Libertarian Public Health
Comments
-
5 days hence will be fun.PurpleThrobber said:
5 days late response- Dazzler still a maff dumbfuck.HHusky said:
And 176 > 109 too.PurpleThrobber said:
MaffHHusky said:
NY State does not have a death rate of 287 per 100K. It has a death rate of 175 per 100K. ND is closing the gap very rapidly.WestlinnDuck said:New York has 287 deaths per 100,000 population. North Dakota has 97 and you think North Dakota is the problem.
175 > 97
m'kay, dazzler?
But the comparison isn’t aging well for you. Shrinkage. -
Please don't ever try to run a business. 5 days does not a trend make.HHusky said:
5 days hence will be fun.PurpleThrobber said:
5 days late response- Dazzler still a maff dumbfuck.HHusky said:
And 176 > 109 too.PurpleThrobber said:
MaffHHusky said:
NY State does not have a death rate of 287 per 100K. It has a death rate of 175 per 100K. ND is closing the gap very rapidly.WestlinnDuck said:New York has 287 deaths per 100,000 population. North Dakota has 97 and you think North Dakota is the problem.
175 > 97
m'kay, dazzler?
But the comparison isn’t aging well for you. Shrinkage.
Go back to Dazzling legal analysis. Leave the numbers to professionals.
-
Funny. I can remember way back to July, when North Dakota wasn’t rapidly closing in on New York’s death rate. Sucks having South Dakota as a neighbor, of course.PurpleThrobber said:
Please don't ever try to run a business. 5 days does not a trend make.HHusky said:
5 days hence will be fun.PurpleThrobber said:
5 days late response- Dazzler still a maff dumbfuck.HHusky said:
And 176 > 109 too.PurpleThrobber said:
MaffHHusky said:
NY State does not have a death rate of 287 per 100K. It has a death rate of 175 per 100K. ND is closing the gap very rapidly.WestlinnDuck said:New York has 287 deaths per 100,000 population. North Dakota has 97 and you think North Dakota is the problem.
175 > 97
m'kay, dazzler?
But the comparison isn’t aging well for you. Shrinkage.
Go back to Dazzling legal analysis. Leave the numbers to professionals.
#MasksDontWork! -
One where they next want us to start ratting out our family and friends.GrundleStiltzkin said: -
Keep us posted, shitstain. In 5 days everyone in South and North Dakota will be dead?HHusky said:
5 days hence will be fun.PurpleThrobber said:
5 days late response- Dazzler still a maff dumbfuck.HHusky said:
And 176 > 109 too.PurpleThrobber said:
MaffHHusky said:
NY State does not have a death rate of 287 per 100K. It has a death rate of 175 per 100K. ND is closing the gap very rapidly.WestlinnDuck said:New York has 287 deaths per 100,000 population. North Dakota has 97 and you think North Dakota is the problem.
175 > 97
m'kay, dazzler?
But the comparison isn’t aging well for you. Shrinkage. -
You’re thinking of Iowa. Understandable error.hardhat said:
Keep us posted, shitstain. In 5 days everyone in South and North Dakota will be dead?HHusky said:
5 days hence will be fun.PurpleThrobber said:
5 days late response- Dazzler still a maff dumbfuck.HHusky said:
And 176 > 109 too.PurpleThrobber said:
MaffHHusky said:
NY State does not have a death rate of 287 per 100K. It has a death rate of 175 per 100K. ND is closing the gap very rapidly.WestlinnDuck said:New York has 287 deaths per 100,000 population. North Dakota has 97 and you think North Dakota is the problem.
175 > 97
m'kay, dazzler?
But the comparison isn’t aging well for you. Shrinkage. -
177 > 120HHusky said:
And 176 > 109 too.PurpleThrobber said:
MaffHHusky said:
NY State does not have a death rate of 287 per 100K. It has a death rate of 175 per 100K. ND is closing the gap very rapidly.WestlinnDuck said:New York has 287 deaths per 100,000 population. North Dakota has 97 and you think North Dakota is the problem.
175 > 97
m'kay, dazzler?
But the comparison isn’t aging well for you. Shrinkage.
But still . . . -
179 > 130HHusky said:
177 > 120HHusky said:
And 176 > 109 too.PurpleThrobber said:
MaffHHusky said:
NY State does not have a death rate of 287 per 100K. It has a death rate of 175 per 100K. ND is closing the gap very rapidly.WestlinnDuck said:New York has 287 deaths per 100,000 population. North Dakota has 97 and you think North Dakota is the problem.
175 > 97
m'kay, dazzler?
But the comparison isn’t aging well for you. Shrinkage.
But still . . .
And yet . . . -
Start? Been going on since the jump in Warshington.EsophagealFeces said:
One where they next want us to start ratting out our family and friends.GrundleStiltzkin said: -
181 > 140HHusky said:
179 > 130HHusky said:
177 > 120HHusky said:
And 176 > 109 too.PurpleThrobber said:
MaffHHusky said:
NY State does not have a death rate of 287 per 100K. It has a death rate of 175 per 100K. ND is closing the gap very rapidly.WestlinnDuck said:New York has 287 deaths per 100,000 population. North Dakota has 97 and you think North Dakota is the problem.
175 > 97
m'kay, dazzler?
But the comparison isn’t aging well for you. Shrinkage.
But still . . .
And yet . . .
PT assures me there is no trend. -
Old people die. Old people die at a slightly greater rate because GG and boomers are getting old.HHusky said:
181 > 140HHusky said:
179 > 130HHusky said:
177 > 120HHusky said:
And 176 > 109 too.PurpleThrobber said:
MaffHHusky said:
NY State does not have a death rate of 287 per 100K. It has a death rate of 175 per 100K. ND is closing the gap very rapidly.WestlinnDuck said:New York has 287 deaths per 100,000 population. North Dakota has 97 and you think North Dakota is the problem.
175 > 97
m'kay, dazzler?
But the comparison isn’t aging well for you. Shrinkage.
But still . . .
And yet . . .
PT assures me there is no trend.
What's your point other than the one on your head?
-
Apparently they die faster in the vast, maskless prairies these days.PurpleThrobber said:
Old people die. Old people die at a slightly greater rate because GG and boomers are getting old.HHusky said:
181 > 140HHusky said:
179 > 130HHusky said:
177 > 120HHusky said:
And 176 > 109 too.PurpleThrobber said:
MaffHHusky said:
NY State does not have a death rate of 287 per 100K. It has a death rate of 175 per 100K. ND is closing the gap very rapidly.WestlinnDuck said:New York has 287 deaths per 100,000 population. North Dakota has 97 and you think North Dakota is the problem.
175 > 97
m'kay, dazzler?
But the comparison isn’t aging well for you. Shrinkage.
But still . . .
And yet . . .
PT assures me there is no trend.
What's your point other than the one on your head? -
Because Cuomo murdered the GG/Boomers earlier this year.HHusky said:
Apparently they die faster in the vast, maskless prairies these days.PurpleThrobber said:
Old people die. Old people die at a slightly greater rate because GG and boomers are getting old.HHusky said:
181 > 140HHusky said:
179 > 130HHusky said:
177 > 120HHusky said:
And 176 > 109 too.PurpleThrobber said:
MaffHHusky said:
NY State does not have a death rate of 287 per 100K. It has a death rate of 175 per 100K. ND is closing the gap very rapidly.WestlinnDuck said:New York has 287 deaths per 100,000 population. North Dakota has 97 and you think North Dakota is the problem.
175 > 97
m'kay, dazzler?
But the comparison isn’t aging well for you. Shrinkage.
But still . . .
And yet . . .
PT assures me there is no trend.
What's your point other than the one on your head?
Maff.
-
186 > 161HHusky said:
181 > 140HHusky said:
179 > 130HHusky said:
177 > 120HHusky said:
And 176 > 109 too.PurpleThrobber said:
MaffHHusky said:
NY State does not have a death rate of 287 per 100K. It has a death rate of 175 per 100K. ND is closing the gap very rapidly.WestlinnDuck said:New York has 287 deaths per 100,000 population. North Dakota has 97 and you think North Dakota is the problem.
175 > 97
m'kay, dazzler?
But the comparison isn’t aging well for you. Shrinkage.
But still . . .
And yet . . .
PT assures me there is no trend.
Hmmmm . . . -
When is the running count of death from the seasonal flu going to start?HHusky said:
186 > 161HHusky said:
181 > 140HHusky said:
179 > 130HHusky said:
177 > 120HHusky said:
And 176 > 109 too.PurpleThrobber said:
MaffHHusky said:
NY State does not have a death rate of 287 per 100K. It has a death rate of 175 per 100K. ND is closing the gap very rapidly.WestlinnDuck said:New York has 287 deaths per 100,000 population. North Dakota has 97 and you think North Dakota is the problem.
175 > 97
m'kay, dazzler?
But the comparison isn’t aging well for you. Shrinkage.
But still . . .
And yet . . .
PT assures me there is no trend.
Hmmmm . . .
-
How did this turn out? Did everyone in North Dakota die?HHusky said: -
All deaths Joey’s fault since Jan. 2021. Those are the rules. Any other numbers you’d care to discuss Dazzler?
-
-
RaceBannon said:
Imagine being that pathetic of a person like H is -
Swaye said:
And an also large chunk of the population is cheerleading for it. Hi @HHuskyGrundleStiltzkin said:Whether you think lockdown shit is a good idea or not, executing those orders by executive fiat without addressing the core civil liberty issues is fucked up, especially whilst sidelining the legislature (hi Jay). Furthermore, it's a huge problem that a large chunk of the population has just accepted it.
Why did we fight and die to win independence for this thing called liberty so a bunch of self entitled pussies could come along 250 years later and tell us to give it all away because SCIENCE? Fucking disgrace. Civil liberties do not apply to business owners, only gay people and blacks, evidently. -
HHusky said:
5 days hence will be fun.PurpleThrobber said:
5 days late response- Dazzler still a maff dumbfuck.HHusky said:
And 176 > 109 too.PurpleThrobber said:
MaffHHusky said:
NY State does not have a death rate of 287 per 100K. It has a death rate of 175 per 100K. ND is closing the gap very rapidly.WestlinnDuck said:New York has 287 deaths per 100,000 population. North Dakota has 97 and you think North Dakota is the problem.
175 > 97
m'kay, dazzler?
But the comparison isn’t aging well for you. Shrinkage. -
HHusky said:
Funny. I can remember way back to July, when North Dakota wasn’t rapidly closing in on New York’s death rate. Sucks having South Dakota as a neighbor, of course.PurpleThrobber said:
Please don't ever try to run a business. 5 days does not a trend make.HHusky said:
5 days hence will be fun.PurpleThrobber said:
5 days late response- Dazzler still a maff dumbfuck.HHusky said:
And 176 > 109 too.PurpleThrobber said:
MaffHHusky said:
NY State does not have a death rate of 287 per 100K. It has a death rate of 175 per 100K. ND is closing the gap very rapidly.WestlinnDuck said:New York has 287 deaths per 100,000 population. North Dakota has 97 and you think North Dakota is the problem.
175 > 97
m'kay, dazzler?
But the comparison isn’t aging well for you. Shrinkage.
Go back to Dazzling legal analysis. Leave the numbers to professionals.
#MasksDontWork! -
Like everywhere else, the chicom crud hates old people and fat people with diabetes. 63 dead under 40, 3 under 20. Lock everyone down and mask because it hurts the feelings of old people and sick people if everyone isn't suffering.
-
Imagine the lives that could be saved with a 5mph speed limit. If it saves 1 life…. It could be your child….
-
How fun was it?HHusky said:
5 days hence will be fun.PurpleThrobber said:
5 days late response- Dazzler still a maff dumbfuck.HHusky said:
And 176 > 109 too.PurpleThrobber said:
MaffHHusky said:
NY State does not have a death rate of 287 per 100K. It has a death rate of 175 per 100K. ND is closing the gap very rapidly.WestlinnDuck said:New York has 287 deaths per 100,000 population. North Dakota has 97 and you think North Dakota is the problem.
175 > 97
m'kay, dazzler?
But the comparison isn’t aging well for you. Shrinkage.
