Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
We are beating Oregon next year
Comments
-
-
NOTHING
ELSE
MATTERS -
Might be tim to grow up and learn the difference between real life and a middle school algebra quiz.backthepack said:
Same. I have a final tomorrowTommySQC said:
I'm fucking drinking on a Monday. My life sucks ass.PurpleBaze said:Tommy gets it.
-
Have you ever watched mad men?!?pawz said:
Might be tim to grow up and learn the difference between real life and a middle school algebra quiz.backthepack said:
Same. I have a final tomorrowTommySQC said:
I'm fucking drinking on a Monday. My life sucks ass.PurpleBaze said:Tommy gets it.
-
btp made it to calculus bitchpawz said:
Might be tim to grow up and learn the difference between real life and a middle school algebra quiz.backthepack said:
Same. I have a final tomorrowTommySQC said:
I'm fucking drinking on a Monday. My life sucks ass.PurpleBaze said:Tommy gets it.
-
Business calculus legend!Pitchfork51 said:
btp made it to calculus bitchpawz said:
Might be tim to grow up and learn the difference between real life and a middle school algebra quiz.backthepack said:
Same. I have a final tomorrowTommySQC said:
I'm fucking drinking on a Monday. My life sucks ass.PurpleBaze said:Tommy gets it.
If you take anything I say on these boreds or twitter seriously, you’re an idiot -
Wooooooooosh !!backthepack said:
Have you ever watched mad men?!?pawz said:
Might be tim to grow up and learn the difference between real life and a middle school algebra quiz.backthepack said:
Same. I have a final tomorrowTommySQC said:
I'm fucking drinking on a Monday. My life sucks ass.PurpleBaze said:Tommy gets it.
Axe @dnc -
pawz said:
Wooooooooosh !!backthepack said:
Have you ever watched mad men?!?pawz said:
Might be tim to grow up and learn the difference between real life and a middle school algebra quiz.backthepack said:
Same. I have a final tomorrowTommySQC said:
I'm fucking drinking on a Monday. My life sucks ass.PurpleBaze said:Tommy gets it.
Axe @dnc
-
They should do more one back and shotgun stuff. Draw plays to Davis, etc. We actually have good personnel to spread the field out more.backthepack said:
In theory we should be really good. We’ll have quality depth and high end at almost every position. The offense should average 42+ but they won’t. We should be a 11-1 or 12-0 type team but we’ll go 9-3 or 10-2.RoadDawg55 said:
I won’t count on it until it happens. I’m not worried about Morris/Huard tho. Whoever starts should be good.backthepack said:Duh. Next year we should be really good**
**depending on John Don FS and the Huard/Morris situation
Davis is a good receiver.
But since Jimmy wore a hat about running the ball he will probably stick to power run. -
Come watch btp struggle in (nearly) every thread.backthepack said:pawz said:
Wooooooooosh !!backthepack said:
Have you ever watched mad men?!?pawz said:
Might be tim to grow up and learn the difference between real life and a middle school algebra quiz.backthepack said:
Same. I have a final tomorrowTommySQC said:
I'm fucking drinking on a Monday. My life sucks ass.PurpleBaze said:Tommy gets it.
Axe @dnc -
Play your best talent.backthepack said:
This is an awful take. Although he didn’t have his best game against Stanford. Stop being a prisoner of the moment.BroadcastingDawg said:
Hell, I'll put Rosengarten there over both of them. Curne got his ass absolutely handed to him in the Stanford game. He's easily our worst OL IMO. Luciano just has a lot of experience and they typically go with age on the OL.1to392831weretaken said:
Luciano over Curne? Why would that reverse next season? Jones over Odunze is also interesting, amazing Stanford catch aside. I've seen nothing from Heimuli yet, but I've seen Tuputala do some good things.BroadcastingDawg said:
My hopeful depth chart:backthepack said:
In theory we should be really good. We’ll have quality depth and high end at almost every position. The offense should average 42+ but they won’t. We should be a 11-1 or 12-0 type team but we’ll go 9-3 or 10-2.RoadDawg55 said:
I won’t count on it until it happens. I’m not worried about Morris/Huard tho. Whoever starts should be good.backthepack said:Duh. Next year we should be really good**
**depending on John Don FS and the Huard/Morris situation
Jones gets a lot of hate here and I'm not exactly sure why. He's been our only real down the field threat and it's not like he's dealing with the best arms at QB... it would help most of our wideouts out if Morris had any ability to throw quality balls with some length to em. He's had a couple ez TD's totally fucked by Morris. And it's not like he's going to lose his starting job as a senior.
Heimuli is projection alone. He did have 5 tackles in that horrific garbage time performance for the Dawgs against AZ... and the points were hardly on him (Julius Irvin sucks balls). But I've just always been a fan... to me he's the most athletic guy they've got with the highest ceiling in a sea of "what the fuck are we doing at this position" that is occupied by Sirmon. He was a big, big get to me and it's a crime that he or Calvert haven't gotten some opportunities.
Are you convinced Curne has what to it takes to anchor the right side of this line after that ass whooping?
I want consistent players that aren't going to cost us drives/games. Curne's play against Stanford was a catalyst for an offensive collapse. He was a human turnstile out there. -
Constantly running lead dive into a stacked box was the main issue. Stop it.BroadcastingDawg said:
Play your best talent.backthepack said:
This is an awful take. Although he didn’t have his best game against Stanford. Stop being a prisoner of the moment.BroadcastingDawg said:
Hell, I'll put Rosengarten there over both of them. Curne got his ass absolutely handed to him in the Stanford game. He's easily our worst OL IMO. Luciano just has a lot of experience and they typically go with age on the OL.1to392831weretaken said:
Luciano over Curne? Why would that reverse next season? Jones over Odunze is also interesting, amazing Stanford catch aside. I've seen nothing from Heimuli yet, but I've seen Tuputala do some good things.BroadcastingDawg said:
My hopeful depth chart:backthepack said:
In theory we should be really good. We’ll have quality depth and high end at almost every position. The offense should average 42+ but they won’t. We should be a 11-1 or 12-0 type team but we’ll go 9-3 or 10-2.RoadDawg55 said:
I won’t count on it until it happens. I’m not worried about Morris/Huard tho. Whoever starts should be good.backthepack said:Duh. Next year we should be really good**
**depending on John Don FS and the Huard/Morris situation
Jones gets a lot of hate here and I'm not exactly sure why. He's been our only real down the field threat and it's not like he's dealing with the best arms at QB... it would help most of our wideouts out if Morris had any ability to throw quality balls with some length to em. He's had a couple ez TD's totally fucked by Morris. And it's not like he's going to lose his starting job as a senior.
Heimuli is projection alone. He did have 5 tackles in that horrific garbage time performance for the Dawgs against AZ... and the points were hardly on him (Julius Irvin sucks balls). But I've just always been a fan... to me he's the most athletic guy they've got with the highest ceiling in a sea of "what the fuck are we doing at this position" that is occupied by Sirmon. He was a big, big get to me and it's a crime that he or Calvert haven't gotten some opportunities.
Are you convinced Curne has what to it takes to anchor the right side of this line after that ass whooping?
I want consistent players that aren't going to cost us drives/games. Curne's play against Stanford was a catalyst for an offensive collapse. He was a human turnstile out there.
