Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Name calling of recruits

DerekJohnson
DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 68,445 Founders Club
We have few rules here and it takes a lot to get the boot. But we now have a new rule. We will no longer allow name calling of underage recruits. It's wrong on many levels. I'm sure most of us can agree that it serves no purpose toward Husky Football or this site. Thank you.
«1

Comments

  • Swaye
    Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,739 Founders Club
    Way to go PL_SS.
  • RaccoonHarry
    RaccoonHarry Member Posts: 2,161
    Sounds like name calling of overage recruits is still on the up
    and up...
  • Sarkingham
    Sarkingham Member Posts: 303
    Can we still point out when they're being idiots?
  • topdawgnc
    topdawgnc Member Posts: 7,839
    I've heard all recruiting has stopped since Peterman took over.
  • BennyBeaver
    BennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,346
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    Since one poster constantly is breaking these rules perhaps he should receive another timeout or banning?

    What's the point of rules if one poster constantly takes a shit all over them with no consequence?
  • Fenwick
    Fenwick Member Posts: 1,174
    can we use euphemisms?
  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    Leave the poasting for us Stalin, rofl buddy!!! Hardy har har
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club
    Fucking boof DJ
  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320

    Since one poster constantly is breaking these rules perhaps he should receive another timeout or banning?

    What's the point of rules if one poster constantly takes a shit all over them with no consequence?

    I like to say that a poster should get ANOTHER timeout, then in the next paragraph accuse the site of never having consequences for said poster. It's what I like to do.
    Those were not contradictory statements, the question is of repeated transgressions.
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club


    What's the point of rules if one poster constantly takes a shit all over them with no consequence?

    This post is craves some tub girl.
  • bananasnblondes
    bananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,513

    Sounds like name calling of overage recruits is still on the up
    and up...

    Tripper Johnson?
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453

    Since one poster constantly is breaking these rules perhaps he should receive another timeout or banning?

    What's the point of rules if one poster constantly takes a shit all over them with no consequence?

    I like to say that a poster should get ANOTHER timeout, then in the next paragraph accuse the site of never having consequences for said poster. It's what I like to do.
    I don't think it was contradicting. You gave him a timeout and told him to not to do it again or he'll be banned. He's repeatedly not followed your advice.

    You want this site to grow as you've said and obviously worried about potential interviews. Well how is allowing one poster to constantly post homophobic material, racial material, can't go a post without saying the word "Cock" or "Cunt" helping with that?

    He's also attacking a poster constantly which was one of your reasons for banning Harv. Like PLSS, Harv could provide some good posts. He could be an asset but chose not to follow your rules which is why you ultimately ran him. How is what PLSS doing any different than Harv?
  • Swaye
    Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,739 Founders Club

    Since one poster constantly is breaking these rules perhaps he should receive another timeout or banning?

    What's the point of rules if one poster constantly takes a shit all over them with no consequence?

    I like to say that a poster should get ANOTHER timeout, then in the next paragraph accuse the site of never having consequences for said poster. It's what I like to do.
    I don't think it was contradicting. You gave him a timeout and told him to not to do it again or he'll be banned. He's repeatedly not followed your advice.

    You want this site to grow as you've said and obviously worried about potential interviews. Well how is allowing one poster to constantly post homophobic material, racial material, can't go a post without saying the word "Cock" or "Cunt" helping with that?

    He's also attacking a poster constantly which was one of your reasons for banning Harv. Like PLSS, Harv could provide some good posts. He could be an asset but chose not to follow your rules which is why you ultimately ran him. How is what PLSS doing any different than Harv?
    What part of "new rule" don't you get? And you're not accurate on Harv vs. PLSS.
    Agree.
  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 68,445 Founders Club

    Since one poster constantly is breaking these rules perhaps he should receive another timeout or banning?

    What's the point of rules if one poster constantly takes a shit all over them with no consequence?

    I like to say that a poster should get ANOTHER timeout, then in the next paragraph accuse the site of never having consequences for said poster. It's what I like to do.
    I don't think it was contradicting. You gave him a timeout and told him to not to do it again or he'll be banned. He's repeatedly not followed your advice.

    You want this site to grow as you've said and obviously worried about potential interviews. Well how is allowing one poster to constantly post homophobic material, racial material, can't go a post without saying the word "Cock" or "Cunt" helping with that?

    He's also attacking a poster constantly which was one of your reasons for banning Harv. Like PLSS, Harv could provide some good posts. He could be an asset but chose not to follow your rules which is why you ultimately ran him. How is what PLSS doing any different than Harv?
    The thing of me being "worried" about interviews has been way overblown. I mentioned it once that it could be a concern with some of the things being posted on here.
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    edited June 2014
    The idea of banning someone because he's constantly attacking another poster and calling him a fag is gay. Most posters accounts are overdrawn from using this word anyway and everyone would have to get banned. If you can't defend yourself against a renegade poster you deserve to get mauled by a pack of wild dogs.
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,141
    edited June 2014
    What did PL SS call Thockmorton? Whatever it was, calling for him to be banned is and always was a bitch move. No need to get into that again though because it's always the same bitch calling for it, and we all know the real reason why he/she (I would hope cockus is a she) wants him banned.
  • uw2010
    uw2010 Member Posts: 940

    Since one poster constantly is breaking these rules perhaps he should receive another timeout or banning?

    What's the point of rules if one poster constantly takes a shit all over them with no consequence?

    I like to say that a poster should get ANOTHER timeout, then in the next paragraph accuse the site of never having consequences for said poster. It's what I like to do.
    I don't think it was contradicting. You gave him a timeout and told him to not to do it again or he'll be banned. He's repeatedly not followed your advice.

    You want this site to grow as you've said and obviously worried about potential interviews. Well how is allowing one poster to constantly post homophobic material, racial material, can't go a post without saying the word "Cock" or "Cunt" helping with that?

    He's also attacking a poster constantly which was one of your reasons for banning Harv. Like PLSS, Harv could provide some good posts. He could be an asset but chose not to follow your rules which is why you ultimately ran him. How is what PLSS doing any different than Harv?
    The thing of me being "worried" about interviews has been way overblown. I mentioned it once that it could be a concern with some of the things being posted on here.
    You can't expect to say something once and not hear it another 23 times.
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453

    What did PL SS call Thockmorton? Whatever it was, calling for him to be banned is and always was a bitch move. No need to get into that again though because it's always the same bitch calling for it, and we all know the real reason why he/she (I would hope cockus is a she) wants him banned.

    RoadDoog you miserable and pathetic cunt! Out of you and me who actually got a poster banned from this place? Remember when you were pressing so terribly you were inboxing me saying I'm either boobs or harv? Then Harv was abusing you like he was Oregon and you were Sark. So you ran like a bitch to get him banned so fuck you.

    Also your ass fucking partner little Jimmy has been trying to get me banned along with Orange and Boobs for the past two weeks. Of course your dumb little twat doesn't say shit. How about when you went on another drunken bender and ranted like a little cunt demanding Orange be run? Also said Fremont should be run.

    Nevermind the fact you claim you have a kid. Sure are a "great" father spending so much time on here, doing blow, getting in fights and still have time to get shit faced drunk to come on here. You sure are a fucking aspiration for so many in here.

    Do the world a favor and fuck off and die in a flaming fire you dumb cock sucking cunt.