Did you watch it? Is it as insane as the clips bouncing around make it appear?
I watched some of it. He has lock-solid evidence but I already know you Rats cheated so it’s really not that informative to me. Keep with your edited news and stay ignorant.
Did you watch it? Is it as insane as the clips bouncing around make it appear?
I watched some of it. He has lock-solid evidence but I already know you Rats cheated so it’s really not that informative to me. Keep with your edited news and stay ignorant.
The media will dig deep on all the points that crazy loon from MIT makes. He only invented email....so not really all that bright of a guy.
Did you watch it? Is it as insane as the clips bouncing around make it appear?
I watched some of it. He has lock-solid evidence but I already know you Rats cheated so it’s really not that informative to me. Keep with your edited news and stay ignorant.
Did he really have Rudy’s drunk witness on the show. Was she drunk?
Did you watch it? Is it as insane as the clips bouncing around make it appear?
I watched some of it. He has lock-solid evidence but I already know you Rats cheated so it’s really not that informative to me. Keep with your edited news and stay ignorant.
Did he really have Rudy’s drunk witness on the show. Was she drunk?
Did you watch it? Is it as insane as the clips bouncing around make it appear?
I watched some of it. He has lock-solid evidence but I already know you Rats cheated so it’s really not that informative to me. Keep with your edited news and stay ignorant.
Odd. The evidence should have been presented in court and accepted by a judge.
You forgot “wake up” and “sheeple” in your post, incidentally.
Did you watch it? Is it as insane as the clips bouncing around make it appear?
I watched some of it. He has lock-solid evidence but I already know you Rats cheated so it’s really not that informative to me. Keep with your edited news and stay ignorant.
Odd. The evidence should have been presented in court and accepted by a judge.
You forgot “wake up” and “sheeple” in your post, incidentally.
Look at who doesn’t know what “dismissed by standing” means.
Did you watch it? Is it as insane as the clips bouncing around make it appear?
I watched some of it. He has lock-solid evidence but I already know you Rats cheated so it’s really not that informative to me. Keep with your edited news and stay ignorant.
Odd. The evidence should have been presented in court and accepted by a judge.
You forgot “wake up” and “sheeple” in your post, incidentally.
Noted didn't make it past 2 minutes guy weighs in.
Did you watch it? Is it as insane as the clips bouncing around make it appear?
I watched some of it. He has lock-solid evidence but I already know you Rats cheated so it’s really not that informative to me. Keep with your edited news and stay ignorant.
Odd. The evidence should have been presented in court and accepted by a judge.
You forgot “wake up” and “sheeple” in your post, incidentally.
Look at who doesn’t know what “dismissed by standing” means.
What about the other 60 cases though? There were affidavits. Experts say that people who signed them could go to jail if they lied on them.
I want you to keep touting the election scandal though. As I said, it’s the coping mechanism you and many others are using to explain the results in a way that makes sense. Trump couldn’t have lost on his own, through his own doing and through faults of his own. Had to be fraud. No other way.
Did you watch it? Is it as insane as the clips bouncing around make it appear?
I watched some of it. He has lock-solid evidence but I already know you Rats cheated so it’s really not that informative to me. Keep with your edited news and stay ignorant.
Odd. The evidence should have been presented in court and accepted by a judge.
You forgot “wake up” and “sheeple” in your post, incidentally.
Look at who doesn’t know what “dismissed by standing” means.
What about the other 60 cases though? There were affidavits. Experts say that people who signed them could go to jail if they lied on them.
I want you to keep touting the election scandal though. As I said, it’s the coping mechanism you and many others are using to explain the results in a way that makes sense. Trump couldn’t have lost on his own, through his own doing and through faults of his own. Had to be fraud. No other way.
It was fraud. Just as Putin and Trump steaming the 2016 election was fraud. Why no congressional investigations this time, Leftist?
Did you watch it? Is it as insane as the clips bouncing around make it appear?
I watched some of it. He has lock-solid evidence but I already know you Rats cheated so it’s really not that informative to me. Keep with your edited news and stay ignorant.
Odd. The evidence should have been presented in court and accepted by a judge.
You forgot “wake up” and “sheeple” in your post, incidentally.
Noted didn't make it past 2 minutes guy weighs in.
I wouldn’t watch it cuz I’m not blowing 2 hrs on a video that OANN had to provide a thorough disclaimer for. Plus if the evidence was so good why bring on the drunk wacko that was an internet punchline for two weeks? If you’re presenting your case maybe leave out the nut job.
Did you watch it? Is it as insane as the clips bouncing around make it appear?
I watched some of it. He has lock-solid evidence but I already know you Rats cheated so it’s really not that informative to me. Keep with your edited news and stay ignorant.
Odd. The evidence should have been presented in court and accepted by a judge.
You forgot “wake up” and “sheeple” in your post, incidentally.
Noted didn't make it past 2 minutes guy weighs in.
I wouldn’t watch it cuz I’m not blowing 2 hrs on a video that OANN had to provide a thorough disclaimer for. Plus if the evidence was so good why bring on the drunk wacko that was an internet punchline for two weeks? If you’re presenting your case maybe leave out the nut job.
I told you to fast forward to the last 30 minutes, head in sand boy.
Comments
Trust the media.
Which is still 28 minutes past the leftists attention span and your typical CNN baseless claims reporting.
You forgot “wake up” and “sheeple” in your post, incidentally.
I want you to keep touting the election scandal though. As I said, it’s the coping mechanism you and many others are using to explain the results in a way that makes sense. Trump couldn’t have lost on his own, through his own doing and through faults of his own. Had to be fraud. No other way.
Cool! Sounds fun!
I wonder if Mike believes in the face transplant story like obk does? Are you guys transplanters, too?
lol