Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Sark or Lambo: who was worse?

Gladstone
Gladstone Member Posts: 16,425
edited June 2014 in Hardcore Husky Board
Is it worse to inherit greatness and plummet into average or to inherit dogshit and crawl onto a plateau of mediocrity?

Who had the best win? Probably Lambo's whammy in Miami.

Who had the worst loss? I say 2012 Apple Cup. Amazingly there were still legions and legions of doogs frothing at the mouth defending Sark after that one.

#offseasontalk
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1345

Comments

  • Mad_Son
    Mad_Son Member Posts: 10,194
    Sark was worse. Lambo did mediocre the right way.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • chuck
    chuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,819 Swaye's Wigwam
    whatshouldicareabout said:

    Didn't we have this conversation back in March?

    I still say Lambo was the better of the two despite him bringing us down rather than Sark bringing us up (obligatory 0-12). Sark should've never been in a position to bring us up because we're WASHINGTON DAMMIT, so I don't really see that as too much of a positive for him.

    Lambo's record at UW was 44-25-1 (.636) and 31-16-1 (.656) in conference.
    Sark's record at UW was 31-29 (.517) and 24-21 (.533) in conference. (I removed DI-AA games because that's a knock on Sark, ruining our streak of never playing DI-AA teams)

    So yeah, Sark was worse.

    My old friend Tailgater said stats are for losers.

    Plus Lambo never had to beat a ranked Oregon State. Has that been mentioned?

    Lambo's biggest problem was that he didn't recruit the edgy WRs from the inner city. A couple more Sark type guys and some sideline dancing would have raised the excitement factor a bit. I personally got a little bored during the Lambo years, choosing to spend more of my time drinking and screwing skanks.

    But...Tailgater was full of shit and the stats don't lie. Lambright wins comfortably.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,329
    sark was worser. this isn't really even a question.

    give me sark's sig win and give me lambo's. the "inherited a mess" talk is for luzerz. i just don't care.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    Guys stop quoting Lambo's win percentage like its good. He inherited a program who was 31-5 the previous three years. His win % would be similar to Sark's had he took over at any other point in program history.

    Both coaches sucked ass. I'd rather state at Lemon Party than relive the Lambo and Sark years.

    What's next? We'll debate between Boobs and Affirmitative action on who was better coach?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    Guys stop quoting Lambo's win percentage like its good. He inherited a program who was 31-5 the previous three years. His win % would be similar to Sark's had he took over at any other point in program history.

    Both coaches sucked ass. I'd rather state at Lemon Party than relive the Lambo and Sark years.

    What's next? We'll debate between Boobs and Affirmitative action on who was better coach?

    Agree, Lambo's true talent came through in his last couple years. Seven Win Steve before Sark
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter