Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

The eyes of Texas are upon you

13

Comments

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,834 Founders Club
    I'd say you're full of shit
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,898
    RaceBannon said:

    I'd say you're full of shit

    Disagree
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,834 Founders Club
    I asked around

    Didn't go well for you
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,561 Standard Supporter
    The dazzler is all in on corruption that allows him to fleece his pitiful clients.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    AOG said:

    SFGbob said:

    AOG said:

    RaceBannon said:

    AOG said:

    Sledog said:

    AOG said:

    RaceBannon said:

    This is really the only thing out there that has even a ghost of a chance because the states clearly did not follow the law in changing the rules for the election in the 4 states. But the law is for the little people. I suspect that it won't even get heard because if they hear it they really need to rule in favor of Texas.

    Partly this is the same crap the Supremes just threw out, that PA pushed the limits of law by allowing for a lot of mail in votes. Imagine if you were a judge. Would you really completely defame yourself for all history by throwing out Biden's win for Trump on the grounds that in the year of a pandemic governments made it easy to vote by mail? You have to have SOME brains to see this issue.
    Rocket man. Please show us where the constitution is null and void during (fake) pandemics.
    If you show that prevailing world circumstances don't affect legal judgments
    Incredible
    Example: Lincoln freed the slaves by decree. Where was that in the Constitution? What right did he have legally? If you think the Constitution is fixed and not open to interpretation and latitude you are naive (in addition to being an internet addict and an asshole).
    There's not a person here who thinks the Constitution is "fixed" hell the fucking people who wrote it didn't think it was "fixed." That's why they provided a system to amend it. Lincoln freed the slaves that were in the Confederate States, he didn't have the authority to free the slaves in states that weren't at war with the Union. It took the Amendment of the Constitution before all the slaves in the border states were free.

    For a guy who consistently talks about how poorly educated others here are, you sure are an ignorant motherfucker.
    Well, einstein, my point was that the proclamation was controversial and heavily influenced by the prevailing circumstances. Legally it was argued on various grounds, but the upheaval of the war influenced the legality, in the same way that the upheaval of the pandemic influences judgments rendered about mail in voting.
    How to run your mouth while really saying nothing
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AOG
    AOG Member Posts: 2,651
    edited December 2020
    SFGbob said:

    AOG said:

    SFGbob said:

    AOG said:

    RaceBannon said:

    AOG said:

    Sledog said:

    AOG said:

    RaceBannon said:

    This is really the only thing out there that has even a ghost of a chance because the states clearly did not follow the law in changing the rules for the election in the 4 states. But the law is for the little people. I suspect that it won't even get heard because if they hear it they really need to rule in favor of Texas.

    Partly this is the same crap the Supremes just threw out, that PA pushed the limits of law by allowing for a lot of mail in votes. Imagine if you were a judge. Would you really completely defame yourself for all history by throwing out Biden's win for Trump on the grounds that in the year of a pandemic governments made it easy to vote by mail? You have to have SOME brains to see this issue.
    Rocket man. Please show us where the constitution is null and void during (fake) pandemics.
    If you show that prevailing world circumstances don't affect legal judgments
    Incredible
    Example: Lincoln freed the slaves by decree. Where was that in the Constitution? What right did he have legally? If you think the Constitution is fixed and not open to interpretation and latitude you are naive (in addition to being an internet addict and an asshole).
    There's not a person here who thinks the Constitution is "fixed" hell the fucking people who wrote it didn't think it was "fixed." That's why they provided a system to amend it. Lincoln freed the slaves that were in the Confederate States, he didn't have the authority to free the slaves in states that weren't at war with the Union. It took the Amendment of the Constitution before all the slaves in the border states were free.

    For a guy who consistently talks about how poorly educated others here are, you sure are an ignorant motherfucker.
    Well, einstein, my point was that the proclamation was controversial and heavily influenced by the prevailing circumstances. Legally it was argued on various grounds, but the upheaval of the war influenced the legality, in the same way that the upheaval of the pandemic influences judgments rendered about mail in voting.
    How to run your mouth while really saying nothing
    You can't understand because you don't have the brainpower. By the way, fascism takes the form demanding that the party follow Trump's idiotic clinging to power and lies about "winning" when he clearly lost. Fascism requires LOYALTY to a DICTATOR. Also fascist is forbidding staffers (thousands literally of his appointees) from looking for new jobs because they have to be devoted loyalists to the fucking dictator. He's got the whole party loyal to him and not the Constitution, == fascism.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,052
    AOG said:

    SFGbob said:

    AOG said:

    SFGbob said:

    AOG said:

    RaceBannon said:

    AOG said:

    Sledog said:

    AOG said:

    RaceBannon said:

    This is really the only thing out there that has even a ghost of a chance because the states clearly did not follow the law in changing the rules for the election in the 4 states. But the law is for the little people. I suspect that it won't even get heard because if they hear it they really need to rule in favor of Texas.

    Partly this is the same crap the Supremes just threw out, that PA pushed the limits of law by allowing for a lot of mail in votes. Imagine if you were a judge. Would you really completely defame yourself for all history by throwing out Biden's win for Trump on the grounds that in the year of a pandemic governments made it easy to vote by mail? You have to have SOME brains to see this issue.
    Rocket man. Please show us where the constitution is null and void during (fake) pandemics.
    If you show that prevailing world circumstances don't affect legal judgments
    Incredible
    Example: Lincoln freed the slaves by decree. Where was that in the Constitution? What right did he have legally? If you think the Constitution is fixed and not open to interpretation and latitude you are naive (in addition to being an internet addict and an asshole).
    There's not a person here who thinks the Constitution is "fixed" hell the fucking people who wrote it didn't think it was "fixed." That's why they provided a system to amend it. Lincoln freed the slaves that were in the Confederate States, he didn't have the authority to free the slaves in states that weren't at war with the Union. It took the Amendment of the Constitution before all the slaves in the border states were free.

    For a guy who consistently talks about how poorly educated others here are, you sure are an ignorant motherfucker.
    Well, einstein, my point was that the proclamation was controversial and heavily influenced by the prevailing circumstances. Legally it was argued on various grounds, but the upheaval of the war influenced the legality, in the same way that the upheaval of the pandemic influences judgments rendered about mail in voting.
    How to run your mouth while really saying nothing
    You can't understand because you don't have the brainpower. By the way, fascism takes the form demanding that the party follow Trump's idiotic clinging to power and lies about "winning" when he clearly lost. Fascism requires LOYALTY to a DICTATOR. Also fascist is forbidding staffers (thousands literally of his appointees) from looking for new jobs because they have to be devoted loyalists to the fucking dictator. He's got the whole party loyal to him and not the Constitution, == fascism.
    Godwin
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,834 Founders Club
    AOG said:

    SFGbob said:

    AOG said:

    SFGbob said:

    AOG said:

    RaceBannon said:

    AOG said:

    Sledog said:

    AOG said:

    RaceBannon said:

    This is really the only thing out there that has even a ghost of a chance because the states clearly did not follow the law in changing the rules for the election in the 4 states. But the law is for the little people. I suspect that it won't even get heard because if they hear it they really need to rule in favor of Texas.

    Partly this is the same crap the Supremes just threw out, that PA pushed the limits of law by allowing for a lot of mail in votes. Imagine if you were a judge. Would you really completely defame yourself for all history by throwing out Biden's win for Trump on the grounds that in the year of a pandemic governments made it easy to vote by mail? You have to have SOME brains to see this issue.
    Rocket man. Please show us where the constitution is null and void during (fake) pandemics.
    If you show that prevailing world circumstances don't affect legal judgments
    Incredible
    Example: Lincoln freed the slaves by decree. Where was that in the Constitution? What right did he have legally? If you think the Constitution is fixed and not open to interpretation and latitude you are naive (in addition to being an internet addict and an asshole).
    There's not a person here who thinks the Constitution is "fixed" hell the fucking people who wrote it didn't think it was "fixed." That's why they provided a system to amend it. Lincoln freed the slaves that were in the Confederate States, he didn't have the authority to free the slaves in states that weren't at war with the Union. It took the Amendment of the Constitution before all the slaves in the border states were free.

    For a guy who consistently talks about how poorly educated others here are, you sure are an ignorant motherfucker.
    Well, einstein, my point was that the proclamation was controversial and heavily influenced by the prevailing circumstances. Legally it was argued on various grounds, but the upheaval of the war influenced the legality, in the same way that the upheaval of the pandemic influences judgments rendered about mail in voting.
    How to run your mouth while really saying nothing
    You can't understand because you don't have the brainpower. By the way, fascism takes the form demanding that the party follow Trump's idiotic clinging to power and lies about "winning" when he clearly lost. Fascism requires LOYALTY to a DICTATOR. Also fascist is forbidding staffers (thousands literally of his appointees) from looking for new jobs because they have to be devoted loyalists to the fucking dictator. He's got the whole party loyal to him and not the Constitution, == fascism.
    Meltdown
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,662 Founders Club
    RaceBannon said:

    AOG said:

    SFGbob said:

    AOG said:

    SFGbob said:

    AOG said:

    RaceBannon said:

    AOG said:

    Sledog said:

    AOG said:

    RaceBannon said:

    This is really the only thing out there that has even a ghost of a chance because the states clearly did not follow the law in changing the rules for the election in the 4 states. But the law is for the little people. I suspect that it won't even get heard because if they hear it they really need to rule in favor of Texas.

    Partly this is the same crap the Supremes just threw out, that PA pushed the limits of law by allowing for a lot of mail in votes. Imagine if you were a judge. Would you really completely defame yourself for all history by throwing out Biden's win for Trump on the grounds that in the year of a pandemic governments made it easy to vote by mail? You have to have SOME brains to see this issue.
    Rocket man. Please show us where the constitution is null and void during (fake) pandemics.
    If you show that prevailing world circumstances don't affect legal judgments
    Incredible
    Example: Lincoln freed the slaves by decree. Where was that in the Constitution? What right did he have legally? If you think the Constitution is fixed and not open to interpretation and latitude you are naive (in addition to being an internet addict and an asshole).
    There's not a person here who thinks the Constitution is "fixed" hell the fucking people who wrote it didn't think it was "fixed." That's why they provided a system to amend it. Lincoln freed the slaves that were in the Confederate States, he didn't have the authority to free the slaves in states that weren't at war with the Union. It took the Amendment of the Constitution before all the slaves in the border states were free.

    For a guy who consistently talks about how poorly educated others here are, you sure are an ignorant motherfucker.
    Well, einstein, my point was that the proclamation was controversial and heavily influenced by the prevailing circumstances. Legally it was argued on various grounds, but the upheaval of the war influenced the legality, in the same way that the upheaval of the pandemic influences judgments rendered about mail in voting.
    How to run your mouth while really saying nothing
    You can't understand because you don't have the brainpower. By the way, fascism takes the form demanding that the party follow Trump's idiotic clinging to power and lies about "winning" when he clearly lost. Fascism requires LOYALTY to a DICTATOR. Also fascist is forbidding staffers (thousands literally of his appointees) from looking for new jobs because they have to be devoted loyalists to the fucking dictator. He's got the whole party loyal to him and not the Constitution, == fascism.
    Meltdown
    AOG Getting dumber with every post.

    Trump apparently now has the whole Republican Party behind him, that would be new news.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DawgFader
    DawgFader Member Posts: 1,414

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    AOG said:

    SFGbob said:

    AOG said:

    RaceBannon said:

    AOG said:

    Sledog said:

    AOG said:

    RaceBannon said:

    This is really the only thing out there that has even a ghost of a chance because the states clearly did not follow the law in changing the rules for the election in the 4 states. But the law is for the little people. I suspect that it won't even get heard because if they hear it they really need to rule in favor of Texas.

    Partly this is the same crap the Supremes just threw out, that PA pushed the limits of law by allowing for a lot of mail in votes. Imagine if you were a judge. Would you really completely defame yourself for all history by throwing out Biden's win for Trump on the grounds that in the year of a pandemic governments made it easy to vote by mail? You have to have SOME brains to see this issue.
    Rocket man. Please show us where the constitution is null and void during (fake) pandemics.
    If you show that prevailing world circumstances don't affect legal judgments
    Incredible
    Example: Lincoln freed the slaves by decree. Where was that in the Constitution? What right did he have legally? If you think the Constitution is fixed and not open to interpretation and latitude you are naive (in addition to being an internet addict and an asshole).
    There's not a person here who thinks the Constitution is "fixed" hell the fucking people who wrote it didn't think it was "fixed." That's why they provided a system to amend it. Lincoln freed the slaves that were in the Confederate States, he didn't have the authority to free the slaves in states that weren't at war with the Union. It took the Amendment of the Constitution before all the slaves in the border states were free.

    For a guy who consistently talks about how poorly educated others here are, you sure are an ignorant motherfucker.
    Well, einstein, my point was that the proclamation was controversial and heavily influenced by the prevailing circumstances. Legally it was argued on various grounds, but the upheaval of the war influenced the legality, in the same way that the upheaval of the pandemic influences judgments rendered about mail in voting.
    How to run your mouth while really saying nothing
    AOG said:

    SFGbob said:

    AOG said:

    SFGbob said:

    AOG said:

    RaceBannon said:

    AOG said:

    Sledog said:

    AOG said:

    RaceBannon said:

    This is really the only thing out there that has even a ghost of a chance because the states clearly did not follow the law in changing the rules for the election in the 4 states. But the law is for the little people. I suspect that it won't even get heard because if they hear it they really need to rule in favor of Texas.

    Partly this is the same crap the Supremes just threw out, that PA pushed the limits of law by allowing for a lot of mail in votes. Imagine if you were a judge. Would you really completely defame yourself for all history by throwing out Biden's win for Trump on the grounds that in the year of a pandemic governments made it easy to vote by mail? You have to have SOME brains to see this issue.
    Rocket man. Please show us where the constitution is null and void during (fake) pandemics.
    If you show that prevailing world circumstances don't affect legal judgments
    Incredible
    Example: Lincoln freed the slaves by decree. Where was that in the Constitution? What right did he have legally? If you think the Constitution is fixed and not open to interpretation and latitude you are naive (in addition to being an internet addict and an asshole).
    There's not a person here who thinks the Constitution is "fixed" hell the fucking people who wrote it didn't think it was "fixed." That's why they provided a system to amend it. Lincoln freed the slaves that were in the Confederate States, he didn't have the authority to free the slaves in states that weren't at war with the Union. It took the Amendment of the Constitution before all the slaves in the border states were free.

    For a guy who consistently talks about how poorly educated others here are, you sure are an ignorant motherfucker.
    Well, einstein, my point was that the proclamation was controversial and heavily influenced by the prevailing circumstances. Legally it was argued on various grounds, but the upheaval of the war influenced the legality, in the same way that the upheaval of the pandemic influences judgments rendered about mail in voting.
    How to run your mouth while really saying nothing
    You can't understand because you don't have the brainpower. By the way, fascism takes the form demanding that the party follow Trump's idiotic clinging to power and lies about "winning" when he clearly lost. Fascism requires LOYALTY to a DICTATOR. Also fascist is forbidding staffers (thousands literally of his appointees) from looking for new jobs because they have to be devoted loyalists to the fucking dictator. He's got the whole party loyal to him and not the Constitution, == fascism.
    Yeah, the fucking moron who claims that a President who appoints people who are loyal to him is really a fascist is just too deep for me to understand.

    Well, einstein, my point was that the proclamation was controversial and heavily influenced by the prevailing circumstances. Legally it was argued on various grounds, but the upheaval of the war influenced the legality, in the same way that the upheaval of the pandemic influences judgments rendered about mail in voting.

    This word salad is nothing more than vacuous gibberish intended to paper over the fact they you stuck your head up your ass with your comment about Lincoln freeing the slaves.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • LoneStarDawg
    LoneStarDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,681 Founders Club
    edited December 2020
    You babies keep running your mouths, but news keeps happening

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 25,613 Standard Supporter
    SFGbob said:

    AOG said:

    Bob_C said:

    AOG said:

    Most of you have kind of incomplete minds. You are white guys that didn't go or couldn't complete college. You believe things like COVID-19 is like the regular flu, climate change is a hoax, Trump won. All I can do is tell you to look at the facts, but you go by "feel" -- not what the facts of the situation dictate.

    Been a rough couple of days for you.

    Are you a woke whitey or something else?
    I'm going off the stats, assume you idiots fit the profile. Trump is most popular with low educated white guys.
    Don't know your skin color, I suspect you're white, but you've displayed zero evidence that you're anything other than low educated.
    hey man, he went to central

    I knew a lot of c students who went there
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MelloDawg
    MelloDawg Member Posts: 6,845
    edited December 2020
    LoneStarDawg said:

    You babies keep running your mouths, but news keeps happening

    But it doesn't, that's the thing, other than it's an event occurring in time. The actual magnitude of the event is what makes it news.

    What is the court case or sure-fire mechanism that'll overturn things after this Texas case is shot down? Debates on floor of Congress? When that amounts to nothing and Biden is inaugurated, I look forward to the lead pipe cinch controversy which will sure to have him removed from office. That'll be a fun 4 years to watch.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • LoneStarDawg
    LoneStarDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,681 Founders Club
    edited December 2020
    So 17 State AGs have joined as have members of PA state legislature joins case


    As have 106 US house members


    But I’m sure it’s nothing
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • insinceredawg
    insinceredawg Member Posts: 5,117
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,834 Founders Club
    insinceredawg said:

    Sounds like the Court needs to hear the case then

    37 states have now expressed an interest in how PA illegally changed the election rules

    Big if true
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,052
    RaceBannon said:

    insinceredawg said:

    Sounds like the Court needs to hear the case then

    37 states have now expressed an interest in how PA illegally changed the election rules

    Big if true
    But the Dazzler and @AOGComeLately said it wasn't so....

    37 states AGs and legislatures clearly are not as intellectually capable as those two. Clearly.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • LoneStarDawg
    LoneStarDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,681 Founders Club
    insinceredawg said:

    They sound scared
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • insinceredawg
    insinceredawg Member Posts: 5,117
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,898
    insinceredawg said:

    RINOs obviously
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • LoneStarDawg
    LoneStarDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,681 Founders Club
    Here comes the shitpoasting
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,052
    Kaitlin Collins gargles with chinese semen.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,561 Standard Supporter
    So does the dazzler. Geezus.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • LoneStarDawg
    LoneStarDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,681 Founders Club
    bUT wHEre iS tHe eviDENce?

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,834 Founders Club
    And Jeb Bush is against it too

    Its almost as if @insinceredawg hasn't even been paying attention the last 5 years

    Too busy swallowing fake news I guess


    As for Chip Roy he just made himself perhaps the dumbest man to ever serve in Congress.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Cougzz
    Cougzz Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 306 Swaye's Wigwam
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,561 Standard Supporter
    The dem states mail in elections is like watching a rerun of old Soviet Union elections. Phucking banana republic corrupt.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • LoneStarDawg
    LoneStarDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,681 Founders Club
    Cougzz said:

    And Josh Shapiro looks like Nick Holt setting up his defense for it

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • LoneStarDawg
    LoneStarDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,681 Founders Club
    Oh now I know why PA legislator joined in, they have the dirt on how they were ignored and bypassed

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter