Husky Jacks open thread [2021]
Comments
-
I miss him so much.FecalFeast said: -
I could see BAMA hiring him to prove all he was missing was that SEC Speed
-
I think he’d corch at Stanfurd if they were interested
-
Do we know if the opt outs (Kizer, Gilchrist, and T Davis) have indicated if they're coming back or not?
I don't see anything either way, but I could have missed it during the past month when I was paying no attention. They're not listed on the 2021 roster, but that doesn't appear to be very accurate at the moment. -
I cant imagine they are coming back. The best chance for playing time among the 3 would probably be Kizer who might get a few snaps as a backup FBWoof said:Do we know if the opt outs (Kizer, Gilchrist, and T Davis) have indicated if they're coming back or not?
I don't see anything either way, but I could have missed it during the past month when I was paying no attention. They're not listed on the 2021 roster, but that doesn't appear to be very accurate at the moment. -
I'd take Kizer back. He's a great blocker and an explosive athlete that could surprise someone in a game for a big play. Gilchrist has had plenty of time to prove he's not a useful player. Davis never looked bad to me but was kind of a filler recruit. He probably can't compete with the other young WR and I assumed that played into sitting out the season.bananasnblondes said:
I cant imagine they are coming back. The best chance for playing time among the 3 would probably be Kizer who might get a few snaps as a backup FBWoof said:Do we know if the opt outs (Kizer, Gilchrist, and T Davis) have indicated if they're coming back or not?
I don't see anything either way, but I could have missed it during the past month when I was paying no attention. They're not listed on the 2021 roster, but that doesn't appear to be very accurate at the moment.
My guess is that all three are gone. -
I agree with everything but you left out the most obvious reason they’re not returning:chuck said:
I'd take Kizer back. He's a great blocker and an explosive athlete that could surprise someone in a game for a big play. Gilchrist has had plenty of time to prove he's not a useful player. Davis never looked bad to me but was kind of a filler recruit. He probably can't compete with the other young WR and I assumed that played into sitting out the season.bananasnblondes said:
I cant imagine they are coming back. The best chance for playing time among the 3 would probably be Kizer who might get a few snaps as a backup FBWoof said:Do we know if the opt outs (Kizer, Gilchrist, and T Davis) have indicated if they're coming back or not?
I don't see anything either way, but I could have missed it during the past month when I was paying no attention. They're not listed on the 2021 roster, but that doesn't appear to be very accurate at the moment.
My guess is that all three are gone.
We’re full. -
Thanks taffCFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
I agree with everything but you left out the most obvious reason they’re not returning:chuck said:
I'd take Kizer back. He's a great blocker and an explosive athlete that could surprise someone in a game for a big play. Gilchrist has had plenty of time to prove he's not a useful player. Davis never looked bad to me but was kind of a filler recruit. He probably can't compete with the other young WR and I assumed that played into sitting out the season.bananasnblondes said:
I cant imagine they are coming back. The best chance for playing time among the 3 would probably be Kizer who might get a few snaps as a backup FBWoof said:Do we know if the opt outs (Kizer, Gilchrist, and T Davis) have indicated if they're coming back or not?
I don't see anything either way, but I could have missed it during the past month when I was paying no attention. They're not listed on the 2021 roster, but that doesn't appear to be very accurate at the moment.
My guess is that all three are gone.
We’re full. -
-
There is an absolutely disgusting level of Sark ball gargling going on at dawgman right now. Grinders, of course, is right there in the midst of it








