Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Sark or Lambo: who was worse?
Gladstone
Member Posts: 16,419
Is it worse to inherit greatness and plummet into average or to inherit dogshit and crawl onto a plateau of mediocrity?
Who had the best win? Probably Lambo's whammy in Miami.
Who had the worst loss? I say 2012 Apple Cup. Amazingly there were still legions and legions of doogs frothing at the mouth defending Sark after that one.
#offseasontalk
Who had the best win? Probably Lambo's whammy in Miami.
Who had the worst loss? I say 2012 Apple Cup. Amazingly there were still legions and legions of doogs frothing at the mouth defending Sark after that one.
#offseasontalk
Comments
-
Sark was worse. Lambo did mediocre the right way.
-
This will be quite the dilemma for Puppylove.
-
Last I checked, Lambo didn't lead a cheer at Don James' funeral
-
Didn't we have this conversation back in March?
I still say Lambo was the better of the two despite him bringing us down rather than Sark bringing us up (obligatory 0-12). Sark should've never been in a position to bring us up because we're WASHINGTON DAMMIT, so I don't really see that as too much of a positive for him.
Lambo's record at UW was 44-25-1 (.636) and 31-16-1 (.656) in conference.
Sark's record at UW was 31-29 (.517) and 24-21 (.533) in conference. (I removed DI-AA games because that's a knock on Sark, ruining our streak of never playing DI-AA teams)
So yeah, Sark was worse. -
I like to live a life of abundance and say both sucked ass. I'm glad neither one is coaching our team.
For what it's worth Sark fucking up games cost us 9 wins. Lambo fucking up games cost us Rose Bowls. -
My old friend Tailgater said stats are for losers.whatshouldicareabout said:Didn't we have this conversation back in March?
I still say Lambo was the better of the two despite him bringing us down rather than Sark bringing us up (obligatory 0-12). Sark should've never been in a position to bring us up because we're WASHINGTON DAMMIT, so I don't really see that as too much of a positive for him.
Lambo's record at UW was 44-25-1 (.636) and 31-16-1 (.656) in conference.
Sark's record at UW was 31-29 (.517) and 24-21 (.533) in conference. (I removed DI-AA games because that's a knock on Sark, ruining our streak of never playing DI-AA teams)
So yeah, Sark was worse.
Plus Lambo never had to beat a ranked Oregon State. Has that been mentioned?
Lambo's biggest problem was that he didn't recruit the edgy WRs from the inner city. A couple more Sark type guys and some sideline dancing would have raised the excitement factor a bit. I personally got a little bored during the Lambo years, choosing to spend more of my time drinking and screwing skanks.
But...Tailgater was full of shit and the stats don't lie. Lambright wins comfortably. -
sark was worser. this isn't really even a question.
give me sark's sig win and give me lambo's. the "inherited a mess" talk is for luzerz. i just don't care. -
Guys stop quoting Lambo's win percentage like its good. He inherited a program who was 31-5 the previous three years. His win % would be similar to Sark's had he took over at any other point in program history.
Both coaches sucked ass. I'd rather state at Lemon Party than relive the Lambo and Sark years.
What's next? We'll debate between Boobs and Affirmitative action on who was better coach? -
Agree, Lambo's true talent came through in his last couple years. Seven Win Steve before SarkHe_Needs_More_Time said:Guys stop quoting Lambo's win percentage like its good. He inherited a program who was 31-5 the previous three years. His win % would be similar to Sark's had he took over at any other point in program history.
Both coaches sucked ass. I'd rather state at Lemon Party than relive the Lambo and Sark years.
What's next? We'll debate between Boobs and Affirmitative action on who was better coach? -
As an Oregon fan, I liked them both.
-
Sark was worse.
He's a sleezy fucking incompetent scammer.
Lambo was just not that good.
-
Sark could have played one of Lambo's 11 game schedules and still managed to go 7-6
-
I will say Lambo was worse. Was handed a top 5-10 program at the time with lots of talent coming through and managed to drive into mediocrity within 4 years.
Being 31 years old Lambo gave the first exposure of expecting uw to get their asses kicked on the road and something that both he and sark excelled at.
Sark is a dip shit don't get me wrong, I just like to think a dead corpse could have led the program to 7 win/ season in 1994-1998. Lambo surpassed that once. -
Huh??He_Needs_More_Time said:Guys stop quoting Lambo's win percentage like its good. He inherited a program who was 31-5 the previous three years. His win % would be similar to Sark's had he took over at any other point in program history.
Both coaches sucked ass. I'd rather state at Lemon Party than relive the Lambo and Sark years.
What's next? We'll debate between Boobs and Affirmitative action on who was better coach? -
-
Sark loses on the dude brah tie breaker making this a cool thread for lambright.
-
I hated Sark, but it's fair to mention that Lamborghini (thanks, autocorrect) followed the recently retired Don James and a program that just saw three consecutive Rose Bowl appearances including a national title. Sark followed 11-37. Hard to make a head to head comparison.
You guys act like 0-12 never happened.
-
I'd rather have Lambo than Sark because he wasn't a constant embarrassment off the field.
I think Lambo was a slighty better recruiter. He couldn't recruit skill guys to save his life but he did bring in DL/OL/LB's while Sark was a good skill recruiter but not a OL/DL/LB's recruiter.
As a gameday coach both were equally shitty. Throw inside the 10 yard line, plunger raped on the road in big games, lose to shitty opponents, pretty solid at home but shitty on the road.
Lambo is really overrated by Doogs(hi Fleenor!) because they look at his W-L% . They assume he got a raw deal but the program was slipping under his watch and his W-L% is boosted due to having so much talent. His W-L% would been similar to Sark's had he took over at any other point in his career or if UW allowed him to continue to coach. -
I never once worried tht a Sark team would beat us. He seemed best at making faces and shaking his head. I don't believe he was really invested in you guys, just used the team as a stepping stone and damned if USC didn't bite. He wanted trust and respect but who did he trust and respect?
-
Dumbfuck question. Lambo ' s fuckard decisions came within a play of two of rosebowls.
-
Lambo benefitted from James great talent. Yet he still managed to fuck it up. 1995 was one of the worst coached seasons I can remember.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Dumbfuck question. Lambo ' s fuckard decisions came within a play of two of rosebowls.
-
Check that. Within a play or two of 2 rosebowls. Sark's boneheaded decisions only cost us a sun bowl and what does it matter. ALL pac bowls stink. Embarrased to be a member of this conference...thank you Tommy you blue haired blue balled geezer
-
Cock you a retarded and ignant motherfucker. Thought you went to games in the 90's? Remember John Fiala ' s simple interception that sealed our Rose Bowl? Of course you don't bitch. Lambo didn't drop Otten's pass. Who is Otten you're asking your dumbass self. Just shut your cunt hole and stay out of actual football conversations.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Lambo benefitted from James great talent. Yet he still managed to fuck it up. 1995 was one of the worst coached seasons I can remember.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Dumbfuck question. Lambo ' s fuckard decisions came within a play of two of rosebowls.
-
SEC SEC SEC?puppylove_sugarsteel said:Embarrased to be a member of this conference...
-
if you are embarrassed you could always leave
-
I was at the game you are referring to there dumb fuck. The team blew a 21-0 lead at home. The Doog in you of course blames the refs and blames the players.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Cock you a retarded and ignant motherfucker. Thought you went to games in the 90's? Remember John Fiala ' s simple interception that sealed our Rose Bowl? Of course you don't bitch. Lambo didn't drop Otten's pass. Who is Otten you're asking your dumbass self. Just shut your cunt hole and stay out of actual football conversations.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Lambo benefitted from James great talent. Yet he still managed to fuck it up. 1995 was one of the worst coached seasons I can remember.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Dumbfuck question. Lambo ' s fuckard decisions came within a play of two of rosebowls.
Fuck you just sounded like a Doog word for word during the Sarkingham era. -
They both sucked, but Lambo sucked less. The end.
-
YBEOZONE said:As an Oregon fan, I liked them both.
-
Not taking sides on this one.
Just pointing out, Lambo had widespread EXPECTATIONS of winning ROSE BOWLS. Sark held no fan expectation of getting to a single Rose Bowl. -
What was Sark's best win and worst loss? Lambos?
Sark I'd say '09 USC as best win, although in hindsight that USC team was bad by Carroll standards...it was a huge earth shattering event at the time. The Willingham era was definitely over. I think that early success got to Sark's head though, he thought he already figured it out and didn't prepare and put in the requisite work ethic needed to win at this level.
Lambo's best win is obvious. Loss....hmmm, the ND one didn't cost a RB but was pretty fucking stupid.
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
