Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Trump parts with impeachment lawyers a week before the trial

12357

Comments

  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    How do you impeach the former CEO of a bankrupted corporation that no longer exists? RIP America Inc.

    How do you impeach a President or Resident of a foreign nation - the Republic of the United States, from the City State of Washington DC, which is not part of the USA, and has no jurisdiction to hold such proceedings?
  • MelloDawg
    MelloDawg Member Posts: 6,917
    Goduckies said:

    HHusky said:

    What

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    doogie said:

    animate said:

    Kaepsknee said:

    animate said:

    Again, how do you give a guy two weeks to prepare for a trial?

    How do you impeach a guy who is no longer president?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iy_IIbAtgJo

    Everyone quit his team. Even the lawyers know it's not a winning situation.
    Or. They wish to not participate in this farce that has no winners.



    Except Facebook wine wife anyway.
    Well, my post goes both ways. I purposely kept it vague and people take it the way they want it.

    But the real truthful part that people overlook is that trump has a history of shafting what he owes.

    Recently he verbalized threats to not pay guilani ... why would any lawyer take an honest account of what's happening and say to themselves "yeah this is worth the risk ..."

    You’d think an attorney would think of asking for a retainer
    I'm sure they did, and that's why the issue has to be their disagreement about what would be presented.

    I don't know how the new lawyers propose to do the dance between a crazy client's whims and their ethical obligations.
    So the accused has no voice in his defense? I expected that from you.
    Are you actually this ignorant about what a lawyer can present to a court?

    Lin Wood and Sidney Powell are likely to face sanctions.

    Rudy was always more careful about what he said to any court. Not so much what he said to the press, of course, which is why he's being sued.
    A political Show Trial presided over by a Democrat Senator is a kangaroo court and should be treated as a farce.
    So the defense at their disciplinary hearing is that a trial before the Senate in their role as lawyers didn't require them to behave ethically.

    Good luck with that.
    Even John Roberts knows this is a complete farce. I’m sure Leaky Leahy will run an honest Kangaroo Court.
    Exactly
    I’m sure many on this board would be pushing full steam ahead on healing and reducing divisiveness if there was a “D” before the political party of the president in question instead of an “R.” The trial would still be seen as a farce and in no way should it proceed.

    You guys are so neat.
  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072
    Mello, what is the point of conducting this so-called Trial?
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,527 Founders Club
    MelloDawg said:

    Goduckies said:

    HHusky said:

    What

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    doogie said:

    animate said:

    Kaepsknee said:

    animate said:

    Again, how do you give a guy two weeks to prepare for a trial?

    How do you impeach a guy who is no longer president?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iy_IIbAtgJo

    Everyone quit his team. Even the lawyers know it's not a winning situation.
    Or. They wish to not participate in this farce that has no winners.



    Except Facebook wine wife anyway.
    Well, my post goes both ways. I purposely kept it vague and people take it the way they want it.

    But the real truthful part that people overlook is that trump has a history of shafting what he owes.

    Recently he verbalized threats to not pay guilani ... why would any lawyer take an honest account of what's happening and say to themselves "yeah this is worth the risk ..."

    You’d think an attorney would think of asking for a retainer
    I'm sure they did, and that's why the issue has to be their disagreement about what would be presented.

    I don't know how the new lawyers propose to do the dance between a crazy client's whims and their ethical obligations.
    So the accused has no voice in his defense? I expected that from you.
    Are you actually this ignorant about what a lawyer can present to a court?

    Lin Wood and Sidney Powell are likely to face sanctions.

    Rudy was always more careful about what he said to any court. Not so much what he said to the press, of course, which is why he's being sued.
    A political Show Trial presided over by a Democrat Senator is a kangaroo court and should be treated as a farce.
    So the defense at their disciplinary hearing is that a trial before the Senate in their role as lawyers didn't require them to behave ethically.

    Good luck with that.
    Even John Roberts knows this is a complete farce. I’m sure Leaky Leahy will run an honest Kangaroo Court.
    Exactly
    I’m sure many on this board would be pushing full steam ahead on healing and reducing divisiveness if there was a “D” before the political party of the president in question instead of an “R.” The trial would still be seen as a farce and in no way should it proceed.

    You guys are so neat.
    Welcome to 2016. You see any democrats on trial

    Biden sucks . You fell for it. Own it

    You're a democrat hack. Own that too
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    It's neat how you actually believe there is a difference between an R and a D. One Party, two factions.

    All Nazi. All Communist. The US government has managed to meld the two worst ideologies of the 20th Century, and turn that machine on the American people.
  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    edited February 2021
    MelloDawg said:

    Goduckies said:

    HHusky said:

    What

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    doogie said:

    animate said:

    Kaepsknee said:

    animate said:

    Again, how do you give a guy two weeks to prepare for a trial?

    How do you impeach a guy who is no longer president?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iy_IIbAtgJo

    Everyone quit his team. Even the lawyers know it's not a winning situation.
    Or. They wish to not participate in this farce that has no winners.



    Except Facebook wine wife anyway.
    Well, my post goes both ways. I purposely kept it vague and people take it the way they want it.

    But the real truthful part that people overlook is that trump has a history of shafting what he owes.

    Recently he verbalized threats to not pay guilani ... why would any lawyer take an honest account of what's happening and say to themselves "yeah this is worth the risk ..."

    You’d think an attorney would think of asking for a retainer
    I'm sure they did, and that's why the issue has to be their disagreement about what would be presented.

    I don't know how the new lawyers propose to do the dance between a crazy client's whims and their ethical obligations.
    So the accused has no voice in his defense? I expected that from you.
    Are you actually this ignorant about what a lawyer can present to a court?

    Lin Wood and Sidney Powell are likely to face sanctions.

    Rudy was always more careful about what he said to any court. Not so much what he said to the press, of course, which is why he's being sued.
    A political Show Trial presided over by a Democrat Senator is a kangaroo court and should be treated as a farce.
    So the defense at their disciplinary hearing is that a trial before the Senate in their role as lawyers didn't require them to behave ethically.

    Good luck with that.
    Even John Roberts knows this is a complete farce. I’m sure Leaky Leahy will run an honest Kangaroo Court.
    Exactly
    I’m sure many on this board would be pushing full steam ahead on healing and reducing divisiveness if there was a “D” before the political party of the president in question instead of an “R.” The trial would still be seen as a farce and in no way should it proceed.

    You guys are so neat.
    The GOP doesn’t have the media behind them to pull such a shameless partisan stunt.

    I don’t want unity with a milquetoast liberal like you. It’s your side calling for it as you do the exact opposite in your actions.

    What did Trump do that deserved impeachment and ... removal, I guess? Questioning an election? Pelosi did that herself when Trump won and you fools applauded her for it and cheered on a bogus Russian Hoax.

  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    At least 2/3 of the US congress will be facing tribunals, life in prison sentences or execution by firing squad. That's what happens when you get caught trying to install a Neo Nazi/Neo Communist regime.
  • animate
    animate Member Posts: 4,245
    Hey ... just to add some realistic weight to this bitch-slappy fest between down's contestants ... youse guys need to adopt chinese surnames for future authenticity.

    Y'know ... like:

    Sled-dong
    Northwes-xi
    Bendinthe-mao

    You get small discounts from the alibaba clearance marketplace ...
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,530 Standard Supporter

    How do you impeach the former CEO of a bankrupted corporation that no longer exists? RIP America Inc.

    How do you impeach a President or Resident of a foreign nation - the Republic of the United States, from the City State of Washington DC, which is not part of the USA, and has no jurisdiction to hold such proceedings?

    Also, ask yourself, if a Dementia-riddled illegitimate President in said City State makes crazy edicts, does the Pope shit in the woods in his City State?