Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

SCOTUS throws out Texas BS case

1235

Comments

  • dflea
    dflea Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,287 Swaye's Wigwam

    dflea said:

    SCOTUS denied on standing, not merit.

    Can be filed at a lower federal court.

    Where it also has no standing.

    But it is another opportunity to lose and get his nuthuggers to send in more money.
    True. I’m just posting that yet again, @insinceredawg jumps in immediately and only gives half the story. It’s a pattern for dumb, emotion-driven people like you and ID.
    Go send in your money, bitch. Of course it's true. I said it.
  • AOG
    AOG Member Posts: 2,836

    SCOTUS denied on standing, not merit.

    Can be filed at a lower federal court.

    Northwest-tard doesn't grasp that if the same suit were filed at a lower court, the lower court would also be a federal court, and unable to render a judgment lacking jurisdiction. The alternative would be to try individual state's courts, but they've spent the last month laughing this bullshit out of court. Nice one Northwest-tard! bravo.
  • HairyBallsDawg
    HairyBallsDawg Member Posts: 1,078
    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Commies cheering election fraud. Who'd have guessed?

    Old Slow Joe ain't president yet. May be in jail before the 21st. You know who get to be president then?

    This lawsuit had nothing to do about fraud. It was about the GOP placating a sore loser because they're terrified of his base.
    No it's about ballots that were not in compliance with the states constitution or laws. Those damn laws!
    The 9 highest judges in the nation just disagreed with you.

    But continue to act like a dumbfuck.

    Unless it isn't an act?
    Soy boy. Standing is about who can and can't bring the case. Nothing else.
    Lol. I'd kick your ass 7 days a week. Pussy.
  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    edited December 2020
    AOG said:

    SCOTUS denied on standing, not merit.

    Can be filed at a lower federal court.

    Northwest-tard doesn't grasp that if the same suit were filed at a lower court, the lower court would also be a federal court, and unable to render a judgment lacking jurisdiction. The alternative would be to try individual state's courts, but they've spent the last month laughing this bullshit out of court. Nice one Northwest-tard! bravo.
    Thanks for confirming that the case was dismissed on standing and can be filed at a lower court. Not sure what the rest of your rant is about.
  • AOG
    AOG Member Posts: 2,836

    AOG said:

    SCOTUS denied on standing, not merit.

    Can be filed at a lower federal court.

    Northwest-tard doesn't grasp that if the same suit were filed at a lower court, the lower court would also be a federal court, and unable to render a judgment lacking jurisdiction. The alternative would be to try individual state's courts, but they've spent the last month laughing this bullshit out of court. Nice one Northwest-tard! bravo.
    Thanks for confirming that the case was dismissed on standing. Not sure what the rest of your rant is about.
    It means you're fucked if you were expecting it to be re-litigated
  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    AOG said:

    SCOTUS denied on standing, not merit.

    Can be filed at a lower federal court.

    Northwest-tard doesn't grasp that if the same suit were filed at a lower court, the lower court would also be a federal court, and unable to render a judgment lacking jurisdiction. The alternative would be to try individual state's courts, but they've spent the last month laughing this bullshit out of court. Nice one Northwest-tard! bravo.
    Thanks for confirming that the case was dismissed on standing. Not sure what the rest of your rant is about.

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Commies cheering election fraud. Who'd have guessed?

    Old Slow Joe ain't president yet. May be in jail before the 21st. You know who get to be president then?

    This lawsuit had nothing to do about fraud. It was about the GOP placating a sore loser because they're terrified of his base.
    No it's about ballots that were not in compliance with the states constitution or laws. Those damn laws!
    The 9 highest judges in the nation just disagreed with you.

    But continue to act like a dumbfuck.

    Unless it isn't an act?
    Soy boy. Standing is about who can and can't bring the case. Nothing else.
    Lol. I'd kick your ass 7 days a week. Pussy.
    RAWR

    So sexy when you go all Butch.
  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    Dugdawg said:

    This seems appropriate tonight...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cpcWMBlzZts

    Herpes Patient Zero sounds like full-blown syphilis has attacked his brain.


  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,593 Standard Supporter

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Sledog said:

    Commies cheering election fraud. Who'd have guessed?

    Old Slow Joe ain't president yet. May be in jail before the 21st. You know who get to be president then?

    This lawsuit had nothing to do about fraud. It was about the GOP placating a sore loser because they're terrified of his base.
    No it's about ballots that were not in compliance with the states constitution or laws. Those damn laws!
    The 9 highest judges in the nation just disagreed with you.

    But continue to act like a dumbfuck.

    Unless it isn't an act?
    Soy boy. Standing is about who can and can't bring the case. Nothing else.
    Lol. I'd kick your ass 7 days a week. Pussy.
    Ok slicksack! Internet tough!
  • Southerndawg
    Southerndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,354 Founders Club
    Bob_C said:

    Enjoy the mandate.