Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Sark or Lambo: who was worse?

245

Comments

  • mobey
    mobey Member Posts: 3,254
    Sark was worse.

    He's a sleezy fucking incompetent scammer.

    Lambo was just not that good.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,773
    Sark could have played one of Lambo's 11 game schedules and still managed to go 7-6
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AtomicDawg
    AtomicDawg Member Posts: 7,358
    edited June 2014
    I will say Lambo was worse. Was handed a top 5-10 program at the time with lots of talent coming through and managed to drive into mediocrity within 4 years.

    Being 31 years old Lambo gave the first exposure of expecting uw to get their asses kicked on the road and something that both he and sark excelled at.

    Sark is a dip shit don't get me wrong, I just like to think a dead corpse could have led the program to 7 win/ season in 1994-1998. Lambo surpassed that once.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 26,123 Standard Supporter
    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    Guys stop quoting Lambo's win percentage like its good. He inherited a program who was 31-5 the previous three years. His win % would be similar to Sark's had he took over at any other point in program history.

    Both coaches sucked ass. I'd rather state at Lemon Party than relive the Lambo and Sark years.

    What's next? We'll debate between Boobs and Affirmitative action on who was better coach?

    Huh??
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MisterEm
    MisterEm Member Posts: 6,685
    OZONE said:

    As an Oregon fan, I liked them both.

    POTD.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    Sark loses on the dude brah tie breaker making this a cool thread for lambright.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DeLarry
    DeLarry Member Posts: 230
    I hated Sark, but it's fair to mention that Lamborghini (thanks, autocorrect) followed the recently retired Don James and a program that just saw three consecutive Rose Bowl appearances including a national title. Sark followed 11-37. Hard to make a head to head comparison.

    You guys act like 0-12 never happened.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    I'd rather have Lambo than Sark because he wasn't a constant embarrassment off the field.

    I think Lambo was a slighty better recruiter. He couldn't recruit skill guys to save his life but he did bring in DL/OL/LB's while Sark was a good skill recruiter but not a OL/DL/LB's recruiter.

    As a gameday coach both were equally shitty. Throw inside the 10 yard line, plunger raped on the road in big games, lose to shitty opponents, pretty solid at home but shitty on the road.

    Lambo is really overrated by Doogs(hi Fleenor!) because they look at his W-L% . They assume he got a raw deal but the program was slipping under his watch and his W-L% is boosted due to having so much talent. His W-L% would been similar to Sark's had he took over at any other point in his career or if UW allowed him to continue to coach.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Fenwick
    Fenwick Member Posts: 1,174
    I never once worried tht a Sark team would beat us. He seemed best at making faces and shaking his head. I don't believe he was really invested in you guys, just used the team as a stepping stone and damned if USC didn't bite. He wanted trust and respect but who did he trust and respect?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • puppylove_sugarsteel
    puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    Dumbfuck question. Lambo ' s fuckard decisions came within a play of two of rosebowls.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter