Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Big Tech is not a Monopoly...

2

Comments

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,725 Founders Club
    Joe Biden's America. Let them reveal themselves. Private companies
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,681 Standard Supporter
    edited January 2021

    This is happening at lightening speed. Fucking communist Shit bags.
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,035 Standard Supporter
    Sledog said:


    This is happening at lightening speed. Fucking communist Shit bags.
    What losers use the Google Play Store anymore?

    Oh.
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913
    He actually sold the couch and canceled it himself.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,681 Standard Supporter
    Lots of people bailing. I'm on paler going to dump Twitter shortly.
  • Southerndawg
    Southerndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,346 Founders Club
    edited January 2021

    This media purge isn’t done in isolation...it has the blessing if not direction straight from the Democrats.

    Is that the behavior of somebody that legitimately won anything, or the behavior of somebody that is completely insecure because they know they cheated?

    It's coordinated, and of course they fear further exposure of their cheating. With few exceptions, big tech is hard left leaning and totalitarian, very much aligned with the democrat party. The monopolies they've created have put them in an incredibly powerful position, particularly with respect to control over online speech. Their ability to squash threats to their narratives as well as their own businesses in nearly unprecedented.

    Twitter, Facebook, SnapChat, Apple, Google, etc, capture, surveil and data mine the vast majority of online traffic. Web services from Amazon, Microsoft and Google provide the vast majority of cloud storage, web servers and services. Tech leaders understand the power they wield far more than the democrats they support, they are leading the charge in my opinion, to the unabashed glee of the democrat party. Want to kill free speech and Parler in a few simple moves? Ban those you don't agree with on your own services, ban Parler from Google and Apple Play Stores, then put a knife in them by banning them from the major cloud services (AWS, Azure, etc). Scary shit happening instantly once big tech got the green light via complete control of the federal government by fellow travelers.
  • Goduckies
    Goduckies Member Posts: 7,965 Standard Supporter
    Which is why those 230 protections need to go. But it won't happen until 2024 at the earliest now.
  • Southerndawg
    Southerndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,346 Founders Club
    Goduckies said:

    Which is why those 230 protections need to go. But it won't happen until 2024 at the earliest now.

    You're right, but 2024 will be too late IMHO. Stopping this is going to take enormous personal sacrifice by courageous patriots who are willing to lose everything. Those few remaining tech magnates and billionaires who might be willing to risk their fortunes in this fight could affect real change on multiple fronts, but at grave risk to their personal fortunes. At stake will be trillions of dollars in government contracts the democrats will use to pay those supporting their cause. If you're on the wrong side of their agenda, democrats have shown no compunction is using the full weight of the federal government to disparage and then crush opposition. As they have in the past, they will use the media in conjunction with taxation, regulation and weaponized federal agencies as a means to purge. Standing up to all of that is going to take some serious balls, especially for those with a lot to lose.
  • GreenRiverGatorz
    GreenRiverGatorz Member Posts: 10,165
    Goduckies said:

    Which is why those 230 protections need to go. But it won't happen until 2024 at the earliest now.

    If the 230 protections go then they double down even further on the censorship. Anything that could possibly be a liability is scrubbed.

    But perhaps that would actually result in a more even-handed approach. Fear of lawsuits would guide censorship, instead of the current appeasement PR method that is currently being employed.
  • dflea
    dflea Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,287 Swaye's Wigwam
    Goduckies said:

    Which is why those 230 protections need to go. But it won't happen until 2024 at the earliest now.

    Sure, that would be great for Derek. That way when we meet up at the 7-11 and I stomp your guts out, you can sue him for enabling the whole confucktion.

    Sounds like a smart way to avoid censorship.

    lol
  • Southerndawg
    Southerndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,346 Founders Club

    Goduckies said:

    Which is why those 230 protections need to go. But it won't happen until 2024 at the earliest now.

    If the 230 protections go then they double down even further on the censorship. Anything that could possibly be a liability is scrubbed.

    But perhaps that would actually result in a more even-handed approach. Fear of lawsuits would guide censorship, instead of the current appeasement PR method that is currently being employed.
    That would be the point.
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,035 Standard Supporter
    dflea said:

    Goduckies said:

    Which is why those 230 protections need to go. But it won't happen until 2024 at the earliest now.

    Sure, that would be great for Derek. That way when we meet up at the 7-11 and I stomp your guts out, you can sue him for enabling the whole confucktion.

    Sounds like a smart way to avoid censorship.

    lol
    Wow. Half-Pint Internet Tough Guy @dflea is up early today, overcompensating for his multiple inadequacies.
  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072

    dflea said:

    Goduckies said:

    Which is why those 230 protections need to go. But it won't happen until 2024 at the earliest now.

    Sure, that would be great for Derek. That way when we meet up at the 7-11 and I stomp your guts out, you can sue him for enabling the whole confucktion.

    Sounds like a smart way to avoid censorship.

    lol
    Wow. Half-Pint Internet Tough Guy @dflea is up early today, overcompensating for his multiple inadequacies.
    Saturday is fish day 🎣 duh.
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,025
    See also rant on equal enforcement of the law.

    230 for thee but not for me.

    Arson for thee but not for me.

  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972

    dflea said:

    Goduckies said:

    Which is why those 230 protections need to go. But it won't happen until 2024 at the earliest now.

    Sure, that would be great for Derek. That way when we meet up at the 7-11 and I stomp your guts out, you can sue him for enabling the whole confucktion.

    Sounds like a smart way to avoid censorship.

    lol
    Wow. Half-Pint Internet Tough Guy @dflea is up early today, overcompensating for his multiple inadequacies.
    He’s posting multiple times a day about gay sex and also beating people up.

    The Olympia Oompa Loompa is strugg-a-ling.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,681 Standard Supporter
    edited January 2021
    Goduckies said:

    Which is why those 230 protections need to go. But it won't happen until 2024 at the earliest now.

    With the commies in full control after openly stealing two elections we will never see another election win. Ever. Unless we remove them.

    They will legalize 40 million illegals and mail in ballots for everyone counted on dominion machines with only demorats allowed to do the counting. Much like the elections in the contested states. No supreme court. No rights. Don't forget their great reset either. You will own nothing and have only what they allow you to have. This is what they have said and this is where they are going.
  • dflea
    dflea Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,287 Swaye's Wigwam

    dflea said:

    Goduckies said:

    Which is why those 230 protections need to go. But it won't happen until 2024 at the earliest now.

    Sure, that would be great for Derek. That way when we meet up at the 7-11 and I stomp your guts out, you can sue him for enabling the whole confucktion.

    Sounds like a smart way to avoid censorship.

    lol
    Wow. Half-Pint Internet Tough Guy @dflea is up early today, overcompensating for his multiple inadequacies.
    I told you to pick your 7-11, shitdick. I'll put a half pint of ass kicking in your tank. Unlike your bitch ass, I don't have inadequacies that need to be compensated for. You, being the candy ass child of liberal teacher weenies, on the other hand.....
  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    dflea said:

    dflea said:

    Goduckies said:

    Which is why those 230 protections need to go. But it won't happen until 2024 at the earliest now.

    Sure, that would be great for Derek. That way when we meet up at the 7-11 and I stomp your guts out, you can sue him for enabling the whole confucktion.

    Sounds like a smart way to avoid censorship.

    lol
    Wow. Half-Pint Internet Tough Guy @dflea is up early today, overcompensating for his multiple inadequacies.
    I told you to pick your 7-11, shitdick. I'll put a half pint of ass kicking in your tank. Unlike your bitch ass, I don't have inadequacies that need to be compensated for. You, being the candy ass child of liberal teacher weenies, on the other hand.....
    OK settle down little guy. You know how you get worked up.
  • Southerndawg
    Southerndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,346 Founders Club
    dflea said:

    dflea said:

    Goduckies said:

    Which is why those 230 protections need to go. But it won't happen until 2024 at the earliest now.

    Sure, that would be great for Derek. That way when we meet up at the 7-11 and I stomp your guts out, you can sue him for enabling the whole confucktion.

    Sounds like a smart way to avoid censorship.

    lol
    Wow. Half-Pint Internet Tough Guy @dflea is up early today, overcompensating for his multiple inadequacies.
    I told you to pick your 7-11, shitdick. I'll put a half pint of ass kicking in your tank. Unlike your bitch ass, I don't have inadequacies that need to be compensated for. You, being the candy ass child of liberal teacher weenies, on the other hand.....
    Calm down Turbo.
  • GreenRiverGatorz
    GreenRiverGatorz Member Posts: 10,165

    dflea said:

    Goduckies said:

    Which is why those 230 protections need to go. But it won't happen until 2024 at the earliest now.

    Sure, that would be great for Derek. That way when we meet up at the 7-11 and I stomp your guts out, you can sue him for enabling the whole confucktion.

    Sounds like a smart way to avoid censorship.

    lol
    Wow. Half-Pint Internet Tough Guy @dflea is up early today, overcompensating for his multiple inadequacies.
    @dflea is Joe Pesci tuff. Don't go down the Billy Batts route.