MAJOR VICTORY For GOP, Judge Rules Mail in Voting Likely Unconstitutional
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IgsTy_krQp4Comments
-
All voting needs to be done in person with signature and identification verification performed on site to make sure only legal citizens of the United States are voting and that they are only casting votes in the congressional district of their primary residency. -
The constitution says we have an election DAY. Singular. All this other shit probably isn't constitutional anywhere.
-
Funny how the number one trending topic disappeared from Twitter altogether.
Pull rule 230. -
Social media censorship is the best “inconvenient fact checker” our society has
-
I old enough to remember when republicans hated activist judges.
-
Dumb enough to think that adhering to the Constitution = being an activist Judge.TheKobeStopper said:I old enough to remember when republicans hated activist judges.
Hey Kobe, you never did answer the question that I put to you. Why do you feel you have an entitlement to the labor of others in order to pay for your college and healthcare expenses? Can I get you to pay for my new sports car? Why not? -
The argument for Bernie/AOC style social democracy would be that we already have a system where the few, the capitalists and shareholders, are entitled to the profit that the worker produces. Shifting that so some of it goes back to the workers, via healthcare and education, would be a massive improvement.
This is an argument over how much should other people be entitled to the labor of others, which is exactly why I always found the Bernie plan wanting. It’s better but it’s not enough.
Only one of us supports a system where the individual is entitled to the value their labor produces and it ain’t you -
Most employers already provide health insurance for their workers comrade. If you want your "free" healthcare get a fucking job. So why do you feel that you have an entitlement to the labor of people who already have a job and are already being provided with health insurance from their employer?TheKobeStopper said:The argument for Bernie/AOC style social democracy would be that we already have a system where the few, the capitalists and shareholders, are entitled to the profit that the worker produces. Shifting that so some of it goes back to the workers, via healthcare and education, would be a massive improvement.
This is an argument over how much should other people be entitled to the labor of others, which is exactly why I always found the Bernie plan wanting. It’s better but it’s not enough.
Only one of us supports a system where the individual is entitled to the value their labor produces and it ain’t you
The value of their labor is already being compensated by their employer. -
Value is what someone else is willing to pay for it, not what the recipient believes they are entitled.
Last I heard workers aren’t shackled in leg irons to their employer. -
He feels that someone working a part time minimum wage job should be provided with "free" healthcare and college due to the "value" they provide by flipping that burger.PurpleThrobber said:Value is what someone else is willing to pay for it, not what the recipient believes they are entitled.
Last I heard workers aren’t shackled in leg irons to their employer. -
According to Kobe, Bernie and AOC, the same or even more supply will be provided with this economic arrangement. Sounds pretty good.
-
I still hate activist judges.TheKobeStopper said:I old enough to remember when republicans hated activist judges.
"You're goddamn right we stole the election." Kobestopper Nov 2020 -
My dad taught me that very early in life. "Something is worth what someone is willing to pay for it. That's life in a nutshell."PurpleThrobber said:Value is what someone else is willing to pay for it, not what the recipient believes they are entitled.
Last I heard workers aren’t shackled in leg irons to their employer. -
So this is the one? Out of twelve dozen lawsuits the Rump fans finally found a judge that hasn't just thrown out the lawsuit while laughing in their face at the crappy filing, lack of evidence, and lack of a case? Let's see how long this ruling lasts...
-
Leftists either have no dad or hate him for being a pansyDerekJohnson said:
My dad taught me that very early in life. "Something is worth what someone is willing to pay for it. That's life in a nutshell."PurpleThrobber said:Value is what someone else is willing to pay for it, not what the recipient believes they are entitled.
Last I heard workers aren’t shackled in leg irons to their employer. -
You are confusing value with price.PurpleThrobber said:Value is what someone else is willing to pay for it, not what the recipient believes they are entitled.
Last I heard workers aren’t shackled in leg irons to their employer. -
I'm not confused about anything. I write payroll checks commensurate with their value to the enterprise.TheKobeStopper said:
You are confusing value with price.PurpleThrobber said:Value is what someone else is willing to pay for it, not what the recipient believes they are entitled.
Last I heard workers aren’t shackled in leg irons to their employer.
Unless you're all about the feelz. Then I give no fucks because feelz don't show up on the Statement of Operations. And they are also free to leave and pursue the feelz to which they feel entitled.
-
If I’m not mistaken the Penn Supreme Court just vacated this ruling. In true banana republic style:
-
No, you write checks at the price they sell you their labor.PurpleThrobber said:
I'm not confused about anything. I write payroll checks commensurate with their value to the enterprise.TheKobeStopper said:
You are confusing value with price.PurpleThrobber said:Value is what someone else is willing to pay for it, not what the recipient believes they are entitled.
Last I heard workers aren’t shackled in leg irons to their employer.
Unless you're all about the feelz. Then I give no fucks because feelz don't show up on the Statement of Operations. And they are also free to leave and pursue the feelz to which they feel entitled. -
If they had excess value, their price would be higher.TheKobeStopper said:
No, you write checks at the price they sell you their labor.PurpleThrobber said:
I'm not confused about anything. I write payroll checks commensurate with their value to the enterprise.TheKobeStopper said:
You are confusing value with price.PurpleThrobber said:Value is what someone else is willing to pay for it, not what the recipient believes they are entitled.
Last I heard workers aren’t shackled in leg irons to their employer.
Unless you're all about the feelz. Then I give no fucks because feelz don't show up on the Statement of Operations. And they are also free to leave and pursue the feelz to which they feel entitled.
Their price is exactly what their value is. -
It's actually constitutional. The PA Constitution cites unqualified "illness" as an excuse to use absentee. Note, it doesn't say WHO is sick or if they are merely contagious, or any qualification. So, anybody could cite "illness" constitutionally as a reason to vote by mail. The illness is Covid-19 which you could give somebody or catch at the polls since you can't test everybody. Totally constitutional. That stupid bitch Republican judge is the cause of this BS.
Even so, the PA Supreme Court threw this out with prejudice because the GOP waited until they fucking lost to complain. They let the 180 day protest period expire last fucking year. -
If they didn’t produce excess value, you could never make a profit.PurpleThrobber said:
If they had excess value, their price would be higher.TheKobeStopper said:
No, you write checks at the price they sell you their labor.PurpleThrobber said:
I'm not confused about anything. I write payroll checks commensurate with their value to the enterprise.TheKobeStopper said:
You are confusing value with price.PurpleThrobber said:Value is what someone else is willing to pay for it, not what the recipient believes they are entitled.
Last I heard workers aren’t shackled in leg irons to their employer.
Unless you're all about the feelz. Then I give no fucks because feelz don't show up on the Statement of Operations. And they are also free to leave and pursue the feelz to which they feel entitled.
Their price is exactly what their value is. -
Imagine believing this.TheKobeStopper said:
If they didn’t produce excess value, you could never make a profit.PurpleThrobber said:
If they had excess value, their price would be higher.TheKobeStopper said:
No, you write checks at the price they sell you their labor.PurpleThrobber said:
I'm not confused about anything. I write payroll checks commensurate with their value to the enterprise.TheKobeStopper said:
You are confusing value with price.PurpleThrobber said:Value is what someone else is willing to pay for it, not what the recipient believes they are entitled.
Last I heard workers aren’t shackled in leg irons to their employer.
Unless you're all about the feelz. Then I give no fucks because feelz don't show up on the Statement of Operations. And they are also free to leave and pursue the feelz to which they feel entitled.
Their price is exactly what their value is. -
Whatever, Marxist. If you're not getting enough for your labor, which you set the price for, that's on you.TheKobeStopper said:The argument for Bernie/AOC style social democracy would be that we already have a system where the few, the capitalists and shareholders, are entitled to the profit that the worker produces. Shifting that so some of it goes back to the workers, via healthcare and education, would be a massive improvement.
This is an argument over how much should other people be entitled to the labor of others, which is exactly why I always found the Bernie plan wanting. It’s better but it’s not enough.
Only one of us supports a system where the individual is entitled to the value their labor produces and it ain’t you -
There is always a virus. It says illness not "I'm a pussy and I'm scared of catching a cold".AOG said:It's actually constitutional. The PA Constitution cites unqualified "illness" as an excuse to use absentee. Note, it doesn't say WHO is sick or if they are merely contagious, or any qualification. So, anybody could cite "illness" constitutionally as a reason to vote by mail. The illness is Covid-19 which you could give somebody or catch at the polls since you can't test everybody. Totally constitutional. That stupid bitch Republican judge is the cause of this BS.
Even so, the PA Supreme Court threw this out with prejudice because the GOP waited until they fucking lost to complain. They let the 180 day protest period expire last fucking year. -
Well, again, that’s not how anyone will really remember it. But I guess you will, so again, whatever gets you through this.Sledog said:
There is always a virus. It says illness not "I'm a pussy and I'm scared of catching a cold".AOG said:It's actually constitutional. The PA Constitution cites unqualified "illness" as an excuse to use absentee. Note, it doesn't say WHO is sick or if they are merely contagious, or any qualification. So, anybody could cite "illness" constitutionally as a reason to vote by mail. The illness is Covid-19 which you could give somebody or catch at the polls since you can't test everybody. Totally constitutional. That stupid bitch Republican judge is the cause of this BS.
Even so, the PA Supreme Court threw this out with prejudice because the GOP waited until they fucking lost to complain. They let the 180 day protest period expire last fucking year.
The take home message is that “dismissed with prejudice” means “GTFO, you’re wasting our time.”
All part of the plan though, right? The big one is still coming ‘round the bend. -
Almost as good at economics as @BearsWiin .TheKobeStopper said:
If they didn’t produce excess value, you could never make a profit.PurpleThrobber said:
If they had excess value, their price would be higher.TheKobeStopper said:
No, you write checks at the price they sell you their labor.PurpleThrobber said:
I'm not confused about anything. I write payroll checks commensurate with their value to the enterprise.TheKobeStopper said:
You are confusing value with price.PurpleThrobber said:Value is what someone else is willing to pay for it, not what the recipient believes they are entitled.
Last I heard workers aren’t shackled in leg irons to their employer.
Unless you're all about the feelz. Then I give no fucks because feelz don't show up on the Statement of Operations. And they are also free to leave and pursue the feelz to which they feel entitled.
Their price is exactly what their value is. -
What is more education going to improve anyway? If people actually became more competent I could buy it.
Are they suddenly going to demand more for their so called value? Or is it going to be the same fuckers in the same jobs?
Dude. The internet exists. No longer does one have to be an aristocrat to learn shit. -
Lol watTheKobeStopper said:
If they didn’t produce excess value, you could never make a profit.PurpleThrobber said:
If they had excess value, their price would be higher.TheKobeStopper said:
No, you write checks at the price they sell you their labor.PurpleThrobber said:
I'm not confused about anything. I write payroll checks commensurate with their value to the enterprise.TheKobeStopper said:
You are confusing value with price.PurpleThrobber said:Value is what someone else is willing to pay for it, not what the recipient believes they are entitled.
Last I heard workers aren’t shackled in leg irons to their employer.
Unless you're all about the feelz. Then I give no fucks because feelz don't show up on the Statement of Operations. And they are also free to leave and pursue the feelz to which they feel entitled.
Their price is exactly what their value is. -
Nothing on the merits of the case. It'll go up the chain and that's what they want anyway.
