Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Hot MyPillow guy talk

PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,724 Standard Supporter
edited February 2021 in Tug Tavern
https://michaeljlindell.com/?fbclid=IwAR3g3DEZ4p-MxPZM0zO8WdCHvWU4PwX9qydqKPBq9UEIfCSeR3IycpsptbU

Nothing to see here....nada nothing zip.

Thankfully we have a press that will get to the bottom of all this.

#grateful

Comments

  • RubberfistRubberfist Member Posts: 1,373
    Did you watch it? Is it as insane as the clips bouncing around make it appear?
  • NorthwestFreshNorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972

    Did you watch it? Is it as insane as the clips bouncing around make it appear?

    I watched some of it. He has lock-solid evidence but I already know you Rats cheated so it’s really not that informative to me. Keep with your edited news and stay ignorant.
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,724 Standard Supporter

    Did you watch it? Is it as insane as the clips bouncing around make it appear?

    I watched some of it. He has lock-solid evidence but I already know you Rats cheated so it’s really not that informative to me. Keep with your edited news and stay ignorant.
    The media will dig deep on all the points that crazy loon from MIT makes. He only invented email....so not really all that bright of a guy.

    Trust the media.
  • RubberfistRubberfist Member Posts: 1,373

    Did you watch it? Is it as insane as the clips bouncing around make it appear?

    I watched some of it. He has lock-solid evidence but I already know you Rats cheated so it’s really not that informative to me. Keep with your edited news and stay ignorant.
    Did he really have Rudy’s drunk witness on the show. Was she drunk?


  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,724 Standard Supporter
    Spoiler: Fast forward to the last 30 minutes.

    Which is still 28 minutes past the leftists attention span and your typical CNN baseless claims reporting.

  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,985 Standard Supporter

    Did you watch it? Is it as insane as the clips bouncing around make it appear?

    I watched some of it. He has lock-solid evidence but I already know you Rats cheated so it’s really not that informative to me. Keep with your edited news and stay ignorant.
    Did he really have Rudy’s drunk witness on the show. Was she drunk?


    Wood. Just in the mouth. Glasses on.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 34,384 Standard Supporter
    Lots of election fraud numbers. But nothing to see..................... So trump will get to present evidence..........
  • MelloDawgMelloDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 6,746 Swaye's Wigwam
    edited February 2021

    Did you watch it? Is it as insane as the clips bouncing around make it appear?

    I watched some of it. He has lock-solid evidence but I already know you Rats cheated so it’s really not that informative to me. Keep with your edited news and stay ignorant.
    Odd. The evidence should have been presented in court and accepted by a judge.

    You forgot “wake up” and “sheeple” in your post, incidentally.
  • NorthwestFreshNorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    MelloDawg said:

    Did you watch it? Is it as insane as the clips bouncing around make it appear?

    I watched some of it. He has lock-solid evidence but I already know you Rats cheated so it’s really not that informative to me. Keep with your edited news and stay ignorant.
    Odd. The evidence should have been presented in court and accepted by a judge.

    You forgot “wake up” and “sheeple” in your post, incidentally.
    Look at who doesn’t know what “dismissed by standing” means.

  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,724 Standard Supporter
    MelloDawg said:

    Did you watch it? Is it as insane as the clips bouncing around make it appear?

    I watched some of it. He has lock-solid evidence but I already know you Rats cheated so it’s really not that informative to me. Keep with your edited news and stay ignorant.
    Odd. The evidence should have been presented in court and accepted by a judge.

    You forgot “wake up” and “sheeple” in your post, incidentally.
    Noted didn't make it past 2 minutes guy weighs in.

  • MelloDawgMelloDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 6,746 Swaye's Wigwam
    edited February 2021

    MelloDawg said:

    Did you watch it? Is it as insane as the clips bouncing around make it appear?

    I watched some of it. He has lock-solid evidence but I already know you Rats cheated so it’s really not that informative to me. Keep with your edited news and stay ignorant.
    Odd. The evidence should have been presented in court and accepted by a judge.

    You forgot “wake up” and “sheeple” in your post, incidentally.
    Look at who doesn’t know what “dismissed by standing” means.

    What about the other 60 cases though? There were affidavits. Experts say that people who signed them could go to jail if they lied on them.

    I want you to keep touting the election scandal though. As I said, it’s the coping mechanism you and many others are using to explain the results in a way that makes sense. Trump couldn’t have lost on his own, through his own doing and through faults of his own. Had to be fraud. No other way.
  • NorthwestFreshNorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    MelloDawg said:

    MelloDawg said:

    Did you watch it? Is it as insane as the clips bouncing around make it appear?

    I watched some of it. He has lock-solid evidence but I already know you Rats cheated so it’s really not that informative to me. Keep with your edited news and stay ignorant.
    Odd. The evidence should have been presented in court and accepted by a judge.

    You forgot “wake up” and “sheeple” in your post, incidentally.
    Look at who doesn’t know what “dismissed by standing” means.

    What about the other 60 cases though? There were affidavits. Experts say that people who signed them could go to jail if they lied on them.

    I want you to keep touting the election scandal though. As I said, it’s the coping mechanism you and many others are using to explain the results in a way that makes sense. Trump couldn’t have lost on his own, through his own doing and through faults of his own. Had to be fraud. No other way.
    It was fraud. Just as Putin and Trump steaming the 2016 election was fraud. Why no congressional investigations this time, Leftist?
  • RubberfistRubberfist Member Posts: 1,373
    edited February 2021

    MelloDawg said:

    Did you watch it? Is it as insane as the clips bouncing around make it appear?

    I watched some of it. He has lock-solid evidence but I already know you Rats cheated so it’s really not that informative to me. Keep with your edited news and stay ignorant.
    Odd. The evidence should have been presented in court and accepted by a judge.

    You forgot “wake up” and “sheeple” in your post, incidentally.
    Noted didn't make it past 2 minutes guy weighs in.

    I wouldn’t watch it cuz I’m not blowing 2 hrs on a video that OANN had to provide a thorough disclaimer for. Plus if the evidence was so good why bring on the drunk wacko that was an internet punchline for two weeks? If you’re presenting your case maybe leave out the nut job.


  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 44,724 Standard Supporter

    MelloDawg said:

    Did you watch it? Is it as insane as the clips bouncing around make it appear?

    I watched some of it. He has lock-solid evidence but I already know you Rats cheated so it’s really not that informative to me. Keep with your edited news and stay ignorant.
    Odd. The evidence should have been presented in court and accepted by a judge.

    You forgot “wake up” and “sheeple” in your post, incidentally.
    Noted didn't make it past 2 minutes guy weighs in.

    I wouldn’t watch it cuz I’m not blowing 2 hrs on a video that OANN had to provide a thorough disclaimer for. Plus if the evidence was so good why bring on the drunk wacko that was an internet punchline for two weeks? If you’re presenting your case maybe leave out the nut job.


    I told you to fast forward to the last 30 minutes, head in sand boy.

  • NorthwestFreshNorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    OAN suspended for Lindell’s factual video that no Leftist watched.

  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 34,384 Standard Supporter
    Well it's obviously true information. Twitter banned it.
  • KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,886
    My terms of service guy in Salinas says Twitter can do whatever they want.
  • thechatchthechatch Member Posts: 6,410
    Too dangerous!
  • LoneStarDawgLoneStarDawg Member Posts: 13,513
    I’d prefer to watch the Maricopa county board of electors present their defense from jail
  • dfleadflea Member Posts: 7,242
    So you guys are still kooking out with Mike, huh?

    Cool! Sounds fun!

    I wonder if Mike believes in the face transplant story like obk does? Are you guys transplanters, too?

    lol

Sign In or Register to comment.