Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Sark or Lambo: who was worse?

135

Comments

  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453

    Dumbfuck question. Lambo ' s fuckard decisions came within a play of two of rosebowls.

    Lambo benefitted from James great talent. Yet he still managed to fuck it up. 1995 was one of the worst coached seasons I can remember.
  • puppylove_sugarsteel
    puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    Check that. Within a play or two of 2 rosebowls. Sark's boneheaded decisions only cost us a sun bowl and what does it matter. ALL pac bowls stink. Embarrased to be a member of this conference...thank you Tommy you blue haired blue balled geezer
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,776

    Embarrased to be a member of this conference...

    SEC SEC SEC?
  • Fenwick
    Fenwick Member Posts: 1,174
    if you are embarrassed you could always leave
  • Swaye
    Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,741 Founders Club
    They both sucked, but Lambo sucked less. The end.
  • AZDuck
    AZDuck Member Posts: 15,390
    OZONE said:

    As an Oregon fan, I liked them both.

    YBE
  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    Not taking sides on this one.

    Just pointing out, Lambo had widespread EXPECTATIONS of winning ROSE BOWLS. Sark held no fan expectation of getting to a single Rose Bowl.
  • Gladstone
    Gladstone Member Posts: 16,425
    What was Sark's best win and worst loss? Lambos?

    Sark I'd say '09 USC as best win, although in hindsight that USC team was bad by Carroll standards...it was a huge earth shattering event at the time. The Willingham era was definitely over. I think that early success got to Sark's head though, he thought he already figured it out and didn't prepare and put in the requisite work ethic needed to win at this level.

    Lambo's best win is obvious. Loss....hmmm, the ND one didn't cost a RB but was pretty fucking stupid.