Clowney Hit of the Century...
Comments
-
Yes, but they are finally getting around to enforcing the Curtis Williams (RIP) rule.
-
I understand the purpose behind trying to protect the players, but I think that there is a lot of gray area here.
How do they justify an ejection, when it takes so much analysis to determine the nature of each hit, especially when there are hits like that in every game? It's a fine line, and every ref is going to interpret things differently. -
The Pac-12 refs are sure to interpret this in the worst possible way. I foresee a lot of booing and verbal abuse in the near future.
-
booing the refs and coaches is OK. They get paid. I never boo the kids though.DerekJohnson said:The Pac-12 refs are sure to interpret this in the worst possible way. I foresee a lot of booing and verbal abuse in the near future.
-
Criticizing the kids is just fine but flat out bashing the kids is wrong (and i'm out).
-
Criticizing the idiots is fine but criticize the kids and you're gone.
Some of you need to learn the difference. -
Soccertards have thoroughly infiltrated the NCAA, from Marktard on down.
-
Thou shalt not smash a woman's face in or thou shalt not withhold child support payments?TierbsHsotBoobs said:Yes, but they are finally getting around to enforcing the Curtis Williams (RIP) rule.
-
Pressing yet again.dtd said:
Thou shalt not smash a woman's face in or thou shalt not withhold child support payments?TierbsHsotBoobs said:Yes, but they are finally getting around to enforcing the Curtis Williams (RIP) rule.
-
Agree, especially given that a questionable call under this rule has the potential to be a complete game changer. Ejections should be limited to the most egregious penalties such as leading with the crown of the helmet in an intentional helmet to helmet blow. Tossing a player for that is justifiable, but playing the interpretation game on lesser hits that carry an automatic ejection penalty is a problem.PurpleJ said:I understand the purpose behind trying to protect the players, but I think that there is a lot of gray area here.
How do they justify an ejection, when it takes so much analysis to determine the nature of each hit, especially when there are hits like that in every game? It's a fine line, and every ref is going to interpret things differently. -
Ho Lee FUK you guys are some little bitches!
GURGLE -
-
Christ you are struggling.dtd said:
Ho Lee FUK you guys are some little bitches!
GURGLE -
My problem with this whole thing, is the "if in doubt, he is out". There is going to be a lot of doubt, because of how fast the game is, regardless of how many replay angles they can look at. I would also agree with Derek in saying that the Pac refs will screw this up on a regular basis.Southerndawg said:
Agree, especially given that a questionable call under this rule has the potential to be a complete game changer. Ejections should be limited to the most egregious penalties such as leading with the crown of the helmet in an intentional helmet to helmet blow. Tossing a player for that is justifiable, but playing the interpretation game on lesser hits that carry an automatic ejection penalty is a problem.PurpleJ said:I understand the purpose behind trying to protect the players, but I think that there is a lot of gray area here.
How do they justify an ejection, when it takes so much analysis to determine the nature of each hit, especially when there are hits like that in every game? It's a fine line, and every ref is going to interpret things differently. -
He was one of the Quooks on Dawgboard who really dragged the place down. Just wait until that Faber idiot and CougLJ come over.dtd said:
Ho Lee FUK you guys are some little bitches!
GURGLE -
Can't wait for more stupid questions and long winded poasts which could be summarized in 1 sentence.He_Needs_More_Time said:
He was one of the Quooks on Dawgboard who really dragged the place down. Just wait until that Faber idiot and CougLJ come over.dtd said:
Ho Lee FUK you guys are some little bitches!
GURGLE -
If there aren't any indications of rough waters, they'll be here.He_Needs_More_Time said:
He was one of the Quooks on Dawgboard who really dragged the place down. Just wait until that Faber idiot and CougLJ come over.dtd said:
Ho Lee FUK you guys are some little bitches!
GURGLE -
You mean like water is wet?CuntWaffle said:
Can't wait for more stupid questions and long winded poasts which could be summarized in 1 sentence.He_Needs_More_Time said:
He was one of the Quooks on Dawgboard who really dragged the place down. Just wait until that Faber idiot and CougLJ come over.dtd said:
Ho Lee FUK you guys are some little bitches!
GURGLE -
Agree on all counts.PurpleJ said:
My problem with this whole thing, is the "if in doubt, he is out". There is going to be a lot of doubt, because of how fast the game is, regardless of how many replay angles they can look at. I would also agree with Derek in saying that the Pac refs will screw this up on a regular basis.Southerndawg said:
Agree, especially given that a questionable call under this rule has the potential to be a complete game changer. Ejections should be limited to the most egregious penalties such as leading with the crown of the helmet in an intentional helmet to helmet blow. Tossing a player for that is justifiable, but playing the interpretation game on lesser hits that carry an automatic ejection penalty is a problem.PurpleJ said:I understand the purpose behind trying to protect the players, but I think that there is a lot of gray area here.
How do they justify an ejection, when it takes so much analysis to determine the nature of each hit, especially when there are hits like that in every game? It's a fine line, and every ref is going to interpret things differently.
-
I hope Gang Green comes here so we can have another Race vs Gang Green battle.CuntWaffle said:
Can't wait for more stupid questions and long winded poasts which could be summarized in 1 sentence.He_Needs_More_Time said:
He was one of the Quooks on Dawgboard who really dragged the place down. Just wait until that Faber idiot and CougLJ come over.dtd said:
Ho Lee FUK you guys are some little bitches!
GURGLE -
I hope Gang Green comes here so we can have another Race vs Gang Green battle.
Paging DiggyDawg. -
Paging DiggyDawg.tracker said:
I hope Gang Green comes here so we can have another Race vs Gang Green battle.
What about cfetters? -
I just got a bonerHe_Needs_More_Time said:
I hope Gang Green comes here so we can have another Race vs Gang Green battle.CuntWaffle said:
Can't wait for more stupid questions and long winded poasts which could be summarized in 1 sentence.He_Needs_More_Time said:
He was one of the Quooks on Dawgboard who really dragged the place down. Just wait until that Faber idiot and CougLJ come over.dtd said:
Ho Lee FUK you guys are some little bitches!
GURGLE -
Mike Leach on this nonsense:
Leach on Clowney: "I think it's ridiculous. I'm getting tired of everyone apologizing for playing football."
Leach on new ejection rule, "It's crazy. It's ridiculous. We have old men in bifocals trying to make a split second decision." -
This is an example of a classy post.MikeDamone said:
booing the refs and coaches is OK. They get paid. I never boo the kids though.DerekJohnson said:The Pac-12 refs are sure to interpret this in the worst possible way. I foresee a lot of booing and verbal abuse in the near future.
-
Why is Leach even concerned? Like his players ever play defense anyways.Southerndawg said:Mike Leach on this nonsense:
Leach on Clowney: "I think it's ridiculous. I'm getting tired of everyone apologizing for playing football."
Leach on new ejection rule, "It's crazy. It's ridiculous. We have old men in bifocals trying to make a split second decision." -
I don't recall gangrene. I got a lot of old enemies gunning for me. #WacoKid
-
Southerndawg said:
Mike Leach on this nonsense:
Leach on Clowney: "I think it's ridiculous. I'm getting tired of everyone apologizing for playing football."
Leach on new ejection rule, "It's crazy. It's ridiculous. We have old men in bifocals trying to make a split second decision."
And those old men have their fat little girlfriends telling them they're great. -
If you want to criticize their little girlfriends that's fine but if you are going to bash them then I am out!DerekJohnson said:Southerndawg said:Mike Leach on this nonsense:
Leach on Clowney: "I think it's ridiculous. I'm getting tired of everyone apologizing for playing football."
Leach on new ejection rule, "It's crazy. It's ridiculous. We have old men in bifocals trying to make a split second decision."
And those old men have their fat little girlfriends telling them they're great.
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
