Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

SCOTUS throws out Texas BS case

1246

Comments

  • WilburHooksHands
    WilburHooksHands Member Posts: 6,804
    MelloDawg said:

    MelloDawg said:

    Sledog said:

    Commies cheering election fraud. Who'd have guessed?

    Old Slow Joe ain't president yet. May be in jail before the 21st. You know who get to be president then?

    This lawsuit had nothing to do about fraud. It was about the GOP placating a sore loser because they're terrified of his base.
    It has everything to do with fraud along with Equal Protection and votes being invalidated by unconstitutional ballots in PA.
    SCOTUS didn't see any fraud. Are Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, and ACB on the take too?
    “They didn’t say they didn’t see fraud. It’s about what they didn’t say. Them not saying there’s fraud means there must be fraud.”

    -2 on this bored and a vocal minority in the country.
    Sounds exactly like “Trump wasn’t exonerated by Mueller” because they can’t prove he didn’t steal the 2016 election with Putin. Fraud happened in this election, that’s already been proven.

    You Leftist morons can’t remember yesterday, let alone two years ago.
    I’m not a leftist, but ok.

    Did fraud happen? Sure, maybe, it should absolutely be prosecuted if so. Was it massively wide scale and tip the election? Seems unlikely and hasn’t been proven anywhere but in press conferences. That’s not a court. He has every right to keep trying though.

    But this is grief and I get how people deal with it.
    Texas GOP is dealing with it really well
  • AOG
    AOG Member Posts: 2,836

    MelloDawg said:

    MelloDawg said:

    Sledog said:

    Commies cheering election fraud. Who'd have guessed?

    Old Slow Joe ain't president yet. May be in jail before the 21st. You know who get to be president then?

    This lawsuit had nothing to do about fraud. It was about the GOP placating a sore loser because they're terrified of his base.
    It has everything to do with fraud along with Equal Protection and votes being invalidated by unconstitutional ballots in PA.
    SCOTUS didn't see any fraud. Are Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, and ACB on the take too?
    “They didn’t say they didn’t see fraud. It’s about what they didn’t say. Them not saying there’s fraud means there must be fraud.”

    -2 on this bored and a vocal minority in the country.
    Sounds exactly like “Trump wasn’t exonerated by Mueller” because they can’t prove he didn’t steal the 2016 election with Putin. Fraud happened in this election, that’s already been proven.

    You Leftist morons can’t remember yesterday, let alone two years ago.
    I’m not a leftist, but ok.

    Did fraud happen? Sure, maybe, it should absolutely be prosecuted if so. Was it massively wide scale and tip the election? Seems unlikely and hasn’t been proven anywhere but in press conferences. That’s not a court. He has every right to keep trying though.

    But this is grief and I get how people deal with it.
    Texas GOP is dealing with it really well
    Jesus, talk about a meltdown, Texas GOP wants to secede. The problem is a civil war would be more like Rawanda since the "tribes" are not really so separated.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,593 Standard Supporter
    AOG said:

    MelloDawg said:

    MelloDawg said:

    Sledog said:

    Commies cheering election fraud. Who'd have guessed?

    Old Slow Joe ain't president yet. May be in jail before the 21st. You know who get to be president then?

    This lawsuit had nothing to do about fraud. It was about the GOP placating a sore loser because they're terrified of his base.
    It has everything to do with fraud along with Equal Protection and votes being invalidated by unconstitutional ballots in PA.
    SCOTUS didn't see any fraud. Are Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, and ACB on the take too?
    “They didn’t say they didn’t see fraud. It’s about what they didn’t say. Them not saying there’s fraud means there must be fraud.”

    -2 on this bored and a vocal minority in the country.
    Sounds exactly like “Trump wasn’t exonerated by Mueller” because they can’t prove he didn’t steal the 2016 election with Putin. Fraud happened in this election, that’s already been proven.

    You Leftist morons can’t remember yesterday, let alone two years ago.
    I’m not a leftist, but ok.

    Did fraud happen? Sure, maybe, it should absolutely be prosecuted if so. Was it massively wide scale and tip the election? Seems unlikely and hasn’t been proven anywhere but in press conferences. That’s not a court. He has every right to keep trying though.

    But this is grief and I get how people deal with it.
    Texas GOP is dealing with it really well
    Jesus, talk about a meltdown, Texas GOP wants to secede. The problem is a civil war would be more like Rawanda since the "tribes" are not really so separated.
    Civil war is a possibility the problem is 68% of the country thinks the election was stolen according to the last pole. I don't think that leaves many on the thieves side.
  • dflea
    dflea Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,287 Swaye's Wigwam
    Sledog said:

    AOG said:

    MelloDawg said:

    MelloDawg said:

    Sledog said:

    Commies cheering election fraud. Who'd have guessed?

    Old Slow Joe ain't president yet. May be in jail before the 21st. You know who get to be president then?

    This lawsuit had nothing to do about fraud. It was about the GOP placating a sore loser because they're terrified of his base.
    It has everything to do with fraud along with Equal Protection and votes being invalidated by unconstitutional ballots in PA.
    SCOTUS didn't see any fraud. Are Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, and ACB on the take too?
    “They didn’t say they didn’t see fraud. It’s about what they didn’t say. Them not saying there’s fraud means there must be fraud.”

    -2 on this bored and a vocal minority in the country.
    Sounds exactly like “Trump wasn’t exonerated by Mueller” because they can’t prove he didn’t steal the 2016 election with Putin. Fraud happened in this election, that’s already been proven.

    You Leftist morons can’t remember yesterday, let alone two years ago.
    I’m not a leftist, but ok.

    Did fraud happen? Sure, maybe, it should absolutely be prosecuted if so. Was it massively wide scale and tip the election? Seems unlikely and hasn’t been proven anywhere but in press conferences. That’s not a court. He has every right to keep trying though.

    But this is grief and I get how people deal with it.
    Texas GOP is dealing with it really well
    Jesus, talk about a meltdown, Texas GOP wants to secede. The problem is a civil war would be more like Rawanda since the "tribes" are not really so separated.
    Civil war is a possibility the problem is 68% of the country thinks the election was stolen according to the last pole. I don't think that leaves many on the thieves side.
    Sure, kook.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,593 Standard Supporter
    dflea said:

    Sledog said:

    AOG said:

    MelloDawg said:

    MelloDawg said:

    Sledog said:

    Commies cheering election fraud. Who'd have guessed?

    Old Slow Joe ain't president yet. May be in jail before the 21st. You know who get to be president then?

    This lawsuit had nothing to do about fraud. It was about the GOP placating a sore loser because they're terrified of his base.
    It has everything to do with fraud along with Equal Protection and votes being invalidated by unconstitutional ballots in PA.
    SCOTUS didn't see any fraud. Are Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, and ACB on the take too?
    “They didn’t say they didn’t see fraud. It’s about what they didn’t say. Them not saying there’s fraud means there must be fraud.”

    -2 on this bored and a vocal minority in the country.
    Sounds exactly like “Trump wasn’t exonerated by Mueller” because they can’t prove he didn’t steal the 2016 election with Putin. Fraud happened in this election, that’s already been proven.

    You Leftist morons can’t remember yesterday, let alone two years ago.
    I’m not a leftist, but ok.

    Did fraud happen? Sure, maybe, it should absolutely be prosecuted if so. Was it massively wide scale and tip the election? Seems unlikely and hasn’t been proven anywhere but in press conferences. That’s not a court. He has every right to keep trying though.

    But this is grief and I get how people deal with it.
    Texas GOP is dealing with it really well
    Jesus, talk about a meltdown, Texas GOP wants to secede. The problem is a civil war would be more like Rawanda since the "tribes" are not really so separated.
    Civil war is a possibility the problem is 68% of the country thinks the election was stolen according to the last pole. I don't think that leaves many on the thieves side.
    Sure, kook.
    You fringe ejection fraud deniers are funny.
  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    SCOTUS denied on standing, not merit.

    Can be filed at a lower federal court.
  • insinceredawg
    insinceredawg Member Posts: 5,117

    SCOTUS denied on standing, not merit.

    Can be filed at a lower federal court.

    There's that false hope I love to see. I'm sure this will end up working in your favor. Keep believing!
  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    edited December 2020

    SCOTUS denied on standing, not merit.

    Can be filed at a lower federal court.

    There's that false hope I love to see. I'm sure this will end up working in your favor. Keep believing!
    Where did I give my opinion. I posted a fact.

    I’ve always said Biden is going to be inaugurated. I just like how the Left is now fine with holding elections in secret, Chavez and Saddam style. Get your corruption out on the open like real authoritarians. Covid policies rewarding some and punishing others has shown that as well as anything in my life. Congrats on being a lemming.
  • dflea
    dflea Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,287 Swaye's Wigwam

    SCOTUS denied on standing, not merit.

    Can be filed at a lower federal court.

    Where it also has no standing.

    But it is another opportunity to lose and get his nuthuggers to send in more money.
  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    dflea said:

    SCOTUS denied on standing, not merit.

    Can be filed at a lower federal court.

    Where it also has no standing.

    But it is another opportunity to lose and get his nuthuggers to send in more money.
    True. I’m just posting that yet again, @insinceredawg jumps in immediately and only gives half the story. It’s a pattern for dumb, emotion-driven people like you and ID.