SCOTUS throws out Texas BS case
Comments
-
I’ve barely followed this case. However this destroying democracy narrative is limpdicked AF. Destroying democracy is rolling in the tanks, not going to court.RaceBannon said:Was democracy destroyed?
-
“They didn’t say they didn’t see fraud. It’s about what they didn’t say. Them not saying there’s fraud means there must be fraud.”insinceredawg said:
SCOTUS didn't see any fraud. Are Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, and ACB on the take too?NorthwestFresh said:
It has everything to do with fraud along with Equal Protection and votes being invalidated by unconstitutional ballots in PA.insinceredawg said:
This lawsuit had nothing to do about fraud. It was about the GOP placating a sore loser because they're terrified of his base.Sledog said:Commies cheering election fraud. Who'd have guessed?
Old Slow Joe ain't president yet. May be in jail before the 21st. You know who get to be president then?
-2 on this bored and a vocal minority in the country. -
FIFYSledog said:Commies cheering election fraud.Drump Tard Dumbfucks confused about how the law and Constitution work. Who'd have guessed? -
The 9 highest judges in the nation just disagreed with you.Sledog said:
No it's about ballots that were not in compliance with the states constitution or laws. Those damn laws!insinceredawg said:
This lawsuit had nothing to do about fraud. It was about the GOP placating a sore loser because they're terrified of his base.Sledog said:Commies cheering election fraud. Who'd have guessed?
Old Slow Joe ain't president yet. May be in jail before the 21st. You know who get to be president then?
But continue to act like a dumbfuck.
Unless it isn't an act? -
They ruled they didn't have standing. They didn't have legal standing to be a victim of the unconstitutional actions.MelloDawg said:
“They didn’t say they didn’t see fraud. It’s about what they didn’t say. Them not saying there’s fraud means there must be fraud.”insinceredawg said:
SCOTUS didn't see any fraud. Are Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, and ACB on the take too?NorthwestFresh said:
It has everything to do with fraud along with Equal Protection and votes being invalidated by unconstitutional ballots in PA.insinceredawg said:
This lawsuit had nothing to do about fraud. It was about the GOP placating a sore loser because they're terrified of his base.Sledog said:Commies cheering election fraud. Who'd have guessed?
Old Slow Joe ain't president yet. May be in jail before the 21st. You know who get to be president then?
-2 on this bored and a vocal minority in the country. -
Soy boy. Standing is about who can and can't bring the case. Nothing else.HairyBallsDawg said:
The 9 highest judges in the nation just disagreed with you.Sledog said:
No it's about ballots that were not in compliance with the states constitution or laws. Those damn laws!insinceredawg said:
This lawsuit had nothing to do about fraud. It was about the GOP placating a sore loser because they're terrified of his base.Sledog said:Commies cheering election fraud. Who'd have guessed?
Old Slow Joe ain't president yet. May be in jail before the 21st. You know who get to be president then?
But continue to act like a dumbfuck.
Unless it isn't an act? -
-
Sounds exactly like “Trump wasn’t exonerated by Mueller” because they can’t prove he didn’t steal the 2016 election with Putin. Fraud happened in this election, that’s already been proven.MelloDawg said:
“They didn’t say they didn’t see fraud. It’s about what they didn’t say. Them not saying there’s fraud means there must be fraud.”insinceredawg said:
SCOTUS didn't see any fraud. Are Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, and ACB on the take too?NorthwestFresh said:
It has everything to do with fraud along with Equal Protection and votes being invalidated by unconstitutional ballots in PA.insinceredawg said:
This lawsuit had nothing to do about fraud. It was about the GOP placating a sore loser because they're terrified of his base.Sledog said:Commies cheering election fraud. Who'd have guessed?
Old Slow Joe ain't president yet. May be in jail before the 21st. You know who get to be president then?
-2 on this bored and a vocal minority in the country.
You Leftist morons can’t remember yesterday, let alone two years ago. -
I’m not a leftist, but ok.NorthwestFresh said:
Sounds exactly like “Trump wasn’t exonerated by Mueller” because they can’t prove he didn’t steal the 2016 election with Putin. Fraud happened in this election, that’s already been proven.MelloDawg said:
“They didn’t say they didn’t see fraud. It’s about what they didn’t say. Them not saying there’s fraud means there must be fraud.”insinceredawg said:
SCOTUS didn't see any fraud. Are Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, and ACB on the take too?NorthwestFresh said:
It has everything to do with fraud along with Equal Protection and votes being invalidated by unconstitutional ballots in PA.insinceredawg said:
This lawsuit had nothing to do about fraud. It was about the GOP placating a sore loser because they're terrified of his base.Sledog said:Commies cheering election fraud. Who'd have guessed?
Old Slow Joe ain't president yet. May be in jail before the 21st. You know who get to be president then?
-2 on this bored and a vocal minority in the country.
You Leftist morons can’t remember yesterday, let alone two years ago.
Did fraud happen? Sure, maybe, it should absolutely be prosecuted if so. Was it massively wide scale and tip the election? Seems unlikely and hasn’t been proven anywhere but in press conferences. That’s not a court. He has every right to keep trying though.
But this is grief and I get how people deal with it. -
This might be salt in the wound for you at this point, but they would have rejected the relief they sought as well, probably quite soundly in fact.Sledog said:
They ruled they didn't have standing. They didn't have legal standing to be a victim of the unconstitutional actions.MelloDawg said:
“They didn’t say they didn’t see fraud. It’s about what they didn’t say. Them not saying there’s fraud means there must be fraud.”insinceredawg said:
SCOTUS didn't see any fraud. Are Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, and ACB on the take too?NorthwestFresh said:
It has everything to do with fraud along with Equal Protection and votes being invalidated by unconstitutional ballots in PA.insinceredawg said:
This lawsuit had nothing to do about fraud. It was about the GOP placating a sore loser because they're terrified of his base.Sledog said:Commies cheering election fraud. Who'd have guessed?
Old Slow Joe ain't president yet. May be in jail before the 21st. You know who get to be president then?
-2 on this bored and a vocal minority in the country.
You may think differently, but that’s expected. The Twitter news feeds no one has heard of and GatewayPundits etc will try to explain it the same way.
