article I § 3 gives the Senate the sole power to try impeachments. The Senate would then debate the matter, and vote, each individual Senator voting whether to convict the President and remove him from office, or against conviction. If more than two-thirds of the Senators present vote to convict, the President would be removed from office. Thus a Senator who abstained from voting but was present would in effect be voting against conviction. (Article I § 3).


    It's over - your overlords didn't have the votes.

    Like we say, fuck off.

    The Founding Fathers win again.

    acquitted

    not cleared of inciting the Capitol riot

    words have meaning
    Was cleared an option in the voting?
    Take it up with the OP
    OK

    Let’s go with exonerate or vindicate. Clear is mild yet still appropriate.

    Does those work, Lionel?

    You really are terrible at this, but given your fantasy life of being some Hot Shot I understand. Limited mental ability is a struggle I bet.

    Words have meaning!!

    https://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/acquit

    Synonyms for acquit

    absolve, clear, exculpate, exonerate, vindicate
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,898

    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    "clears"

    funny

    Please to be posting a copy of your law degree -it's quite clear you have no fucking clue on the US Constitution.

    Article I § 2 of the United States Constitution gives the House of Representatives the sole power to impeach (make formal charges against) and Article I § 3 gives the Senate the sole power to try impeachments. The Senate would then debate the matter, and vote, each individual Senator voting whether to convict the President and remove him from office, or against conviction. If more than two-thirds of the Senators present vote to convict, the President would be removed from office. Thus a Senator who abstained from voting but was present would in effect be voting against conviction. (Article I § 3).


    It's over - your overlords didn't have the votes.

    Like we say, fuck off.

    The Founding Fathers win again.

    acquitted

    not cleared of inciting the Capitol riot

    words have meaning
    Was cleared an option in the voting?
    Take it up with the OP
    OK

    Let’s go with exonerate or vindicate. Clear is mild yet still appropriate.

    Does those work, Lionel?

    You really are terrible at this, but given your fantasy life of being some Hot Shot I understand. Limited mental ability is a struggle I bet.

    Words have meaning!!

    https://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/acquit

    Synonyms for acquit

    absolve, clear, exculpate, exonerate, vindicate
    Another synonym: when at least 58 US Senators think you're guilty as fuck.
  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    edited February 2021
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    "clears"

    funny

    Please to be posting a copy of your law degree -it's quite clear you have no fucking clue on the US Constitution.

    Article I § 2 of the United States Constitution gives the House of Representatives the sole power to impeach (make formal charges against) and Article I § 3 gives the Senate the sole power to try impeachments. The Senate would then debate the matter, and vote, each individual Senator voting whether to convict the President and remove him from office, or against conviction. If more than two-thirds of the Senators present vote to convict, the President would be removed from office. Thus a Senator who abstained from voting but was present would in effect be voting against conviction. (Article I § 3).


    It's over - your overlords didn't have the votes.

    Like we say, fuck off.

    The Founding Fathers win again.

    acquitted

    not cleared of inciting the Capitol riot

    words have meaning
    Was cleared an option in the voting?
    Take it up with the OP
    OK

    Let’s go with exonerate or vindicate. Clear is mild yet still appropriate.

    Does those work, Lionel?

    You really are terrible at this, but given your fantasy life of being some Hot Shot I understand. Limited mental ability is a struggle I bet.

    Words have meaning!!

    https://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/acquit

    Synonyms for acquit

    absolve, clear, exculpate, exonerate, vindicate
    Another synonym: when at least 58 US Senators think you're guilty as fuck.
    You could just say “I’m a fucking dipshit” and be done with it.

    A limited vocabulary on the word “acquit” for a supposed attorney. Give up the ruse, dummy, and stick with kissing Biden’s ass.

    Lionel Hutz confirmed.
  • Southerndawg
    Southerndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,346 Founders Club
  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    And poof, @HHusky gets his dumb ass kicked again and leaves.

    What a clown.
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,662
    Man this was a stupid waste of time. Even when the Dems win they can't help but be petty losers.
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913
    The Real crime here is the House leadership pushing through a 2nd impeachment when they knew there wasn’t a chance in Hell of the Senate convicting.

    The first time was when the Pandemic was getting their guys in there and no attention from Congress was given.

    This time it was for a not my President. The guy that left office a month ago. Meanwhile Biden’s main campaign promise of sending Cheques as soon as possible rings empty.

    And come next Thursday, Trump won’t get the clicks and eyeballs that any tweet or news story about him received today. And within 2 weeks the Media Cabal will be looking for fresh meat. And that will be ol Joe.
  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    Kaepsknee said:

    The Real crime here is the House leadership pushing through a 2nd impeachment when they knew there wasn’t a chance in Hell of the Senate convicting.

    The first time was when the Pandemic was getting their guys in there and no attention from Congress was given.

    This time it was for a not my President. The guy that left office a month ago. Meanwhile Biden’s main campaign promise of sending Cheques as soon as possible rings empty.

    And come next Thursday, Trump won’t get the clicks and eyeballs that any tweet or news story about him received today. And within 2 weeks the Media Cabal will be looking for fresh meat. And that will be ol Joe.

    The Left has a fantasy about criminally indicting Trump for “insurrection” but that would require discovery along with Pelosi’s and Bowser’s official communications, along with the media who were in the Capitol during the “riot” like the NYT reporter being subpoenaed.

    Trump fades away to help primary RINOs unless New York’s AG goes after him. Which opens a whole can of worms for Cuomo.




  • thechatch
    thechatch Member Posts: 7,221 Standard Supporter
    Nancy and Chuck had to know it would play out this way. I just don’t understand spending the political capital on this, while covid relief just sort of sat there.

    This is how you lose your majority.
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,042
    thechatch said:

    Nancy and Chuck had to know it would play out this way. I just don’t understand spending the political capital on this, while covid relief just sort of sat there.

    This is how you lose your majority.

    They kickbacks and graft they can rake in the next two years make the risk/reward worth it.

    These fucks are all about raking in the most $$$ they possibly can behind their barb wire encampments. They give no fucks.

  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,559
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    "clears"

    funny

    Please to be posting a copy of your law degree -it's quite clear you have no fucking clue on the US Constitution.

    Article I § 2 of the United States Constitution gives the House of Representatives the sole power to impeach (make formal charges against) and Article I § 3 gives the Senate the sole power to try impeachments. The Senate would then debate the matter, and vote, each individual Senator voting whether to convict the President and remove him from office, or against conviction. If more than two-thirds of the Senators present vote to convict, the President would be removed from office. Thus a Senator who abstained from voting but was present would in effect be voting against conviction. (Article I § 3).


    It's over - your overlords didn't have the votes.

    Like we say, fuck off.

    The Founding Fathers win again.

    acquitted

    not cleared of inciting the Capitol riot

    words have meaning
    Can they retry him again? No? So yeah, cleared. Fucking moron.