This is really the only thing out there that has even a ghost of a chance because the states clearly did not follow the law in changing the rules for the election in the 4 states. But the law is for the little people. I suspect that it won't even get heard because if they hear it they really need to rule in favor of Texas.
Partly this is the same crap the Supremes just threw out, that PA pushed the limits of law by allowing for a lot of mail in votes. Imagine if you were a judge. Would you really completely defame yourself for all history by throwing out Biden's win for Trump on the grounds that in the year of a pandemic governments made it easy to vote by mail? You have to have SOME brains to see this issue.
Rocket man. Please show us where the constitution is null and void during (fake) pandemics.
If you show that prevailing world circumstances don't affect legal judgments
Incredible
Example: Lincoln freed the slaves by decree. Where was that in the Constitution? What right did he have legally? If you think the Constitution is fixed and not open to interpretation and latitude you are naive (in addition to being an internet addict and an asshole).
There's not a person here who thinks the Constitution is "fixed" hell the fucking people who wrote it didn't think it was "fixed." That's why they provided a system to amend it. Lincoln freed the slaves that were in the Confederate States, he didn't have the authority to free the slaves in states that weren't at war with the Union. It took the Amendment of the Constitution before all the slaves in the border states were free.
For a guy who consistently talks about how poorly educated others here are, you sure are an ignorant motherfucker.
Well, einstein, my point was that the proclamation was controversial and heavily influenced by the prevailing circumstances. Legally it was argued on various grounds, but the upheaval of the war influenced the legality, in the same way that the upheaval of the pandemic influences judgments rendered about mail in voting.
This is really the only thing out there that has even a ghost of a chance because the states clearly did not follow the law in changing the rules for the election in the 4 states. But the law is for the little people. I suspect that it won't even get heard because if they hear it they really need to rule in favor of Texas.
Partly this is the same crap the Supremes just threw out, that PA pushed the limits of law by allowing for a lot of mail in votes. Imagine if you were a judge. Would you really completely defame yourself for all history by throwing out Biden's win for Trump on the grounds that in the year of a pandemic governments made it easy to vote by mail? You have to have SOME brains to see this issue.
Rocket man. Please show us where the constitution is null and void during (fake) pandemics.
If you show that prevailing world circumstances don't affect legal judgments
Incredible
Example: Lincoln freed the slaves by decree. Where was that in the Constitution? What right did he have legally? If you think the Constitution is fixed and not open to interpretation and latitude you are naive (in addition to being an internet addict and an asshole).
There's not a person here who thinks the Constitution is "fixed" hell the fucking people who wrote it didn't think it was "fixed." That's why they provided a system to amend it. Lincoln freed the slaves that were in the Confederate States, he didn't have the authority to free the slaves in states that weren't at war with the Union. It took the Amendment of the Constitution before all the slaves in the border states were free.
For a guy who consistently talks about how poorly educated others here are, you sure are an ignorant motherfucker.
Well, einstein, my point was that the proclamation was controversial and heavily influenced by the prevailing circumstances. Legally it was argued on various grounds, but the upheaval of the war influenced the legality, in the same way that the upheaval of the pandemic influences judgments rendered about mail in voting.
How to run your mouth while really saying nothing
You can't understand because you don't have the brainpower. By the way, fascism takes the form demanding that the party follow Trump's idiotic clinging to power and lies about "winning" when he clearly lost. Fascism requires LOYALTY to a DICTATOR. Also fascist is forbidding staffers (thousands literally of his appointees) from looking for new jobs because they have to be devoted loyalists to the fucking dictator. He's got the whole party loyal to him and not the Constitution, == fascism.
This is really the only thing out there that has even a ghost of a chance because the states clearly did not follow the law in changing the rules for the election in the 4 states. But the law is for the little people. I suspect that it won't even get heard because if they hear it they really need to rule in favor of Texas.
Partly this is the same crap the Supremes just threw out, that PA pushed the limits of law by allowing for a lot of mail in votes. Imagine if you were a judge. Would you really completely defame yourself for all history by throwing out Biden's win for Trump on the grounds that in the year of a pandemic governments made it easy to vote by mail? You have to have SOME brains to see this issue.
Rocket man. Please show us where the constitution is null and void during (fake) pandemics.
If you show that prevailing world circumstances don't affect legal judgments
Incredible
Example: Lincoln freed the slaves by decree. Where was that in the Constitution? What right did he have legally? If you think the Constitution is fixed and not open to interpretation and latitude you are naive (in addition to being an internet addict and an asshole).
There's not a person here who thinks the Constitution is "fixed" hell the fucking people who wrote it didn't think it was "fixed." That's why they provided a system to amend it. Lincoln freed the slaves that were in the Confederate States, he didn't have the authority to free the slaves in states that weren't at war with the Union. It took the Amendment of the Constitution before all the slaves in the border states were free.
For a guy who consistently talks about how poorly educated others here are, you sure are an ignorant motherfucker.
Well, einstein, my point was that the proclamation was controversial and heavily influenced by the prevailing circumstances. Legally it was argued on various grounds, but the upheaval of the war influenced the legality, in the same way that the upheaval of the pandemic influences judgments rendered about mail in voting.
How to run your mouth while really saying nothing
You can't understand because you don't have the brainpower. By the way, fascism takes the form demanding that the party follow Trump's idiotic clinging to power and lies about "winning" when he clearly lost. Fascism requires LOYALTY to a DICTATOR. Also fascist is forbidding staffers (thousands literally of his appointees) from looking for new jobs because they have to be devoted loyalists to the fucking dictator. He's got the whole party loyal to him and not the Constitution, == fascism.
This is really the only thing out there that has even a ghost of a chance because the states clearly did not follow the law in changing the rules for the election in the 4 states. But the law is for the little people. I suspect that it won't even get heard because if they hear it they really need to rule in favor of Texas.
Partly this is the same crap the Supremes just threw out, that PA pushed the limits of law by allowing for a lot of mail in votes. Imagine if you were a judge. Would you really completely defame yourself for all history by throwing out Biden's win for Trump on the grounds that in the year of a pandemic governments made it easy to vote by mail? You have to have SOME brains to see this issue.
Rocket man. Please show us where the constitution is null and void during (fake) pandemics.
If you show that prevailing world circumstances don't affect legal judgments
Incredible
Example: Lincoln freed the slaves by decree. Where was that in the Constitution? What right did he have legally? If you think the Constitution is fixed and not open to interpretation and latitude you are naive (in addition to being an internet addict and an asshole).
There's not a person here who thinks the Constitution is "fixed" hell the fucking people who wrote it didn't think it was "fixed." That's why they provided a system to amend it. Lincoln freed the slaves that were in the Confederate States, he didn't have the authority to free the slaves in states that weren't at war with the Union. It took the Amendment of the Constitution before all the slaves in the border states were free.
For a guy who consistently talks about how poorly educated others here are, you sure are an ignorant motherfucker.
Well, einstein, my point was that the proclamation was controversial and heavily influenced by the prevailing circumstances. Legally it was argued on various grounds, but the upheaval of the war influenced the legality, in the same way that the upheaval of the pandemic influences judgments rendered about mail in voting.
How to run your mouth while really saying nothing
You can't understand because you don't have the brainpower. By the way, fascism takes the form demanding that the party follow Trump's idiotic clinging to power and lies about "winning" when he clearly lost. Fascism requires LOYALTY to a DICTATOR. Also fascist is forbidding staffers (thousands literally of his appointees) from looking for new jobs because they have to be devoted loyalists to the fucking dictator. He's got the whole party loyal to him and not the Constitution, == fascism.
This is really the only thing out there that has even a ghost of a chance because the states clearly did not follow the law in changing the rules for the election in the 4 states. But the law is for the little people. I suspect that it won't even get heard because if they hear it they really need to rule in favor of Texas.
Partly this is the same crap the Supremes just threw out, that PA pushed the limits of law by allowing for a lot of mail in votes. Imagine if you were a judge. Would you really completely defame yourself for all history by throwing out Biden's win for Trump on the grounds that in the year of a pandemic governments made it easy to vote by mail? You have to have SOME brains to see this issue.
Rocket man. Please show us where the constitution is null and void during (fake) pandemics.
If you show that prevailing world circumstances don't affect legal judgments
Incredible
Example: Lincoln freed the slaves by decree. Where was that in the Constitution? What right did he have legally? If you think the Constitution is fixed and not open to interpretation and latitude you are naive (in addition to being an internet addict and an asshole).
There's not a person here who thinks the Constitution is "fixed" hell the fucking people who wrote it didn't think it was "fixed." That's why they provided a system to amend it. Lincoln freed the slaves that were in the Confederate States, he didn't have the authority to free the slaves in states that weren't at war with the Union. It took the Amendment of the Constitution before all the slaves in the border states were free.
For a guy who consistently talks about how poorly educated others here are, you sure are an ignorant motherfucker.
Well, einstein, my point was that the proclamation was controversial and heavily influenced by the prevailing circumstances. Legally it was argued on various grounds, but the upheaval of the war influenced the legality, in the same way that the upheaval of the pandemic influences judgments rendered about mail in voting.
How to run your mouth while really saying nothing
You can't understand because you don't have the brainpower. By the way, fascism takes the form demanding that the party follow Trump's idiotic clinging to power and lies about "winning" when he clearly lost. Fascism requires LOYALTY to a DICTATOR. Also fascist is forbidding staffers (thousands literally of his appointees) from looking for new jobs because they have to be devoted loyalists to the fucking dictator. He's got the whole party loyal to him and not the Constitution, == fascism.
Meltdown
AOG Getting dumber with every post.
Trump apparently now has the whole Republican Party behind him, that would be new news.
This is really the only thing out there that has even a ghost of a chance because the states clearly did not follow the law in changing the rules for the election in the 4 states. But the law is for the little people. I suspect that it won't even get heard because if they hear it they really need to rule in favor of Texas.
Partly this is the same crap the Supremes just threw out, that PA pushed the limits of law by allowing for a lot of mail in votes. Imagine if you were a judge. Would you really completely defame yourself for all history by throwing out Biden's win for Trump on the grounds that in the year of a pandemic governments made it easy to vote by mail? You have to have SOME brains to see this issue.
Rocket man. Please show us where the constitution is null and void during (fake) pandemics.
If you show that prevailing world circumstances don't affect legal judgments
Incredible
Example: Lincoln freed the slaves by decree. Where was that in the Constitution? What right did he have legally? If you think the Constitution is fixed and not open to interpretation and latitude you are naive (in addition to being an internet addict and an asshole).
There's not a person here who thinks the Constitution is "fixed" hell the fucking people who wrote it didn't think it was "fixed." That's why they provided a system to amend it. Lincoln freed the slaves that were in the Confederate States, he didn't have the authority to free the slaves in states that weren't at war with the Union. It took the Amendment of the Constitution before all the slaves in the border states were free.
For a guy who consistently talks about how poorly educated others here are, you sure are an ignorant motherfucker.
Well, einstein, my point was that the proclamation was controversial and heavily influenced by the prevailing circumstances. Legally it was argued on various grounds, but the upheaval of the war influenced the legality, in the same way that the upheaval of the pandemic influences judgments rendered about mail in voting.
This is really the only thing out there that has even a ghost of a chance because the states clearly did not follow the law in changing the rules for the election in the 4 states. But the law is for the little people. I suspect that it won't even get heard because if they hear it they really need to rule in favor of Texas.
Partly this is the same crap the Supremes just threw out, that PA pushed the limits of law by allowing for a lot of mail in votes. Imagine if you were a judge. Would you really completely defame yourself for all history by throwing out Biden's win for Trump on the grounds that in the year of a pandemic governments made it easy to vote by mail? You have to have SOME brains to see this issue.
Rocket man. Please show us where the constitution is null and void during (fake) pandemics.
If you show that prevailing world circumstances don't affect legal judgments
Incredible
Example: Lincoln freed the slaves by decree. Where was that in the Constitution? What right did he have legally? If you think the Constitution is fixed and not open to interpretation and latitude you are naive (in addition to being an internet addict and an asshole).
There's not a person here who thinks the Constitution is "fixed" hell the fucking people who wrote it didn't think it was "fixed." That's why they provided a system to amend it. Lincoln freed the slaves that were in the Confederate States, he didn't have the authority to free the slaves in states that weren't at war with the Union. It took the Amendment of the Constitution before all the slaves in the border states were free.
For a guy who consistently talks about how poorly educated others here are, you sure are an ignorant motherfucker.
Well, einstein, my point was that the proclamation was controversial and heavily influenced by the prevailing circumstances. Legally it was argued on various grounds, but the upheaval of the war influenced the legality, in the same way that the upheaval of the pandemic influences judgments rendered about mail in voting.
How to run your mouth while really saying nothing
You can't understand because you don't have the brainpower. By the way, fascism takes the form demanding that the party follow Trump's idiotic clinging to power and lies about "winning" when he clearly lost. Fascism requires LOYALTY to a DICTATOR. Also fascist is forbidding staffers (thousands literally of his appointees) from looking for new jobs because they have to be devoted loyalists to the fucking dictator. He's got the whole party loyal to him and not the Constitution, == fascism.
Yeah, the fucking moron who claims that a President who appoints people who are loyal to him is really a fascist is just too deep for me to understand.
Well, einstein, my point was that the proclamation was controversial and heavily influenced by the prevailing circumstances. Legally it was argued on various grounds, but the upheaval of the war influenced the legality, in the same way that the upheaval of the pandemic influences judgments rendered about mail in voting.
This word salad is nothing more than vacuous gibberish intended to paper over the fact they you stuck your head up your ass with your comment about Lincoln freeing the slaves.
Most of you have kind of incomplete minds. You are white guys that didn't go or couldn't complete college. You believe things like COVID-19 is like the regular flu, climate change is a hoax, Trump won. All I can do is tell you to look at the facts, but you go by "feel" -- not what the facts of the situation dictate.
Been a rough couple of days for you.
Are you a woke whitey or something else?
I'm going off the stats, assume you idiots fit the profile. Trump is most popular with low educated white guys.
Don't know your skin color, I suspect you're white, but you've displayed zero evidence that you're anything other than low educated.
But it doesn't, that's the thing, other than it's an event occurring in time. The actual magnitude of the event is what makes it news.
What is the court case or sure-fire mechanism that'll overturn things after this Texas case is shot down? Debates on floor of Congress? When that amounts to nothing and Biden is inaugurated, I look forward to the lead pipe cinch controversy which will sure to have him removed from office. That'll be a fun 4 years to watch.
Comments
Didn't go well for you
Trump apparently now has the whole Republican Party behind him, that would be new news.
Well, einstein, my point was that the proclamation was controversial and heavily influenced by the prevailing circumstances. Legally it was argued on various grounds, but the upheaval of the war influenced the legality, in the same way that the upheaval of the pandemic influences judgments rendered about mail in voting.
This word salad is nothing more than vacuous gibberish intended to paper over the fact they you stuck your head up your ass with your comment about Lincoln freeing the slaves.
I knew a lot of c students who went there
What is the court case or sure-fire mechanism that'll overturn things after this Texas case is shot down? Debates on floor of Congress? When that amounts to nothing and Biden is inaugurated, I look forward to the lead pipe cinch controversy which will sure to have him removed from office. That'll be a fun 4 years to watch.
As have 106 US house members
But I’m sure it’s nothing
37 states have now expressed an interest in how PA illegally changed the election rules
Big if true
37 states AGs and legislatures clearly are not as intellectually capable as those two. Clearly.