Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Hot MyPillow guy talk

2»

Comments

  • MelloDawg
    MelloDawg Member Posts: 6,917
    edited February 2021
    NorthwestFresh said:

    MelloDawg said:

    NorthwestFresh said:

    Rubberfist said:

    Did you watch it? Is it as insane as the clips bouncing around make it appear?

    I watched some of it. He has lock-solid evidence but I already know you Rats cheated so it’s really not that informative to me. Keep with your edited news and stay ignorant.
    Odd. The evidence should have been presented in court and accepted by a judge.

    You forgot “wake up” and “sheeple” in your post, incidentally.
    Look at who doesn’t know what “dismissed by standing” means.

    What about the other 60 cases though? There were affidavits. Experts say that people who signed them could go to jail if they lied on them.

    I want you to keep touting the election scandal though. As I said, it’s the coping mechanism you and many others are using to explain the results in a way that makes sense. Trump couldn’t have lost on his own, through his own doing and through faults of his own. Had to be fraud. No other way.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    MelloDawg said:

    NorthwestFresh said:

    MelloDawg said:

    NorthwestFresh said:

    Rubberfist said:

    Did you watch it? Is it as insane as the clips bouncing around make it appear?

    I watched some of it. He has lock-solid evidence but I already know you Rats cheated so it’s really not that informative to me. Keep with your edited news and stay ignorant.
    Odd. The evidence should have been presented in court and accepted by a judge.

    You forgot “wake up” and “sheeple” in your post, incidentally.
    Look at who doesn’t know what “dismissed by standing” means.

    What about the other 60 cases though? There were affidavits. Experts say that people who signed them could go to jail if they lied on them.

    I want you to keep touting the election scandal though. As I said, it’s the coping mechanism you and many others are using to explain the results in a way that makes sense. Trump couldn’t have lost on his own, through his own doing and through faults of his own. Had to be fraud. No other way.
    It was fraud. Just as Putin and Trump steaming the 2016 election was fraud. Why no congressional investigations this time, Leftist?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Rubberfist
    Rubberfist Member Posts: 1,373
    edited February 2021
    PurpleThrobber said:

    MelloDawg said:

    NorthwestFresh said:

    Rubberfist said:

    Did you watch it? Is it as insane as the clips bouncing around make it appear?

    I watched some of it. He has lock-solid evidence but I already know you Rats cheated so it’s really not that informative to me. Keep with your edited news and stay ignorant.
    Odd. The evidence should have been presented in court and accepted by a judge.

    You forgot “wake up” and “sheeple” in your post, incidentally.
    Noted didn't make it past 2 minutes guy weighs in.

    I wouldn’t watch it cuz I’m not blowing 2 hrs on a video that OANN had to provide a thorough disclaimer for. Plus if the evidence was so good why bring on the drunk wacko that was an internet punchline for two weeks? If you’re presenting your case maybe leave out the nut job.


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,864 Standard Supporter
    Rubberfist said:

    PurpleThrobber said:

    MelloDawg said:

    NorthwestFresh said:

    Rubberfist said:

    Did you watch it? Is it as insane as the clips bouncing around make it appear?

    I watched some of it. He has lock-solid evidence but I already know you Rats cheated so it’s really not that informative to me. Keep with your edited news and stay ignorant.
    Odd. The evidence should have been presented in court and accepted by a judge.

    You forgot “wake up” and “sheeple” in your post, incidentally.
    Noted didn't make it past 2 minutes guy weighs in.

    I wouldn’t watch it cuz I’m not blowing 2 hrs on a video that OANN had to provide a thorough disclaimer for. Plus if the evidence was so good why bring on the drunk wacko that was an internet punchline for two weeks? If you’re presenting your case maybe leave out the nut job.


    I told you to fast forward to the last 30 minutes, head in sand boy.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    OAN suspended for Lindell’s factual video that no Leftist watched.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,820 Standard Supporter
    Well it's obviously true information. Twitter banned it.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,919
    My terms of service guy in Salinas says Twitter can do whatever they want.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • thechatch
    thechatch Member Posts: 7,519 Standard Supporter
    Too dangerous!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • LoneStarDawg
    LoneStarDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,779 Founders Club
    I’d prefer to watch the Maricopa county board of electors present their defense from jail
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dflea
    dflea Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,287 Swaye's Wigwam
    So you guys are still kooking out with Mike, huh?

    Cool! Sounds fun!

    I wonder if Mike believes in the face transplant story like obk does? Are you guys transplanters, too?

    lol

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter