Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

MAJOR VICTORY For GOP, Judge Rules Mail in Voting Likely Unconstitutional

24

Comments

  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,260 Founders Club
    According to Kobe, Bernie and AOC, the same or even more supply will be provided with this economic arrangement. Sounds pretty good.
  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 69,805 Founders Club

    I old enough to remember when republicans hated activist judges.

    I still hate activist judges.

    "You're goddamn right we stole the election." Kobestopper Nov 2020
  • HairyBallsDawg
    HairyBallsDawg Member Posts: 1,078
    edited November 2020
    So this is the one? Out of twelve dozen lawsuits the Rump fans finally found a judge that hasn't just thrown out the lawsuit while laughing in their face at the crappy filing, lack of evidence, and lack of a case? Let's see how long this ruling lasts...
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,680

    Value is what someone else is willing to pay for it, not what the recipient believes they are entitled.

    Last I heard workers aren’t shackled in leg irons to their employer.

    My dad taught me that very early in life. "Something is worth what someone is willing to pay for it. That's life in a nutshell."
    Leftists either have no dad or hate him for being a pansy
  • TheKobeStopper
    TheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959

    Value is what someone else is willing to pay for it, not what the recipient believes they are entitled.

    Last I heard workers aren’t shackled in leg irons to their employer.

    You are confusing value with price.
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,545 Standard Supporter

    Value is what someone else is willing to pay for it, not what the recipient believes they are entitled.

    Last I heard workers aren’t shackled in leg irons to their employer.

    You are confusing value with price.
    I'm not confused about anything. I write payroll checks commensurate with their value to the enterprise.

    Unless you're all about the feelz. Then I give no fucks because feelz don't show up on the Statement of Operations. And they are also free to leave and pursue the feelz to which they feel entitled.


  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 6,011
    If I’m not mistaken the Penn Supreme Court just vacated this ruling. In true banana republic style:
  • TheKobeStopper
    TheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959


    Value is what someone else is willing to pay for it, not what the recipient believes they are entitled.

    Last I heard workers aren’t shackled in leg irons to their employer.

    You are confusing value with price.
    I'm not confused about anything. I write payroll checks commensurate with their value to the enterprise.

    Unless you're all about the feelz. Then I give no fucks because feelz don't show up on the Statement of Operations. And they are also free to leave and pursue the feelz to which they feel entitled.


    No, you write checks at the price they sell you their labor.
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,545 Standard Supporter


    Value is what someone else is willing to pay for it, not what the recipient believes they are entitled.

    Last I heard workers aren’t shackled in leg irons to their employer.

    You are confusing value with price.
    I'm not confused about anything. I write payroll checks commensurate with their value to the enterprise.

    Unless you're all about the feelz. Then I give no fucks because feelz don't show up on the Statement of Operations. And they are also free to leave and pursue the feelz to which they feel entitled.


    No, you write checks at the price they sell you their labor.
    If they had excess value, their price would be higher.

    Their price is exactly what their value is.