Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

MAJOR VICTORY For GOP, Judge Rules Mail in Voting Likely Unconstitutional

«134

Comments

  • Southerndawg
    Southerndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,354 Founders Club

    All voting needs to be done in person with signature and identification verification performed on site to make sure only legal citizens of the United States are voting and that they are only casting votes in the congressional district of their primary residency.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,583 Standard Supporter
    The constitution says we have an election DAY. Singular. All this other shit probably isn't constitutional anywhere.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,583 Standard Supporter


    Funny how the number one trending topic disappeared from Twitter altogether.

    Pull rule 230.
  • LoneStarDawg
    LoneStarDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,703 Founders Club
    Social media censorship is the best “inconvenient fact checker” our society has
  • TheKobeStopper
    TheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    I old enough to remember when republicans hated activist judges.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188

    I old enough to remember when republicans hated activist judges.

    Dumb enough to think that adhering to the Constitution = being an activist Judge.

    Hey Kobe, you never did answer the question that I put to you. Why do you feel you have an entitlement to the labor of others in order to pay for your college and healthcare expenses? Can I get you to pay for my new sports car? Why not?
  • TheKobeStopper
    TheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    The argument for Bernie/AOC style social democracy would be that we already have a system where the few, the capitalists and shareholders, are entitled to the profit that the worker produces. Shifting that so some of it goes back to the workers, via healthcare and education, would be a massive improvement.

    This is an argument over how much should other people be entitled to the labor of others, which is exactly why I always found the Bernie plan wanting. It’s better but it’s not enough.

    Only one of us supports a system where the individual is entitled to the value their labor produces and it ain’t you
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188

    The argument for Bernie/AOC style social democracy would be that we already have a system where the few, the capitalists and shareholders, are entitled to the profit that the worker produces. Shifting that so some of it goes back to the workers, via healthcare and education, would be a massive improvement.

    This is an argument over how much should other people be entitled to the labor of others, which is exactly why I always found the Bernie plan wanting. It’s better but it’s not enough.

    Only one of us supports a system where the individual is entitled to the value their labor produces and it ain’t you

    Most employers already provide health insurance for their workers comrade. If you want your "free" healthcare get a fucking job. So why do you feel that you have an entitlement to the labor of people who already have a job and are already being provided with health insurance from their employer?

    The value of their labor is already being compensated by their employer.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188

    Value is what someone else is willing to pay for it, not what the recipient believes they are entitled.

    Last I heard workers aren’t shackled in leg irons to their employer.

    He feels that someone working a part time minimum wage job should be provided with "free" healthcare and college due to the "value" they provide by flipping that burger.