SCOTUS throws out Texas BS case
Comments
-
-
but but but 106 GOP house members and 17 AGs backed it!!
-
Their last hail mary will be objecting in January.insinceredawg said:but but but 106 GOP house members and 17 AGs backed it!!
-
Is this a bigger kick in the nuts for Trumptards on a Friday afternoon than Emeka committing to tOSU in an hour?
-
Election fraud is now the law of the land. Celebrate!
-
wE LiVe iN a BaNaNa rEpUbLiC nOwNorthwestFresh said:Election fraud is now the law of the land. Celebrate!
-
This is pretty good. Nothing like scrolling through twitter right now for a cheap highinsinceredawg said:Is this a bigger kick in the nuts for Trumptards on a Friday afternoon than Emeka committing to tOSU in an hour?
-
First correct thing I’ve ever read from you.insinceredawg said:
wE LiVe iN a BaNaNa rEpUbLiC nOwNorthwestFresh said:Election fraud is now the law of the land. Celebrate!
-
-
Sasse is kind of turncoat but better than most of the GOP senators.insinceredawg said: -
Commies cheering election fraud. Who'd have guessed?
Old Slow Joe ain't president yet. May be in jail before the 21st. You know who get to be president then? -
You must be gravely disappointed. Look on the bright side, Sletard, with the first scotus denial you only got one sentence. You're up to two paragraphs or so now. Just keep up these lawsuits and you might get a full page.Sledog said:Commies cheering election fraud. Who'd have guessed?
Old Slow Joe ain't president yet. May be in jail before the 21st. You know who get to be president then? -
-
He’s a squishy dipshit like you, except he’s also corrupt. Of course you like him.AOG said:
Sasse is kind of turncoat but better than most of the GOP senators.insinceredawg said:
https://youtu.be/2z8ybuZ5aMc -
This lawsuit had nothing to do about fraud. It was about the GOP placating a sore loser because they're terrified of his base.Sledog said:Commies cheering election fraud. Who'd have guessed?
Old Slow Joe ain't president yet. May be in jail before the 21st. You know who get to be president then? -
No it's about ballots that were not in compliance with the states constitution or laws. Those damn laws!insinceredawg said:
This lawsuit had nothing to do about fraud. It was about the GOP placating a sore loser because they're terrified of his base.Sledog said:Commies cheering election fraud. Who'd have guessed?
Old Slow Joe ain't president yet. May be in jail before the 21st. You know who get to be president then? -
It has everything to do with fraud along with Equal Protection and votes being invalidated by unconstitutional ballots in PA.insinceredawg said:
This lawsuit had nothing to do about fraud. It was about the GOP placating a sore loser because they're terrified of his base.Sledog said:Commies cheering election fraud. Who'd have guessed?
Old Slow Joe ain't president yet. May be in jail before the 21st. You know who get to be president then? -
SCOTUS didn't see any fraud. Are Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, and ACB on the take too?NorthwestFresh said:
It has everything to do with fraud along with Equal Protection and votes being invalidated by unconstitutional ballots in PA.insinceredawg said:
This lawsuit had nothing to do about fraud. It was about the GOP placating a sore loser because they're terrified of his base.Sledog said:Commies cheering election fraud. Who'd have guessed?
Old Slow Joe ain't president yet. May be in jail before the 21st. You know who get to be president then? -
Was democracy destroyed?
-
Enjoy the mandate.
-
I’ve barely followed this case. However this destroying democracy narrative is limpdicked AF. Destroying democracy is rolling in the tanks, not going to court.RaceBannon said:Was democracy destroyed?
-
“They didn’t say they didn’t see fraud. It’s about what they didn’t say. Them not saying there’s fraud means there must be fraud.”insinceredawg said:
SCOTUS didn't see any fraud. Are Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, and ACB on the take too?NorthwestFresh said:
It has everything to do with fraud along with Equal Protection and votes being invalidated by unconstitutional ballots in PA.insinceredawg said:
This lawsuit had nothing to do about fraud. It was about the GOP placating a sore loser because they're terrified of his base.Sledog said:Commies cheering election fraud. Who'd have guessed?
Old Slow Joe ain't president yet. May be in jail before the 21st. You know who get to be president then?
-2 on this bored and a vocal minority in the country. -
FIFYSledog said:Commies cheering election fraud.Drump Tard Dumbfucks confused about how the law and Constitution work. Who'd have guessed? -
The 9 highest judges in the nation just disagreed with you.Sledog said:
No it's about ballots that were not in compliance with the states constitution or laws. Those damn laws!insinceredawg said:
This lawsuit had nothing to do about fraud. It was about the GOP placating a sore loser because they're terrified of his base.Sledog said:Commies cheering election fraud. Who'd have guessed?
Old Slow Joe ain't president yet. May be in jail before the 21st. You know who get to be president then?
But continue to act like a dumbfuck.
Unless it isn't an act? -
They ruled they didn't have standing. They didn't have legal standing to be a victim of the unconstitutional actions.MelloDawg said:
“They didn’t say they didn’t see fraud. It’s about what they didn’t say. Them not saying there’s fraud means there must be fraud.”insinceredawg said:
SCOTUS didn't see any fraud. Are Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, and ACB on the take too?NorthwestFresh said:
It has everything to do with fraud along with Equal Protection and votes being invalidated by unconstitutional ballots in PA.insinceredawg said:
This lawsuit had nothing to do about fraud. It was about the GOP placating a sore loser because they're terrified of his base.Sledog said:Commies cheering election fraud. Who'd have guessed?
Old Slow Joe ain't president yet. May be in jail before the 21st. You know who get to be president then?
-2 on this bored and a vocal minority in the country. -
Soy boy. Standing is about who can and can't bring the case. Nothing else.HairyBallsDawg said:
The 9 highest judges in the nation just disagreed with you.Sledog said:
No it's about ballots that were not in compliance with the states constitution or laws. Those damn laws!insinceredawg said:
This lawsuit had nothing to do about fraud. It was about the GOP placating a sore loser because they're terrified of his base.Sledog said:Commies cheering election fraud. Who'd have guessed?
Old Slow Joe ain't president yet. May be in jail before the 21st. You know who get to be president then?
But continue to act like a dumbfuck.
Unless it isn't an act? -
-
Sounds exactly like “Trump wasn’t exonerated by Mueller” because they can’t prove he didn’t steal the 2016 election with Putin. Fraud happened in this election, that’s already been proven.MelloDawg said:
“They didn’t say they didn’t see fraud. It’s about what they didn’t say. Them not saying there’s fraud means there must be fraud.”insinceredawg said:
SCOTUS didn't see any fraud. Are Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, and ACB on the take too?NorthwestFresh said:
It has everything to do with fraud along with Equal Protection and votes being invalidated by unconstitutional ballots in PA.insinceredawg said:
This lawsuit had nothing to do about fraud. It was about the GOP placating a sore loser because they're terrified of his base.Sledog said:Commies cheering election fraud. Who'd have guessed?
Old Slow Joe ain't president yet. May be in jail before the 21st. You know who get to be president then?
-2 on this bored and a vocal minority in the country.
You Leftist morons can’t remember yesterday, let alone two years ago. -
I’m not a leftist, but ok.NorthwestFresh said:
Sounds exactly like “Trump wasn’t exonerated by Mueller” because they can’t prove he didn’t steal the 2016 election with Putin. Fraud happened in this election, that’s already been proven.MelloDawg said:
“They didn’t say they didn’t see fraud. It’s about what they didn’t say. Them not saying there’s fraud means there must be fraud.”insinceredawg said:
SCOTUS didn't see any fraud. Are Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, and ACB on the take too?NorthwestFresh said:
It has everything to do with fraud along with Equal Protection and votes being invalidated by unconstitutional ballots in PA.insinceredawg said:
This lawsuit had nothing to do about fraud. It was about the GOP placating a sore loser because they're terrified of his base.Sledog said:Commies cheering election fraud. Who'd have guessed?
Old Slow Joe ain't president yet. May be in jail before the 21st. You know who get to be president then?
-2 on this bored and a vocal minority in the country.
You Leftist morons can’t remember yesterday, let alone two years ago.
Did fraud happen? Sure, maybe, it should absolutely be prosecuted if so. Was it massively wide scale and tip the election? Seems unlikely and hasn’t been proven anywhere but in press conferences. That’s not a court. He has every right to keep trying though.
But this is grief and I get how people deal with it. -
This might be salt in the wound for you at this point, but they would have rejected the relief they sought as well, probably quite soundly in fact.Sledog said:
They ruled they didn't have standing. They didn't have legal standing to be a victim of the unconstitutional actions.MelloDawg said:
“They didn’t say they didn’t see fraud. It’s about what they didn’t say. Them not saying there’s fraud means there must be fraud.”insinceredawg said:
SCOTUS didn't see any fraud. Are Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, and ACB on the take too?NorthwestFresh said:
It has everything to do with fraud along with Equal Protection and votes being invalidated by unconstitutional ballots in PA.insinceredawg said:
This lawsuit had nothing to do about fraud. It was about the GOP placating a sore loser because they're terrified of his base.Sledog said:Commies cheering election fraud. Who'd have guessed?
Old Slow Joe ain't president yet. May be in jail before the 21st. You know who get to be president then?
-2 on this bored and a vocal minority in the country.
You may think differently, but that’s expected. The Twitter news feeds no one has heard of and GatewayPundits etc will try to explain it the same way.
