It’s official
Comments
-
It’s @detlefschrempfEmoterman said:1to392831weretaken said:
Anonymous rando on the internet claims to be worth $8 million from Bitcoin and makes $500K donations to a college football program, and we need a research thesis to deduce it's unlikely? I guess what I'm getting at is my belief that Sonics is full of shit actually decreased after reading that research. It sounded impossible to me until I read that.creepycoug said:
@jhfstyle24 ' theory is inductive. He just saying it smells fishy.1to392831weretaken said:I have to admit, I'm kind of confused by this whole thread right now. To me, it reads like this:
@jhfstyle24: "Sonics claims x. But x can't be true, because if it were true, [long explanation of exactly how it could have happened] would have had to have happened."
Everyone else: "Ooooooooh, damn! You got him!"
@jhfstyle24: "And the timing would be such that you'd have had to start trading mega-donations for program access almost immediately after getting rich. And nobody has EVER done something stupid and pointless with their money immediately after becoming suddenly wealthy!..."
Everyone else: "Hello Pulitzer! This is hard-hitting shit!"
To summarize, I'm struggling to understand how all of this gotcha research did anything but provide a roadmap for how @sonics1993 could actually be telling the truth about his wealth and donations. This is the internet, so odds are still that it's bullshit, but how did anything in this thread help prove that?
@GaryMSumersDawg true?!??
All the bullshit about selling 5 million dime bags or whatever was just a bad cover. The 1993 Sonics handle finally makes sense.
-
Wie geht’s Detlef?
-
I love where this thread had gone.
-
I would hope he understands that if you brag on this site you're going to get challenged. Post your BS then accept your fate but don't post and get run
-
Your post had nothing to do with me, so "taking it personally" probably wasn't the wording you were looking for. "Taking it too seriously"? I'd buy that. Think of my post as more of a critique of your technically gifted writing. The tone of your post was the opposite of the effect it had on me, and I was just pointing that out. I found it interesting, that's all.jhfstyle24 said:I think you're taking my 5 minutes of internet research unnecessarily personally.
ATBSJBSS, I agree with the sentiment above that it's probably worth looking past a weird baseless internet flex in order to keep around somebody who does seem to occasionally have legitimate insider info. -
I think its Spencer Hawes.
-
So the first list totals over $17 million and the 2nd list tops $67 million. Why can't we buy out Gregory or Boner? Or pay top dollar for an OC?
-
A top women's volleyball program doesn't pay for itself you know.KrunkJuice said:So the first list totals over $17 million and the 2nd list tops $67 million. Why can't we buy out Gregory or Boner? Or pay top dollar for an OC?
-
Calling out massive dipshittery is the bread and butter of this place. No amount of juicy insider info is going to buy you immunity from that. And fuck you for even suggesting we sully this place by handling "VIPs" with kids' gloves. Leave that to doogman.Doogstone said:why do you idiots repeatedly try and run this guy when he provides real value here
of course his financial claims were full of shit, who cares, as are 99.99% of any insecure weirdo who feels emotionally compelled to brag about money on an anonymous backwater dead football team website
fuck off -
The interest on those bonds that are financing our state of the art empty stadium isn't cheap you know.KrunkJuice said:So the first list totals over $17 million and the 2nd list tops $67 million. Why can't we buy out Gregory or Boner? Or pay top dollar for an OC?
