Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Rats are going all-in on Fascism. Plans grounded because people supported Drumpf

NorthwestFresh
NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
edited January 2021 in Tug Tavern
I want @dflea when the shit really hits the fan. I’d kick that midget’s faggy ass. 7-11!

«1

Comments

  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    I want @dflea when the shit really hits the fan. I’d kick that midget’s faggy ass. 7-11!

    What's the big deal? Private businesses can do whatever they like.
  • Rubberfist
    Rubberfist Member Posts: 1,373
    Gee, I wonder if there’s more to the story.
  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    edited January 2021

    Gee, I wonder if there’s more to the story.

    No arrests. Just people talking about supporting Trump and soft Leftists like you got upset and had the plane diverted.

    Trump supporters are Nazis! You fags...
  • MelloDawg
    MelloDawg Member Posts: 6,848

    Gee, I wonder if there’s more to the story.

    I doubt it. No one on this board has ever posted a tweet that later turned out to be false. I’m sure it’s all exactly as it seems.
  • MelloDawg
    MelloDawg Member Posts: 6,848
    SFGbob said:

    Let me see if I have this straight, leftists believe that a private business must bake a gay couple a wedding cake even if gay marriage is an affront to their religious views of the owner of the bakery. But a private company has no obligation to rent a car, or offer a hotel room or sell an airline ticket to someone if they don't like their politics.

    Yeah, this is going to end well.

    No private business has the obligation to serve any customer. I agree.

    Except Twitter...Twitter shouldn’t suspend people’s accounts for any reason and doing so is communist censorship by the politburo.
  • GreenRiverGatorz
    GreenRiverGatorz Member Posts: 10,165
    SFGbob said:

    Let me see if I have this straight, leftists believe that a private business must bake a gay couple a wedding cake even if gay marriage is an affront to their religious views of the owner of the bakery. But a private company has no obligation to rent a car, or offer a hotel room or sell an airline ticket to someone if they don't like their politics.

    Yeah, this is going to end well.

    What do you believe?
  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    MelloDawg said:

    SFGbob said:

    Let me see if I have this straight, leftists believe that a private business must bake a gay couple a wedding cake even if gay marriage is an affront to their religious views of the owner of the bakery. But a private company has no obligation to rent a car, or offer a hotel room or sell an airline ticket to someone if they don't like their politics.

    Yeah, this is going to end well.

    No private business has the obligation to serve any customer. I agree.

    Except Twitter...Twitter shouldn’t suspend people’s accounts for any reason and doing so is communist censorship by the politburo.
    You’re so boring. Just let your inner Leftist self out.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    SFGbob said:

    Let me see if I have this straight, leftists believe that a private business must bake a gay couple a wedding cake even if gay marriage is an affront to their religious views of the owner of the bakery. But a private company has no obligation to rent a car, or offer a hotel room or sell an airline ticket to someone if they don't like their politics.

    Yeah, this is going to end well.

    What do you believe?
    I believe in freedom. Can a private utility deny electrical service to someone if they disagree with their politics?
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    MelloDawg said:

    SFGbob said:

    Let me see if I have this straight, leftists believe that a private business must bake a gay couple a wedding cake even if gay marriage is an affront to their religious views of the owner of the bakery. But a private company has no obligation to rent a car, or offer a hotel room or sell an airline ticket to someone if they don't like their politics.

    Yeah, this is going to end well.

    No private business has the obligation to serve any customer. I agree.

    Except Twitter...Twitter shouldn’t suspend people’s accounts for any reason and doing so is communist censorship by the politburo.
    Really? Can a business deny service to black people if they don't like them?
  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    SFGbob said:

    MelloDawg said:

    SFGbob said:

    Let me see if I have this straight, leftists believe that a private business must bake a gay couple a wedding cake even if gay marriage is an affront to their religious views of the owner of the bakery. But a private company has no obligation to rent a car, or offer a hotel room or sell an airline ticket to someone if they don't like their politics.

    Yeah, this is going to end well.

    No private business has the obligation to serve any customer. I agree.

    Except Twitter...Twitter shouldn’t suspend people’s accounts for any reason and doing so is communist censorship by the politburo.
    Really? Can a business deny service to black people if they don't like them?
    They can’t because SCOTUS has protected being Black as a lesser human being needed to be helped by discrimination based on race.
  • TheKobeStopper
    TheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    SFGbob said:

    Let me see if I have this straight, leftists believe that a private business must bake a gay couple a wedding cake even if gay marriage is an affront to their religious views of the owner of the bakery. But a private company has no obligation to rent a car, or offer a hotel room or sell an airline ticket to someone if they don't like their politics.

    Yeah, this is going to end well.

    That’s correct. See one is a choice you make and the other is something you are born as. It’s called protected classes.

    I know you’re still mad they let blacks use the same public restrooms as you but the rest of us are trying to move forward.
  • Rubberfist
    Rubberfist Member Posts: 1,373
    SFGbob said:

    Let me see if I have this straight, leftists believe that a private business must bake a gay couple a wedding cake even if gay marriage is an affront to their religious views of the owner of the bakery. But a private company has no obligation to rent a car, or offer a hotel room or sell an airline ticket to someone if they don't like their politics.

    Yeah, this is going to end well.

    In Bob’s America restaurants are perfectly within their right to not server black people. Right, Bob?
  • thechatch
    thechatch Member Posts: 7,226 Standard Supporter
    MelloDawg said:

    Gee, I wonder if there’s more to the story.

    I doubt it. No one on this board has ever posted a tweet that later turned out to be false. I’m sure it’s all exactly as it seems.
    James Comey appreciates this post.
  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972

    SFGbob said:

    Let me see if I have this straight, leftists believe that a private business must bake a gay couple a wedding cake even if gay marriage is an affront to their religious views of the owner of the bakery. But a private company has no obligation to rent a car, or offer a hotel room or sell an airline ticket to someone if they don't like their politics.

    Yeah, this is going to end well.

    In Bob’s America restaurants are perfectly within their right to not server black people. Right, Bob?
    Nobody here has said that other than you, Stinkfist.
  • GreenRiverGatorz
    GreenRiverGatorz Member Posts: 10,165
    edited January 2021
    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Let me see if I have this straight, leftists believe that a private business must bake a gay couple a wedding cake even if gay marriage is an affront to their religious views of the owner of the bakery. But a private company has no obligation to rent a car, or offer a hotel room or sell an airline ticket to someone if they don't like their politics.

    Yeah, this is going to end well.

    What do you believe?
    I believe in freedom. Can a private utility deny electrical service to someone if they disagree with their politics?
    That's not really an answer. Any reasonable person doesn't like a company subjectively censoring users. But as long as companies bend to the collective will of customers, this kind of selective censorship isn't going away on its own.

    So what's your answer? Treat them as a publisher and remove their section 230 exemptions, in which case they begin censoring anything that could be perceived as a liability? Or is there a healthier alternative here that I'm forgetting?
  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072
    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Let me see if I have this straight, leftists believe that a private business must bake a gay couple a wedding cake even if gay marriage is an affront to their religious views of the owner of the bakery. But a private company has no obligation to rent a car, or offer a hotel room or sell an airline ticket to someone if they don't like their politics.

    Yeah, this is going to end well.

    What do you believe?
    I believe in freedom. Can a private utility deny electrical service to someone if they disagree with their politics?
    Absolutely. The power company, gas company, water company, grocery stores, every company has the right to punish Trump voters
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,754 Standard Supporter
    MelloDawg said:

    SFGbob said:

    Let me see if I have this straight, leftists believe that a private business must bake a gay couple a wedding cake even if gay marriage is an affront to their religious views of the owner of the bakery. But a private company has no obligation to rent a car, or offer a hotel room or sell an airline ticket to someone if they don't like their politics.

    Yeah, this is going to end well.

    No private business has the obligation to serve any customer. I agree.

    Except Twitter...Twitter shouldn’t suspend people’s accounts for any reason and doing so is communist censorship by the politburo.
    Which you fully support. Right comrade?
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    SFGbob said:

    Let me see if I have this straight, leftists believe that a private business must bake a gay couple a wedding cake even if gay marriage is an affront to their religious views of the owner of the bakery. But a private company has no obligation to rent a car, or offer a hotel room or sell an airline ticket to someone if they don't like their politics.

    Yeah, this is going to end well.

    In Bob’s America restaurants are perfectly within their right to not server black people. Right, Bob?
    That's the America you and Dazzler have been saying you want. Private businesses can deny anyone service.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,754 Standard Supporter
    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Let me see if I have this straight, leftists believe that a private business must bake a gay couple a wedding cake even if gay marriage is an affront to their religious views of the owner of the bakery. But a private company has no obligation to rent a car, or offer a hotel room or sell an airline ticket to someone if they don't like their politics.

    Yeah, this is going to end well.

    In Bob’s America restaurants are perfectly within their right to not server black people. Right, Bob?
    That's the America you and Dazzler have been saying you want. Private businesses can deny anyone service.
    Unless they're conservative or doing it on religious grounds.
  • Rubberfist
    Rubberfist Member Posts: 1,373
    edited January 2021
    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Let me see if I have this straight, leftists believe that a private business must bake a gay couple a wedding cake even if gay marriage is an affront to their religious views of the owner of the bakery. But a private company has no obligation to rent a car, or offer a hotel room or sell an airline ticket to someone if they don't like their politics.

    Yeah, this is going to end well.

    In Bob’s America restaurants are perfectly within their right to not server black people. Right, Bob?
    That's the America you and Dazzler have been saying you want. Private businesses can deny anyone service.
    You must be new to the concept of “terms of service.”

    On Twitter I told a Nazi to kill himself and got a 12 hr ban within minutes.
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 25,616 Standard Supporter

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Let me see if I have this straight, leftists believe that a private business must bake a gay couple a wedding cake even if gay marriage is an affront to their religious views of the owner of the bakery. But a private company has no obligation to rent a car, or offer a hotel room or sell an airline ticket to someone if they don't like their politics.

    Yeah, this is going to end well.

    In Bob’s America restaurants are perfectly within their right to not server black people. Right, Bob?
    That's the America you and Dazzler have been saying you want. Private businesses can deny anyone service.
    You must be new to the concept of “terms of service.”

    On Twitter I told a Nazi to kill himself and got a 12 hr ban within minutes.
    A real Nazi, or the 120,000,000 NAZIs the left has labelled anyone who doesn't go along with their SJW dogma? I'm guessing the latter. You're another one who hides behind a keyboard.
  • huskyhooligan
    huskyhooligan Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 5,930 Swaye's Wigwam
    So last I checked Delta and a majority of airlines utilize publicly funded and subsidized airports in order to make their money. Unless Delta can show in the terms of their sales agreement that 'supporting the president' is grounds for removal, I'd expect them to lose in court.
  • GreenRiverGatorz
    GreenRiverGatorz Member Posts: 10,165
    edited January 2021

    So last I checked Delta and a majority of airlines utilize publicly funded and subsidized airports in order to make their money. Unless Delta can show in the terms of their sales agreement that 'supporting the president' is grounds for removal, I'd expect them to lose in court.

    I don't think utilization of public property is relevant. If they did remove someone for simple ideology I think there'd be a nice fat settlement regardless.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,883 Founders Club

    So last I checked Delta and a majority of airlines utilize publicly funded and subsidized airports in order to make their money. Unless Delta can show in the terms of their sales agreement that 'supporting the president' is grounds for removal, I'd expect them to lose in court.

    Interstate commerce

    Time for freedom riders
  • dflea
    dflea Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,287 Swaye's Wigwam

    I want @dflea when the shit really hits the fan. I’d kick that midget’s faggy ass. 7-11!

    Motherfucker, I'd gut you like a fucking fish and then make a little hut out of your skin to live in. And then I'd laugh about how easy it was.


    I'm sure this happened exactly like you say it did.

    Or it didn't, and you're just a sniveling little cunt that has to cry about everything and won't let anything stop you. Why don't you and thechunt get a room and cry it out together?