SCOTUS throws out Texas BS case
Comments
-
Texas GOP is dealing with it really wellMelloDawg said:
I’m not a leftist, but ok.NorthwestFresh said:
Sounds exactly like “Trump wasn’t exonerated by Mueller” because they can’t prove he didn’t steal the 2016 election with Putin. Fraud happened in this election, that’s already been proven.MelloDawg said:
“They didn’t say they didn’t see fraud. It’s about what they didn’t say. Them not saying there’s fraud means there must be fraud.”insinceredawg said:
SCOTUS didn't see any fraud. Are Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, and ACB on the take too?NorthwestFresh said:
It has everything to do with fraud along with Equal Protection and votes being invalidated by unconstitutional ballots in PA.insinceredawg said:
This lawsuit had nothing to do about fraud. It was about the GOP placating a sore loser because they're terrified of his base.Sledog said:Commies cheering election fraud. Who'd have guessed?
Old Slow Joe ain't president yet. May be in jail before the 21st. You know who get to be president then?
-2 on this bored and a vocal minority in the country.
You Leftist morons can’t remember yesterday, let alone two years ago.
Did fraud happen? Sure, maybe, it should absolutely be prosecuted if so. Was it massively wide scale and tip the election? Seems unlikely and hasn’t been proven anywhere but in press conferences. That’s not a court. He has every right to keep trying though.
But this is grief and I get how people deal with it. -
Jesus, talk about a meltdown, Texas GOP wants to secede. The problem is a civil war would be more like Rawanda since the "tribes" are not really so separated.WilburHooksHands said:
Texas GOP is dealing with it really wellMelloDawg said:
I’m not a leftist, but ok.NorthwestFresh said:
Sounds exactly like “Trump wasn’t exonerated by Mueller” because they can’t prove he didn’t steal the 2016 election with Putin. Fraud happened in this election, that’s already been proven.MelloDawg said:
“They didn’t say they didn’t see fraud. It’s about what they didn’t say. Them not saying there’s fraud means there must be fraud.”insinceredawg said:
SCOTUS didn't see any fraud. Are Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, and ACB on the take too?NorthwestFresh said:
It has everything to do with fraud along with Equal Protection and votes being invalidated by unconstitutional ballots in PA.insinceredawg said:
This lawsuit had nothing to do about fraud. It was about the GOP placating a sore loser because they're terrified of his base.Sledog said:Commies cheering election fraud. Who'd have guessed?
Old Slow Joe ain't president yet. May be in jail before the 21st. You know who get to be president then?
-2 on this bored and a vocal minority in the country.
You Leftist morons can’t remember yesterday, let alone two years ago.
Did fraud happen? Sure, maybe, it should absolutely be prosecuted if so. Was it massively wide scale and tip the election? Seems unlikely and hasn’t been proven anywhere but in press conferences. That’s not a court. He has every right to keep trying though.
But this is grief and I get how people deal with it. -
Civil war is a possibility the problem is 68% of the country thinks the election was stolen according to the last pole. I don't think that leaves many on the thieves side.AOG said:
Jesus, talk about a meltdown, Texas GOP wants to secede. The problem is a civil war would be more like Rawanda since the "tribes" are not really so separated.WilburHooksHands said:
Texas GOP is dealing with it really wellMelloDawg said:
I’m not a leftist, but ok.NorthwestFresh said:
Sounds exactly like “Trump wasn’t exonerated by Mueller” because they can’t prove he didn’t steal the 2016 election with Putin. Fraud happened in this election, that’s already been proven.MelloDawg said:
“They didn’t say they didn’t see fraud. It’s about what they didn’t say. Them not saying there’s fraud means there must be fraud.”insinceredawg said:
SCOTUS didn't see any fraud. Are Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, and ACB on the take too?NorthwestFresh said:
It has everything to do with fraud along with Equal Protection and votes being invalidated by unconstitutional ballots in PA.insinceredawg said:
This lawsuit had nothing to do about fraud. It was about the GOP placating a sore loser because they're terrified of his base.Sledog said:Commies cheering election fraud. Who'd have guessed?
Old Slow Joe ain't president yet. May be in jail before the 21st. You know who get to be president then?
-2 on this bored and a vocal minority in the country.
You Leftist morons can’t remember yesterday, let alone two years ago.
Did fraud happen? Sure, maybe, it should absolutely be prosecuted if so. Was it massively wide scale and tip the election? Seems unlikely and hasn’t been proven anywhere but in press conferences. That’s not a court. He has every right to keep trying though.
But this is grief and I get how people deal with it. -
Sure, kook.Sledog said:
Civil war is a possibility the problem is 68% of the country thinks the election was stolen according to the last pole. I don't think that leaves many on the thieves side.AOG said:
Jesus, talk about a meltdown, Texas GOP wants to secede. The problem is a civil war would be more like Rawanda since the "tribes" are not really so separated.WilburHooksHands said:
Texas GOP is dealing with it really wellMelloDawg said:
I’m not a leftist, but ok.NorthwestFresh said:
Sounds exactly like “Trump wasn’t exonerated by Mueller” because they can’t prove he didn’t steal the 2016 election with Putin. Fraud happened in this election, that’s already been proven.MelloDawg said:
“They didn’t say they didn’t see fraud. It’s about what they didn’t say. Them not saying there’s fraud means there must be fraud.”insinceredawg said:
SCOTUS didn't see any fraud. Are Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, and ACB on the take too?NorthwestFresh said:
It has everything to do with fraud along with Equal Protection and votes being invalidated by unconstitutional ballots in PA.insinceredawg said:
This lawsuit had nothing to do about fraud. It was about the GOP placating a sore loser because they're terrified of his base.Sledog said:Commies cheering election fraud. Who'd have guessed?
Old Slow Joe ain't president yet. May be in jail before the 21st. You know who get to be president then?
-2 on this bored and a vocal minority in the country.
You Leftist morons can’t remember yesterday, let alone two years ago.
Did fraud happen? Sure, maybe, it should absolutely be prosecuted if so. Was it massively wide scale and tip the election? Seems unlikely and hasn’t been proven anywhere but in press conferences. That’s not a court. He has every right to keep trying though.
But this is grief and I get how people deal with it. -
You fringe ejection fraud deniers are funny.dflea said:
Sure, kook.Sledog said:
Civil war is a possibility the problem is 68% of the country thinks the election was stolen according to the last pole. I don't think that leaves many on the thieves side.AOG said:
Jesus, talk about a meltdown, Texas GOP wants to secede. The problem is a civil war would be more like Rawanda since the "tribes" are not really so separated.WilburHooksHands said:
Texas GOP is dealing with it really wellMelloDawg said:
I’m not a leftist, but ok.NorthwestFresh said:
Sounds exactly like “Trump wasn’t exonerated by Mueller” because they can’t prove he didn’t steal the 2016 election with Putin. Fraud happened in this election, that’s already been proven.MelloDawg said:
“They didn’t say they didn’t see fraud. It’s about what they didn’t say. Them not saying there’s fraud means there must be fraud.”insinceredawg said:
SCOTUS didn't see any fraud. Are Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, and ACB on the take too?NorthwestFresh said:
It has everything to do with fraud along with Equal Protection and votes being invalidated by unconstitutional ballots in PA.insinceredawg said:
This lawsuit had nothing to do about fraud. It was about the GOP placating a sore loser because they're terrified of his base.Sledog said:Commies cheering election fraud. Who'd have guessed?
Old Slow Joe ain't president yet. May be in jail before the 21st. You know who get to be president then?
-2 on this bored and a vocal minority in the country.
You Leftist morons can’t remember yesterday, let alone two years ago.
Did fraud happen? Sure, maybe, it should absolutely be prosecuted if so. Was it massively wide scale and tip the election? Seems unlikely and hasn’t been proven anywhere but in press conferences. That’s not a court. He has every right to keep trying though.
But this is grief and I get how people deal with it. -
SCOTUS denied on standing, not merit.
Can be filed at a lower federal court. -
There's that false hope I love to see. I'm sure this will end up working in your favor. Keep believing!NorthwestFresh said:SCOTUS denied on standing, not merit.
Can be filed at a lower federal court. -
Where did I give my opinion. I posted a fact.insinceredawg said:
There's that false hope I love to see. I'm sure this will end up working in your favor. Keep believing!NorthwestFresh said:SCOTUS denied on standing, not merit.
Can be filed at a lower federal court.
I’ve always said Biden is going to be inaugurated. I just like how the Left is now fine with holding elections in secret, Chavez and Saddam style. Get your corruption out on the open like real authoritarians. Covid policies rewarding some and punishing others has shown that as well as anything in my life. Congrats on being a lemming. -
Where it also has no standing.NorthwestFresh said:SCOTUS denied on standing, not merit.
Can be filed at a lower federal court.
But it is another opportunity to lose and get his nuthuggers to send in more money. -
True. I’m just posting that yet again, @insinceredawg jumps in immediately and only gives half the story. It’s a pattern for dumb, emotion-driven people like you and ID.dflea said:
Where it also has no standing.NorthwestFresh said:SCOTUS denied on standing, not merit.
Can be filed at a lower federal court.
But it is another opportunity to lose and get his nuthuggers to send in more money.





