Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
SCOTUS throws out Texas BS case
Comments
-
Texas GOP is dealing with it really wellMelloDawg said:
I’m not a leftist, but ok.NorthwestFresh said:
Sounds exactly like “Trump wasn’t exonerated by Mueller” because they can’t prove he didn’t steal the 2016 election with Putin. Fraud happened in this election, that’s already been proven.MelloDawg said:
“They didn’t say they didn’t see fraud. It’s about what they didn’t say. Them not saying there’s fraud means there must be fraud.”insinceredawg said:
SCOTUS didn't see any fraud. Are Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, and ACB on the take too?NorthwestFresh said:
It has everything to do with fraud along with Equal Protection and votes being invalidated by unconstitutional ballots in PA.insinceredawg said:
This lawsuit had nothing to do about fraud. It was about the GOP placating a sore loser because they're terrified of his base.Sledog said:Commies cheering election fraud. Who'd have guessed?
Old Slow Joe ain't president yet. May be in jail before the 21st. You know who get to be president then?
-2 on this bored and a vocal minority in the country.
You Leftist morons can’t remember yesterday, let alone two years ago.
Did fraud happen? Sure, maybe, it should absolutely be prosecuted if so. Was it massively wide scale and tip the election? Seems unlikely and hasn’t been proven anywhere but in press conferences. That’s not a court. He has every right to keep trying though.
But this is grief and I get how people deal with it. -
Jesus, talk about a meltdown, Texas GOP wants to secede. The problem is a civil war would be more like Rawanda since the "tribes" are not really so separated.WilburHooksHands said:
Texas GOP is dealing with it really wellMelloDawg said:
I’m not a leftist, but ok.NorthwestFresh said:
Sounds exactly like “Trump wasn’t exonerated by Mueller” because they can’t prove he didn’t steal the 2016 election with Putin. Fraud happened in this election, that’s already been proven.MelloDawg said:
“They didn’t say they didn’t see fraud. It’s about what they didn’t say. Them not saying there’s fraud means there must be fraud.”insinceredawg said:
SCOTUS didn't see any fraud. Are Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, and ACB on the take too?NorthwestFresh said:
It has everything to do with fraud along with Equal Protection and votes being invalidated by unconstitutional ballots in PA.insinceredawg said:
This lawsuit had nothing to do about fraud. It was about the GOP placating a sore loser because they're terrified of his base.Sledog said:Commies cheering election fraud. Who'd have guessed?
Old Slow Joe ain't president yet. May be in jail before the 21st. You know who get to be president then?
-2 on this bored and a vocal minority in the country.
You Leftist morons can’t remember yesterday, let alone two years ago.
Did fraud happen? Sure, maybe, it should absolutely be prosecuted if so. Was it massively wide scale and tip the election? Seems unlikely and hasn’t been proven anywhere but in press conferences. That’s not a court. He has every right to keep trying though.
But this is grief and I get how people deal with it. -
Civil war is a possibility the problem is 68% of the country thinks the election was stolen according to the last pole. I don't think that leaves many on the thieves side.AOG said:
Jesus, talk about a meltdown, Texas GOP wants to secede. The problem is a civil war would be more like Rawanda since the "tribes" are not really so separated.WilburHooksHands said:
Texas GOP is dealing with it really wellMelloDawg said:
I’m not a leftist, but ok.NorthwestFresh said:
Sounds exactly like “Trump wasn’t exonerated by Mueller” because they can’t prove he didn’t steal the 2016 election with Putin. Fraud happened in this election, that’s already been proven.MelloDawg said:
“They didn’t say they didn’t see fraud. It’s about what they didn’t say. Them not saying there’s fraud means there must be fraud.”insinceredawg said:
SCOTUS didn't see any fraud. Are Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, and ACB on the take too?NorthwestFresh said:
It has everything to do with fraud along with Equal Protection and votes being invalidated by unconstitutional ballots in PA.insinceredawg said:
This lawsuit had nothing to do about fraud. It was about the GOP placating a sore loser because they're terrified of his base.Sledog said:Commies cheering election fraud. Who'd have guessed?
Old Slow Joe ain't president yet. May be in jail before the 21st. You know who get to be president then?
-2 on this bored and a vocal minority in the country.
You Leftist morons can’t remember yesterday, let alone two years ago.
Did fraud happen? Sure, maybe, it should absolutely be prosecuted if so. Was it massively wide scale and tip the election? Seems unlikely and hasn’t been proven anywhere but in press conferences. That’s not a court. He has every right to keep trying though.
But this is grief and I get how people deal with it. -
Sure, kook.Sledog said:
Civil war is a possibility the problem is 68% of the country thinks the election was stolen according to the last pole. I don't think that leaves many on the thieves side.AOG said:
Jesus, talk about a meltdown, Texas GOP wants to secede. The problem is a civil war would be more like Rawanda since the "tribes" are not really so separated.WilburHooksHands said:
Texas GOP is dealing with it really wellMelloDawg said:
I’m not a leftist, but ok.NorthwestFresh said:
Sounds exactly like “Trump wasn’t exonerated by Mueller” because they can’t prove he didn’t steal the 2016 election with Putin. Fraud happened in this election, that’s already been proven.MelloDawg said:
“They didn’t say they didn’t see fraud. It’s about what they didn’t say. Them not saying there’s fraud means there must be fraud.”insinceredawg said:
SCOTUS didn't see any fraud. Are Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, and ACB on the take too?NorthwestFresh said:
It has everything to do with fraud along with Equal Protection and votes being invalidated by unconstitutional ballots in PA.insinceredawg said:
This lawsuit had nothing to do about fraud. It was about the GOP placating a sore loser because they're terrified of his base.Sledog said:Commies cheering election fraud. Who'd have guessed?
Old Slow Joe ain't president yet. May be in jail before the 21st. You know who get to be president then?
-2 on this bored and a vocal minority in the country.
You Leftist morons can’t remember yesterday, let alone two years ago.
Did fraud happen? Sure, maybe, it should absolutely be prosecuted if so. Was it massively wide scale and tip the election? Seems unlikely and hasn’t been proven anywhere but in press conferences. That’s not a court. He has every right to keep trying though.
But this is grief and I get how people deal with it. -
You fringe ejection fraud deniers are funny.dflea said:
Sure, kook.Sledog said:
Civil war is a possibility the problem is 68% of the country thinks the election was stolen according to the last pole. I don't think that leaves many on the thieves side.AOG said:
Jesus, talk about a meltdown, Texas GOP wants to secede. The problem is a civil war would be more like Rawanda since the "tribes" are not really so separated.WilburHooksHands said:
Texas GOP is dealing with it really wellMelloDawg said:
I’m not a leftist, but ok.NorthwestFresh said:
Sounds exactly like “Trump wasn’t exonerated by Mueller” because they can’t prove he didn’t steal the 2016 election with Putin. Fraud happened in this election, that’s already been proven.MelloDawg said:
“They didn’t say they didn’t see fraud. It’s about what they didn’t say. Them not saying there’s fraud means there must be fraud.”insinceredawg said:
SCOTUS didn't see any fraud. Are Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, and ACB on the take too?NorthwestFresh said:
It has everything to do with fraud along with Equal Protection and votes being invalidated by unconstitutional ballots in PA.insinceredawg said:
This lawsuit had nothing to do about fraud. It was about the GOP placating a sore loser because they're terrified of his base.Sledog said:Commies cheering election fraud. Who'd have guessed?
Old Slow Joe ain't president yet. May be in jail before the 21st. You know who get to be president then?
-2 on this bored and a vocal minority in the country.
You Leftist morons can’t remember yesterday, let alone two years ago.
Did fraud happen? Sure, maybe, it should absolutely be prosecuted if so. Was it massively wide scale and tip the election? Seems unlikely and hasn’t been proven anywhere but in press conferences. That’s not a court. He has every right to keep trying though.
But this is grief and I get how people deal with it. -
SCOTUS denied on standing, not merit.
Can be filed at a lower federal court. -
There's that false hope I love to see. I'm sure this will end up working in your favor. Keep believing!NorthwestFresh said:SCOTUS denied on standing, not merit.
Can be filed at a lower federal court. -
Where did I give my opinion. I posted a fact.insinceredawg said:
There's that false hope I love to see. I'm sure this will end up working in your favor. Keep believing!NorthwestFresh said:SCOTUS denied on standing, not merit.
Can be filed at a lower federal court.
I’ve always said Biden is going to be inaugurated. I just like how the Left is now fine with holding elections in secret, Chavez and Saddam style. Get your corruption out on the open like real authoritarians. Covid policies rewarding some and punishing others has shown that as well as anything in my life. Congrats on being a lemming. -
Where it also has no standing.NorthwestFresh said:SCOTUS denied on standing, not merit.
Can be filed at a lower federal court.
But it is another opportunity to lose and get his nuthuggers to send in more money. -
True. I’m just posting that yet again, @insinceredawg jumps in immediately and only gives half the story. It’s a pattern for dumb, emotion-driven people like you and ID.dflea said:
Where it also has no standing.NorthwestFresh said:SCOTUS denied on standing, not merit.
Can be filed at a lower federal court.
But it is another opportunity to lose and get his nuthuggers to send in more money. -
Go send in your money, bitch. Of course it's true. I said it.NorthwestFresh said:
True. I’m just posting that yet again, @insinceredawg jumps in immediately and only gives half the story. It’s a pattern for dumb, emotion-driven people like you and ID.dflea said:
Where it also has no standing.NorthwestFresh said:SCOTUS denied on standing, not merit.
Can be filed at a lower federal court.
But it is another opportunity to lose and get his nuthuggers to send in more money. -
Northwest-tard doesn't grasp that if the same suit were filed at a lower court, the lower court would also be a federal court, and unable to render a judgment lacking jurisdiction. The alternative would be to try individual state's courts, but they've spent the last month laughing this bullshit out of court. Nice one Northwest-tard! bravo.NorthwestFresh said:SCOTUS denied on standing, not merit.
Can be filed at a lower federal court. -
Lol. I'd kick your ass 7 days a week. Pussy.Sledog said:
Soy boy. Standing is about who can and can't bring the case. Nothing else.HairyBallsDawg said:
The 9 highest judges in the nation just disagreed with you.Sledog said:
No it's about ballots that were not in compliance with the states constitution or laws. Those damn laws!insinceredawg said:
This lawsuit had nothing to do about fraud. It was about the GOP placating a sore loser because they're terrified of his base.Sledog said:Commies cheering election fraud. Who'd have guessed?
Old Slow Joe ain't president yet. May be in jail before the 21st. You know who get to be president then?
But continue to act like a dumbfuck.
Unless it isn't an act? -
Thanks for confirming that the case was dismissed on standing and can be filed at a lower court. Not sure what the rest of your rant is about.AOG said:
Northwest-tard doesn't grasp that if the same suit were filed at a lower court, the lower court would also be a federal court, and unable to render a judgment lacking jurisdiction. The alternative would be to try individual state's courts, but they've spent the last month laughing this bullshit out of court. Nice one Northwest-tard! bravo.NorthwestFresh said:SCOTUS denied on standing, not merit.
Can be filed at a lower federal court. -
It means you're fucked if you were expecting it to be re-litigatedNorthwestFresh said:
Thanks for confirming that the case was dismissed on standing. Not sure what the rest of your rant is about.AOG said:
Northwest-tard doesn't grasp that if the same suit were filed at a lower court, the lower court would also be a federal court, and unable to render a judgment lacking jurisdiction. The alternative would be to try individual state's courts, but they've spent the last month laughing this bullshit out of court. Nice one Northwest-tard! bravo.NorthwestFresh said:SCOTUS denied on standing, not merit.
Can be filed at a lower federal court. -
Thanks for confirming that the case was dismissed on standing. Not sure what the rest of your rant is about.AOG said:
Northwest-tard doesn't grasp that if the same suit were filed at a lower court, the lower court would also be a federal court, and unable to render a judgment lacking jurisdiction. The alternative would be to try individual state's courts, but they've spent the last month laughing this bullshit out of court. Nice one Northwest-tard! bravo.NorthwestFresh said:SCOTUS denied on standing, not merit.
Can be filed at a lower federal court.
RAWRHairyBallsDawg said:
Lol. I'd kick your ass 7 days a week. Pussy.Sledog said:
Soy boy. Standing is about who can and can't bring the case. Nothing else.HairyBallsDawg said:
The 9 highest judges in the nation just disagreed with you.Sledog said:
No it's about ballots that were not in compliance with the states constitution or laws. Those damn laws!insinceredawg said:
This lawsuit had nothing to do about fraud. It was about the GOP placating a sore loser because they're terrified of his base.Sledog said:Commies cheering election fraud. Who'd have guessed?
Old Slow Joe ain't president yet. May be in jail before the 21st. You know who get to be president then?
But continue to act like a dumbfuck.
Unless it isn't an act?
So sexy when you go all Butch. -
-
Herpes Patient Zero sounds like full-blown syphilis has attacked his brain.Dugdawg said:This seems appropriate tonight...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cpcWMBlzZts
-
Ok slicksack! Internet tough!HairyBallsDawg said:
Lol. I'd kick your ass 7 days a week. Pussy.Sledog said:
Soy boy. Standing is about who can and can't bring the case. Nothing else.HairyBallsDawg said:
The 9 highest judges in the nation just disagreed with you.Sledog said:
No it's about ballots that were not in compliance with the states constitution or laws. Those damn laws!insinceredawg said:
This lawsuit had nothing to do about fraud. It was about the GOP placating a sore loser because they're terrified of his base.Sledog said:Commies cheering election fraud. Who'd have guessed?
Old Slow Joe ain't president yet. May be in jail before the 21st. You know who get to be president then?
But continue to act like a dumbfuck.
Unless it isn't an act? -
-
China has!Southerndawg said: -
Thanks for straightening this dumb fuck out.Sledog said:
Soy boy. Standing is about who can and can't bring the case. Nothing else.HairyBallsDawg said:
The 9 highest judges in the nation just disagreed with you.Sledog said:
No it's about ballots that were not in compliance with the states constitution or laws. Those damn laws!insinceredawg said:
This lawsuit had nothing to do about fraud. It was about the GOP placating a sore loser because they're terrified of his base.Sledog said:Commies cheering election fraud. Who'd have guessed?
Old Slow Joe ain't president yet. May be in jail before the 21st. You know who get to be president then?
But continue to act like a dumbfuck.
Unless it isn't an act? -
Biden will never be inaugurated. In fact, he is attempting to negotiate surrender behind the scenes, and will likely end up conceding to avoid going to Guantanamo, where he will likely end up anyway, along with Kamala Harris.
-
this thread is delivering
-
SCOTUS didn’t hear the case, they dismissed on standing. They didn’t rule on the case at all, you idiot.insinceredawg said:
SCOTUS didn't see any fraud. Are Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, and ACB on the take too?NorthwestFresh said:
It has everything to do with fraud along with Equal Protection and votes being invalidated by unconstitutional ballots in PA.insinceredawg said:
This lawsuit had nothing to do about fraud. It was about the GOP placating a sore loser because they're terrified of his base.Sledog said:Commies cheering election fraud. Who'd have guessed?
Old Slow Joe ain't president yet. May be in jail before the 21st. You know who get to be president then?
How many times are you going to continue to do this? Even when you get a win, you fuck up the thread celebrating it with your ignorance and stupidity. -
-
Ya know...after some consideration....I agree with this one.Sledog said:
-
You seem upset.NorthwestFresh said:
SCOTUS didn’t hear the case, they dismissed on standing. They didn’t rule on the case at all, you idiot.insinceredawg said:
SCOTUS didn't see any fraud. Are Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, and ACB on the take too?NorthwestFresh said:
It has everything to do with fraud along with Equal Protection and votes being invalidated by unconstitutional ballots in PA.insinceredawg said:
This lawsuit had nothing to do about fraud. It was about the GOP placating a sore loser because they're terrified of his base.Sledog said:Commies cheering election fraud. Who'd have guessed?
Old Slow Joe ain't president yet. May be in jail before the 21st. You know who get to be president then?
How many times are you going to continue to do this? Even when you get a win, you fuck up the thread celebrating it with your ignorance and stupidity.
When is SCOTUS going to hear Mike Kelly's case? I heard it's still pending.
-
Seems legit. Source?oregonblitzkrieg said:Biden will never be inaugurated. In fact, he is attempting to negotiate surrender behind the scenes, and will likely end up conceding to avoid going to Guantanamo, where he will likely end up anyway, along with Kamala Harris.
-
This has legsoregonblitzkrieg said:Biden will never be inaugurated. In fact, he is attempting to negotiate surrender behind the scenes, and will likely end up conceding to avoid going to Guantanamo, where he will likely end up anyway, along with Kamala Harris.
