Quote of the Year
--Kim Grinolds 6/15/2014
Comments
-
Yea cause he didn't run Damone immediately after questioning praising Sark after a KICK ASS presser.DerekJohnson said:"It's OK to have concerns and questions [about Coach Petersen]. What's scary is those who want to stifle those who do."
--Kim Grinolds 6/15/2014
Such a hypocritical cunt. -
Fuck off Kim ...
What exactly has Petersen done to earn those concerns and questions to date? Particularly when you consider Dude Brah and the lack of criticism he got when he took the job.
The only way it can be spun in regards to having concern about Petersen is because we actually have fucking expectations now.
Other than that, 92-12 is 92 and fucking 12 ... fuck off until Petersen actually gives you reasons to question him. -
Yea but Sark took over 0-12. Plus gave access while Petersen is the next Ty and we all know how that ended......Tequilla said:Fuck off Kim ...
What exactly has Petersen done to earn those concerns and questions to date? Particularly when you consider Dude Brah and the lack of criticism he got when he took the job.
The only way it can be spun in regards to having concern about Petersen is because we actually have fucking expectations now.
Other than that, 92-12 is 92 and fucking 12 ... fuck off until Petersen actually gives you reasons to question him. -
And we've only got 3 verbals right now while Dude Brah is winning another offseason natty and UCLA is rolling up 5 star after 5 star.
-
Just wait for Peterman to win big this year, and for Kim to say that it was due to Sark's recruiting.Tequilla said:Fuck off Kim ...
What exactly has Petersen done to earn those concerns and questions to date? Particularly when you consider Dude Brah and the lack of criticism he got when he took the job.
The only way it can be spun in regards to having concern about Petersen is because we actually have fucking expectations now.
Other than that, 92-12 is 92 and fucking 12 ... fuck off until Petersen actually gives you reasons to question him.
Deep down he knows he's wrong, and that's why he's a likely alcoholic that nearly exclusively hangs out with two food addicts. -
Kim's a fucking joke that has been exposed for the idiot that he is.
His last tweet is saying that Chambers Bay needs a lot of work prior to next years US Open and will most likely be shut down for large stretches to get it ready.
Apparently Kim's now #golfcoursemaintenancesuperiorityguy -
That's just what he's hearing. Learn the FUCKING difference, braTequilla said:Kim's a fucking joke that has been exposed for the idiot that he is.
His last tweet is saying that Chambers Bay needs a lot of work prior to next years US Open and will most likely be shut down for large stretches to get it ready.
Apparently Kim's now #golfcoursemaintenancesuperiorityguy
-
what does beezlebub have to say about this?
-
I have questions about Petersen. Until he wins, it's perfectly fine to have questions. Nothing is a guarantee. What pisses me off about Kim is he's an idiot who makes shit up about recruiting or rubbing players the wrong way. He acts like Sark never took lowly rated 3 star guys or even 2 star guys. Fuck, Sark took Cooper Pelleur, Taylor Hindy, Tufunga, and a bunch of other lightly recruited guys. Every coach has some players who hate them and there will always be guys that choose to transfer. There were players who hated Sark too. It's big time football. You think every guy on Alabama loves Saban or everyone that played at UW loved Don James. The majority, yes, but there will always be guys that don't.
-
But still...
-
Kim would have loved a Nuss though
-
Kim has proven what we've accused him of all along.
He only cares about access. He'd gladly take 0-12 with access than a national title with no access.
He's a little piece of shit who needs to LEAVE! Bad for the program and hopefully he can get his credentials revoked soon. -
Tequila is right. There are no viable concerns with Petersen. He's a proven championship coach and proven developer of talent.
The question is will he get us back to DJ type success or close to that or just win the conference once or twice. -
Interesting.
-
Unlike Sark who had won countless National Championships while at USC before arriving at UW, Peterman has done nothing to indicate he can coach at this level.
-
I just want Washington to go 14-0 this year so Kim can be wrong.
-
I have no problem admitting that I had questions leading up to the hire and in hindsight most of them were driven by the things that I didn't know about his program than the things that I did know.
What I knew was that Boise won at ridiculously high levels that I felt were propped up by the schedule that they played and how they only had to play maybe 3-4 hard games a year. At the same time, you had to give them credit for winning those games. I knew that Boise developed players to the NFL and that recruiting there wasn't easy.
What I was concerned about was how Petersen would be able to recruit in the PAC because you just never know until you see someone. He closed last year's class very strongly by not only getting a full class that may not be full of guys that you'd consider star power, but guys that you look at, consider the foundation of your program and depth, and you might get a few that develop into all conference caliber players for you. Then, when he swung Budda to the UW (and contrary to what Kim and the rest of the sour faced trio wanted to believe, there's no way that a principled young man like Budda was going to show up and play for the morally questionable Dude Brah), I knew that we'd have no problem in the recruiting game because not only was Petersen's eye and ability to develop talent plain to see, but that he's got a very strong appeal to a certain caliber of recruit ... those that are OKGs.
Kim would want you to think that recruiting OKGs is a problem. He'd want you to think that because we only have 3 verbals right now that we're behind the curve. Guess who else has 3 verbals? Stanford. Pretty sure that what they've been doing is working out quite well and nobody is questioning whether or not David Shaw has a plan when it comes to recruiting. Unlike Dude Brah who handed out offers like they were condoms at the local birth control clinic, Petersen does his research on kids before he offers them, ensures that not only are they players that they want at the UW, but are the kinds of kids that will be successful at the UW, and are increasing the prestige of a UW offer to that of being something special. When you hear Petersen say that he considers coming in second for a recruit as a giant waste of his time, you know exactly what he means. To idiots like Kim and Dude Brah, it means free pub.
One of the biggest things that has got me over to Petersen's side very quickly is the fact that you can tell that he places a huge emphasis on accountability, work ethic, and dedication to the TEAM. Anybody that needs further lessons on how that works out at a championship level need to go look at what the San Antonio Spurs have done in the last 12-24 months. -
Tequilla said:
I have no problem admitting that I had questions leading up to the hire and in hindsight most of them were driven by the things that I didn't know about his program than the things that I did know.
What I knew was that Boise won at ridiculously high levels that I felt were propped up by the schedule that they played and how they only had to play maybe 3-4 hard games a year. At the same time, you had to give them credit for winning those games. I knew that Boise developed players to the NFL and that recruiting there wasn't easy.
What I was concerned about was how Petersen would be able to recruit in the PAC because you just never know until you see someone. He closed last year's class very strongly by not only getting a full class that may not be full of guys that you'd consider star power, but guys that you look at, consider the foundation of your program and depth, and you might get a few that develop into all conference caliber players for you. Then, when he swung Budda to the UW (and contrary to what Kim and the rest of the sour faced trio wanted to believe, there's no way that a principled young man like Budda was going to show up and play for the morally questionable Dude Brah), I knew that we'd have no problem in the recruiting game because not only was Petersen's eye and ability to develop talent plain to see, but that he's got a very strong appeal to a certain caliber of recruit ... those that are OKGs.
Kim would want you to think that recruiting OKGs is a problem. He'd want you to think that because we only have 3 verbals right now that we're behind the curve. Guess who else has 3 verbals? Stanford. Pretty sure that what they've been doing is working out quite well and nobody is questioning whether or not David Shaw has a plan when it comes to recruiting. Unlike Dude Brah who handed out offers like they were condoms at the local birth control clinic, Petersen does his research on kids before he offers them, ensures that not only are they players that they want at the UW, but are the kinds of kids that will be successful at the UW, and are increasing the prestige of a UW offer to that of being something special. When you hear Petersen say that he considers coming in second for a recruit as a giant waste of his time, you know exactly what he means. To idiots like Kim and Dude Brah, it means free pub.
One of the biggest things that has got me over to Petersen's side very quickly is the fact that you can tell that he places a huge emphasis on accountability, work ethic, and dedication to the TEAM. Anybody that needs further lessons on how that works out at a championship level need to go look at what the San Antonio Spurs have done in the last 12-24 months.
You were doing so well lately....
-
Disagree.Tequilla said:I have no problem admitting that I had questions leading up to the hire and in hindsight most of them were driven by the things that I didn't know about his program than the things that I did know.
What I knew was that Boise won at ridiculously high levels that I felt were propped up by the schedule that they played and how they only had to play maybe 3-4 hard games a year. At the same time, you had to give them credit for winning those games. I knew that Boise developed players to the NFL and that recruiting there wasn't easy.
What I was concerned about was how Petersen would be able to recruit in the PAC because you just never know until you see someone. He closed last year's class very strongly by not only getting a full class that may not be full of guys that you'd consider star power, but guys that you look at, consider the foundation of your program and depth, and you might get a few that develop into all conference caliber players for you. Then, when he swung Budda to the UW (and contrary to what Kim and the rest of the sour faced trio wanted to believe, there's no way that a principled young man like Budda was going to show up and play for the morally questionable Dude Brah), I knew that we'd have no problem in the recruiting game because not only was Petersen's eye and ability to develop talent plain to see, but that he's got a very strong appeal to a certain caliber of recruit ... those that are OKGs.
Kim would want you to think that recruiting OKGs is a problem. He'd want you to think that because we only have 3 verbals right now that we're behind the curve. Guess who else has 3 verbals? Stanford. Pretty sure that what they've been doing is working out quite well and nobody is questioning whether or not David Shaw has a plan when it comes to recruiting. Unlike Dude Brah who handed out offers like they were condoms at the local birth control clinic, Petersen does his research on kids before he offers them, ensures that not only are they players that they want at the UW, but are the kinds of kids that will be successful at the UW, and are increasing the prestige of a UW offer to that of being something special. When you hear Petersen say that he considers coming in second for a recruit as a giant waste of his time, you know exactly what he means. To idiots like Kim and Dude Brah, it means free pub.
One of the biggest things that has got me over to Petersen's side very quickly is the fact that you can tell that he places a huge emphasis on accountability, work ethic, and dedication to the TEAM. Anybody that needs further lessons on how that works out at a championship level need to go look at what the San Antonio Spurs have done in the last 12-24 months. -
81% of the time I keep the posts short ...
Sometimes I need to rant ... Kim and the Lemon Party trio is often a good reason for me to do so -
TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I just want
Washington to go 14-0 this year soKimcan be wrongto get crushed with a jagged flint mudslide and then napalmed to finish things up. -
I'd settle for Kim running heroin over the border from Afghanistan to Iran or cocaine over the I-35 border between Texas and Mexico.Swaye said:TierbsHsotBoobs said:I just want
Washington to go 14-0 this year soKimcan be wrongto get crushed with a jagged flint mudslide and then napalmed to finish things up. -
Thanks for reading. -
Thing is, when you get passionate enough to rant, no one wants to take the time to read that novella.Tequilla said:81% of the time I keep the posts short ...
Sometimes I need to rant ... Kim and the Lemon Party trio is often a good reason for me to do so
You bring up good points, but you would reach a larger audience with brevity.
or at least add a fucking TL;DR summary at the end -
Only if it ends in him getting butt raped by ISIS members wearing napalm condoms.Tequilla said:
I'd settle for Kim running heroin over the border from Afghanistan to Iran or cocaine over the I-35 border between Texas and Mexico.Swaye said:TierbsHsotBoobs said:I just want
Washington to go 14-0 this year soKimcan be wrongto get crushed with a jagged flint mudslide and then napalmed to finish things up.
edit: Just realized this will probably turn away potential interviews. -
Last big one that I wrote before that was a TL, DR at the start.
I could just as easily break them up into smaller posts but with a number behind them.
Normally if you get a TL, DR post from me, it's normally going to be tied to a) something is on my mind or b) I've been away for a day or two and have a number of points to make and just do it in a single post instead of responding directly to 4-6 posts.
Shouldn't you be spending more time making Little Jimmy feel like shit? -
If you broke your posts down in easily digestible chunks, you would have more posts than More_Tequilla said:Last big one that I wrote before that was a TL, DR at the start.
I could just as easily break them up into smaller posts but with a number behind them.
Normally if you get a TL, DR post from me, it's normally going to be tied to a) something is on my mind or b) I've been away for a day or two and have a number of points to make and just do it in a single post instead of responding directly to 4-6 posts.
Shouldn't you be spending more time making Little Jimmy feel like shit?TimeCock (LOL). -
If Cornell actually gets his feelings hurt over internet posting, then I'm the least of his problems...Tequilla said:
Shouldn't you be spending more time making Little Jimmy feel like shit?
I would gladly meet up with him and drink and talk husky football. It was the $50 that I took issue with
and thanks for marginalizing the point I made. keep making long ass rants that no one will fucking read -
Hey, I read it. I actually printed it off and took it to the shitter when I had a particularly aggressive growler to unleash. I got halfway through (almost) before my legs fell asleep. I will finish it up later tonight...I'm having Mexican for dinner.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
If Cornell actually gets his feelings hurt over internet posting, then I'm the least of his problems...Tequilla said:
Shouldn't you be spending more time making Little Jimmy feel like shit?
and thanks for marginalizing the point I made. keep making long ass rants that no one will fucking read -
If you have to offer complete strangers $50 to hand out with you then you are a fucking future serial killer.
Cased closed. End of discussion.
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
