Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Trump Acquitted.

pawz
pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,515 Founders Club
edited February 2021 in Tug Tavern
«13456

Comments

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,334
    "clears"

    funny
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,515 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    "clears"

    funny

    2024
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,334
    pawz said:

    HHusky said:

    "clears"

    funny

    2024
    sure
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,500 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    "clears"

    funny

    Please to be posting a copy of your law degree -it's quite clear you have no fucking clue on the US Constitution.

    Article I § 2 of the United States Constitution gives the House of Representatives the sole power to impeach (make formal charges against) and Article I § 3 gives the Senate the sole power to try impeachments. The Senate would then debate the matter, and vote, each individual Senator voting whether to convict the President and remove him from office, or against conviction. If more than two-thirds of the Senators present vote to convict, the President would be removed from office. Thus a Senator who abstained from voting but was present would in effect be voting against conviction. (Article I § 3).


    It's over - your overlords didn't have the votes.

    Like we say, fuck off.

    The Founding Fathers win again.

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,334

    HHusky said:

    "clears"

    funny

    Please to be posting a copy of your law degree -it's quite clear you have no fucking clue on the US Constitution.

    Article I § 2 of the United States Constitution gives the House of Representatives the sole power to impeach (make formal charges against) and Article I § 3 gives the Senate the sole power to try impeachments. The Senate would then debate the matter, and vote, each individual Senator voting whether to convict the President and remove him from office, or against conviction. If more than two-thirds of the Senators present vote to convict, the President would be removed from office. Thus a Senator who abstained from voting but was present would in effect be voting against conviction. (Article I § 3).


    It's over - your overlords didn't have the votes.

    Like we say, fuck off.

    The Founding Fathers win again.

    acquitted

    not cleared of inciting the Capitol riot

    words have meaning
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,500 Standard Supporter
    edited February 2021
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    "clears"

    funny

    Please to be posting a copy of your law degree -it's quite clear you have no fucking clue on the US Constitution.

    Article I § 2 of the United States Constitution gives the House of Representatives the sole power to impeach (make formal charges against) and Article I § 3 gives the Senate the sole power to try impeachments. The Senate would then debate the matter, and vote, each individual Senator voting whether to convict the President and remove him from office, or against conviction. If more than two-thirds of the Senators present vote to convict, the President would be removed from office. Thus a Senator who abstained from voting but was present would in effect be voting against conviction. (Article I § 3).


    It's over - your overlords didn't have the votes.

    Like we say, fuck off.

    The Founding Fathers win again.

    acquitted

    not cleared of inciting the Capitol riot

    words have meaning
    Indubitably.

    Fuck off.

    With meaning.

    Post the law degree or STFU.
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,500 Standard Supporter
    Need to mix that with the blonde MILF from LSU dance...