Maximum Carnage Week Game Thread
Comments
-
Who declares martial law first newsom or Cuomo?
Johnny tobacco is fucking pissed! -
Real quote, didn't believe it until I heard it.
-
I don’t even have the energy to pull up all the data refuting this.
That was so performative, he’s literally trying to kill his city. -
It's workingLoneStarDawg said:I don’t even have the energy to pull up all the data refuting this.
That was so performative, he’s literally trying to kill his city. -
What’s the end game? Vacate the city so outside investment can buy it? It seems outrageously harmful what is happening.RaceBannon said:
It's workingLoneStarDawg said:I don’t even have the energy to pull up all the data refuting this.
That was so performative, he’s literally trying to kill his city. -
The end game is power absolutely corrupting those wielding it
A story as old as I am. Garcetti's donors are doing fine. -
Even the one getting hunted like a dog?!?RaceBannon said:The end game is power absolutely corrupting those wielding it
A story as old as I am. Garcetti's donors are doing fine. -
Dems believe the game is over, America's day in the sun is over, and the masses should take their proper place in the world order as Chinese subjects.LoneStarDawg said:
What’s the end game? Vacate the city so outside investment can buy it? It seems outrageously harmful what is happening.RaceBannon said:
It's workingLoneStarDawg said:I don’t even have the energy to pull up all the data refuting this.
That was so performative, he’s literally trying to kill his city.
It's how they talk, how they govern and how they act. What Democrat anywhere is praising the US as a great country and showing any pride and faith in the country, its values and its ideals?
I'll save you the trouble; The answer is none. -
This is all about the election still. Protests popping up around the country by Trump supporters and they fear it will get nasty.. Lock them down! Ain't lockin' me down!
-
-
#mytulsiTurdBomber said:
Dems believe the game is over, America's day in the sun is over, and the masses should take their proper place in the world order as Chinese subjects.LoneStarDawg said:
What’s the end game? Vacate the city so outside investment can buy it? It seems outrageously harmful what is happening.RaceBannon said:
It's workingLoneStarDawg said:I don’t even have the energy to pull up all the data refuting this.
That was so performative, he’s literally trying to kill his city.
It's how they talk, how they govern and how they act. What Democrat anywhere is praising the US as a great country and showing any pride and faith in the country, its values and its ideals?
I'll save you the trouble; The answer is none.
-
Goddamnit PT! You just had to go and do that, didn't you?PurpleThrobber said:
#mytulsiTurdBomber said:
Dems believe the game is over, America's day in the sun is over, and the masses should take their proper place in the world order as Chinese subjects.LoneStarDawg said:
What’s the end game? Vacate the city so outside investment can buy it? It seems outrageously harmful what is happening.RaceBannon said:
It's workingLoneStarDawg said:I don’t even have the energy to pull up all the data refuting this.
That was so performative, he’s literally trying to kill his city.
It's how they talk, how they govern and how they act. What Democrat anywhere is praising the US as a great country and showing any pride and faith in the country, its values and its ideals?
I'll save you the trouble; The answer is none.
Narrative Killer. -
No one despises attractive women like libs.PurpleThrobber said:
#mytulsiTurdBomber said:
Dems believe the game is over, America's day in the sun is over, and the masses should take their proper place in the world order as Chinese subjects.LoneStarDawg said:
What’s the end game? Vacate the city so outside investment can buy it? It seems outrageously harmful what is happening.RaceBannon said:
It's workingLoneStarDawg said:I don’t even have the energy to pull up all the data refuting this.
That was so performative, he’s literally trying to kill his city.
It's how they talk, how they govern and how they act. What Democrat anywhere is praising the US as a great country and showing any pride and faith in the country, its values and its ideals?
I'll save you the trouble; The answer is none.
Who are mostly ugly women and men that cannot attract pretty women. -
Not politicized at all. Biden's reliance on science consists of keep the same idiot around that has been running the science from day 1
Fowchi had 40 years and billions of dollars at his disposal to be ready and the dumbfuck still contradicts himself daily. -
-
-
-
Kind of glad we just elected a ham sandwich to be the fall guy for the collapse of the economy
Hey wear a mask for another 100 days and it will just be spiffy -
-
Science? Like The Who declaring Racism an equal threat to public health as the pandemic in order to retroactively immunize BLM and supporters for gathering in public without masks, packed together like sardines, and screaming in each others' faces for hours?
That ain't science. That's propaganda.
Fuck your little yard signs that say "we believe in science." How can you believe in science when you don't know what science is to begin with? -
-
The medias primary trick the past 10 or so years is to release numbers with no context to make things sound really bad
The ICU is 75% full!
1000 people died today in the US! -
This bored and falling for fake news. Name a more iconic duo.HuskyInAZ said:For those interesred...
Consider the following figures- US Total deaths by year per CDC:
2013: 2,596,993
2014: 2,626,418
2015: 2,712,630
2016: 2,744,248
2017: 2,813,503
2018: 2,839,205
2019: 2,855,000
2020: as of 11/14 total deaths= 2,512,880
At present the US is experiencing a 1.12% increase in overall mortality rates for 2020- not good- pandemicky numbers to be sure.
However, last year, 2019, there was also a 1.12% increase. Did we miss a pandemic in 2019?
But wait it’s even "scarier"- 2018 saw a 1.22% increase in mortality rates, 2017 saw a 1.24% increase, 2016 1.27% increase, 2015 1.27% increase, 2014 1.29% increase- all exceeding 2020’s increase in mortality rate- so does this mean we have had pandemics for the last 7 years?
Does this indicate non-stop pandemics every year for the last 7 years and we just weren’t paying attention and didn’t have an 'honest" media to keep us pinned to our beds in a proper state of fear?
And BTW 2013 all the way back to 2009 all showed .09% increases in mortality rates- don’t know where the cutoff is but certainly even these years were “pandemic like” if you feel this year was truly a pandemic.
It isn’t until we go back to the year 2008 that we see a decrease in overall mortality rates in the US. For 20 straight years there were decreases in mortality rates and then in 2009 this changed- since then we have had an increase in mortality rates. Why is that? Could this point to the 2008 economic recession as being the leading indicator rather than some supernatural viral entity?
In reality this year at present seems to be no different in overall mortality rates compared to last year and less of an increase than 5 of the 6 the preceding years. How is this possible during a “pandemic of biblical proportions?”
It's always important to look at the rates (populations are increasing and rates vary) and overall trends to get a clear picture.
It's also been obvious since April that how death certificates are filed have been dramatically altered (first time in history) to give liberal interpretations to "Covid" as being cause of death- and let's not forget that PCR tests at greater than 35 cycles (as is the case in virtually every lab in the US/Europe) produce massive false positives. This article illustrates indeed that past deaths caused by heart disease are now obviously getting lumped into the catch-all "Covid" category.
Oh and BTW the WHO changed it's definition of what IS a Pandemic in 2009- might want to look into how and why that was done.
https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-chart-us-death-figures-2020-idUSKBN2872MV -
With vs Of. Gullible IC still doesn't know the diff.insinceredawg said:
This bored and falling for fake news. Name a more iconic duo.HuskyInAZ said:For those interesred...
Consider the following figures- US Total deaths by year per CDC:
2013: 2,596,993
2014: 2,626,418
2015: 2,712,630
2016: 2,744,248
2017: 2,813,503
2018: 2,839,205
2019: 2,855,000
2020: as of 11/14 total deaths= 2,512,880
At present the US is experiencing a 1.12% increase in overall mortality rates for 2020- not good- pandemicky numbers to be sure.
However, last year, 2019, there was also a 1.12% increase. Did we miss a pandemic in 2019?
But wait it’s even "scarier"- 2018 saw a 1.22% increase in mortality rates, 2017 saw a 1.24% increase, 2016 1.27% increase, 2015 1.27% increase, 2014 1.29% increase- all exceeding 2020’s increase in mortality rate- so does this mean we have had pandemics for the last 7 years?
Does this indicate non-stop pandemics every year for the last 7 years and we just weren’t paying attention and didn’t have an 'honest" media to keep us pinned to our beds in a proper state of fear?
And BTW 2013 all the way back to 2009 all showed .09% increases in mortality rates- don’t know where the cutoff is but certainly even these years were “pandemic like” if you feel this year was truly a pandemic.
It isn’t until we go back to the year 2008 that we see a decrease in overall mortality rates in the US. For 20 straight years there were decreases in mortality rates and then in 2009 this changed- since then we have had an increase in mortality rates. Why is that? Could this point to the 2008 economic recession as being the leading indicator rather than some supernatural viral entity?
In reality this year at present seems to be no different in overall mortality rates compared to last year and less of an increase than 5 of the 6 the preceding years. How is this possible during a “pandemic of biblical proportions?”
It's always important to look at the rates (populations are increasing and rates vary) and overall trends to get a clear picture.
It's also been obvious since April that how death certificates are filed have been dramatically altered (first time in history) to give liberal interpretations to "Covid" as being cause of death- and let's not forget that PCR tests at greater than 35 cycles (as is the case in virtually every lab in the US/Europe) produce massive false positives. This article illustrates indeed that past deaths caused by heart disease are now obviously getting lumped into the catch-all "Covid" category.
Oh and BTW the WHO changed it's definition of what IS a Pandemic in 2009- might want to look into how and why that was done.
https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-chart-us-death-figures-2020-idUSKBN2872MV -
Says the guy linking a fact check.insinceredawg said:
This bored and falling for fake news. Name a more iconic duo.HuskyInAZ said:For those interesred...
Consider the following figures- US Total deaths by year per CDC:
2013: 2,596,993
2014: 2,626,418
2015: 2,712,630
2016: 2,744,248
2017: 2,813,503
2018: 2,839,205
2019: 2,855,000
2020: as of 11/14 total deaths= 2,512,880
At present the US is experiencing a 1.12% increase in overall mortality rates for 2020- not good- pandemicky numbers to be sure.
However, last year, 2019, there was also a 1.12% increase. Did we miss a pandemic in 2019?
But wait it’s even "scarier"- 2018 saw a 1.22% increase in mortality rates, 2017 saw a 1.24% increase, 2016 1.27% increase, 2015 1.27% increase, 2014 1.29% increase- all exceeding 2020’s increase in mortality rate- so does this mean we have had pandemics for the last 7 years?
Does this indicate non-stop pandemics every year for the last 7 years and we just weren’t paying attention and didn’t have an 'honest" media to keep us pinned to our beds in a proper state of fear?
And BTW 2013 all the way back to 2009 all showed .09% increases in mortality rates- don’t know where the cutoff is but certainly even these years were “pandemic like” if you feel this year was truly a pandemic.
It isn’t until we go back to the year 2008 that we see a decrease in overall mortality rates in the US. For 20 straight years there were decreases in mortality rates and then in 2009 this changed- since then we have had an increase in mortality rates. Why is that? Could this point to the 2008 economic recession as being the leading indicator rather than some supernatural viral entity?
In reality this year at present seems to be no different in overall mortality rates compared to last year and less of an increase than 5 of the 6 the preceding years. How is this possible during a “pandemic of biblical proportions?”
It's always important to look at the rates (populations are increasing and rates vary) and overall trends to get a clear picture.
It's also been obvious since April that how death certificates are filed have been dramatically altered (first time in history) to give liberal interpretations to "Covid" as being cause of death- and let's not forget that PCR tests at greater than 35 cycles (as is the case in virtually every lab in the US/Europe) produce massive false positives. This article illustrates indeed that past deaths caused by heart disease are now obviously getting lumped into the catch-all "Covid" category.
Oh and BTW the WHO changed it's definition of what IS a Pandemic in 2009- might want to look into how and why that was done.
https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-chart-us-death-figures-2020-idUSKBN2872MV -
How can they believe in science when they don't know which bathroom to use or that shit isn't free?TurdBomber said:Science? Like The Who declaring Racism an equal threat to public health as the pandemic in order to retroactively immunize BLM and supporters for gathering in public without masks, packed together like sardines, and screaming in each others' faces for hours?
That ain't science. That's propaganda.
Fuck your little yard signs that say "we believe in science." How can you believe in science when you don't know what science is to begin with? -
SCIENCE and apparently black lives don't matter.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/gun-violence-has-killed-23-times-more-chicago-youth-covid
Gun Violence Has Killed 23 Times More Chicago Youth Than COVID
by Tyler Durden
Sat, 12/05/2020 - 11:10
Chicago youth are at far higher risk of dying from gun violence than they are from COVID-19. That’s been the case since the start of the pandemic.
As of December 1, four Chicago youth have died from COVID but over 90 have died from gun violence. That’s 23 children dead from gun violence for every COVID death.
The numbers are far worse than they were five months ago when Wirepoints laid out the facts about reopening Chicago Public Schools to in-class learning. One of the more revealing points we covered was that the virus was far less a threat to Chicago children than gun violence.
Data from the Cook County Medical Examiner showed 3 children had died from COVID-19 between Mar. 1 and Jul 22. In comparison, over 46 had already died of gun violence.
It’s hard for us to know just how many fewer youth would have died from gun violence if CPS had opened up months ago, but we’d venture to guess it would have been fewer.
With more experts agreeing that schools are not a COVID-spreading threat, and the negative impacts of keeping students out of school on the rise, CPS should proceed with its reopening plans with all speed. -
Tested 'Positive' For COVID-19? Be Sure To Ask This Question
by Tyler Durden
Sat, 12/05/2020 - 10:20
The lockdowns are based on surging “cases” which are based on positive PCR test results.
However, what exactly is a positive PCR test result? What does it mean? As Dr. Tommy Megremis summarized recently:
If you are generally aware, the PCR test is used to amplify small amount of genetic material so as to recognize patterns of DNA by “cycling.” (Also, for RNA virus, the RNA is converted to DNA in order to be detected, it’s just the way the test works) This is how we have been able to recognize the genomes in Egyptian mummies and Wooly Mammoths. It works because if you amplify and cycle enough times to “grow” legitimate DNA fragments, you get something with with a fair amount of specificity. What is becoming more and more apparent is that the PCR test was not designed as a diagnostic tool for infection, and really cannot function as one without having a huge amount of false positives, period.
When it comes to COVID, the presence of viral particles picked up by the PCR technique does not and has not been quantitatively linked to an active “symptomatic” infection. It simply cannot be so, because infection threshold as a result of viral load is different for each patient. It turns out, if you “cycle” over around 25 times, the false positivity of COVID infection starts getting very high.
I and others have explained in blogs how people can be exposed to virus, and mount a simple innate immune response and never know any differently. When you test these people with very low viral loads, who are not sick, you can find the viral RNA code that is used to “diagnose” if you cycle enough times. The last I read, Labcorp cycles at least 40 times to detect viral genome fragments. The PCR test was never intended for diagnosis of infection but as a qualitative test for presence of parts of a virus genome. I know there has been some confusion circulating the net about what the inventor Kary Mullis had said about that. But we walk daily with people who have any number of parts of killer virus or bacterial genomes which one could pick up with a PCR test if one had the specific test for it. Would we claim that that individual was an infected patient? No!
So given all that, PeakProsperity's Chris Martenson explains below, in great details, the answer to the most important question you should ask if you or a loved one gets a positive PCR test result.
“What’s the Cycle Threshold (CT) value for that test?”
Sounds wonky but it’s actually really important to understand. A low CT value means someone is loaded with virus. A high value, oppositely, means less of a viral load.
Beyond a certain level the load is insufficient to either infect someone else or be of any clinical or epidemiological relevance whatsoever.
The problem? Governments all over the country and world are basing their decisions on CT values that are very high. Too high. -
A virus so deadly there is a 99.9% survival rate. With all the cooked death numbers here it's even higher.
https://jordanschachtel.substack.com/p/global-data-covid-19-recovery-rate -
Took an antigen brain swab today to appease my overly cautious neighborhood homeschool setup after having guests for thanksgiving.
I did my part to contribute to negative tests.
PCR test sensitivity has been bullshit since day one, but nobody is talking about it.
