Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Sark or Lambo: who was worse?

2

Comments

  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 11,453

    Dumbfuck question. Lambo ' s fuckard decisions came within a play of two of rosebowls.

    Lambo benefitted from James great talent. Yet he still managed to fuck it up. 1995 was one of the worst coached seasons I can remember.
  • puppylove_sugarsteelpuppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    Check that. Within a play or two of 2 rosebowls. Sark's boneheaded decisions only cost us a sun bowl and what does it matter. ALL pac bowls stink. Embarrased to be a member of this conference...thank you Tommy you blue haired blue balled geezer
  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,525 Founders Club

    Embarrased to be a member of this conference...

    SEC SEC SEC?
  • FenwickFenwick Member Posts: 1,174
    if you are embarrassed you could always leave
  • SwayeSwaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,544 Founders Club
    They both sucked, but Lambo sucked less. The end.
  • AZDuckAZDuck Member Posts: 15,381
    OZONE said:

    As an Oregon fan, I liked them both.

    YBE
  • sarktasticsarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    Not taking sides on this one.

    Just pointing out, Lambo had widespread EXPECTATIONS of winning ROSE BOWLS. Sark held no fan expectation of getting to a single Rose Bowl.
  • GladstoneGladstone Member Posts: 16,419
    What was Sark's best win and worst loss? Lambos?

    Sark I'd say '09 USC as best win, although in hindsight that USC team was bad by Carroll standards...it was a huge earth shattering event at the time. The Willingham era was definitely over. I think that early success got to Sark's head though, he thought he already figured it out and didn't prepare and put in the requisite work ethic needed to win at this level.

    Lambo's best win is obvious. Loss....hmmm, the ND one didn't cost a RB but was pretty fucking stupid.
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    Gladstone said:

    What was Sark's best win and worst loss? Lambos?

    Sark I'd say '09 USC as best win, although in hindsight that USC team was bad by Carroll standards...it was a huge earth shattering event at the time. The Willingham era was definitely over. I think that early success got to Sark's head though, he thought he already figured it out and didn't prepare and put in the requisite work ethic needed to win at this level.

    Lambo's best win is obvious. Loss....hmmm, the ND one didn't cost a RB but was pretty fucking stupid.

    One of the worst Lambo loss I can remember was Oregon in 97. It didn't cost a Rose Bowl, but it was certainly pathetic.
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,805
    Which F were you most proud of?

    image
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    Check that. Within a play or two of 2 rosebowls. Sark's boneheaded decisions only cost us a sun bowl and what does it matter. ALL pac bowls stink. Embarrased to be a member of this conference...thank you Tommy you blue haired blue balled geezer

    SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC
    SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC
    SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC
    SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC
    SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC
    SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC
    SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC
    SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC
    SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC
    SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC
    SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC
    SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC
    SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC
    SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC
    SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC
    SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC
    SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC
    SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC
    SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC
    SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC
  • GladstoneGladstone Member Posts: 16,419
    Sark wasn't an F. More like an unremarkable C-
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 11,453

    Gladstone said:

    What was Sark's best win and worst loss? Lambos?

    Sark I'd say '09 USC as best win, although in hindsight that USC team was bad by Carroll standards...it was a huge earth shattering event at the time. The Willingham era was definitely over. I think that early success got to Sark's head though, he thought he already figured it out and didn't prepare and put in the requisite work ethic needed to win at this level.

    Lambo's best win is obvious. Loss....hmmm, the ND one didn't cost a RB but was pretty fucking stupid.

    One of the worst Lambo loss I can remember was Oregon in 97. It didn't cost a Rose Bowl, but it was certainly pathetic.
    That's not even in Lambo's top 2 worst losses to Oregon you newbie fucktard.

    Perhaps Doogbored is more your speed.

    He also got blown the fuck out to a shitty Stanford team in 1994. Go ahead and celebrate your 7-6 Holiday Bowl season though with your bark for sark shirt fuckhead.
  • GladstoneGladstone Member Posts: 16,419
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,805

    Gladstone said:

    What was Sark's best win and worst loss? Lambos?

    Sark I'd say '09 USC as best win, although in hindsight that USC team was bad by Carroll standards...it was a huge earth shattering event at the time. The Willingham era was definitely over. I think that early success got to Sark's head though, he thought he already figured it out and didn't prepare and put in the requisite work ethic needed to win at this level.

    Lambo's best win is obvious. Loss....hmmm, the ND one didn't cost a RB but was pretty fucking stupid.

    One of the worst Lambo loss I can remember was Oregon in 97. It didn't cost a Rose Bowl, but it was certainly pathetic.
    That's not even in Lambo's top 2 worst losses to Oregon you newbie fucktard.

    Perhaps Doogbored is more your speed.

    He also got blown the fuck out to a shitty Stanford team in 1994. Go ahead and celebrate your 7-6 Holiday Bowl season though with your bark for sark shirt fuckhead.
    He didn't call it the worst one he could remember, he called it "one of the worst Lambo losses I can remember". SOYNTLTD.

    And since 97 was probably Lambo's most talented team and the game was at home, it's definitely worthy of recognition as a fucking awful loss. I'd say there's a decent argument for it as one of the worst two losses to UO, along with 95 (with 94 obviously the worst).

    When it comes to bad Lambo losses, the answer is always abundance.
  • CuntWaffleCuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499
    What an awful choice. Lambo would probably plunger Sark though.
  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,525 Founders Club
    edited June 2014
    The memory that will always stick in my mind of Lambright was getting plungered by Air Force in his last game, and promptly door assed out after. I'm too young to remember his early years. I'd still take him over Sark. He left Rick some great linemen, unlike Sark who neglected the position.
Sign In or Register to comment.