Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Hot MyPillow guy talk
PurpleThrobber
Member Posts: 48,005
https://michaeljlindell.com/?fbclid=IwAR3g3DEZ4p-MxPZM0zO8WdCHvWU4PwX9qydqKPBq9UEIfCSeR3IycpsptbU
Nothing to see here....nada nothing zip.
Thankfully we have a press that will get to the bottom of all this.
#grateful
Nothing to see here....nada nothing zip.
Thankfully we have a press that will get to the bottom of all this.
#grateful
Comments
-
Did you watch it? Is it as insane as the clips bouncing around make it appear?
-
I watched some of it. He has lock-solid evidence but I already know you Rats cheated so it’s really not that informative to me. Keep with your edited news and stay ignorant.Rubberfist said:Did you watch it? Is it as insane as the clips bouncing around make it appear?
-
The media will dig deep on all the points that crazy loon from MIT makes. He only invented email....so not really all that bright of a guy.NorthwestFresh said:
I watched some of it. He has lock-solid evidence but I already know you Rats cheated so it’s really not that informative to me. Keep with your edited news and stay ignorant.Rubberfist said:Did you watch it? Is it as insane as the clips bouncing around make it appear?
Trust the media. -
Did he really have Rudy’s drunk witness on the show. Was she drunk?NorthwestFresh said:
I watched some of it. He has lock-solid evidence but I already know you Rats cheated so it’s really not that informative to me. Keep with your edited news and stay ignorant.Rubberfist said:Did you watch it? Is it as insane as the clips bouncing around make it appear?
-
Spoiler: Fast forward to the last 30 minutes.
Which is still 28 minutes past the leftists attention span and your typical CNN baseless claims reporting.
-
Wood. Just in the mouth. Glasses on.Rubberfist said:
Did he really have Rudy’s drunk witness on the show. Was she drunk?NorthwestFresh said:
I watched some of it. He has lock-solid evidence but I already know you Rats cheated so it’s really not that informative to me. Keep with your edited news and stay ignorant.Rubberfist said:Did you watch it? Is it as insane as the clips bouncing around make it appear?
-
Lots of election fraud numbers. But nothing to see..................... So trump will get to present evidence..........
-
Odd. The evidence should have been presented in court and accepted by a judge.NorthwestFresh said:
I watched some of it. He has lock-solid evidence but I already know you Rats cheated so it’s really not that informative to me. Keep with your edited news and stay ignorant.Rubberfist said:Did you watch it? Is it as insane as the clips bouncing around make it appear?
You forgot “wake up” and “sheeple” in your post, incidentally. -
Look at who doesn’t know what “dismissed by standing” means.MelloDawg said:
Odd. The evidence should have been presented in court and accepted by a judge.NorthwestFresh said:
I watched some of it. He has lock-solid evidence but I already know you Rats cheated so it’s really not that informative to me. Keep with your edited news and stay ignorant.Rubberfist said:Did you watch it? Is it as insane as the clips bouncing around make it appear?
You forgot “wake up” and “sheeple” in your post, incidentally.
-
Noted didn't make it past 2 minutes guy weighs in.MelloDawg said:
Odd. The evidence should have been presented in court and accepted by a judge.NorthwestFresh said:
I watched some of it. He has lock-solid evidence but I already know you Rats cheated so it’s really not that informative to me. Keep with your edited news and stay ignorant.Rubberfist said:Did you watch it? Is it as insane as the clips bouncing around make it appear?
You forgot “wake up” and “sheeple” in your post, incidentally.
-
What about the other 60 cases though? There were affidavits. Experts say that people who signed them could go to jail if they lied on them.NorthwestFresh said:
Look at who doesn’t know what “dismissed by standing” means.MelloDawg said:
Odd. The evidence should have been presented in court and accepted by a judge.NorthwestFresh said:
I watched some of it. He has lock-solid evidence but I already know you Rats cheated so it’s really not that informative to me. Keep with your edited news and stay ignorant.Rubberfist said:Did you watch it? Is it as insane as the clips bouncing around make it appear?
You forgot “wake up” and “sheeple” in your post, incidentally.
I want you to keep touting the election scandal though. As I said, it’s the coping mechanism you and many others are using to explain the results in a way that makes sense. Trump couldn’t have lost on his own, through his own doing and through faults of his own. Had to be fraud. No other way. -
It was fraud. Just as Putin and Trump steaming the 2016 election was fraud. Why no congressional investigations this time, Leftist?MelloDawg said:
What about the other 60 cases though? There were affidavits. Experts say that people who signed them could go to jail if they lied on them.NorthwestFresh said:
Look at who doesn’t know what “dismissed by standing” means.MelloDawg said:
Odd. The evidence should have been presented in court and accepted by a judge.NorthwestFresh said:
I watched some of it. He has lock-solid evidence but I already know you Rats cheated so it’s really not that informative to me. Keep with your edited news and stay ignorant.Rubberfist said:Did you watch it? Is it as insane as the clips bouncing around make it appear?
You forgot “wake up” and “sheeple” in your post, incidentally.
I want you to keep touting the election scandal though. As I said, it’s the coping mechanism you and many others are using to explain the results in a way that makes sense. Trump couldn’t have lost on his own, through his own doing and through faults of his own. Had to be fraud. No other way. -
I wouldn’t watch it cuz I’m not blowing 2 hrs on a video that OANN had to provide a thorough disclaimer for. Plus if the evidence was so good why bring on the drunk wacko that was an internet punchline for two weeks? If you’re presenting your case maybe leave out the nut job.PurpleThrobber said:
Noted didn't make it past 2 minutes guy weighs in.MelloDawg said:
Odd. The evidence should have been presented in court and accepted by a judge.NorthwestFresh said:
I watched some of it. He has lock-solid evidence but I already know you Rats cheated so it’s really not that informative to me. Keep with your edited news and stay ignorant.Rubberfist said:Did you watch it? Is it as insane as the clips bouncing around make it appear?
You forgot “wake up” and “sheeple” in your post, incidentally.
-
I told you to fast forward to the last 30 minutes, head in sand boy.Rubberfist said:
I wouldn’t watch it cuz I’m not blowing 2 hrs on a video that OANN had to provide a thorough disclaimer for. Plus if the evidence was so good why bring on the drunk wacko that was an internet punchline for two weeks? If you’re presenting your case maybe leave out the nut job.PurpleThrobber said:
Noted didn't make it past 2 minutes guy weighs in.MelloDawg said:
Odd. The evidence should have been presented in court and accepted by a judge.NorthwestFresh said:
I watched some of it. He has lock-solid evidence but I already know you Rats cheated so it’s really not that informative to me. Keep with your edited news and stay ignorant.Rubberfist said:Did you watch it? Is it as insane as the clips bouncing around make it appear?
You forgot “wake up” and “sheeple” in your post, incidentally.
-
OAN suspended for Lindell’s factual video that no Leftist watched.
-
Well it's obviously true information. Twitter banned it.
-
My terms of service guy in Salinas says Twitter can do whatever they want.
-
Too dangerous!
-
I’d prefer to watch the Maricopa county board of electors present their defense from jail
-
So you guys are still kooking out with Mike, huh?
Cool! Sounds fun!
I wonder if Mike believes in the face transplant story like obk does? Are you guys transplanters, too?
lol
